Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6841-6860 of 8244 results.
Shahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... commit any illegality in rejecting the application filed under Section 561A of the code of Criminal procedure. There is no substance in this petition and hence it is dismissed. Ed. ...... commit any illegality in rejecting the application filed under Section 561A of the code of Criminal procedure. There is no substance in this petition and hence it is dismissed. Ed. ...... commit any illegality in rejecting the application filed under Section 561A of the code of Criminal procedure. There is no substance in this petition and hence it is dismissed. Ed. ......ammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shahabuddin ..........Petitioner Vs. The State...............Respondent Judgment November 20, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not Repre..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Abdul Mannan alias A. Mannan Vs. Mosammat Nurbanu & another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......s A. Mannan..................................Petitioner Vs Mosammat Nurbanu & another ....................................Respondent Judgment November 8, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Obaidur Rahman Mustafa, Advocate instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Samar Uddin and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ...... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ...... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ......p;…………………………………………….Respondent Judgement December 10, 2003. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Gaffer, Advocate (appeared with leave of the court) instructed by A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Farukur Rahman @ Farook and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appellants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appellants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appellants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......minal Appeal No.16/2001) Vs. The State………………………Respondent (In all cases) Judgment August 12, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Mujubur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab AH, Advocate-on-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Md. Golam Murtuza @ Isphil Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......ppellant vs The State………………………………….Respondent Judgment October 20, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Khondoker Mahbub Hossain Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Delip Kumar Shaha Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Mr. Nawab Ali lastly submits that this case was heard by the High Court Division without considering that the filing lawyer of Criminal Appeal No. 557 of 1997 became Assistant Attorney General for Bangladesh and for this notice in Form No. 10 should have been issued as per provisions, but witho...... and accordingly dismissed the appeal. Since the High Court Division in its judgment considered all the points as raised, the criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ...... and accordingly dismissed the appeal. Since the High Court Division in its judgment considered all the points as raised, the criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......ners Vs The State…………………………………..Respondent Judgment February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Respon..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Habibur Rahman alias Habu and othÂers Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ......But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ......But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ...... Habibur Rahman alias Habu and others......................Petitioner Vs The State..............................Respondents Judgment August 31, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advo..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
State Vs. Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......hury J The State...........................Appellant vs Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi..........Respondent (In all cases) Judgment October 20, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah,..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
BUET Vs. Dr. Nizamuddin & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....der as to costs. Ed. ...... a disputed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a disputed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......;……………………………………………..Respondents Judgment January 30, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mr. Serajur Rahman, Ad..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Satish Chandra Mondal Vs. Ayjuddin Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rcumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......rcumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......rcumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ed to- Ramdhari Rai Vs. Gorakh Rai, AIR 1931 (Patna) 236; Shahid Nasim and 2 other Vs. Syeda Imtiaz Khatoon, PLD 1997 (Lahore) 243; Umedewal Moti Ram vs. Deva ILR (1866) 2 Bombay 547. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by S. R. Khoshnab..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sree Subas Chandra Sarker , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s. Ed. ......llate Court. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......llate Court. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......another Vs. Shirely Anny Ansari, 52 DLR(AD) 180; Chitta Ranjan Chakraborty being dead, his heirs Ashish Chakraborty and others Vs. Md. Abdur Rob Alias Mvi. Md. Abdur Rob, 49 DLR AD) 96. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Azim Khair, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advoc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Chair, Board of Int. & Sec. Education, Jessore & ors Vs. Golam Quddus & anr, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....g the rules absolute. The judgment therefore does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the appeals are dismissed without any order of to costs. Ed. ......g the rules absolute. The judgment therefore does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the appeals are dismissed without any order of to costs. Ed. ......g the rules absolute. The judgment therefore does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the appeals are dismissed without any order of to costs. Ed. ................Respondents (In C. A., No 249 of 2002) Serajul Haque & anr.......................Respondents (In C. A. No 250 of 2002) Judgment May 22, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Sk. Awsaful Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Re..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....osts. Ed. ......er alluvion. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......er alluvion. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ip;………………...Respondents Judgment April 9, 2006 Case Referred To- Abdul Mannan vs. Kulada Ranjan Mowali 31 DLR (AD) 195. Lawyers Involved: A. H. M. Mushfiqur Rahman, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Md. Sirajuddin Mondal and other Vs. Mosammat Miration Nessa and othÂers, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ......n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ......n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ...... Mondal @ Md. Sirajuddin Mondal and other.............Appellants Vs Mosammat Miration Nessa and others..................Respondents Judgment March 23, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab All Advocate-..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Chairman, Bangladesh Telephone and Telegraph Board Vs. Mohammad Toufique & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. ......paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ......paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ...... Road, P. S: Ramna, Dhaka-1000.................. Petitioner vs. Mohammad Toufique and others..................................Respondents Judgement May 17, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate (Rais Uddin Ahmed, Advocate with leave of th..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 97
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Israt Jahan Kazal, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... to costs. Ed. ......ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......lip;…………………….Respondent Judgement March 24, 2004. Case Referred to- Mirza Shahab Ispahani, 40 DLR (AD) 116. Lawyers Involved A. J. Mohammad Ali. Additional Attorney General, instructed by Sajjadul Huq..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Commissioner of Customs and anr Vs. Bangladesh Traders, Dhaka, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Hamidul Haque J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Commissioner of Customs and anr......Appellants (In all the cases) Vs Bangladesh Traders, Dhaka…………………...Respondents (In ......n made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect and further directing the writ respondents to return the bank guarantees furnished by the writ petitioners are hereby set aside. Ed. ......n made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect and further directing the writ respondents to return the bank guarantees furnished by the writ petitioners are hereby set aside. Ed. ......ossain, 48 DLR (AD) 199; Khairul Bashar Vs Collector of Customs, 50 DLR 225; 42 DLR (AD) 167; 48 DLR (AD) 199; Mustafizur Rahman's Case, 51 DLR (AD) 40; Mizanur Rahman's case 52 DLR (AD) 49. Lawyers Involved: A.J. Mohammad (In all the cases) Ali, Additional Attorney General, instruc..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Bangladesh Krishi Bank Vs. A.F.M. Farid Uddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....thout any order as to costs. Ed. ......he impugned order of compulsory retirement of the Respondent No.1 and as such the same requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......he impugned order of compulsory retirement of the Respondent No.1 and as such the same requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Md. Tafazzul Islam J Bangladesh Krishi Bank…….......Appellant Vs A.F.M. Farid Uddin and others .........Respondents Judgement: May 19, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, M.A. Baqui, Advocate with him, instru..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Sree Promad Chandra Barman & others Vs. Most. Khodeza Khatun Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......J Sree Promad Chandra Barman & others..............Appellants Vs Most. Khodeza Khatun Bewa and others.........Respondents Judgement February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Adv..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Ali Asgar Khan Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....reme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Ali Asgar Khan, Registrar, Supreme Court of Bangladesh & others....Appellants. Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam being dead his heirs; Mos...... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......ngladesh & others....Appellants. Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam being dead his heirs; Most. Afroza Begum& others...............Respondents. Judgement July 26, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney General (Faisal H. Khan, Addition..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
20572056205520542053205220512050204920482047204620452044204320422041204020392038