Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7881-7900 of 8244 results.
Hasina Khatoon and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....Khatoon and others ………………………………………………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others............................................. Respondents Judgment ......t follows that the Court of Settlement must now dispose of this matter according to law. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 13 ......t follows that the Court of Settlement must now dispose of this matter according to law. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 13 ......lip;……Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others............................................. Respondents Judgment January 30th, 1992 Lawyers Involved: M I Farooqui, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Jalil and others, 1995, 24 CLC (AD)
....on (Civil) Present: ATM Afzal CJ Mustafa Kamal J Md Abdur Rouf J Md Ismailuddin Sarker J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works ……….Appellant ...... the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 415, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 10, 49 DLR (AD) (1997) 26 ...... the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 415, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 10, 49 DLR (AD) (1997) 26 ......ellip;.Appellant Vs. Md. Jalil and others…….Respondents Judgment August 23, 1995. Lawyers Involved: B Hossain, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidulla..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Abdul Wadud Vs. State, 1995, 24 CLC (AD)
....ded by Act No. XLII of 1992 will be applicable to the pending cases. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1995) 3 BLT (AD) 236, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 6.......ded by Act No. XLII of 1992 will be applicable to the pending cases. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1995) 3 BLT (AD) 236, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 6.......ded by Act No. XLII of 1992 will be applicable to the pending cases. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1995) 3 BLT (AD) 236, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 6.......ent Judgment August 22, 1995. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referrd to- Babul and others vs. The State, 15 BLD (1995) (HCD) 88, Md. Aslam vs. State 19 DLR (SC) 242. Lawyers Involved: A A Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Au, Advocate-on-Record — Fo..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Suruzzamal and others, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....s also Reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 1. ....... Both Bangladesh and Director-General Radio Bangladesh are in unauthorised occupation of the suit property without any right, title and interest. It was asserted that Dr. Shamim was a Bangladeshi National and he had his permanent residence in the city of Dhaka and he was living at Dhaka althou......ut any order as to costs. Title Suit No. 339 of 1981 is dismissed and Title suit No. 69 of 1981 is decreed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 1. ...... People’s Republic of Bangladesh vs. M/s Speedbird Navigation Co. 30 DLR (SC) 101, Bangladesh vs Messrs ATJ Industries Ltd. 28 DLR (AD) 120, Gannyson vs. Sonali Bank, 36 DLR (AD) 146. Lawyers Involved: A. W. Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Hu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Basiruddin Sarkar Vs. Jasimuddin Sarkar and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. The judgment and decree of the trial Court as upheld by the lower appellate Court are affirmed. Ed. ......s and another vs. Hickson AIR 1946 PC 156: Kumbhan Lakshmana and ors. vs. Tangirala Venkateswarla 2 DLR (PC) 83; Durga Prasad and another vs. Ghanshiam Das and others AIR 1948 (PC) 210; Robins vs. National Trust Company Ltd. and others 1927 AC 515; Muhammad Wall Khan vs. Muhammad Mohiuddin Khan ......The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. The judgment and decree of the trial Court as upheld by the lower appellate Court are affirmed. Ed. ......rokh Ahmed vs. Abul Khair and others 6 DLR 365; Aminuddin Munshi vs. Tajaddin and others AIR 1932 Cal 538; (Syed) Abdul Huck and others vs Seetameetti Narayan Naidu and anr. AIR 1938 Mad 14. Lawyers Involved: Muhammad Habibur Rahman, Md. Ayub—For the Appellant. Syed Amj..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Abdul Gani and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....nt of sentence has become infructuous and it is accordingly discharged. Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Special Judge wherever he may be in present stationed. Ed. ......nt of sentence has become infructuous and it is accordingly discharged. Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Special Judge wherever he may be in present stationed. Ed. ......nt of sentence has become infructuous and it is accordingly discharged. Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Special Judge wherever he may be in present stationed. Ed. ......D 1963 (SC) 38; Ghulam Haider vs. The State 9 DLR (WP) 52 = PLD 1957 (WP) Lah. 519; Muhammad Zaheer Nadem vs. The State PLD 1960 (SC) 50; Saeed Ahmed vs. The State 16 DLR (SC) 484 Reference. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hamid Chowdhury with SM Nurul Alam—For the Appellant (in Cr. A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 68
