Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6861-6880 of 8244 results.
Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... and as such we do not find any substance in this petition. More so the petition appears to have not been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ellip;…………….....Petitioner Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others……….........Respondents Judgement April1 0, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Mvi. M..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Kamrul Hasan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....enty thousand). Ed. ......into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ......into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ......l Islam J Government of Bangladesh and others…………….Appellants vs Kamrul Hasan.........Respondent Judgement July19, 2004. Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahi..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Government of Bangladesh Vs. A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d. ...... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......s……... ........Respondents Judgement February 10, 2004. Case Referred to- Central London Property Trust Ltd Vs. High Trees House Ltd, 1974 QB 130. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney General instructed by B. Hossain, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Moksed Ali Mondal Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....greement. The plaintiff surrendered his possession of 'Ka' schedule properties situated in India infavour of Ghose brothers who also gave possession of 'Kha' schedule properties to the plaintiff in Bangladesh in pursuance of the contract. But when the plaintiff came to this country on query he le......gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......s heirs Md. Abdul Mannan and others...Appellants. Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others…………..........Respondents. Judgement May 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Adv..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Rasheda Begum Vs. M.M. Nurussafa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 12 BLD (AD) 247; Abdul Jalil and others Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd., 20 BLD (AD) 278; Sreemati Pushpa Rani Das and another Vs. A.K.M. Habibur Rahman a......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......k Bangladesh Ltd., 20 BLD (AD) 278; Sreemati Pushpa Rani Das and another Vs. A.K.M. Habibur Rahman and others, 13 BLD (AD) 217; Mahbubul Huq vs. Md. A. Kader Munshi and others, 52 DLR, 194. Lawyers involved: Mustafa Neaz Muhammad, Advocate instructed by Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Re..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer Bangladesh Railway Vs. A.P.M. Basher, Advocate & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ere is no order as to costs. Ed. ......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Bangladesh Railway……………......Appellant Vs A.P.M. Basher, Advocate and others .........Respondents Judgement February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Shaheed Alam, Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
A.N.M. Gaziul Azim Vs. M.A. Kader and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......………………….....Petitioner Vs M.A. Kader and others..........................Respondents. Judgement January 1, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Khandhker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mustafa Niaz Muhammad, Senio..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others Vs. Kad Banu and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ...... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ...... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ......ul Amin J Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others…………Appellants Vs. Kad Banu and others........Respondents Judgement February 17, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Shaheed Alam, Advocate instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
M/s. Standard Match Factory Ltd Vs. Chairman, First Labour Court, Chittagong, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... is allowed without an order as to costs and the judgment and order dated 29.8.92 passed by the Labour Court, Chittagong is set aside. The Trade Union Case No. 22 of 1988 is allowed. Ed. ...... is allowed without an order as to costs and the judgment and order dated 29.8.92 passed by the Labour Court, Chittagong is set aside. The Trade Union Case No. 22 of 1988 is allowed. Ed. ...... is allowed without an order as to costs and the judgment and order dated 29.8.92 passed by the Labour Court, Chittagong is set aside. The Trade Union Case No. 22 of 1988 is allowed. Ed. ......td……………..Appellant Vs The Chairman, First Labour Court, Chittagong and Other's.........Respondents Judgement February 29, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khalilur Rahman, Advocate instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Pubali Bank Limited Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ellip;………………………………………..Appellant Versus Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, and others ..............Respondent......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......sus Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, and others ..............Respondents Judgement: July 31, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Saiah Uddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Sonali Bank Vs. Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
......Appellant Vs Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others…………….........Respondents Judgement June 27, 2004. Case Referred to- Bangladesh Railway Vs. M/s. Sinaf Racht Chartering and Ship Broking Corporation, 5 BLD (AD) 115. ......has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......p;.........Respondents Judgement June 27, 2004. Case Referred to- Bangladesh Railway Vs. M/s. Sinaf Racht Chartering and Ship Broking Corporation, 5 BLD (AD) 115. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq,..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... This Case is also Reported in: ......gh Court Division are set aside. The judgment and decree passed by (he Additional District Judge, Rangpur is restored. Consequently the suit stands dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......gh Court Division are set aside. The judgment and decree passed by (he Additional District Judge, Rangpur is restored. Consequently the suit stands dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ............Respondents Judgement June 21, 2005. Case Referred to- Abdul Kader Mondal and others Vs Shamsur Rahman Chowdhury alias Shamsur Rahman Saha, 51 DLR(AD) 253; 1 BLC (1996) page 105. Lawyers Involved: A. H. M. Mushfiqur Rahman, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Sajjadul Huq,..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 156
