Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7501-7520 of 7814 results.
Suriya Begum and others Vs. Alimulla Mallik, and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....Rao and others vs. MO Natesa Chatty, AIR 1948 Madras 138. Lawyers Involved: Aftabuddin Ahmed- For the Petitioners. MA Rouf — For the Opposite Party No. 1. Civil Rule No. 144 of 1967. Judgment: &nb......Afzal vs. Mt. Sardar Begum and others, AIR 1949 Lahore 69; Komorappa Goundan vs. Ramaswamy Goundan, AIR 1948 Madras 150; RK Balaji Rao and others vs. MO Natesa Chatty, AIR 1948 Madras 138. Lawyers Involved: Aftabuddin Ahmed- For the Petitioners. MA Rouf — For the Opp..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
SK Shamsul Huda Vs. EPWAPDA, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....f the filing of the suit till the date of realisation. Fazle Munim J —I agree. Ed. ......ovince vs. Dr. Lakshmi Das AIR 1944 Lahore, 149; Re Arban, Munshilal and Sons vs. Modi. Bros. 51 CWN 563 and of Nanhelal Ananddal Jain and another vs. Singhai Gulobchand AIR 1944 Nagpur 24. Lawyers Involved: MH Khondker and Abu Backkar—For the Appellant. Abdul Wadud C..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 98
Mofazzal Molla and another Vs. Parul Bala Debi and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....Suresh Chandra Sen vs. Jogesh Chandra Sen, 43 CWN 969; Lawyers involved: Syed Mohammad Ali—For the Petitioner. SMA Latif—For the Opposite Party No.1. Civil Rule No. 1324 of 1966. Judgment: T H Khan J.- This Rul......ibi vs. Md. Ali.Shaha, AIR 1941 Cal. 336; Sheosagar Singh vs. Sitaram AIR 1952 Pat. 48; Md. Idris Khan vs. Hajee Erfanuddin, 9 DLR 601; Suresh Chandra Sen vs. Jogesh Chandra Sen, 43 CWN 969; Lawyers involved: Syed Mohammad Ali—For the Petitioner. SMA Latif—For the..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Golam Kader Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....on and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge is hereby set aside. We direct that the appellant be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other matter. Ed. ......lip;..Respondent Judgment August 13th, 1970. Cases Referred to: Lai vs. The Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 38; PLD 1954 (FC) 95; State vs. Umed Ali (1963) 15 DLR 712. Lawyers involved: No one- both for the Appellant and Respondent. Appeal No. 174 of 1..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Syed Idris alias Idris Mir and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....— the Opposite Party. Criminal Revision No. 642 of 1969. Judgment: Habibur Rahman J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment passed by Mr. MS Rahman, Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Court......p; August 21st, 1970. Cases Referred to- Emperor Vs. CA Mathews, AIR 1929 Cal. 822. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rasheed with ATM Afzal — For the Petitioners. Not repre..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
AKM Shamsuzzaman Khan Vs. Chairman EPRTC, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....e of the amount of Rs. 8400.00 should be so deposited within the period stipulated as above. The appellant worker is entitled to his costs throughout and we order accordingly. Ed. ...... 1937 Cal. 526; Tannoch (Pauper) appellant vs. Brownieside Coal Company Limted respondent 1929 AC 642; Tannoch (Pauper) appellant vs. Brownieside Coal Company Limted respondent 1929 AC 642; Lawyers Involved: M A Aziz - For the Appellant. Abdus Subhan — For the Respond..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Daulatpur Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors., 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... AM Khan Chowdhury, Assistant Advocate General—For the Respondent. Petition Nos. 527 and 530 of 1963. Judgment: Salahuddin Ahmed J: The Rules Nisi issued in these two petitions have been heard one after another, and as common question......Cases Referred To: Nagina Silk Mills Ltd 15 DLR (SC) 181; PLD 1963 (SC) 322; the Secretary of State for India in Council vs. Hindustan Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd. 35 CWN 794. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq and Mohammad Hassan — For the petitioner. AM Kh..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Basanta Kumar Basak Vs. Santosh Kumar Basak and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....all the material documentary and oral evidence on record in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. The costs of this appeal will abide the result. Ed. ......58; 18 CWN 428 (PC) and 29 CWN 1037 (PC); Must. Bhagwanu Kunwar and another vs Mohan Singh 29 CWN 1037 (PC); Bhagoji vs Bapuji ILR 13 Bom. 75; Negeshwar Baksh Singh vs Ganesha 47 IAS. Lawyers Involvrd: Moinul Huq—For the Appellant. Haradhan Sarkar&mda..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Serajul Hoque Muktar and others Vs. ARM Mustanesar Billah & others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... appeal is dismissed with costs; and the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below are affirmed. The leave as prayed for under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is refused. Ed. ......r Khaleque Newaz Khan Chowdhury and others vs Maulvi Chowdhury Habibuddin Ahmed Siddique 46 CWN 817; Aposh Ali on behalf of Sailendra Nath Chakraborty vs. Amjad Ali Bhuiya 10 DLR Dacca, 248, Lawyers Involved: A Matin Khan Chowdhury—For the Appellants Abdur Rab (1)&mdash..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Keramat Ali and others Vs. Probhat Chandra Majumder, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....he Opposite Party. Criminal Revision No. 400 of 1969 Judgment: H. Rahman J. This Rule is directed against the judgment passed By Mr. M A Ali, Magistrate 1st Class Noakhali, on 15.......bsp; Vs. Probhat Chandra Majumder.........Opposite Party Judgment August 21st, 1972. Lawyers Involved: A. Wahab—For the Petitioners. Humayun Habibur Rasul —F..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
