Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
S. M. Emdadul Hossain (Bulbul) Vs. Jinnur Hosain and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... order dated 26.07.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 8491 of 2001 is stayed for a period of 6 (six) months from dated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... order dated 26.07.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 8491 of 2001 is stayed for a period of 6 (six) months from dated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... order dated 26.07.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 8491 of 2001 is stayed for a period of 6 (six) months from dated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......dul Hossain (Bulbul).................................Petitioner Vs. Jinnur Hosain and another.........................Respondent Order: August 8, 2004. Result: Leave is granted. Lawyers Involved: Mansurul Hoq Chowdhury, Advocate instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-R..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ahajadpur Police Station against the accused petitioner Nurul Islam, to the effect that the said accused in his capacity as Manager, Milk Vita, Bagabari Factory, Shahajadpur, Serajganj, under Bangladesh Milk Producers Co-operative Union Limited along with two other accused in collusion with......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......ellip;……………...Petitioner vs The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pabna.....Respondents Judgment November 28, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represente..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Mahbubur Rahman Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... made on behalf of the petitioner we do not find any ground to lay our hands. There being no substance in the petition, the said leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... made on behalf of the petitioner we do not find any ground to lay our hands. There being no substance in the petition, the said leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... made on behalf of the petitioner we do not find any ground to lay our hands. There being no substance in the petition, the said leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......er Vs. The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka Collectorate Building, Dhaka.........Respondent Judgment August 1, 2004. Result: The leave petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Mizanur Rahman alias Mithu and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......llip;……………………………………………...Respondent Order November 22, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Md. Golam Mostafa alias Gholam Mostafa and others Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ......sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ......sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ...... Md. Golam Mostafa alias Gholam Mostafa and others..............Petitioner Vs The State...............................Respondent Judgement February 29, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Kazi Shahadat Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advoc..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Chair, Board of Int. and Secondary Education, Jessore and others Vs. Nazir Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Government of India and another vs. C. A. Balakrishnan and others, AIR 1975 (SC) 1498; Ram Sewak Prasad Vs. State of U. P and others, AIR 1991 (SC) 1818; ANM Belayet Hossain and others Vs. Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Corporation, 51 DLR, 104; 4 BLC (AD) 65; Secretary, Ministry of Com......lity. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......lity. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......s and Mineral Corporation, 51 DLR, 104; 4 BLC (AD) 65; Secretary, Ministry of Communications, Road and Road Transport Division and another Vs. Md. Azizur Rahman and others, 46 DLR (AD) 19. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Abd..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Bangladesh Bank & others Vs. Messers Fabrica Nacional De Monedy Timbre & others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A.T.M. Afzal CJ. Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Mohammad Abdur Rouf J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J Bangladesh Bank & others..........Defendant-Appellants vs Messers Fabrica Nacion......ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ladesh Bank & others..........Defendant-Appellants vs Messers Fabrica Nacional De Monedy Timbre & others..............Respondents Judgment April 1, 1997. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocat..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Abul Hashem Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of case under the Provisions of Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan (Bishes Bidhan) Ain, 1995 in the light of the observation/direction made above. The leave petition is thus disposed of. Ed. ......of case under the Provisions of Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan (Bishes Bidhan) Ain, 1995 in the light of the observation/direction made above. The leave petition is thus disposed of. Ed. ......e Rule, the petitioner Abul Hashem, seeks leave to appeal. 2. The aforesaid petitioner was implicated in Chokoria Police Station Case No. 6 dated 07.09.1995 under Section 5 of the Cruelty to Women (Deterrent Punishment) Ordinance, 1983 hereinafter referred to as the Ordinance.......bul Hashem..........................Petitioner Vs. The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Cox's Bazar...........Respondent Judgment March 7, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Mona alias Zillur Rahman Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......na alias Zillur Rahman.........Convict Appellant (In Jail) vs The State…………………..Respondent Judgment March 7, 2004 Lawyers Involved: Idrisur Rahman, Advocate instructed by A. K. M. Shahaidul Huq Advocate-on-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. Md. Ismail and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he complainant leave petitioner upon furnishing bond of TK. 1,50,00,000/- ( One crore fifty lacs). 