Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7681-7700 of 8244 results.
Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent. Criminal appeal No. 3 of 1975. (From the judgment and order dated 24-7-1972 passed by the erstwhile High Court of Bangladesh in Criminal Appeal No. 581 of 1966). Judgment: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J.&md......ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ......ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ...... Shera Vs. The Crown (6 D.L.R. (F.C.) 80), State of Andh. Pra. Vs. T. Narayana (AIR 1962) SC. 240, Lakhan Mahto Vs. State of Bihar (AIR 1966, SC. 1742); Shera Vs. The Crown (6 BLR (FC) 80). Lawyers Involved: S.R, Pal, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Mohd. A. Aziz, Adv..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
M.A. Zaher and others Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....man, Narayanganj Municipality, (2) The Narayanganj Municipal Committee, (3) The Commissioner, Dacca Division and Controlling Authority of Municipal Committees and (4) Government of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) in the Fourth Court of the Munsif, Narayanganj for permanent injunction restraining them......g the appellant Khurshed Alam Khan for abetment of the offence of contempt of court and sentencing him therefor. In the result this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......g the appellant Khurshed Alam Khan for abetment of the offence of contempt of court and sentencing him therefor. In the result this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Appellant And Md. Khurshed Alam Khan………….Appellant Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another……..Respondent Judgment April 27, 1976. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr, Advocate, instructed by A. M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Recordâ€..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 142
Sirajuddin alias Siraj Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....e find no reason for reversal of the decisions of courts below and hence dismiss the appeal. The appellant must now surrender to his bail and serve out the remainder of the sentence. Ed. ......e find no reason for reversal of the decisions of courts below and hence dismiss the appeal. The appellant must now surrender to his bail and serve out the remainder of the sentence. Ed. ......e find no reason for reversal of the decisions of courts below and hence dismiss the appeal. The appellant must now surrender to his bail and serve out the remainder of the sentence. Ed. ...... 146); Empress of India Vs. Ajudhia (2 Allahabad (644), In re-Natesa Mudaliar, A.I.R. 1945 Madras, 330. Sital Vs. Emperor AIR 1942 Oudh. 214. Reg. Vs. Tukay Bin Tamana, I.L.R. 1 Bombay 214. Lawyers Involved: Md. Behatar Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Swami Joytirghananda Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......nanda………..….Appellant. Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Khulna and others…………..Respondents. Judgment, Dec 9, 1975. Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record&mdas..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Dacca Improvement Trust Vs. Waliullah and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ia Vs. Mask & Co. L. B. 67 I. A. 222 = A.I.R. 1940 P.C 105; Abdul Rouf and others Vs. Abdul Hamid Khan in 16 D.L.R. (S.C.) 515; Phool Chand Vs. Gopal Lal, reported in A.I.R. 1967, 1470; Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Huq Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by Mr. A. Rab-H, Advocate..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Ata Hossain Khan Ltd., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....that this appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and that of the Appellate Tribunal restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141.......that this appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and that of the Appellate Tribunal restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141.......that this appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and that of the Appellate Tribunal restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141.......= 160(2) Taxation 130; Pandit Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, AIR 1955 PunÂjab 42 = 1954 (26) ITR 159; Ghanshyamdas Farmanand Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (1952-21 ITR 79 at page 81). Lawyers Involved: A.W. Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by A. M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 164
....f another Indian
Company, namely, Kanknarrah Co. Ltd., hereinafter referred to' as- the managed
company which operated several mills in India and also owned some godowns,
situated in Pakistan, now Bangladesh. In accordance with the terms of the
agreement the appellant was vested with the power o......pinion that the High Court took the correct view in answering
the question referred to it under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act.
Both
the appeals are dismissed with costs.
Ed.
......pinion that the High Court took the correct view in answering
the question referred to it under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act.
Both
the appeals are dismissed with costs.
Ed.
......er of Income-tax, Dacca, 12 DLR (SC) 121 same case PLD
160 SC 371; McNeill and Barry Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, East
Pakistan reported in 21 DLR (SC) 200 same case PLD 1969 SC 527.
