Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdus Samad & ors Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ge cannot be sustained, therefore, the appeal is allowed with costs and the Judgment of the High Court set aside. Judgment and order of the lower Appellate Court are restored. Ed. ......ip;…………Appellant Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali and others..................... Respondents Judgment March 18, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Khadomul Islam Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....rder of his predecessor-in-office, have been made without any lawful authority and are of no legal effect, and for a direction to the Respondent lo cancel and withdraw the notice of 21st July, 1976. Rule was issued and notice of the Rule was served on the Respondents including the Dacca Improvement......drul Haider Chowdhury J Khadomul Islam Chowdhury…………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others ……………………………..Respondents Judgment July 21, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate instructed by Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocat..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 160
Shamuj Ali and other Vs. Kamalarma Bibi and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....the appellate court if appeal is preferred from the decree of reversal of the first appellate court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......arwari A.I.R. 1925 Pat. 1; Somamndaram, A.I.R. 1917 Mad. 185; Venkatraraju, A.I.R. 1943 Mad. 248; Kurgodlgouda A.I.R. 1917 Bom 210; Hamidal, A.I.R. 1921 Bom 67; bhaunath, A.I.R. 1934 Pat. 246(2). Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Ful Chand Das and others Vs. Mohammad Hammad and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....pendently of section 4 and 6 that also falls." The learned Judges of the Special Bench concluded the judgment saying that "regard being had to findings above, this Rule is made absolute and it is declared that the order passed by the Respondent No. 3 refusing to ......p;………… Respondents Judgment March 23, 1982. Case Referred to- Mohandra Lal Jaini vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1963 (SC) 1019. Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, Senior Advocate instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Abdul Alim and others Vs. A. K. Abdul Hoque and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... This application was filed on 6th April, 1966 and was rejected by the Court on 11 th May, 1967. This order of rejection was challenged before the High Court in its revisional jurisdiction but the Rule was discharged on final hearing on 25th June, 1970. The decree holders-respondents, there......ugust 15, 1979. Cases Referred to- AIR 1935 Allahabad 323, AIR 1938 Lahore 117; AIR 1935 P.C. 85; AIR 1945 Mad 86; AIR 1948 Bom. 185. Lawyers Involved:  ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others Vs. Haji Sultan Ahmed and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....gh Court Division dated 5 June 1981, order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 30th November 1979 and the order dated 16 October 1978 of the learned Magistrate are set aside. Ed. ......hellip;…………... Appellants Vs. Haji Sultan Ahmed and others..................................Respondents Judgment July 27, 1982. Lawers Involved: M. Fazlul Karim, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate- on-Record..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Govt. of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Arshad Ali, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....tion before Customs authority for determining the actual value of the gold and silver or its realised value and claimed Tk. 1,59,220/- being the 20% value of the seized articles as reward under the Rules and since the reward amounted to more than Tk. 5000/-, under the Rules of Business of the Gov...... Vs. Md. Arshad Ali………………………………......... Respondent Judgment February 25, 1982. Lawyers Involved: A Wadud Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney General, B. Hossain, Assistant Attorney G..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 171
M/s. Everett Orient Lines Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Ctg Zone, Ctg, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ps were not installed in Pakistan. The Appellate Tribunal considered that it is immaterial whether the ships were installed or not in Pakistan for the purpose of additional depreciation under Rule 9(2). It was, however, noticed that the vessel 'Monolo Everett' was installed after the first ...... Agencies of Bangladesh Ltd..... Appellant. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Chittagong Zone, Chittagong……Respondents Judgment March, 11, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Advocate. Mohammad Hossain, Advocate instructed by S. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Messrs. Haji Noor Ali Sowdagar & Sons Ltd. Vs. Comm. of Sales, Tax, Ctg Zone, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....hy;tention of the assessee cannot be accepted. In my opinion the question has been correctly decided by the High Court Division. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......lip;……………………………………………Respondent Judgment April 13, 1982. Lawyers Involved: M, Hassan, Advocate instructed by S.M, Huq, Advocate-on-Record, — Fo..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Mofizur Rahman Khan Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ...... Corp. City of Abmadabad Vs. New S.S. & Wag Ld. AIR 1970 (SC) 1292; Farzand Ali V West Pakistan (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 208; Sai Md. vs. W st Pakistan PLR (1958)(SC) 181; Millner V. Raita Commonwealth Law Report Vol 66(1942-43): Basanto Co. Ghosh vs. Emperor AIR 1944 (P.C.) 36. Lawyers Involved..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
