Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 8141-8156 of 8156 results.
Shafiqur Rahman and others Vs. Mahbub Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... District Judge), Chittagong for partition of the suit property stating, inter alia, that the suit land originally belonged to Hamidunnessa wife of Chan Mia. The C.S. Khatian was prepared and finally published in her name. 3. Hamidunnessa settled 1 kani of land as described in the sched......; Mohammad Ali, Advocate-on-Record, For Respondent Nos.1-4 Respondent Nos.5-26- Not represented. Civil Petition For Leave To Appeal No. 503 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 02.11.2003 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No.377 of 1996.) Jud......ot find any cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... M.M. Ruhul Amin J. Md. Tafazzul Islam J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. Shafiqur Rahman and others…………………………......... Petitioners. Vs. Mahbub Ali and others....... Respondents. Judgment 2nd January, 2006 Law..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Sena Kalyan Sangstha Vs. Haji Sufi Fazal Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ry and the residential building were taken over by the Government on 31-12-1971 under the purported exercise of power under Acting President's Order No. SRO-XII-M-35/71/17 dated 26th December, 1971 published in the Bangladesh Gazette Extraordinary dated January 3, 1972. 8. However, th......casioning failure of justice, review petition should not be entertained lightly. The provisions under Articles 23 and 24 of the President’s Order 16 of 1972 are intended to cover only orders passed with jurisdiction and these provide no protection to orders passed without jurisdicti......o Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 197. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Sena Kalyan Sangstha and another..............Petitioners Vs. Sufi Fazal Ahmed and others ..................Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Chairman, BADC, Dhaka Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ind merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ......nbsp; Md. Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal is against the order dated December 6, 2000 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 466......rder as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ......g operation of the Memo, dated 5.12.1996 (Annexure-R to the writ petition) and directing the writ-Respondents to pay LPR benefits, provident fund, gratuity and family insurance to the writ-petitioner. 2. The writ petition was filed challenging the Memo, as mentioned hereinbefore ca..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Kamal Uddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....commit any error in passing the impugned judgment and order. 15. In view of-the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Ali, Attorney General, instructed by Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record For the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 282 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 08.08.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3446 of ......judgment and order. 15. In view of-the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ....... ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 103
State Vs. Mofizuddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ............................Petitioner. Vs. Mofizuddin and others ......... Respondents. Judgment 29 November 2005 Criminal Petition For Leave To Appeal No. 135 of 2O04. (From the judgment and order dated 15.02.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No. 40 of 2001 and Crimi...... record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. M.M. Ruhul Amin J. Md. Tafazzul Islam J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. The State.................................Petitioner. Vs. Mofizuddin and others ......... Respondents. Judgment 29 November 2005 Crimina..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Ismat Zerin Khan Vs. The World Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... order of the High Court Division and the trial Court is hereby directed to hear the suit on all issues including the issue regarding maintainability in accordance with law. Ed. ......ructed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No.1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-4. Civil Appeal No. 184 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 24 August 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revisi......shy;ing the issue regarding maintainability in accordance with law. Ed. ......junction stating, inter alia, that appellant was appointed as an External Affairs Officer of the office of the World Bank, Dhaka through a rigorous selection process for 2 years as a probationer with effect from 16 January 2000. The appellant rendered excellent service, recognized as well ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 211
Abul Kalam Azad Vs. Govt of BD, represented by the DC, Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- Respondents Civil Petition For Leave to Appeal No. 1089 of 2002 (From the judgment and order dated 30.4.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Rule No. 110 (con) of 1999) ...... Mohammad Fazlul Karim, J. Md. Hamidul Haque, J.Md. Tafazzul Islam, J. Abul Kalam Azad.....................Petitioner. Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur and others........Respondents. Judgment 8 November 2003 Lawyers Involved:&nbs...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: K. M. Hasan, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim, J. Md. Hamidul Haque, J.Md. Tafazzul Islam, J. Abul Kalam Azad.....................Petitioner. Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur and others.....Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Anil Ranjan Deb Vs. Yoshodalal Amritalal Shaha Banik & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and in such view of the matter the petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ate-on-Record- For respondent No. 1 Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-5. Civil Petition For Leave To Appeal No. 1458 of 2001 (From the judgment and order dated 17th April, 2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 576 of 1991)&nb......rt Division and in such view of the matter the petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......p; Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ntemner-appellant No. 1 stating that he is appointed Chairman for the purpose of holding the AGM of the Bank for the years in question prior to the amendment came into operation and requested them to publish and notify the date for holding the AGM giving details of the time and place but neither of ...... Rafique-Ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 1st and 2nd November 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Contempt Petition No. 3 o......the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ected Chairman of the Board of Directors of the said Bank and the present contemner-appellants are the Managing Director and the Secretary respectively of the said Bank. It appears that on 18.01.2000 one Jahangir Alam Khan, a shareholder and a Director of the Bank filed an application under section ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Syed Ehsanul Hussain & ors Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ule. Since the High Court Division did not commit any error of law in the decision we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......s Involved: Muhammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners. Not represented-Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 229 of 2002. (From Judgment and order dated 2.8.2001 passed by the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 51 of 1998 ...... decision we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nbsp; Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ...... Fida M. Kamal, Additional Attorney General- For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 257 of 2003. Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.11.2001 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal dismissing the Miscellaneous ......cordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......n that as per judgment dated 24.6.1996 of the Administrative Appellate Tribunal in AAT Appeal No.181 of 1995, the appellant is entitled to get anti-dated seniority and promotions as Assistant Commissioner of Taxes with effect from 5.8.1974 and as Deputy Commissioner of Taxes with effect from 31.10..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Md. Mojibul Huq alias Shaikh Md. Mojibul Huq Vs. Md. Yakub Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ons made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 181. ......ed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-7. Civil Appeal No. 52 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated June 8, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5011 of 1998). ...... costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 181. ...... he got allotment of shop Nos. 235(ka) and 235(kha) in the ground floor of the under construction market of the Society and got possession of the said 2 shops. He let out the shop No. 235 (kha) to one Shah Alam and Respondent No. 1 having felt necessity of cash money mortgaged the shop no. 235(k..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....not at all entertainable by the Civil Court. 14. The undisputed position is that the property in suit was acquired under the provision of the Act and to that respect gazette notification has been published making the acquisition final and vesting the property in suit in the Government. As per pr...... Nos. 1-8 & 11-13. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 9-10 & 14-23. Civil Appeal No. 66 of 2003 Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin, J. - This appeal by leave is against the judgment and order dated August 7, 2001 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Rule No. 800 (condo......s set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......a Begum and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 50 DLR (AD) 11, Nur Mohammad and others Vs. Moulvi Mainuddin Ahmed and others, 39 DLR (AD) 1, Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and others Vs. Basharatullah, being dead his heirs and successors: Fazle Karim and other..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
Aynul Sheikh and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay fine of Tk. 5,000/- each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Criminal Appeal Nos. 42 and 43 of 2003 Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Criminal Appeal No. 42 of 2003 is at the instance of convict appellant Shafiuddin Sheikh against the judgment and order dated 30.04.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal no. 2180 of 1997. 2. ......ch and to pay fine of Tk. 5,000/- each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... this Single judgment. 4. The facts revealed in the leave petitions, in short, are that the convict Aynul Sheikh (not appellant before us) started digging a drain through the middle of the land of one Abdul Gafur Sheikh by damaging his onion crops on 28.01.1996 at about 3.30 P.M. and so Abdul Gaf..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 97
.... background of the discussions we are of the view no interference with judgment sought to be appealed is called for.
Accordingly the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:......
Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1232 of 2002.
Judgment
Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is against the judgment and order dated May 7, 2002 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2715 of ......ent sought to be appealed is called for.
Accordingly the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:......Court
Appellate Division
(Civil)
Present:
Md. Ruhul Amin J
MM Ruhul Amin J
Md. Tafazzul Islam J
The Mayor, Chittagong City Corporation, Chittagong and others……….... Petitioners
Vs.
Mohammad Jahangir Faruk and others….......Respondents
Result:
The petition ..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 96
M. A. Rashid and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......tion for Leave to Appeal No. 591 of 2002. Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- At the instance of the writ petitioners this petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 18.10.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 940 of 1995 dischargin......judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......s also Reported in: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
337335334332331330326325324323307306303302299297