Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Chand Mia and others Vs. MA Rajput Ghosh Bahadur & others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....red by the predecessor of the plaintiffs by oral lease in the month of Baishak, 1360 BS. There was a subsequent registered dakhila dated 27‑4‑54. It is further stated that the RS and SA record of rights having been wrongly prepared in the name of defendant No.1, who claimed false title to the su..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Salahuddin Talukder (Md) Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....aming of new Service Rules does not mean the amalgamation or unification of the Services. He has further submitted that section 8 of the impugned Act is also violative of the petitioner's fundamental rights as guaranteed under Articles 27 and 31 of the Constitution and that the said Act gives the au..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 191
QC Shipping Limited and another Vs. Chittagong Port Authority and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
.... Bench in an illuminating passage says; “The jurisdiction conferred by Article 226 is in very wide terms. This Article empowers the High Court to give relief by way of enforcement of fundamental rights and other rights by issuing directions, orders or writs, including writ in the nature of habe..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 583
Arbi Khanom and 4 others Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....hat advance and or partial compensation is paid and the possession of the land is taken over by the Government and given it to the requiring body the owner of the land requisitioned will lose all his rights over the land save the right to have compensation and cannot question the manner of use and u..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Abu Mohammad Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh & another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
..../I/FF-6/81 (Part-5) 53 dated 9-3-97 should not be declared to have been made without lawful authority and of no legal effect and/or unconstitutional and in violation of the petitioner’s fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 27 and 31 of the Constitution. 2. The facts as stated in the pet..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 95
Habibur Rahman Paikar (Md.) Vs. Gour Gopal Datta and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....dure and the same has occasioned failure of justice. The learned Advocate further submits that this sort of order evidently betrays a total lack of application of the judicial mind in determining the rights of the litigants before the Court and, as such, the same cannot be sustained in law. The l..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Basihur Rahman Biswas Vs. Md. Hanif Ali Biswas & others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....ed to possess only 1/3rd of the total land of 0.47 acre and defendant No. 2 Intaj Biswas also used to possess his portion of the said purchased land. 12. These evidence together with the record of rights belie the claim of the plaintiff and clearly shows that although 0.47 acre of land in plot No..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Md. Riaz Uddin Khan, Advocate and another Vs. Mahmudur Rahman and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... 29. In Morris [Morris V. The Crown Office (1970)1 All ER 1079.] Lord Justice Salmon Spoke: "The sole purpose of proceedings for contempt is to give our Courts the power effectively to protect the rights of the public by ensuring that the administration of justice shall not be obstructed or preve..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 161
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 198
Matiur Rahman (Md.) Vs. Dhaka Stock Exchange Ltd. and another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....on under section 43 of the Companies Act, 1994. 2. The petitioner Md. Matiur Rahman claims to have purchased one share of the Dhaka Stock Exchange Limited bearing share Certificate No. 000025 with rights attached to it inclusive of the right of possession of Room No. 212 of the Dhaka Stock Exchan..Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 194
Abdul Gani Howlader (Md.) and another Vs. Abdus Somed Howlader and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... is the benamder but the plaintiff failed to prove the plea of benami. After assessment of the oral evidence of the plaintiff witnesses and also considering the documentary evidence such as record of rights of Asmat Ali, the rent receipt showing payment of rent in the name of Asmat Ali he opined tha..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Sajeda Begum Vs. Member, Bhumi Appeal Board and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
.... at Dhaka held that navigation-right over rivers and waterways, cannot be interfered with (except provided otherwise by specific provisions of law) by the Government. Such right with other incidental rights are universally recognised as vested in public. Justice SM Murshed, as he then was, deliverin..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 107
SM Fazlul Haque Vs. Salahuddin Ahmed and another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....o. 1 because it is the defendant No. 1, who was the original beneficiary of the LC and who actually transferred a part of his interest in the LC to the plaintiff with specific data of each person’s rights in the money. Indeed, it was open to the said defendant to create four instruments of transfe..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 164
Shah Alam (Md.) Vs. Md. Shahidur Rahman and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....ul Karim reported in 52 DLR (AD) 41 wherein it has been enunciated by their Lordships in the concluding paragraph “............passing of the final decree in a partition suit finally determines the rights of the co-sharers in the land. Hence, the application for the pre‑emptor respondents on t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Haripada Saha Vs. Md. Shamsuddin Quraishi and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....tor of himself and the joint family, he cannot merely by that reason be said to be a member of such family within the meaning of the section. It has been held in the case reported in 88 CWN, 147 that rights of co-sharers owning a dwelling house as members of an undivided family is distinguished from..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 210
Suraiya Begum and others Vs. Misir Ali and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....and under C.S. Dag No.110 were recorded in the name of Payrun Nessa Bibi and the rest 194 decimals land was recorded in the name of Aushi Bibi alias Aushi during the preparation of C.S. record of rights and Payrun Ness Bibi Rupjan Bibi while enjoying and possessing 55 decimals land under C.S. Da..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Azizul Hoq Vs. Administrator of Waqf, Government of Bangladesh and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... has been further submitted that the petitioner committed offence under section 32 of the Waqfs Ordinance which led to his removal and as such, there is no question of infringement of any fundamental rights. He argued that the writ petition is uncalled for and the petitioner is not entitled to get a..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 180