State Vs. Shiraj Ali, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....the further evidence to be adduced, as directed. The condemned prisoner shall continue in the custody till disposal of the Session Case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 DLR (1972) 69. ....... Shiraj Ali.................................... (Condemned Prisoner) Judgment January 26, 1971. Cases Referred to- 33 CWN 136; 13 DLR 289; PLD 1959 Lahore 474, PLD 1960 Lahore 111. Lawyers Involved: A Talukdar with Daliluddin Ahmed—For Condemned Prisoner. AW Mallik with Mu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Rakhal Chandra Das and ors Vs. Benecha Khatun and others, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....ing the principal defendants therefrom are restored. But the decree of the trial Court for recovery of Rs 110/- as compensation is set aside. There will be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ...... Khatun and others........Respondents Judgment May 6th, 1970. Cases Refered to- Ali Dewan and another vs. Akram AH Prodania and another 17 DLR 343; 41 CWN 257 (PC); AIR 1948 (PC) 168. Lawyers Involved: MA Rouf —for the Appellants. Not Represented—the Respondents. Appea..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Tamiza Khatoon and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....iate charge as the learned judge thinks fit. Pending the retrial the accused will remain in custody. Let the records be sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. ...... Cases Referred to- State vs Abed All 14 DLR 701; Jananedra Chandra Ghattak vs. The King Emperor 34 CWN 198; Indur Chand vs. Emperor ILR 42 Cal 1094; Emperor vs Mahbir Prasad ILR 49. Lawyers Involved: Md. Moktar Hossain—For the Appellants. Shah Harmutullah&mdas..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Shuk Deb and another Vs. Province of East Pakistan, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....ly before the conflict of 1965 between India and Pakistan, the property is an enemy property and has, by virtue of the notification dated the 3rd December, 1965, made under the Defence of Pakistan Rules, become an enemy property. Shuk Deb, the Pujari, and some others who are living in the premis......bsp; Vs Province of East Pakistan represented through the Chief Secretary Government of East Pakistan .......Respondents Judgment November 21st, 1969. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed—For the Petitioner. Anwarul Hoque ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Rahman Ali Vs. Upendra Lal Sarkar, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
.... and for all and the cost for appointment of the pleader commissioner will be borne by the plaintiff, 18. Leave as prayed for under clause 15 of the Letters Patent is granted. Ed. ......athura Nath Ghosal vs Ratneswer Sen (1914) 231C 917; Ahhoya Charan Lata Baidya vs Srimati Kamani Probha Nag in 53 1C 188; Faruzuddin Mondal vs. Tahirannessa Bibi and ors. 15 DLR Dacca, 214. Lawyers Involved: Farid Ahmed, Advocate—For the Appellants. Mahmudul Islam for ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
State Vs. Abdur Rashid, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....before us could not also indicate the probability of any prejudice having been caused. Accordingly, the question of ordering retrial of the condemned prisoner does not arise at all. Ed. ......andra Mondal 22 DLR 289; Abdul Gani and another vs State, reported in 16 DLR; Khadim vs. The Crown, reported in 1954 PDL (Lah) 69; Quine vs Leatham, reported in (7907; A.C. 495, at page 506. Lawyers Involved: ATM Masud, Deputy Legal Remembrancer with Md Batin—For the State. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Azizur Rahman Vs. Hedayet Ahmed Chowdhury and others, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
.... Lawyers Involved: M H Khandker, Salauddin Ahmed. B K Das-For the Petitioner. Ahmed Sobhan. Md. Ruhul Amin-For Respondents 1 & 2. Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 352 of 1968 with Civil Rule No. 675 (S) of 1969. (Appeal against the Decree of Mr. Md Mosseh, Additional District Judge ...... Ahmed vs. Prafulla Kumar Dey and others 13 DLR 70, Bharat Bhandhu Chattopadhya vs. Ranendra Kumar Dutta and others 70 CLJ 370; Halimunnessa vs. Hemendra Kumar Roy Chowdhury and others 12 DLR 448. Lawyers Involved: M H Khandker, Salauddin Ahmed. B K Das-For the Petitioner. Ahmed Sobhan. Md...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 137
Hasina Begum Vs. Province of East Pakistan, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....lso failed. The respondent No. 2 observed therein that under such circumstance no further action was possible by him. 4. Being aggrieved by this order the petitioner has obtained this Rule and has prayed for a declaration that the order of the respondent No. 2 dated 12.2.70 is illeg...... Muksum ul- Hakim J. Fazle Munim J. Hasina Begum…………….. Petitioner Vs. Province of East Pakistan, represented by Secretary, Law (Judl) Department, Registration Branch, Eden Building, Dacca and others ............Respondents..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Pak Waterways Vs. EPIWTA and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... introducing new routes which can only be introduced after following the detailed procedures as laid down in the East Pakistan Inland Water Transport (Allocation of Routes and Grant of Route Permits) Rules, 1967, as promulgated by notification dated 8th March, 1967, under section 67(1) read with sec......ddin Hossain J Pak Waterways..........................Petitioner Vs. EPIWTA and others.................Respondents Judgment March 2, 1970. Result: This application fails. Lawyers Involved: Kh. Mahbubuddin Ahmed with Pathan Shafiqur Rahman—For the Petitioner. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 255
Star Alkaid Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. EPIWTA and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....yem J A Quasim J Star Alkaid Jute Mills Ltd..................Petitioner Vs. EPIWTA andothers.......................Respondents Judgment November 25, 1970. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubur Rahman—For the Petitioner Rafiqur Rahman w......Star Alkaid Jute Mills Ltd..................Petitioner Vs. EPIWTA andothers.......................Respondents Judgment November 25, 1970. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubur Rahman—For the Petitioner Rafiqur Rahman with ATM Afzal-For the R..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 162
730729728727725724723722720719718717716715713712711710709708