Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7241-7260 of 8244 results.
Mazharul Huq Vs. Returning Officer & Circle Officer, (Dev.) Double Moorings, Ctg, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....as well as the action of the Returning Officer. 6. We also heard the learned Attorney-General on the question raised by Mr. Pal. He argued that President's Order No. 22 of 1973 which is called the Bangladesh Local Government (Union Parishad and Paurashava) Order, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ......Writ Jurisdiction under Article 102(2) of the Constitution. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 11. ......Writ Jurisdiction under Article 102(2) of the Constitution. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 11. ......uq Chowdhury………...Appellant. Vs. The Returning Officer and Circle Officer, (Dev.) Double Moorings, Chittagong, and others ………….……Respondents Judgment April 17, 1974. Lawyers involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by B.C. Panday—For the Respondent No. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Abdur Rashid Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ......de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ......de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ...... Cases Referred to- Khadim Vs. The Crown, P.L.D. 1954 Lahore 69; Abdul Gani Vs. The State, 19, DLR. Dacca 388; The State Vs. Puma Chandra Mondal 22 DLR. Dac. 280. Lawyers involved: Abdur Rashed, Advocate— For the Appellant. Khan, Advocate-o..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Shamsuddin Ahmed @ Tofa Mia & others Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... the facts of this case. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ...... the facts of this case. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ...... the facts of this case. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ....... Yakub ILR 16 All. 344; Sitaram Bhaurao vs. Jiaul Hasan Khan AIR 1923 P.C. 41; Jadu Lal Sahu vs. Janaki Koer (1900) 35 Cal 575. Naresh Chandra Dutta vs. Girish Chandra Das ILR 62 Cal. 972. Lawyers Involved: S. K. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Bangladesh Bank Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh Bank .................................Appellant Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta &......view of the above, the appeal is allowed, the decision of the Appellate Beach is set aside and that of the company Judge restored. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......view of the above, the appeal is allowed, the decision of the Appellate Beach is set aside and that of the company Judge restored. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. .....................Appellant Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta ……………………...........Respondent Judgment. April 9, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Ahmed Husain, Senior Advocate instructed by Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Sunil Kumar Biswas Vs. Mohammad Idris and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......ip;……………….Appellant Vs. Mohammad Idris and others…………Respondents Judgment April 16, 1981 Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khandkar, Senior Advocated instructed by B.C. panday Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Sanjib Kumar Bose and another Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......ar Bose and another.....................Appellant Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another…………….Respondents Judgment April 22, 1981 Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, Md. Yasin, Advocate, with him, instructed ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Dr. Jamshed Bakht Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... directed against the judgment passed in Criminal Revision No. 579 of 1970 by the High Court Division acquitting the accused respondent Ameenur Rashid Chowdhury on charges under section 501 of the Bangladesh Penal Code. The said respondent was convicted by a Magistrate, First Class Sylhet and se......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......vs. L.O. Reilfy. 17 C.W.N.; Sanjibi Raddy vs. Konary Raddy, 1926 I.L.R. 49 Mad. 315; Ahmedbhai vs. Framji (1903) I.L.R. 28 Bom 228; Golapjan vs. Bholanath Khattry (1911) I.L.R. 38 Cal. 888. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Abdur Rouf and others Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
..... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ....... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ....... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ......rs…………………….Appellants Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others...................Respondents Judgment July 10, 1978. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by S.M. Haq, Advocate-on-Record&mdas..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Bangladesh Freedom Fighters Welfare Trust Vs. Burhanuddin Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ny orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......llip;…………...Appellant Vs Burhanuddin Chowdhury.....................................................Respondent Judgment June 11, 1979. Lawyers Involved: Syed Amirul Islam, Advocate, Faruque Ahmed, Advocate with him instruc..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 112
A.S.A. Nur Vs. Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....anies Act, 1913 is required to hold the Annual General Meeting of the Members, or is a special type of 'one-member Company' established under section 8(2) of the Petroleum Act of 1974 and that Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation virtually being the only member it cannot hold any meeting wi......ion of Jamuna Oil Company Limited for the purpose of its management. 3. The relevant facts which led to the formation of the Company are as follows:— (a) Pakistan National Oils Limited was a Company registered in Pakistan which, inter alia, carried on busines......ge and the Division Bench are set aside. The case is remitted back to the Company Judge for disposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ellip;..Appellant. Vs. Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca…………………. Respondents Judgment November 24, 1980. Lawyers Involved : Amirul Islam, Advocate, instructed by Md, Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Baitul Aman Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & anr Vs. Md. Shamsur Rahman & ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ler the appeal is allowed. The application filed by the appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed We make no Order as to costs. Ed. ......ler the appeal is allowed. The application filed by the appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed We make no Order as to costs. Ed. ......ler the appeal is allowed. The application filed by the appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed We make no Order as to costs. Ed. ......lip;……………………………………………Respondent Judgment March 10, 1981. Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury, Senior Advocates, with A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Mohd. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others , 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......pellants. (For all the appeals) Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others..........................Respondents (In C.A. Nos. 143 to 146 of 1978) Judgment June 7, 1979. Lawyers Involved: Khandkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, K.S. Nabi, Advocate (on 6.6.79) inst..