Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ember 5, 1995 of the 5th Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Dhaka in Title Suit No. 135 of 1995 allowing the application filed by the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure and section 6 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 seeking rejec...... appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Union of India and another vs. Ladulal Jain AIR 1963 SC, 1681. M/s. Anwar and Brothers vs. Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (1995) 15 BLD (HCD) 447. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Samad, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....red, the petitioner cannot be permitted to raise it now and as such we do not find any substance in this petition. Moreso, the petition appears to have not been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of Order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988.......R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Shafique Ahmed........................................ Petitioner Vs Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others………...............Respondents ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... civil-petition at the instance of plaintiffs is directed against the judgment and order dated 22nd October, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.863 of 2000 discharging the Rule which was issued upon a revisional application, filed by the plaintiffs against the judgment a................................................Respondent. Judgment June 22, 2002. Cases Referred To- 18 DLR (H.C) 709, 26 DLR (H.C) 10, 47 DLR (H.C) 163. Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioner. Not..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ot provide any specific mode by which the Government will express its decision regarding the abatement application to be made under this Order. In that view of the matter, the provisions of Order 27, Rules 2, 5 and 8(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure will apply and they are sufficient to give author...... Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others ……………..Respondents Judgment July 28, 1980. Result: The appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, with Jamiruddin Ahmed, Advocate, instruct..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Com. of In. Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....whether the Income-Tax Officer was in his jurisdiction to refuse the renewal of the registration of the firm in view of section 23(4) of the Income-Tax Act read with rules 6 and 7 of the Income Tax Rules. 4. Registration of firms is regulated by the Act and Rules framed thereunder, a firm ......i and Co., 1948 I.T.R., 404; Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Md. Asgar Mohammad Yunus & Co. P.L.D, 1968 Karachi 805; Mohabir Glass Manufacturing Co. vs. C.I.T.A.I.R, i960 Patna, 516. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Amar Chandra Saha Vs. Ajit Kumar Das, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....dvocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 3-D of 1971. (From the Judgment and Order dated 29th November, 1968 of the High Court of East Pakistan in Civil Rule Nos. 1286 and 1313 (Rule) of 1968). Judgment: &......y J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J Amar Chandra Saha........Appellant. Vs. Ajit Kumar Das.........Respondents Judgment June 10, 1976. Lawyers Involved: T. Ali, Advocate, Instructed by Abdur Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Reforms and another……………Respondents Judgment July 29.1980. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (N. H. Khondaker, Advocate with him),..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Jamal Soap Factory, Narayanganj Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......…………....................Appellant. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca..................Respondent Judgment. July 10, 1980. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: C.R. Ali, Advocate, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the A..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ed 2-4-56 u/s 3 of the Act are null and void; (4) that no compensation assessment rolls with regard to the Plff-Debuttor Estate have been prepared or published in terms of the Act a 1 Rules thereunder; (5) that the Debuttor Estate is not acquirable under the Act in view o......ril 29. 1980. Cases Referred to- Jalil Ahmed vs. The Province of East Pakistan (1967) 19 DLR 106; Tanvir Ahmed Siddiky Vs. The Province of East Pakistan (1968)20 DLR (SC) 144. Lawyers Involve: Md. Moksudur Rahman, Dy. Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advoc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury & others Vs. Gani Ahmed and others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ...... Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury & others….....………Appellants Vs. Gani Ahmed and others …………………………..Respondents Judgment. July 18, 1979. The Mohammadan Law Onus in case of Transfer by Pardanashin Lady Special rule of onus of proof will apply in..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan &. others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255..........Respondents. Judgment December 14, 1979. Result: The petition is dismissed. The Bangladesh Abandoned Property (Control, Management and Disposal) Order, 1972 (XVI of 1972) Martial Law Regulation No. VII of 1977 Owner in possession in pursuance of a valid agreement and the agre..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors Vs. State and another, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ......shad vs. Abdur Rahman, 22 Cal. 131 ; Sheonandan Mahton vs. Emperor, 19 Cr.LJ. 263 ; Subal Chandra Nama Das vs. Abdullah Sheikh, 30 CWN 546 ; Jogesh Chandra Sarkar vs Abdul Gani, 18 Cr.LJ. 626. Lawyers Involved: Md. Meser All, Senior Advocate instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Bangladesh Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
