Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Works and Rural Development and an......angsad Building at Tejgaon, Dacca before the next session of the Jatiya Sangsad and to submit the necessary estimate immediately so that the works could be completed before ensuing sessions of the National Assembly. The respondent received this order on 6 December, 1973, but instead of taki......ourt Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed with the modification that; the punishment is altered to compulsory retirement. No order as to costs. Ed. ......p;………………..Respondent Judgment March 4, 1982. Case Referred To- M.A. Hai vs. Trading Corporation (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 46. Lawyers Involved: A.W Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-o..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Rajan Miah Vs. Abdur Rashid and another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... of the trial court judgment by the appellate Court below was justified and the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... of the trial court judgment by the appellate Court below was justified and the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... of the trial court judgment by the appellate Court below was justified and the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... Vs Abdur Rashid and another…………………………….. Respondents Judgment March 25, 1982. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate on Record.—For the Appellants. B. K. Da..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Chowdhury Ramzan Ali and another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ed without any order as to costs. The orders of the Court below are set aside, the proceedings of claims of the appellant before the Company Judge will proceed according to law. Ed. ......ed without any order as to costs. The orders of the Court below are set aside, the proceedings of claims of the appellant before the Company Judge will proceed according to law. Ed. ......ed without any order as to costs. The orders of the Court below are set aside, the proceedings of claims of the appellant before the Company Judge will proceed according to law. Ed. ......gh Investment Co. Vs G-G. in Council AIR 1947 (PC) 78; Ravi Paint Colour & Varnish Works Ltd. Vs Federation of Pakistan PID 1954 (Lab) 551; Sargodha Trading Co. AIR 1943 (Lah) 228. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M Mozammel Huq Bhuiyan. Advocate with Rabia Bhuiyan, Advocate, instruc..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Hajee Khabiruddin Ahmed Vs. Md. Salam Kabir, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ter the lapse of a reasonable time. For the reason stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial court restored. Ed. ......ter the lapse of a reasonable time. For the reason stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial court restored. Ed. ......ter the lapse of a reasonable time. For the reason stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial court restored. Ed. ...... Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Hajee Khabiruddin Ahmed…………………Appellant Vs. Md. Salam Kabir…………………………..... Respondent Judgment April 1, 1982. Lawyers Involved: S R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Santiranjan Karmaker, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Rokeya Khatun Vs. Alijan @ Alijan Bepari and ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....he modification that the suit is decreed in part in favour of the appellant to the extent of the 1/3 rd share in the suit property. Respondent No. 1 is to pay cost of the appeal. Ed. ......he modification that the suit is decreed in part in favour of the appellant to the extent of the 1/3 rd share in the suit property. Respondent No. 1 is to pay cost of the appeal. Ed. ......he modification that the suit is decreed in part in favour of the appellant to the extent of the 1/3 rd share in the suit property. Respondent No. 1 is to pay cost of the appeal. Ed. ......ber 10, 1981. Cases Referred To- Farid un Nesa vs. Mukhtar Ahmed 52 I.A. 342; Ruhalla vs. Hananlli Begumia AIR 1928 PC 303; Hem Chandra vs. Suradhani Debya AIR (1940) PC 134. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam, Senior Advocate instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on- Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Abu Bakkar Vs. Nazir Ahmed, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....sion are set aside and those of the lower appellate court are restored. The respondent shall pay costs of the appeal to the appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 237. ......sion are set aside and those of the lower appellate court are restored. The respondent shall pay costs of the appeal to the appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 237. ......sion are set aside and those of the lower appellate court are restored. The respondent shall pay costs of the appeal to the appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 237. ......plete usufructuary mortgage for a period not exceeding 7 years on the expiry of which the mortgagor may get back possession by an application to the Sub divisional Magistrate……….(5 and 6). Lawyers Involved: A. K. M Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate M. Giasuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by M..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Khondker Moshtaque Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....sain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Khondker Moshtaque Ahmed………………………. Appellant (In both the appeals). Vs. Bangladesh through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs……….. Respondent (In both the appeal......w Court and the order of Government on review are set aside, The orders of conviction passed on the appellant ate hereby quashed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 222. ......w Court and the order of Government on review are set aside, The orders of conviction passed on the appellant ate hereby quashed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 222. ......; State Vs. Zia-Ur-Rahman PLD 1973 (SC) 49; Federation of Pakistan Vs. Saeed Ahmed PLD (SC) 151; Jamil Huq Vs. Bangladesh (1982) 34 DLR(AD) 125; A Rouf Vs. Abdul Hamid Khan (1965 17 DLR (SC) 515. Lawyers Involved: MH Khandker and Khandker Mahbub uddin Ahmed, Senior Advocates with Nizamuddin ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 287
Lebu Mia Vs. Ganesh Chandra Nath and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....al below and remit the case back to the said Court of appeal below for its disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 220.......al below and remit the case back to the said Court of appeal below for its disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 220.......al below and remit the case back to the said Court of appeal below for its disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 220.......ut by then the document had been registered and so the pre-maturity could be said to have been cured……..(3) Case Referred to- Abdur Rahman @ Abdul Rahman Vs. Maklis Ali, 31 DLR (AD) 118. Lawyers Involved: Md. Hannan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Haji Tajamal Ali being dead his heirs: Kamarunnesa & ors. Vs. Abdus Sattar & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....iguity" within the meaning of section 9 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. 8. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ......iguity" within the meaning of section 9 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. 8. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ......iguity" within the meaning of section 9 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. 8. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ......ondent Judgment March 31, 1982 Cases Referred To- Akhtarun Nesa vs. Habibullah (1979) 31 DLR (AD) 88; Ahmed Hossain vs. Basharat Ali (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 54. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Sr. Advocate, instructed by Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate on-Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Bangladesh Vs. Hon'ble Judge, Prize Court, HCD, Supreme Court Building, Dacca, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... ......e learned Attorney-General are found unacceptable, not because it lack reasons but such reason has no support in law. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. ......e learned Attorney-General are found unacceptable, not because it lack reasons but such reason has no support in law. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. ...... Vs. Hon'ble Judge, Prize Court, High Court Division, Supreme Court Building, Dacca …………….. Respondents Judgment Feb. 23, 1982. Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General with A. W. Bhuiyan Deputy Attorney-General, i..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 116