Lawyers Involved:
M. Hafizullah,
Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-H, Advocate-on-Record—..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Abul Hossain & ors. Vs. The State and anr., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......im, J. Abul Hossain & ors………...Petitioners. Vs. The State and anr………...Respondents. Judgment April 6, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Alt Khan, Advocate, with A. Basel Majumdar, Advocate, instructed b..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Messres A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....28 DLR (AD) 120. ......sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ......sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ......charya J Government of Bangladesh......Appellant. Vs. Messrs A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others…….Respondents Judgement March 15, 1976. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attor..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Karnaphuli Rayon and Chemical Ltd. Vs. The Govt. of BanglaÂdesh and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....shy;nufacture by the appellant Company is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and was of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......shy;nufacture by the appellant Company is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and was of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......shy;nufacture by the appellant Company is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and was of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......ers, Sons & Maxim Ltd. Vs. Evans (1910) A.C. 444 of page 445; Messers Usmania Glass Sheet Factory Limited Vs. Sales T s Officer, Chittagong (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 43T— PLD 1971 SC 205. Lawyers Involved: M. Habibur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by A. Bakkar, Advocate-on-Record&m..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Haji Md. Shariatullah Vs. Ashrafun Nessa Bibi and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....g regard to the considerations made above we find no substance in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 91. ......g regard to the considerations made above we find no substance in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 91. ......g regard to the considerations made above we find no substance in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 91. ...... Singh Hazari Vs. Juman Meah,13 D.L.R. 105; Ankala Venkata Reddy Vs. Manchala Venkata Reddy (A.I.R. 1915 Madras 1222; Dharani Dhar Ghose Vs. Phanibhusan Mukherjee 50 C.W.N. 837. Lawyers Involved: Golam Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by Md. Behter Ali, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Khondkar Mohiuddin Vs. Syed Moin Ahmed, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ......dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ......dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ......I.R. 1929 Cal. 152; Ramji Patal Vs. Rao Kishore Singh, L.R. 56 LA. 280 = 33 C.W.N. 893 = A.I.R. 1929 P.C, 190; Misrailal Vs. Mst. Surji, 9 D.L.R. 375; Abdul Majid Vs. Khalil 12 D.L.R. (S.C.) 132. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, with S.C. Das, Advocate, instructed by A. W. Mian, ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Mozaffar Ahmed Vs. Md. Osman and anr, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... is .barred by limitation. The appeal shall be disposed of on the evidence already on record. The appeal is disposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... is .barred by limitation. The appeal shall be disposed of on the evidence already on record. The appeal is disposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... is .barred by limitation. The appeal shall be disposed of on the evidence already on record. The appeal is disposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......oz Ahmed Choudhury (1952) 4 DLR 604—1951 PLR (1) Dacca, 576; Badrul Huq Rashidi Vs. Shah Hossain Ahmed AIR, 1935. Allahabad 278; Gobinda Chandra Vs. A. Majid, A.I.R. 1944 Calcutta 163. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nurul Huq, Advoc..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 239
Azizur Rahman and another Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ......to the category of the plainÂtiff and permitting him to prosecute the suit on behalf of the plaintiffs. It was stated in the application that the plaintiffs and the principal defendants being Indian Nationals and having resided in India the disputed properties had vested in the applicant defendant ......the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ...... Tea Company Limited (1968) 20 DLR (Dac.) 54, PLD 1969 Dacca 946; Mt. Tulsha Devi Vs. Shah Chironjeelal and others AIR 1943 All. 1; Anadilal and others Vs. Ram Sarup and others, AIR 1936 All 495. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
.... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ...... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ...... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ......ahadur Vs. Srinath, Chakrabarti 31 C.W.N. 135, Kumar Rai Vs. Baraboni Coal, A.I.R. 1935 Calcutta 36, Jemarat Ali Vs. Rahman Sardar, 17 DLR 589, Pramatha Nath Vs. Kamir Mondal, 17 DLR (SC) 392.
Lawyers Involved:
B. N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For t..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Syed Mofazzal Hossain Vs. The Election CoÂmmissioner and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
.... J.— This appeal by Special Leave is against an order of a Bench of the High Court Division summarily rejecting an application under Article 102(2) of the ConstiÂtution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and refusing to interfere with the judgment of an Election Tribunal which set aside the e......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ...... Syed Mofazzal Hossain…………...Appellant. Vs. The Election CoÂmmissioner and others……..Respondents. Judgment November 24, 1975. Result: The Appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Shah Azizur Rahman with Latifur Rahman, Advocates, instructed by B. Hossain, A..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....Civil) Present: A. M. Sayem, C. J. Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya. J. Bangladesh……Appellant. Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another…&hel......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Shanthanand Gir Vs. Mahant Basundevanand Gir, I.L.R. 52 All. 619 same case A.I.R. 1930, All. 225; C.V. Raghavayya Vs. Chamria Talkie Distributors and another, A.I.R. 1958 Andhra Pradesh 31. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A. W. Mallick, A..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ion In CriÂminal Revision No. 360 of 1969). Judgment Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J.—These two appÂeals, by special leave, arise out of a single judgÂment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Bangladesh refusing in exercise of powers under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to q......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for exÂpeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for exÂpeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......; Muhammad Vs. Muzammel Khan, PLD 1967 (SC) 317, Gianchand Vs. State, 1968 Pakistan Criminal Law Journal (SC) 764, R.P. Kapur Vs. State, AIR 1960 (SC) 866, M.S. Khawaja Vs. State, 17 DLR (SC) 153. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab, Advocate-on-Recordâ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 225
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Cr.P.C. and on conclusion of the trial they were found guilty and convicted under section 19(A) & (f) of the Arms Act read with President's Order No. 50 of 1972, namely, Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order and sentenced to rigorous imprison......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......Appellants. Vs. The State............................Respondent Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Aleem-Al-Razee, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Rccord.&mda..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
The Com. of Income-tax Chittagong zone, Ctg. Vs. M/s Everett Orient Line Corpn, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ght in so far it allowed the three assessees' initial depreciation under s. 10(2)(vi) of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ght in so far it allowed the three assessees' initial depreciation under s. 10(2)(vi) of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ght in so far it allowed the three assessees' initial depreciation under s. 10(2)(vi) of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......sp; 1948 A.C. 422, and Davigdor Goldsmid Vs. Inland Revenue Commissioners 1953 A.C. 347 Income Tax, Madras Vs. Mir Mohammad Ali 1964 (53) ITR, 165; Abdul Wahab Vs. The Crown, 7 DLR (FC) 87. Lawyers Involved: A. W. Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by A.M. Khan C..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 134
968967964963962961959958957956955954953950949947946945944943