Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7241-7260 of 7814 results.
Sonali Bank and others Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....not allowed but we allow interest on the decretal sum of Tk. 15,39,300.00 @ 7.1/2% per annum from the date of the institution of the suit upto the date of decree of this Court. Ed. ...... Vs. Sonali Bank and others................................... Respondents [In CA No. 68/90] Judgment February 4th, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by B Hossain, Advocate-o..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Subash Chandra Halder & another Vs. Abdul Bari & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....hus cannot be sustained. The order is, accordingly, set aside. The appeal is allowed without any order as to Cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1992) 12 BLD (AD) 174; 44 DLR (AD) 253. ......and the minimum that is required to be found in such a case is that the presence of such a party is necessary within the meaning of Order 1 rule 10(2) CPC or for the ends of justice............(8) Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (SK Sinha, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Manik Chand Bibi @ Rezian Nahar & anr Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chy @ Sufi Mia Chy, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ision No. 204 of 1998 (Sylhet) Judgment: Latifur Rahman J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court Division passed in Civil Revision No. 104 of 1989 making the Rule absolute and directing to proceed with the execution case in accordance with law. 2. The mat......Bibi alias Rezian Nahar and another.........................Appellant Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chowdhury alias Sufi Mia Chowdhury……………….Respondents Judgment December 3rd, 1991 Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Mozahar Ali Howlader Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....rt Division is modified accordingly and it is directed that the accused‑petitioner be tried by the Sessions Judge and Ex‑officio Senior Special Judge, Jhalakati. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......amal J Latifur Rahman J Mozahar Ali Howlader………………….Accused-Petitioner. Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another…………………Respondent. Judgment July 9th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Moksudor Rahman, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossai..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 100
Habibur Rahman Vs. Sree Jogiswar Roy Chowdhury Chand and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ment and decree dated 27.6.80 affirmed the same. A learned Single Judge of the Barisal Bench, High Court Division by judgment and order dated 24.11.85 in Civil Revision No. 311 of 1981 discharged the Rule, maintaining the judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court. 2. The property described......eing dead his heirs Saleha Begum and other ...................Appellants Vs. Sree Jogiswar Roy Chowdhury Chand and others…………………… Respondents Judgment April 23, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahabubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
AKM Mosharaf Hossain Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....are of the view that the appellant is entitled to bail. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The appellant will remain on same bail granted by this Court earlier till commencement of the trial. Ed. ......J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J AKM Mosharaf Hossain...............Accused‑Appellant Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment March 8th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Rokunuddin Mahmud, Advocate (Mr. Tamizul Haque, Advocate with him), instructed ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 92
Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....thin the jurisdiction of the court where the plaint was filed. We find no good ground to interfere with the concurrent order of the courts below. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... Cal. 659; Peoples Insurance Co. Vs. Benoy Bhusan AIR 1943 Cal. 199 (202); Read Vs. Brown 22 QBD 128 (132); Cooke Vs. Gill LR 8 CP 107; G. Venkatesha Vs. Kamlapath 1957 AIR 201 (Mad). Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mr. Kazi Shahabuddin Ahm..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 124
....enged the said detention under section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 173 of 1988 and after hearing the High Court Division by order dated 16.2.1989 made the Rule absolute and directed the release of the detenu at once; that the said order was communicated o......nt.
Vs.
Tahera Nargis Syed and another............... Respondents
Judgment
July 28, 1991
Result:
The unconditional apology of the appellant is accepted and the sentence remitted.
Lawyers Involved:
Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instruc..
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Abdus Samad @ AKM Abdus Samad and others Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... with the finding of fact. The petition is dismissed. The order of conviction and sentence is maintained with the modification that it is under section 148 of the Penal Code. Ed. ......1992 Lawyers Involved: Sirajul Huq, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Shamser Ali (Md) and others Vs. Mosammat Kafizan Bibi, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Latifur Rahman J.- This appeal by the plaintiff calls in question the judgment and order of the High Court Division, Rangpur Bench, passed in Civil Revision No. 1627 of 1981 making the Rule absolute and setting aside the judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court which in turn ......……Appellants. Vs. Mosammat Kafizan Bibi………..…………….Respondent Judgment August 18th, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Narayan Chandra Rajak Das Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....round that the appellant "has made submission on facts" and has "not been able to point out any error of law in the decision" of the lower appellate Court "for issuance of Rule." 12. Leave was granted to consider the appellant's submission that the finding of......ahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment November 21 st, 1991. Lawyers Involved: SS Halder, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdul Hamid Mollah Vs. Ali Mollah and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....der of acquittal, the appellant took a revision, No. 90 of 1985, in which a Division Bench of the High Court Division, Dhaka by the Impugned judgment and order dated 24 October, 1989 discharged the Rule. 12. Leave was granted to consider the case as against respondent No. 1 Ali Mollah only............. Complainant-Appellant Vs. Ali Mollah and another…………………... Accused-Respondents Judgment March 25th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Moksudor Rahman, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, (Lutfur Rahman Mazumdar,..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Chairman, Kushtia Cooperative Industrial Union Ltd Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....n need not also call for any consideration. 18. All the opposite parties have shown sufficient contrition in throwing themselves at the mercy of this Court. Their apologies are accepted. The Rule is discharged. Mustaf...... Mujibur Rahman & others...............Respondents Judgment June 10th, 1991 Lawyers Involved: Moinul Huq, Advocate, instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate-on-Record -..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
State Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ......the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......... ......Appellant Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr...........Respondents Judgement May 3rd, 1992. Lawyers Involved: A. Wadud Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by B Hossain, Ad..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 118
BD Chemical Industries Corporation & another Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works & ors, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ......hellip;.Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation and others…………. Respondents (In CA 36/1991) Judgment March 4th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: M Zahir, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 227
Shamsuddin Ahmed, Advocate Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....led to practise, by operation of law, before the Appellate Division of the Bangladesh Supreme Court without being enrolled as an Advocate under the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 2. The appellant was an Advocate entitled to Practise in the erstwhile High Cou......nbsp; Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and another .....................Respondent J..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 92
Muhammad Muslim Ali Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....y. The said inquiry was held against the petitioner as a member of the public and not as a Government servant which is not contemplated under the ‑Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1985, the Petitioner submitted further. 5. There is no substance in the contenti...... Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others……………Respondents Judgment May 21st, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Muhammad Muslim Ali, In person-For the Petitioner. Not ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Ishaque Khan (Md) and another Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ovember, 1981 and Appellate No 2 was suspended on 26 December, 1981. Formal charge‑ sheet was submitted against them on 26th April, 1982 under the Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1976 for "misconduct corruption". 3. They denied the charge taking the plea......ration of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Principal Office, Kawran Bazar, Dhaka………………Respondent Judgment October 31st, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab‑I, Advocate‑on‑Record, Supreme Court‑..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Fazlur Rahman Molla Vs. Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Ex parte‑Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 16 of‑1989. (From the judgment and order dated 28.5.1989 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Suo Motu Contempt Rule No. 189 of 1989) Judgment: &nb......n J Fazlur Rahman Molla ...................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Division and another ………………… Respon..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Shaikh Shahidul Islam Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ......………....……Accused‑Appellant (in both the Appeals) Vs. State .......................Respondent Judgment February 24th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek Senior Advocate, (Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate with him) inst..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 150
10361035103410331032103110301029102810271026102410231022102110201019101810171016