Abdul Hamid Vs. Abdul Jabbar , 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....o this modification the appeal is allowed, the order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Subordinate Judge is restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......o this modification the appeal is allowed, the order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Subordinate Judge is restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......o this modification the appeal is allowed, the order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Subordinate Judge is restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......t Vs. Abdul Jabbar…………………………………... Respondents Judgment Feb. 18, 1982. Lawyers Involved: SM. Zillul Huq Advocate, Supreme Court instructed by Md Aftab Hossain, Adv..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Bangladesh & others Vs. A. K. M. Zahangir Hossain, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....34 DLR (AD) 173. ...... member of the said 'disciplined force' if he has been illegally dismissed, removed, discharged, reduced in rank or compulsorily retired. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 173. ...... member of the said 'disciplined force' if he has been illegally dismissed, removed, discharged, reduced in rank or compulsorily retired. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 173. ......N Sharma, AIR 1965 SC 1595; APHL Conference, Shillong Vs. WA Sangma, AIR 1977 SC 2155; Durga Shanker Mehta Vs. Raghuraj Singh, AIR 1954 SC 520; Royal Aquarium Vs. Parkinson 1892 (1) CB 436 (466). Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General, with A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, inst..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
General Manager Jamuna Oil Company Ltd. Vs. Golap Rahman & another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....dinance shows that the Court itself either cannot compel the attendance of such member or extract his advice. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......td........................Appellant Vs. Golap Rahman & another….......................... Respondent Judgment June 15, 1981. Cases Referred To- National Bank of Pakistan vs Md. Golam Mostofa, (1975) 27 DLR 158; Aminul Islam vs. James Finlay, ......dinance shows that the Court itself either cannot compel the attendance of such member or extract his advice. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......al Bank of Pakistan vs Md. Golam Mostofa, (1975) 27 DLR 158; Aminul Islam vs. James Finlay, (1974) 26 DLR (SC) 33; Project-in-Charge, Paruma Ltd., vs. Aminur Rahman Khan, (1979) 31 DLR 124. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate (Abdul Azim, Advocate with him) Instructe..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Bangladesh Vs. Winifred Rubi & ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. ...... 7. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. And the Judgement of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... 7. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. And the Judgement of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Vs Winifred Rubi & ors………………………………..Respondents Judgment Feb. 24, 1982. Lawyers Involved: K. A, Bakr, Attorney General, A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney General, with ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Md. Habibur Rahman & ors. Vs. Hasen Ali Mondal and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....atal so as to nullify the notification issued on February 4, 1980. The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......atal so as to nullify the notification issued on February 4, 1980. The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......atal so as to nullify the notification issued on February 4, 1980. The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......hellip;……………... Respondents Judgment April 2, 1980. Case Referred to- Azizul Molla vs. Taher Ali Sarder (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 61. Lawyers Involved: Md, Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him, instr..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Md. Enayet Ali Vs. Munsif of First Court at Khulna & Election Tribunal and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... Court By the majority decision, the appeal is allowed. The orders of the Courts below are set aside and the election petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Court By the majority decision, the appeal is allowed. The orders of the Courts below are set aside and the election petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Court By the majority decision, the appeal is allowed. The orders of the Courts below are set aside and the election petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ......……...Appellant. Vs. Munsif of First Court at Khulna & Election Tribunal and others....................... Respondents Judgment June 19, 1981. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, (M/S Zamiruddin A..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Haripada Biswas Vs. State & another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... the decision of the High Court Division Is set aside and the proceedings in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 687 of 1978 of the Court of Sessions Judge, Bakerganj are hereby quashed. Ed. ...... the decision of the High Court Division Is set aside and the proceedings in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 687 of 1978 of the Court of Sessions Judge, Bakerganj are hereby quashed. Ed. ...... the decision of the High Court Division Is set aside and the proceedings in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 687 of 1978 of the Court of Sessions Judge, Bakerganj are hereby quashed. Ed. ......tate & another ……………………………………….Respondents Judgment Jan. 4, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Aleem-Al-Razee, Advocate instructed by Aminul Hug, Advocate-on-Record&..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Jamil Huq and 11 others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Shahabuddin Ahmed J Jamil Huq and 11 others……………….Petitioners (In Petition Nos. 65/81 66/81, 67/81, 68/81, 69/81, 70/81, 71/81, 72/81, 73/81, 74/81, 75/81, and 76/81) Vs. Bangladesh and others................................Respondent Judgment September 22, 1981.......lication under Article 104 of the Constitution is rejected. The verbal prayer for stay of the execution of the sentences made by Mr. MH Khandker is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......lication under Article 104 of the Constitution is rejected. The verbal prayer for stay of the execution of the sentences made by Mr. MH Khandker is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ign C. (Commission) 1969(1) All ER 208; Ex Rel, French vs. Weeks, 259 US 326; R. vs. Secretary of State for War 1949(1) All ER 242; R. vs. O/C Depot Battalion 1949, All ER 373; Burns vs. Wilson, 97 Lawyers Edition, 1508; Kartar Singh vs. Imperator, AIR 1946 Lah. (FB) 1C3. Lawyers Involved: ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 327