2. The relevant facts are to the effect that a trawler named F. V. Champa was owned by Bangladesh Fisheries Development Corporation. The petitioner took lease of the said trawler by exec......) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ......) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ......ir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Amin .............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ismail and other........................Respondents Judgement January 16, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mohammad Salim Ahmed @ Md. Salim Miah Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ......nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ......nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ......Salim Ahmed @ Md. Salim Miah...........Petitioner vs The State…………………….Respondent Judgment November 20, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represente..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Md. Jahangir Alam (Selim) Vs. Md. Hebjul Bari and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ......without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ......without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ......am (Selim)....................Appellant vs Md. Hebjul Bari and others…………………...Respondents Judgment August 3, 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Chief Engin, Dredger Direct, BD Water Dev. Board. Vs. Chairman, 2nd Lbour Court, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed A hammed J Chief Engineer Dredger directorate, Bangladesh Water Dev. Board, Narayangonj and others…………….. Appel......ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......llip;……….. Appellants (In both Appeals) Vs Chairman, 2nd Labour Court and others........ Respondents (In both Appeals) Judgment May 13, 2002. Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Abdul Hakim Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain. Advocate-o..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Md. Abdul Jalil Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment dated 6.1.1997 passed in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992 is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ......ingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment dated 6.1.1997 passed in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992 is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ......ingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment dated 6.1.1997 passed in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992 is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ...... M.A. Aziz J Md. Abdul Jalil....................Appellant Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and others.....Respondents Judgment May 17, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Majid, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Kanai Lal Roy Vs. Swaraswati Roy, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e with law by giving opportunity to the concerned party to produce the will itself in question and prove it by adducing evidence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......e with law by giving opportunity to the concerned party to produce the will itself in question and prove it by adducing evidence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......e with law by giving opportunity to the concerned party to produce the will itself in question and prove it by adducing evidence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......m J Kanai Lal Roy.... ..............Appellant Vs. Swaraswati Roy alias Srimati Swaraswati Roy and others............Respondents Judgment October 31, 2004 Lawyers Involved: M.K. Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-R..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Sree Sukhendu Nath Saha and others Vs. Hamangini Saha, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......(ESSO) and Abdur Razzak, 16 DLR (SC) 287; Md. Abu Bakar Mollah vs. Abdul Majid Moral (2201) 6 MLR (AD) 151; Md. Naimuddin Sarder @ Naimuddin Sarder vs. Md. Abdul Kalam Biswas 39 DLR (AD) 237 Lawyers Involved: Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants Nurul ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Shamsul Huq Sarker Vs. Enamul Huq Sarker and ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rolment of the property of Taltali Jame Mosque Waqf Estate and appointment of its Motually unsuccessfully filed Miscellaneous E. C. Case No.9 of 1984 before the Administrator of Waqf Government of Bangladesh whereupon he preferred Title Appeal No. 3 of 1988 before the learned District Judge, Cha......on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......r Chowdhury J Shamsul Huq Sarker...............................Appellant vs Enamul Huq Sarker and ors.....................Respondent Judgment March 8, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Huq Sarker(in person)-For the Appellant Not represented..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Trading Corporation of Bangladesh Vs. Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31), 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, TCB Bhaban, Kawran Bazar, Dhaka .........Appellant (in all the cases) vs ......ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..........Appellant (in all the cases) vs Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31)..............Respondents (in Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2005). Judgment April 27, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Dr. A. K. M. Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Mainul Islam Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ...........Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 189 of 2003) The State & others...............Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 190 of 2003) Judgment October 14, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab all, Advocate on Record-For the Petitioner(In both the Ca..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ...... Kabir Chowdhury J Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another.............Petitioner Vs The State...........................Respondents Judgment May 24, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Nizamul Huq, Advocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-Fo..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 27