...., 190, 197 and 303 of 1973 and 11, 12, 14, 19,24,26, 27, 52, 56, 57, 58, 59, 117, 139, 232, 261, 367 add 565 of 1974 which were heard analogously under Article 102 of the Constitution making the said Rule absolute. These are certificated appeals under Article 103(2) (a) of the Constitution. Facts......isions of the Constitution. The transactions which are not alive before the promulgation of President's Order No. 88 of 1972 they are concluded by the transactions past and closed………..(11) Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr Attorney-General, with Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan Assistant Attorney-Genera..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Belayet Hossain and another Vs. Md. Abu Taher and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....her and others................... Respondents. Judgment January 16, 1980. The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (Act XXVII of 1951) section 96 The Code of Civil Procedure, Order IX, Rule 13 The order of dismissal of an application under Order IX, rule 13 of the CPC for restorat......of dismissal of an application under Order IX, rule 13 of the CPC for restoration of a proceeding under section 96 of the state Acquisition and Tenancy Act disposed of ex-parte, is not appealable. Lawyers Involved: Nizamuddin Haider, Advocate instructed by Shahabuddin Ahmed, Advocate-on Record..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Wahid Ali and ors Vs. State, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....e the orders of the High Court and that of the Sessions Judge and direct that the proceedings are to continue in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 229 ...... case cannot convert himself in respect of the same proceedings to Special Tribunal under the Special Powers Act and cannot pass an order on the petition under section 27 of the Special Powers Act. Lawyers Involved: A. Hasib, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record—For the App..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
M/s. Hossain Ahmed Vs. M/s. H. D Hossain & Brothers, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....s order dated 21.9.79 stayed the operation of the ad interim order of the learned Munsif till the disposal of the appeal. As against the order the plaintiff moved the High Court Division and obtained Rule in Civil Revision No. 1195 of 1979. The High Court Division stayed the operation of the order o...... not bound to accept the lowest bid…………..(10) Cases Referred to- Ramphal Vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1954 (Pat.) 235; K. N. Guruswami Vs. State of Mysore, PLD 1956 (S.C.—India), 53. Lawyers Involved: Kh. Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Shafiqur Rahman Advocate-o..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 94
Nasiruddin Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & ors, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....t Division and remit the case back to it for decision in the light of the observation made above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 216 ......ladesh & ors………….Respondent. Judgement April 14, 1980. The Bangladesh Abandoned Property (Control, Management and Disposal) Order, 1972 (President Order No. 16 of 1972) and Martial Law Regulation VII of 1977 On the passing of P.O. 16 of 1972 i..e from 28.2.1972 all abandon..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 157
Sayed Ali Vs. Sree Gopal Chandra Das and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ithout any order as to costs and remit the case to the Court of first instance to dispose of the matter in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 212. ...... Gopal Pario vs. Searna Bewa 34 C.W.N. 707: Swamirao vs. Valentine, AIR 1920 Bom. 12; Balaram Reddi vs. Govinda Reddi A.I.R 1947 Mad. 54; Allahabad Theatres vs. Ram Sajiwan. A.I.R. 1949 All 730. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam, Senior Advocate, Mohfuzur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Pan..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Abu Taleb Mridha Vs. State, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....minal Revision No. 291 of 1979). Judgment: Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. -This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 14-8-79 passed by the High Court Division discharging the Rule in Criminal Revision No. 291 of 1979. 2. The appellant is accused in a criminal case being......nces committed in the connection with offences shall be triable exclusively by Special Tribunal………..(6) Case Referred to Anwar Ahmed Vs. State in Criminal Appeal Nos. 29 and 30 of 1977. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Abdur Rashid Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Cabinet Affairs, Establishment Div & ors, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....se against the charges levelled against him and he duly showed cause appearing before the Board, examined witnesses in support of his case and was personally heard by the Board. On this finding the Rule was discharged. 4. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, in......ting authority to give notice of the proposed higher punishment, unless it can be shown that it was passed arbitrarily or capriciously, which, on the facts on record, cannot be urged…………(8) Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, (K. Z. Alam and Zamiruddi..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 70