Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 741-760 of 4843 results.
Rokeya Begum Vs. Md. Nurul Absar and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ef prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. .............Respondents (In C.A.No.84 of 1999) Md. Nurul Alam and others……………...............Respondents (In C.A.No.85 of 1999) Judgment April 25, 2004 Cases Referred To- Jadav Chandra Mali Vs. Abdul Khaleque and others, 27 DLR (AD) 114; Md. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal a......ions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 42
Bangladesh Bank and ors. Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....cise of jurisdiction and referred to a decision in the case of State of Orissa vs. Modan Gopal Rungta reported in AIR 1952 SC 12. 5. The short facts leading to the said decision are that the Government of Orissa having, passed an order canceling the temporary permits and directed the respon......d. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh Bank and others......Appellants Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another .........Respondents Judgment April 24, 2004......rt Division was not authorized in law to pass any relief while disposing of an application under article 102 of the Constitution. ………………..(9 & 10) Cases Referred to- Md. Amir Khan vs. Controller of Estate Duty PLD 1961 SC 119 = 13 DLR (SC) 105; Kumudini Welfare Trus..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 24 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 175
Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ohinderpal and another, AIR 1989 SC 1263; Ghulam Abbas Vs. Trustees of Port of Karachi, PLD 1987 SC 393; Mohammad Eunus & Brothers Vs. Chittagong University, 44 DLR (AD) 296; KM Shafi Limited Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1983 BLD (AD) 109; State of Orissa Vs. Dhandasi Sahu, AIR 1989 SC 1791; Dh......ot empowered to supersede the arbitration clause and appoint an arbitrator who is not named in said arbitration clause………………(51) Cases Referred to- Bangladesh Water Development Board Vs. Nasim another, 1988 BLD 369; RAJUK Vs. MN Alam & others, ......rt High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur................Appellant Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd...................................Respondent Judgment A......any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 3
Agrani Bank, rep. by the Chairman, BoD, & ors. Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ept of proportionality which has no application in the instant case and thus it is not sustainable. Moreover doctrine of proportionality is non-existent in the field of administration of justice in Bangladesh. …………………………(13)&nb...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M M Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank, represented by the Chairman, Board of Directors, and others .....Appellants Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza ......................Respondent Judgment ......ngly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 130
Ananda Builders Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ate. (5) The High Court Division erred in law in holding that there was no legal basis for legitimate expectation by the petitioner as no assurance was ever given either by the BIWTA or by the Government inasmuch as the recommendation made by the committee was assistance by the respondents to...... ......1. ......al is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 215
Sec. Min. of Law, Justice & Par. Affairs & ors. Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....s Judgment April 5, 2004. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), section 492 The relationship between the Special Public Prosecutor and the Government being that of a client and a lawyer and that being the accepted position and whose skill...... Division in Writ Petition No. 3005 of 1998 declaring the Memo No. 2862/Solicitor/96‑312/4 dated 13‑9‑1998 of the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Bangladesh cancelling the appointment of the petitioner as Special Public Prosecutor illegal and wi......p; Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others .......Appellants Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and others……..................Respondents Ju......rdingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 201
SM Jillur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....aring of the Sessions Case No. 120 of 1993 of the 3rd Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Dhaka. The appointment was made by the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs (Solicitor Wing) Government of Bangladesh by the letter dated June 8, 1997. By the letter dated September 13, 1998 t...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J SM Jillur Rahman ..............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others .......................Respondents Judgment April 5, 2004......nbsp; Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J SM Jillur Rahman ..............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others .......................Respondents Judgment A......ccordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 259
Alauddin Sikder (Md) & anr. Vs. BD and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ort of the petition, Mr. Prabir Haider, the learned Advocate, submits, inter alia, that High Court Division committed error in not considering that the administration and management of a Non‑Government Intermediate College having School Section is vested with Governing Body of the Institut...... Alauddin Sikder (Md) and another……………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others ....…….............Respondents Judgment Mar...... J Alauddin Sikder (Md) and another……………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others ....…….............Respondents Judgment...... one month from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 31 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 213
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Mridha & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....on Act, 1957 read with paragraph 59 of the Anti‑Corruption Manual. 25. Provision of section 3(2) of Anti-Corruption Act, 1957 reads as: Section 3(2): "Subject to any orders which the Government may make in this behalf, officers of the Bureau shall have throughout Bangladesh in rela......appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......lowed. Ed. ......d of our discussions made hereinabove we find merit in all these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 30 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 74
Ershad Ali Sikder (Md) Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....e are in respectful agreement with the aforesaid observation which manifests the correct exposition of law on the subject. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......der (Md).....................Petitioner Vs. State ...........................................Respondent Judgment March 22, 2004. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 105 Unless the impugned order shows error apparent on the f...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Ershad Ali Sikder (Md).....................Petitioner Vs. State ...........................................Respondent Judgment......ject. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 22 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 332
BRTC Vs. Md. Esken Mollick and anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....as come to a correct decision and there being no error in the said judgment, the appeal has no substance. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... ......il) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh Road Transport Corporation .......................Appellant Vs. Md Esken Mollick and another.... Respondents Judgment March 16......l is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 16 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 99
Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ed in Writ Petition No. 5958 of 2003 summarily rejecting the same. The writ petition was filed impugning Memo, dated September 3, 2003 issued under the signature of Deputy Secretary (Pouro), Local Government Division of the Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co‑operatives ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) …………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh………………………… Responden...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) …………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh………………………&hellip......Ordinance. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 16 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 269
.... arises does not thereby become an industry as commonly understood. We hardly think in terms of an industry, when we have regard, for instance, to the rights and duties of master and servant, or of a Government and its secretariat, or the members of the medical profession working in a hospital. It w...... therefore, necessary to limit its scope on permissible grounds, having regard to the aim, scope and the object of the whole Act."
