Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7161-7180 of 8244 results.
Md. Naimuddin Sardar Vs. Md. Abdul Kalam Biswas, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... In the result, therefore, the appeal is allowed with cost. The impugned judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the first appellate court restored. Ed. ...... In the result, therefore, the appeal is allowed with cost. The impugned judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the first appellate court restored. Ed. ...... In the result, therefore, the appeal is allowed with cost. The impugned judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the first appellate court restored. Ed. ......……………Respondents Judgment April 5, 1987. Cases Referred to- Erfan Ali vs. Joynal Abedin Mia, 1983 BLD (AD) 342=DLR 35 (AD) 216. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Mst. Maleka Khatun & another Vs. Abid Ali & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....d above, the appeal is allowed, judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......d above, the appeal is allowed, judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......d above, the appeal is allowed, judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ip;……………………………………………Respondents Judgment September 2, 1985. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahbubey Alam, Advocate ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Abani Mohan Saha Vs. Asst. Custodian (S. D. O) Vested Property, Chandpur & ors, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....o prove his assertion that at the time of the execution of the deed of gift Surendra's sons, the executants, were residing in an enemy country. In this regard reliance is placed on Abul Khair Mia vs. Bangladesh and others 32 DLR (AD) 29. 37. In that case the dispute turned on the question whethe......H Rahman J. Order of the Court By a majority decision the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 223. ......H Rahman J. Order of the Court By a majority decision the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 223. ......vs. Hodges (1838); 28 DLR (1976) 437; AIR 1928 (Cab 705; Mohd. Cherag vs. Dullay Khan PLD 1954 (Dhaka) 134; Ihtesham Ali vs. Jamna Prasad and others 48 I.A 365= AIR 1928 (P.C) 56; 32 DLR (AD) 29. Lawyers Involved: B. N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by Shamsul Hoque Siddique, Advocate-on-Re..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Sudhir Chandra Sil & another Vs. Harimohan Das & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ......The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ......The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ......an, 30 DLR (SC) 236. Erfan Ali vs. Joynal Abedin, 35 DLR (AD) 216. Sk. Abdul Latif and another vs. Abdul Malek Kazi, 38 DLR (AD) 22. Nafar Chandra Pal vs. Sukur Sk., AIR 1918 (PC) 92. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. S. S, Ha..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Kalitara Biswas Vs. Mrinal Kanti Biswas and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....t below are set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. The original suit will now proceed expeditiously from the stage where it was left. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......t below are set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. The original suit will now proceed expeditiously from the stage where it was left. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......t below are set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. The original suit will now proceed expeditiously from the stage where it was left. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......;……………….Appellant. Vs. Mrinal Kanti Biswas and others…………Respondents Judgment June 10, 1987. Lawyers Involved: Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Md..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Sonali Bank, Local Office, Dhaka Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....appeal Schedules of 1960, 1969 and 1981 will be refer red to in this judgment. Schedule I of 1969 was brought in by East Pakistan Ordinance No. I of 1969 and the Schedule 1 of 1981 was brought in by (Bangladesh) Finance Act—Act XI of 1981. It may be noted here that though rates of fees as specifie......on 35A does not come into conflict with the limitation provided in the schedule as to the maximum ad valorem fees which may be determined under the schedule. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......on 35A does not come into conflict with the limitation provided in the schedule as to the maximum ad valorem fees which may be determined under the schedule. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ingangouda Patil (AIR (31) 1944 Bombay 259); Messrs. Kohinoor Mercantile Corporation vs. Hazera Khatun and another (14 DLR 47); 14 DLR 47= PLD 1963 Dhaka 238; AIR 1955 All, 353; (1941) 2 K.B. 89. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Kobad Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ion (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pabna…………&helli......ot to have summarily rejected the application. We condone the delay, allow the appeal and remand the matter to the High Court Division for hearing in accordance with law. No costs Ed. ......ot to have summarily rejected the application. We condone the delay, allow the appeal and remand the matter to the High Court Division for hearing in accordance with law. No costs Ed. ......;…Respondents Judgment March 9, 1987 Case Referred to- Muhammad Swaleh V. Messrs United Grain & Fodder Agencies PLD 1964 (SC) 97—16 DLR (SC) 155. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Appellant. Ex-parte&m..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Amin Scales Limited and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ......her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ......her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ......shy;pondent (In both the appeals) Judgment March 8, 1987 Cases Referred To- Ellal Textile Mills Ltd., 38 DLR (AD) 26; Re Sulekha Works Ltd, AIR 1965, Cal. 98. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed and Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocates (Mahmu..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Nausher Ali Sarder & others Vs. The State, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... are sentenced to transportation for life instead of death. 12. In the result, the appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death is commuted to transportation for life. Ed. ...... are sentenced to transportation for life instead of death. 12. In the result, the appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death is commuted to transportation for life. Ed. ...... are sentenced to transportation for life instead of death. 12. In the result, the appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death is commuted to transportation for life. Ed. ......tate…………………………………………….Respondent Judgment March 16, 1987. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocat..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Priyatosh Talukdar Vs. Asst. Custodian, Vested & Non-Resident Propty, Ctg & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... and Disposal Order (1966) therefore continued in force automatically as Rule 182 continued in force, there having been no necessity for a separate legislation for this purpose. After emergence of Bangladesh as an independent State, Ordinance No. 1 of 1969 was repealed by Act XLV of 1974 namely,...... order of the Executing Court is set aside and it is directed that the Execution Case No. 4 of 1967 be proceeded with and disposed of in the light of this judgment. No order as to cost. Ed. ...... order of the Executing Court is set aside and it is directed that the Execution Case No. 4 of 1967 be proceeded with and disposed of in the light of this judgment. No order as to cost. Ed. ......September 24, 1986 Cases Referred to- Rahima Aktar Vs. Asim Kumar Bose 1985 BLD (AD) 155; Watson v. Winch, 1 K. B. (1916) 688; Surtees v. Ellison (1829) 9 B & C. 750, 752. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate, Nurul Islam Chowdhury, Advocate with him instr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
The State Vs. Fazal and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......……....Respondents Judgment March 12, 1987. Cases Referred to- AIR 1917 PC 25; Siraj Din v. Kala, 16 DLR, SC 95; A.I.R 1917 P.C. 25; 16 D.L.R (SC) 94. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdul Malek, Seni..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Bangladesh Biman Corporation Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....st’s. Ed. ......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......nd others……………….......Respondent Judgment May 14 1986. Cases Referred to- Nava Kumar vs. Radhashyam. AIR 1931 (PC) 229; United Provinces Vs. Atiqa Begum, AIR 1984 PC 16. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 97
State Vs. Lalu Miah and another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ...... following words: "In the months of September, October and November 1946 several machines were brought for trial from various parties in our office till the typewriter Art. A was purchased by National Alcohol Ltd. Company". 57. The question for consideration was if this statement of th......sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ......an Upadhyay AIR 1960 S.C. 1125; Kauda Paduyachi vs. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 1972 S.C. 66(69); Bhuboni Sahu vs. The King AIR 1949 P.C. 257 (259); H.S. Rathod vs. State of Gujrat AIR 1979 S.C. 1232. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.- For the Appellant. Habib Ahmed, Advocate, i..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Ayub Vs. Bangladesh, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Md. Ayub…………………………..……….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works & others……..Respondent...... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ......aria vs. Additional Member Board of Revenue, AIR 1963 SC 786; Zahirul Huq Vs. Ejamul Huq (1982) 34 DLR AD 25; Abdul Khaleque Bains vs. Government of Bangladesh, Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1986. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M. A. Mahbub Miah, Advocate with him, instruc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Shafquat Haider & others Vs. M. Al-Amin and another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....lso in imparting technical education and training in computer science and technology. The company got a clientele of 300 computer systems and its customers include, among others, Banga Bhaban. Bangladesh Biman, Defence Intelligence Directorate, Power Development Board, T & T Board ...... Multani vs. Paramount Talkies AIR 1942 Bom. 241; The North Cheshire and Manchester Brewery Company Ltd. v. The Manchester Brewery Company Ltd. (1899) A.C 83; Hendriks vs. Montagu Ch. D (17), 638; National Bank of India vs. The National Bank of Indore, AIR 1923 Bom. 119; Simatul Chemical Industr......s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ......ton, 42 Ch. Division, 128; Office Clearing Services Ltd. v. Westminster Window and General Cleaners Ltd. RPC Vol. 62-63 p. 39; K.M. Multani v. Paramount Talkies, AJR 1942 Bom. 119. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advoc..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 239
M/S. Zaman and Co. Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal. J M/S. Zaman and Co. represented by its Proprietor N. Zaman…………....Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors………...Respondents ......cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......lip;……...Respondents Judgment August 24, 1986. Cases Referred to- Md. Chand Miah Sowdagar Vs SMH Rahman 1985 BLD 337; Kalu Vs. Sowaria 27 1C 703. Lawyers Involved: Miah A. Gafur, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Khalilu..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd.....................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh & others…………………………………………………………….Respond......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......itation AIR 1961 Assam 101; Talekhal Fishermen Co-operative Society vs. Bangladesh 1981 BLD (AD) 103; EFO Vs. Ram Sanchi AIR 1973 (S.C) 205; Ramana V.I.A. Authority of India A.I.R 1979 SC. 1628. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instruc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....pellants is maintainable. 2. Plaintiff-respondent it the Jiban Bima Corporation. It is the Successor of the erstwhile Homeland Insurance Company in that under the President's Order No. 95 of 1972-Bangladesh Insurance Nationalisation Order-the entire undertaking, of the said Company stood trans......ble. 2. Plaintiff-respondent it the Jiban Bima Corporation. It is the Successor of the erstwhile Homeland Insurance Company in that under the President's Order No. 95 of 1972-Bangladesh Insurance Nationalisation Order-the entire undertaking, of the said Company stood transferred to and vested ...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... Kandaswami v. Vegheesam Pilial AIR 1941 (Mad) 822; Prabirendra Nath Nandy v Narendro Nath Nandy, AIR 1958 Cat. 179; Delhi Gate Service Private Ltd. v. M/s. Caltex (India) Ltd. AIR 1962 Pan. 370. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahbubey Alam, Advocate, Supr..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104
Sree Monoranjan Banik & anr Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ...... others V. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others 33 DLR (AD) 309; Md. Khairullah Bhuiyan V. Haji Nurul Alam Chowdhury 35 DLR (AD) 338; Muhammad H. Rouf Vs. Ahamuda Khatun 33 DLR (AD) 323. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate instructed by Kazi Abdul Hoque, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another Vs. Lasman Dasi & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......hellip;…………………………………………..Respondents Judgment September 2, 1986. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate (M.A. Wahab Miah, Advocate) instructed by Kazi ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
16591658165716561655165416531652165116501649164816471646164516441643164216411640