Abdul Halim Mollah @ Monohar Mollah & anr Vs. Member, App Tribunal Dacca & ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....nion is that such appeal cannot be entertained. I would, therefore, allow the appeal. Order of the Court By the majority judgment the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......Cases Referred To- Dr. Hori Ram Singh V. Emperor, AIR 1939 P.C. 43; S. Kuppuswami Rao V. King AIR 1949; F.C.I. Golzar Hasan Shah V. Gholam Murtaza (1970) 22 DLR S.C. 258. Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate, instructed by A. Basel Majumder, Advocat..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Misfor Ali and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....t them, by itself cannot be ground for disentitling the competent authority to initiate departmental proceeding on the same allegations and award punishment in accordance with the Service Rules. Similarly, if the delinquent employee escapes punishment in a departmental proceeding, ......ellip;……………………………………………Respondents Judgment March 18, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Matiur Rahman, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advoca..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... from service or otherwise suitably punished for inefficiency and misconduct within the meanings of clauses (a) and (b) of rule 3 of the Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1976 The explanation was not satisfactory and inquiry was held. The Inquiry Officer found hi......p;………………..Respondent Judgment March 4, 1982. Case Referred To- M.A. Hai vs. Trading Corporation (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 46. Lawyers Involved: A.W Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-o..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Rajan Miah Vs. Abdur Rashid and another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... of the trial court judgment by the appellate Court below was justified and the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... Vs Abdur Rashid and another…………………………….. Respondents Judgment March 25, 1982. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate on Record.—For the Appellants. B. K. Da..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Chowdhury Ramzan Ali and another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ed without any order as to costs. The orders of the Court below are set aside, the proceedings of claims of the appellant before the Company Judge will proceed according to law. Ed. ......gh Investment Co. Vs G-G. in Council AIR 1947 (PC) 78; Ravi Paint Colour & Varnish Works Ltd. Vs Federation of Pakistan PID 1954 (Lab) 551; Sargodha Trading Co. AIR 1943 (Lah) 228. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M Mozammel Huq Bhuiyan. Advocate with Rabia Bhuiyan, Advocate, instruc..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Hajee Khabiruddin Ahmed Vs. Md. Salam Kabir, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ter the lapse of a reasonable time. For the reason stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial court restored. Ed. ...... Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Hajee Khabiruddin Ahmed…………………Appellant Vs. Md. Salam Kabir…………………………..... Respondent Judgment April 1, 1982. Lawyers Involved: S R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Santiranjan Karmaker, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Rokeya Khatun Vs. Alijan @ Alijan Bepari and ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....he modification that the suit is decreed in part in favour of the appellant to the extent of the 1/3 rd share in the suit property. Respondent No. 1 is to pay cost of the appeal. Ed. ......ber 10, 1981. Cases Referred To- Farid un Nesa vs. Mukhtar Ahmed 52 I.A. 342; Ruhalla vs. Hananlli Begumia AIR 1928 PC 303; Hem Chandra vs. Suradhani Debya AIR (1940) PC 134. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam, Senior Advocate instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on- Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Abu Bakkar Vs. Nazir Ahmed, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....sion are set aside and those of the lower appellate court are restored. The respondent shall pay costs of the appeal to the appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 237. ......plete usufructuary mortgage for a period not exceeding 7 years on the expiry of which the mortgagor may get back possession by an application to the Sub divisional Magistrate……….(5 and 6). Lawyers Involved: A. K. M Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate M. Giasuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by M..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58