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Md. Mafizuddin Patwari Vs. Abdul Hakim Miazi , 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....t had been acted upon. In the result, therefore this appeal is allowed and the petition for pre-emption is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 305. ......t had been acted upon. In the result, therefore this appeal is allowed and the petition for pre-emption is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 305. ......t had been acted upon. In the result, therefore this appeal is allowed and the petition for pre-emption is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 305. ......fizan Bibi & ors vs. Naji Farid Kazi and ors, 18 D.L.R(Dacca) 281; Chandra Kumar Maladas vs. Abdul Motaleb and ors, 19 DLR (SC), 36; Wilkinson Vs Banking Corporation (1948) 1 KB, 721 (724). Lawyers Involved: K.A. Bakr, Attorney General, instructed by A, Baset Majumder, Advocate&mdash..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Uttara Bank Vs. Macneill and Kilburn Ltd. and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed with costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside, and the application for temporary injunction rejected. Ed. ...... the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed with costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside, and the application for temporary injunction rejected. Ed. ...... the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed with costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside, and the application for temporary injunction rejected. Ed. ......ip;………Appellant Vs. Macneill and Kilburn Ltd. and others……………….Respondents Judgment Aug. 8, 1981. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate, with T. Islam, Advocate instructed by B. Bo..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Hasan Imam Chowdhury Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....nded that having made the rule absolute the High Court Division was functious officio and the direction was unwarranted and uncalled for. 4. The Water Development Board of the Government of Bangladesh has not challenged tube impugned direction, but it is the appellant at whose instance wr......ion is pregnant with any new issue which requires adjudication in separate proceedings. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ion is pregnant with any new issue which requires adjudication in separate proceedings. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Hasan Imam Chowdhury........................... Appellant Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others................. Respondents Judgment March 23, 1981. Lawyers Involved: Ahmad Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Amanullah Bhuiyan and others Vs. Abdul Hafiz and ors, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ......m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ......m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ...... Balmakund Marwary 29, C.W.N. 391; Jatindra Mohan Tagore vs. Bijou Chand Mahatap AIR 32 Cal. 483; Raghubir Sahu vs. Ajodhya Sahu A.I.R 1945 Pat. 482; Ram Rattan vs. Parma Nand 50 C.W.N. 367. Lawyers Involved: A.W. Mian, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Shafiqur ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Commissioner of Taxes & another Vs. M/s. Mullick Brothers, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ereafter, by special leave the appeal was filed and this Court by its judgment allowed the appeal holding that the arrear tax assessed against the firm not being a Government debt before emergence of Bangladesh is not recoverable by any process of law. This Division observed: "The learned Judges...... going through the aforesaid order-sheet has not disputed the correctness of it. The record does not show that Assessee had made out any case that his administrative review was still pending with the National Board of Revenue. On the other hand, at it appears from the Circular No. M.L.R. No. 1 of 19......rom want of legal authority. In the result, therefore, this review application is allowed and the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: ....... Mullick Brothers…………………………………………..Respondent Judgment February 2, 1981. Result: The review application is allowed and the appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, with Muzammel Huq Bunyan, Rabia Bhuiyan, Advocate..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Md. Abdul Jalil Vs. Durjan Ali alias Siddique Hossain and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....re-emption. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The Judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate court is restored. Ed. ......re-emption. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The Judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate court is restored. Ed. ......re-emption. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The Judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate court is restored. Ed. ...... Vs. Durjan Ali alias Siddique Hossain and others………………………..Respondent Judgment February 23, 1981 Lawyers Involved: Anil Chandra Sarker, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Pandey, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Sreemati Charubala Sen Gupta Vs. Abul Hashem and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....udge are set aside and the application for addition of party to the probate proceeding is dismissed without, however, any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 254. ......udge are set aside and the application for addition of party to the probate proceeding is dismissed without, however, any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 254. ......udge are set aside and the application for addition of party to the probate proceeding is dismissed without, however, any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 254. ......any interest in the estate of the deceased. Since the petitioners does not claim interest through the testator they got no locus Standi to be added as a party to the probate proceeding……..(8) Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Rouf, Advocate, instructed by M. R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record-For the..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Dr. Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
.... Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Dr. Nurul Islam………………………..Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Population Control and others…...... subject or context,— (a) "Corporation” means anybody corporate constituted or established by or under any law and includes any other body or organisation set up by the Government; (b) "Nationalised enterprise" includes any commercial or industrial enterprise bank, firm, tea estate o......osts. The decision of the High Court Division is set aside and the impugned order declared to be of no lawful authority. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 201, 1981 BLD (AD) 140. ......ara Singh vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 1975 S.C. 1487: Shearar vs. Shield 1914 A-C. 80S; Sev Charan vs. State of Mysore AIR 1965 S.C. 280; Bisnunrayan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1965 S.C. 1967. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahmudul Islam, Jamiruddin Ahmed, K.Z. Al..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 180
15761575157415731572157115701569156815671566156515641563156215601559155815561555