But before we consider the relevant Labour Legislations in Bangladesh we would like to consider certain earlier judgments passed by the Supreme Court of India ......Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
ABM Khairul Haque J
Md. Miftahuddin Choudhury J
Chittagong City Corporation, represented by its Mayor and 3 others............Petitioners
Vs.
Md. Afzal Hossain and others ..............................................Respondents
......
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 741.
..
Category: Corporate Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 14 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 4
Jahangir Alam (Md) alias Zakir Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... to 10 (ten) years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months more. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (AD) 217. ......prisonment and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months more. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), Section 561A The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Articles 103 & 104 Considering the facts and circumstances of the cases and......t Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Hussain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Jahangir Alam (Md) alias Zakir .....................Petitioner Vs. State ....... Respondent Judgment March 9, 2004. Result: Maintaining the convict......orous imprisonment for 6 (six) months more. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (AD) 217. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 93
Ataur Rahman (Md.) another Vs. Edruc Limited, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... applications are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Amin Scales Ltd. and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987 BLD (AD) 259 = 39 DLR (AD) 201; Haridas Vs. Baroda Kishore, 27 Cal 38; Fardous Chowdhury Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 3 BLC (AD) 213; Bancharam Majumdar Vs. Adyanath Bhattacharja, ILR 36 Cal, ......are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Amin Scales Ltd. and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987 BLD (AD) 259 = 39 DLR (AD) 201; Haridas Vs. Baroda Kishore, 27 Cal 38; Fardous Chowdhury Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 3 BLC (AD) 213; Bancharam Majumdar Vs. Adyanath Bhattacharja, ILR 36 Cal, 936; Capt BS D......Supreme Court High Court Division (Statutory Original Civil Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Amirul Islam J Ataur Rahman (Md.) another......................Petitioners Vs. Edruc Limited ..........................................Respondent Judgment March......is Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 337. ..Category: Company Law | Date: 3 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 8
Govt. of BD. rep. by Sec., Min. of Post, T&T & ors. Vs. Abul Khair, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Post, Telegraph and Tele......peal No. 57 of 2002). Judgment Md. Faziul Karim J.- The Government of Bangladesh and others seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order of the Administrative Appe...... Md. Tafazzal Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Post, Telegraph and Tele communication and others....................Petitioners Vs. Abul Khair.... Respondent Judgment February 23, 2004. ......following, the principles of natural justice. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 23 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 125
Jalil Brothers and ors. Vs. Humayun Majid and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....assed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3223 of 1996 making the Rule absolute. 2. The respondent No. 1 filed the above writ petition seeking direction upon the respondent No. 2, the Government of Bangladesh, to hand over to him the vacant possession of the ground floor of the build......azlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jalil Brothers and ors...................Appellants Vs. Humayun Majid and ors................Respondents Judgement February 18, 2004. The Bangladesh Abandoned Property (Control, Management & Disposal) Order, 1972, Article 10 The p...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jalil Brothers and ors...................Appellants Vs. Humayun Majid and ors................Respondents Judgement February 18, 2004. Th......High Court Division. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 18 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 133
Abdus Sattar (Md) and ors. Vs. Lalon Mazar Sharif & Seba Sadan Committee & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....onsideration of the evidence on record has arrived at the correct finding and, as such, no interference is called for. Accordingly, this leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......onsideration of the evidence on record has arrived at the correct finding and, as such, no interference is called for. Accordingly, this leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......d. ......ch, no interference is called for. Accordingly, this leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 11 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 127
State Vs. Moslemuddin (Md), 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....l Attorney‑General appearing for the appellant, submits that the order of acquittal was passed by the learned Single Judge only on the ground that in the present case sanction was obtained from the Government but through inadvertence the copy of the order of the President's Secretariat granting sa......tence is illegal". In view of above position we fined no reason to interfere with the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......rt Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ned no reason to interfere with the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 19 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 96
State Vs. Bahar Miah, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....he offence for taking necessary steps in accordance with law as per observations made above. The connected appeals are allowed accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 454. ...... Rakhalananda Thakur, AIR 1941 PC 16; State Vs. Eunus Kha, 5 BLC 353; State Vs. Mannan Gazi, 6 BLC 187; Ashnan Begum Vs. State, 51 DLR (AD) 18; Haripada Biswas Vs. State and another, 34 DLR (AD) 142; Bangladesh Vs. Yeakub Ali Sardar and others, 40 DLR (AD) 246; Abdul Matin and others Vs. State, 42 D......o Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 454. ......d appeals are allowed accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 454. ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 18 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 163
2261147902413759136134135132124133130903916489101501291491465680