State Vs. Lutfor Fakir, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... allowed to the extent of sentence only and the conviction under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code is maintained. The appellant is sentenced to undergo transportation for life. Ed. ...... allowed to the extent of sentence only and the conviction under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code is maintained. The appellant is sentenced to undergo transportation for life. Ed. ...... allowed to the extent of sentence only and the conviction under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code is maintained. The appellant is sentenced to undergo transportation for life. Ed. ......LR (FC) 126: Mst. Sairan vs. The State 22 DLR (SC) 35: Hakim Gul vs. The State PLD 1964 Pesh. 1: Abdus Shukur vs. The State 16 DLR Dacca 147: Wazir and others vs. The State PLD 1960 Kar 74. Lawyers Involved: Latifur Rahman, Advocate —For the Condemned Prisoner. ATM Masu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Rakman Ali alias Md. Rakman Ali and others Vs. Hasib Ali Chowdhury and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....servations made above after discussing and considering all the material evidence on record. 18. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......servations made above after discussing and considering all the material evidence on record. 18. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......servations made above after discussing and considering all the material evidence on record. 18. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... IA 83; Ng, See Hem vs. The Official Assignee Federation of Malaya 5 DLR (PC) 214; Radha Ballav Basak vs. Krishna Sundari Basak 5 DLR 114; Purnendu Kumar Das vs. Hiran Kumar Das 21 DLR 918. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam Khan, AR Khan—For the Appellants. Nasiruddin ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Safar Ali and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....isonment for one month. If there is default in the payment of fine under both the counts (sections 147 and 324 PPC) the sentences of two months and one month shall run consecutively. Ed. ......isonment for one month. If there is default in the payment of fine under both the counts (sections 147 and 324 PPC) the sentences of two months and one month shall run consecutively. Ed. ......isonment for one month. If there is default in the payment of fine under both the counts (sections 147 and 324 PPC) the sentences of two months and one month shall run consecutively. Ed. ......p; Cases Referred to: Montazuddin and others vs. Crown 8 DLR Dacca 95; MFN Rewail vs. State 8 DLR Dacca 589; Amir Hossain Talukdar and others vs. Crown 9 DLR, Dacca, 71. Lawyers Involved: NA Rouf, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Not represented- State...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Dr. Rati Ranjan Choudhury Vs. Parul Bala Marwari and another, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... meet with disappointment. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs, the judgment and order under appeal is hereby confirmed. Ed. ...... meet with disappointment. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs, the judgment and order under appeal is hereby confirmed. Ed. ...... meet with disappointment. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs, the judgment and order under appeal is hereby confirmed. Ed. ......rs AIR (1937)(PC)251 corresponding to 64 IA 311; Kesoram Poddar vs. Banamali Dey and ors. AIR 1927 Cal. 141 and Gajadhar Lodha vs. Khas Mahatab Colliery Co. and ors. AIR 1959 Patna 562 ref. Lawyers Involved: DC Bhattacharjee, BB Roy Chowdhury —For the Appellant. SK Sen..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Premhari Barman and others Vs. Commissioner of Taxation, East Pak. Dacca, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....ingly, our answer to the second question is in the affirmative. 12. In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case, we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......ingly, our answer to the second question is in the affirmative. 12. In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case, we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......ingly, our answer to the second question is in the affirmative. 12. In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case, we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ...... 1970. Cases Referred to- Kalyani Vithaldas vs. Commissioner of Income Tax. 64 IA 87; Sur Sundar Singh Majithia vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, CP and UP 1942 (10) ITR 457. Lawyers Involved: BN Chowdhury, Pradip Kumar Guha — For the Applicant. Mohammad..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Syed Modaris Ali Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....he observations made in the judgment. The cost of this appeal will abide by the result. In view of the above order, the cross-objection has lost its importance and is, therefore, rejected. Ed. ......he observations made in the judgment. The cost of this appeal will abide by the result. In view of the above order, the cross-objection has lost its importance and is, therefore, rejected. Ed. ......he observations made in the judgment. The cost of this appeal will abide by the result. In view of the above order, the cross-objection has lost its importance and is, therefore, rejected. Ed. ......p; Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others.......... ......Respondents Judgment May 6th, 1971. Lawyers Involved: Nasiruddin Chowdhury — For the Appellant. Habibur Rah..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Rabiul Hossain Vs. Chairman, District Council Khulna and DC Khulna and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....s petition was passed without lawful authority and has no legal effect. The petitioner is entitled to his cost of this petition which we assess at Rs. 51.00 (Rupees fifty one-only). Ed. ......s petition was passed without lawful authority and has no legal effect. The petitioner is entitled to his cost of this petition which we assess at Rs. 51.00 (Rupees fifty one-only). Ed. ......s petition was passed without lawful authority and has no legal effect. The petitioner is entitled to his cost of this petition which we assess at Rs. 51.00 (Rupees fifty one-only). Ed. ......; Vs. Chairman, District Council Khulna and DC Khulna and others................Respondents Judgment January 13th, 1971. Lawyers Involved: Ismailuddin Sarkar — For the Petitioner. Abdul Matin ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 92