A. Motaleb Howlader Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ...... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ...... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ............................................Petitioner Vs The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Patuakhali…...Respondent Judgement March 17, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Zahirul Haque, Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-On-R..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Md. Saidur Rahman Shahid Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ns made in the judgment. As against that order dated 26.1.2003 accused petitioner filed Criminal Revision No. 546 of 2003 before a Division Bench of the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and their lordships by judgment and order dated 17.6.2003 rejected the said criminal rev......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... Vs The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and another…………… …...Respondents. Judgement January 14, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-On-Re..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 102
University of Rajshahi Vs. Md. Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ......have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ......have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ......hancellor............Petitioner Vs Md. Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and others.......Respondents Judgement June 13, 2005. Cases Referred to- 3 BLC (AD) 45. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Jabbar, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Robert Pinaru Vs. Moulana Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....out of that 14 decimals were acquired by C & B Department and thereupon he remained owner and possessor of 27 decimals of land. It was further averred that during the war of liberation he left Bangladesh and in his absence structures including dwelling house in the land in suit were destroye......he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ......he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ...... April 7, 2003. Cases Referred to- 41 DLR (AD) 1997; Malik Din and another Vs. Mohammad Aslam, 21 DLR, 95; Alauddin Mia and another Vs. Abdul Latif and others, 9 DLR, 357. Lawyers Involved: S. S. Haider, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mr. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advoca..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
State Vs. Khandker Zillul Bari and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 1998 has been preferred by the State represented by the Solicitor to the Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh against the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division on 9th April, 1996in Cr......gainst them. In default, the District Magistrate concerned shall take step for effecting their arrest to undergo the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (AD) 2006, 77. ......gainst them. In default, the District Magistrate concerned shall take step for effecting their arrest to undergo the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (AD) 2006, 77. ...... is quite unknown to our criminal jurisprudence and we, therefore, disprove this unwarranted method of administration of justice…………………..(40) Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General (Faisal H Khan, Assistant ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Abdus Salam Vs. Samala Bibi and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nations offered for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. 10. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. 10. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. 10. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ....... R. Mudassir Husain J Abdus Salam alias Md. Abdus Salam................Petitioner Vs. Samala Bibi and others.........Respondents Judgment May 22, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represent..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Hotel Agrabad Ltd. CTG Vs. Chairman, First Labour Court, Khatungonj, CTG & ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ce the impugned Judgment passed in the aforesaid two writ petitions deserves no interference by this court. Both the appeals are accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ce the impugned Judgment passed in the aforesaid two writ petitions deserves no interference by this court. Both the appeals are accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ce the impugned Judgment passed in the aforesaid two writ petitions deserves no interference by this court. Both the appeals are accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......others .......Respondents Judgment January10, 2007 Case Referred to- M/s. Railway Men's Stores Ltd. and another vs. Chairman, Labour Court, 30 DLR (SC) (1978) 251. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate (Faheemul Huq and Ahasanul Karim, Advocate..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-op......ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 111. ......ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 111. ......ural Development and Co-operatives, and others.....Petitioners. Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder...................................Respondent Judgment April 21, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Md. Firoz ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
20372036203520342033203220312030202920282027202520242023202220212020201920182016