Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6821-6840 of 7814 results.
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Kobad Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ot to have summarily rejected the application. We condone the delay, allow the appeal and remand the matter to the High Court Division for hearing in accordance with law. No costs Ed. ......;…Respondents Judgment March 9, 1987 Case Referred to- Muhammad Swaleh V. Messrs United Grain & Fodder Agencies PLD 1964 (SC) 97—16 DLR (SC) 155. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Appellant. Ex-parte&m..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Amin Scales Limited and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ......shy;pondent (In both the appeals) Judgment March 8, 1987 Cases Referred To- Ellal Textile Mills Ltd., 38 DLR (AD) 26; Re Sulekha Works Ltd, AIR 1965, Cal. 98. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed and Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocates (Mahmu..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 76
....d by the learned Subordinate Judge who found that respondent Nos.
2-6 were not in Pakistan at the relevant point of time, that the respondents
came within the definition of enemy as
given in Rule 161 of the Defence of Pakistan Rules, 1965 and the
property in question was enemy ......September 24, 1986
Cases
Referred to-
Rahima Aktar Vs. Asim Kumar Bose
1985 BLD (AD) 155; Watson v. Winch, 1 K. B. (1916) 688; Surtees v. Ellison
(1829) 9 B & C. 750, 752.
Lawyers Involved:
S. R.
Pal, Senior Advocate, Nurul Islam Chowdhury, Advocate with him instr..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
The State Vs. Fazal and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......……....Respondents Judgment March 12, 1987. Cases Referred to- AIR 1917 PC 25; Siraj Din v. Kala, 16 DLR, SC 95; A.I.R 1917 P.C. 25; 16 D.L.R (SC) 94. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdul Malek, Seni..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Bangladesh Biman Corporation Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....red an applicatÂion under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the High Court Division, being Civil Revision No. 506 of 1986. The learned Judge of the High Court Division discharged the Rule on finding that responÂdents being appointed under Ordinance XIX of 1977, the terms and condit......nd others……………….......Respondent Judgment May 14 1986. Cases Referred to- Nava KuÂmar vs. Radhashyam. AIR 1931 (PC) 229; United Provinces Vs. Atiqa Begum, AIR 1984 PC 16. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 97
State Vs. Lalu Miah and another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... line of the examination of, the accused under section 342 of the Code. 85. Of the two confessions Lalu's confession is to be straightaway discarded. It was recorded in violation of the High Court Rules, incorporÂated, in abundant caution, in Form No. M (84), for, guidance in recording a c......an Upadhyay AIR 1960 S.C. 1125; Kauda Paduyachi vs. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 1972 S.C. 66(69); Bhuboni Sahu vs. The King AIR 1949 P.C. 257 (259); H.S. Rathod vs. State of Gujrat AIR 1979 S.C. 1232. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.- For the Appellant. Habib Ahmed, Advocate, i..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Ayub Vs. Bangladesh, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....vernment orders declaring the aforesaid property as abandoned and refusing to release the same and also its action inviting offers to sell the aforesaid property. Appellant succeeded in obtaining a Rule Nisi issued upon respondent Nos. 1-5 on 18th August 1985 to show-cause as to why Memo. No. dec......aria vs. Additional Member Board of Revenue, AIR 1963 SC 786; Zahirul Huq Vs. Ejamul Huq (1982) 34 DLR AD 25; Abdul Khaleque Bains vs. Government of Bangladesh, Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1986. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M. A. Mahbub Miah, Advocate with him, instruc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
M/S. Zaman and Co. Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......lip;……...Respondents Judgment August 24, 1986. Cases Referred to- Md. Chand Miah Sowdagar Vs SMH Rahman 1985 BLD 337; Kalu Vs. Sowaria 27 1C 703. Lawyers Involved: Miah A. Gafur, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Khalilu..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya SaÂmity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... shall not include any fishery. Hence the fishery has been made non-retainable by the erstwhile rent receiver and such fishery is maintained, regulated and controlled by the Government manual. 41. Rules 205 and 206 in the Government Estates Manual 1958 provide the procedure for settlement of fish......itation AIR 1961 Assam 101; Talekhal Fishermen Co-opÂerative Society vs. Bangladesh 1981 BLD (AD) 103; EFO Vs. Ram Sanchi AIR 1973 (S.C) 205; Ramana V.I.A. Authority of India A.I.R 1979 SC. 1628. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instruc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman CorpoÂration, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... Kandaswami v. Vegheesam Pilial AIR 1941 (Mad) 822; Prabirendra Nath Nandy v Narendro Nath Nandy, AIR 1958 Cat. 179; Delhi Gate Service Private Ltd. v. M/s. Caltex (India) Ltd. AIR 1962 Pan. 370. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior AdÂvocate, Mahbubey Alam, AdÂvocate, Supr..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104
Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another Vs. Lasman Dasi & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......hellip;…………………………………………..Respondents Judgment September 2, 1986. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate (M.A. Wahab Miah, Advocate) instructed by Kazi ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Comm Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone) Vs. M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Ct, Dhaka, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ......R 910; Hari Kailash vs. CIT 22 ITR 195, AIR 1953 ALL 170; Kettlewell Bullen Vs. C.I.T. AIR 1965 S.C. 65; C.I.T. Vs. Chari & Chari Ltd. AIR 1966 S.C. 34; Karam Chand Thapra 80 I.T.R. 167. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advo..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Dira Dockyard & Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs.Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ellip;Respondent Judgment July 14, 1986. Cases Referred To- Ocean Industries Ltd. Vs. Industrial Development Bank. (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 354; PLD 1966 SC 1938. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) in..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Siraj Miah & another Vs. State & another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......ts Vs. State & another…………………………………..Respondents Judgment May 15, 1986. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.-For the Appellants. Syed Mudassir Huss..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Sufia Khanam Chowdhury Vs. Faizun Nesa ChowÂdhury, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......LR (F-B) 119; Katia Pillai. AIR 1929 Mad 393; Petherpermal ILR 35. Cal.551; V. Konar Vs.R. Konar, AIR 1939 Mad. 894; Kanchanmala Bepari (1954) 6 DLR 254; Mono Mohini Devi (1969) 21 DLR 626. Lawyers Involved: M H Khondkar, Senior Advocate (B. K. Das, Advocate, with him), instructed ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Chunnu Mia Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....rgument was advanced before the High Court Division with regard to the merit of the settlement. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... (PC) 112; Shibessouree Debya M.I.A. 270; Vidya V.T. Swamigal AIR 1922 P.C. 123; Sridhar Suar AIR 1976 (SC) 1860; Srimath D. P. Desikar AIR 1936 (P.C.) 183; Atyam Veerraju AIR 1966 (SC) 629. Lawyers Involved: Sheikh Afzalur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Hazera Begum and others Vs. Roushan Ara BeÂgum and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......8 (P.C) =38 C.W.N. 285; Maharaja Srischandra Nandy vs. Bajjnath Jugal Kishore 39 CW.N. 352 (P.C.); Corea vs. Apuhamy A.I.R. 1914 P.C. 243; Culley vs. D.D. Taylerson 11 A & E 1008(1840). Lawyers Involved: S R, Pal, Senior Advocate, M. H. Khondkar, Senior Advocate & A. J.Moh..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another Vs. Municipal CommitÂtee, Mymensingh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is disÂmissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ......ssed. Cases Referred to- 18 DLR 618 (622); Sk. Abdul Latif vs. Malek 38 DLR (AD) 22; Raishaeb Pandit vs. Bombay, Baroda Rly. 39 CWN 552P.C.; D.M.D. National Bank vs. Ataul Huq, DLR (SC) 74. Lawyers Involved: S R Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Recordâ€..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Nur Muhammad & others Vs. Moulvi Moinuddin Ahmed & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....f the plaint, his contentions, among others, being that the suit land was requisiÂtioned under the provisions of the (Emergency) Requisition of Property Act, 1948 and that according to clause (d) of Rule 11 (quoted above) the suit is barred under section 14A of the aforesaid Act. 21. Malafide a......y of States vs. Mask & Co. 44 CWN 70—AIR 1940 PC 105; Mian Mohammed Latif vs. Province of West Pakistan, 221 DLR 98 SC—PLD 1970 SC 180; Abdul Rauf Vs. Abdul Hamid 17 DLR 515 SC at p. 519. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate, M. H. Khondker, Senior Advocate and A. J. Mohammad..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Muslimuddin & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ......rial is that the accused shall be presumed innocent and that he is not required to prove his innocence. The entire burden of proof of his guilt lies on the prosecution alone………….(49) Law does not require a partiÂcular number of witnesses to prove a case. A conviction can be founded..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56
16531652165016491648164716461644164316421640163916381637163616351634163316321631