Abul Hossain and Abul Md. Vs. Amatu Md., 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... learned Sessions Judge directing that the petitioner be committed to the Court of Sessions for trial is set aside. Let the records be sent down expeditiously to the court concerned. Ed. ...... learned Sessions Judge directing that the petitioner be committed to the Court of Sessions for trial is set aside. Let the records be sent down expeditiously to the court concerned. Ed. ...... learned Sessions Judge directing that the petitioner be committed to the Court of Sessions for trial is set aside. Let the records be sent down expeditiously to the court concerned. Ed. ......hminarayan and others vs. Suryanarayan, AIR 1932 Mad. 502; Emperor vs. Asghar and others 37 ALJ 337; Chhadamila Jain and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another AIR I960 SC (India) 41. Lawyers Involved: Md. Jamiruddin Sircar — For the Petitioner. ATM Afzal —..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Bijon Bala Chowdhurani & others Vs. Maniruddin Biswas & others, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....the learned Advocate for the petitioners is upheld it will amount to partial pre-emption. The result, therefore, is that the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the learned Advocate for the petitioners is upheld it will amount to partial pre-emption. The result, therefore, is that the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the learned Advocate for the petitioners is upheld it will amount to partial pre-emption. The result, therefore, is that the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ra Nath Chakravarty vs. Trailakya Nath Chakravarty and others 40 CWN 1023; Abdul Aziz. Khan vs. Lalit Mohan Banerji 54 CWN 442; Ajit and others vs. Hacharuddin Prodhan PLD 1966 (Dacca) 198. Lawyers Involved: Nizamuddin Haider—For the Petitioners. Latifur Rah..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Kasiruddin Sarkar @ Kasiruddin Fakir Vs. The State, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....ppellant is set aside and he is acquitted from the charge under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code. He may be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......ppellant is set aside and he is acquitted from the charge under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code. He may be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......ppellant is set aside and he is acquitted from the charge under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code. He may be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ...... 9 DLR (SC) 177; Md, Siddiq vs. Crown (1954) DLR (FC) 56. st Sairan vs. State (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 35; Sultan Ahmad vs. Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 28: Fazal Elahi vs. Crown (1953) 5 DLR (FC) 207. Lawyers Involved: M. Golam Rabbani and Md. Nurul Islam, Advocates—For the Appellant. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Jogomaya Kundu Vs. Sudhir Kumar Kundu and another, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....of restoration of possession. There is, therefore, no ground for this Court to interfere with the order passed by the appellate Court. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Ed. ......of restoration of possession. There is, therefore, no ground for this Court to interfere with the order passed by the appellate Court. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Ed. ......of restoration of possession. There is, therefore, no ground for this Court to interfere with the order passed by the appellate Court. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Ed. ......: Md. Sharif vs. Diwan Singh AIR 1940 Lah 95; Ghazan vs. Mt. Bag Bhari, AIR 1932 Lah. 210; Ujir Sheikh vs. Syed AH Sheikh 16 CrLJ 607; Gourhari Gope vs. Alay Gopini, 29 ILR Cal. 724 Lawyers Involved: SA Latif—For the Petitioner. SS Haider—for the Opposit..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Pronab Kumar Majumder Vs. Hatem Mondal and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....I make no order as to costs. However, I direct the learned Munsif to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. Let the records of this case be sent down expeditiously. Ed. ......I make no order as to costs. However, I direct the learned Munsif to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. Let the records of this case be sent down expeditiously. Ed. ......I make no order as to costs. However, I direct the learned Munsif to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. Let the records of this case be sent down expeditiously. Ed. ......Ghosh & others (1959) 11 DLR 470; Jamman Mia vs Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property (1969) 21 DLR 562; Shahzada Muhd. Omar Beg vs Sultan Mohammad Khan and others (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 41. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate—For the Petitioner. AM Mahmudur Rah..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Aminul Islam Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....s not at all been proved and he is entitled to be acquitted. The appeal is allowed. The conviction and sentence passed against the appellant are set aside and he is acquitted of the charge. Ed. ......Sub-divisional Officer of Sadar Jessore he had domain over a sum of Rs. 5, 976, 20 paisa which represented the fund of the Works Programme. The amount was lying in the current account No. 1459 of the National Bank of Pakistan, Jessore. During the period between 16.8.64 and 21.8.64 the appellant paid......s not at all been proved and he is entitled to be acquitted. The appeal is allowed. The conviction and sentence passed against the appellant are set aside and he is acquitted of the charge. Ed. ......, 1970. Cases Referred: Sk. Mujibur Rahman & others vs State 15 DLR 549 PLD 1964 Dac 330; Fakku Mia alias Motahar All vs. The State 10 DLR 26; Srinivas Mall vs King Emperor 51 C.W.N 900. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Aziz with Latifur Rahman—For the Appellant. Md. Modabber Hosain —F..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83
Abdul Hamid Howlader and others Vs. Province of East Pakistan, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....n has no merit which is therefore, discharged with costs which we assess at Rs. 500/ (Rupees five hundred) only. The costs so ordered will be taken equally by the respondents. Ed. ......n has no merit which is therefore, discharged with costs which we assess at Rs. 500/ (Rupees five hundred) only. The costs so ordered will be taken equally by the respondents. Ed. ......n has no merit which is therefore, discharged with costs which we assess at Rs. 500/ (Rupees five hundred) only. The costs so ordered will be taken equally by the respondents. Ed. ......ast Pakistan ..............Respondents Judgment January 27th, 1971. Lawyers Involved: Tufail Mahammad Vs. Raja Mohammad Ziaullah 17 DLR (1965) (SC) 325 PLD 1965..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 81
752751750749746745744743742741740739738737736735734733732731