Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 801-820 of 5157 results.
....he Bankruptcy Court is directed to dispose of the bankruptcy case expeditiously.
The order of stay granted earlier by this Court
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 716.
......istrict Judge (respondent No.1), Chittagong, should not be declared to have been initiated without any lawful authority and to be of no legal effect.
2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that Bangladesh Shilpa Bank, the respondent No.2, filed a bankruptcy case being Bankruptcy case No.1 of 2......7 DLR (2005) 716.
......din Chowdhury J
National Oxygen Limited and others…………………………………………Petitioners
Vs.
Additional District Judge and Bankruptcy Court, Chittagong and another……&hell..
Category: Banking Law, Corporate Law | Date: 10 May, 2004 | Hits: 9
Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ...... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ......the subsequent proprietor of registered trade mark No.27185 in Class‑25 cancelling his earlier order dated 29‑4-1993 passed on an application filed by the appellant on 31‑3‑1993 in TM 24 and dated 6‑4‑1993 in TM 38. 2. Short facts, necessary, for the disposal of this appeal are...... Md. Abdul Hafiz J Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe………………………………………..Appellant Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another………………&hell..Category: Others | Date: 5 May, 2004 | Hits: 4
Sunder Ali being dead his heirs A. Hannan & ors. Vs. Md. Serajul I. Sarker & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....cality are enjoying the resources thereof, that plaintiffs have no cause of action for filing, the instant suit, that suit has been filed without impleading the people of the locality and the Government and, as such, the same is not maintainable. 4. The trial Court rejected the ......allowed. The trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sunder Ali being dead his heirs Abdul Hannan and others .........Appellants Vs. Md. Serajul Islam Sarker & others................... (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sunder Ali being dead his heirs Abdul Hannan and others .........Appellants Vs. Md. Serajul Islam Sarker & others................Respondents Judg..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 102
Rokeya Begum Vs. Md. Nurul Absar and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ef prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......l Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Rokeya Begum………………………..Appellant (In both the Appeals) Vs Md. Nurul Absar and others………….................Respondents (In C.A.No.84 of 1999) Md. Nurul Alam and other.............Respondents (In C.A.No.84 of 1999) Md. Nurul Alam and others……………...............Respondents (In C.A.No.85 of 1999) Judgment April 25, 2004 Cases Referred To- Jadav Chandra Mali Vs. Abdul Khaleque and others, 27 DLR (AD) 114; Md. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal a..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 42
Bangladesh Bank and ors. Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....cise of jurisdiction and referred to a decision in the case of State of Orissa vs. Modan Gopal Rungta reported in AIR 1952 SC 12. 5. The short facts leading to the said decision are that the Government of Orissa having, passed an order canceling the temporary permits and directed the respon......d. This Case is also Reported in: ...... is also Reported in: ...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh Bank and others......Appellants Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another .........Respondents Judgment April 24, 2004..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 24 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 175
Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ohinderpal and another, AIR 1989 SC 1263; Ghulam Abbas Vs. Trustees of Port of Karachi, PLD 1987 SC 393; Mohammad Eunus & Brothers Vs. Chittagong University, 44 DLR (AD) 296; KM Shafi Limited Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1983 BLD (AD) 109; State of Orissa Vs. Dhandasi Sahu, AIR 1989 SC 1791; Dh......ot empowered to supersede the arbitration clause and appoint an arbitrator who is not named in said arbitration clause………………(51) Cases Referred to- Bangladesh Water Development Board Vs. Nasim another, 1988 BLD 369; RAJUK Vs. MN Alam & others, ......to make an order of reference to the arbitrator appointed by the parties, whether in the agreement or otherwise. The Court can appoint an arbitrator only when the contract did not name any arbitrator and the parties failed to agree to appoint an arbitrator. Not otherwise. 'No objection' on b......rt High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur................Appellant Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd...................................Respondent Judgment A..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 3
Agrani Bank, rep. by the Chairman, BoD, & ors. Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ept of proportionality which has no application in the instant case and thus it is not sustainable. Moreover doctrine of proportionality is non-existent in the field of administration of justice in Bangladesh. …………………………(13)&nb......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M M Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank, represented by the Chairman, Board of Directors, and others .....Appellants Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza ......................Respondent&...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M M Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank, represented by the Chairman, Board of Directors, and others .....Appellants Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza ......................Respondent Judgment ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 130
Ananda Builders Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ate. (5) The High Court Division erred in law in holding that there was no legal basis for legitimate expectation by the petitioner as no assurance was ever given either by the BIWTA or by the Government inasmuch as the recommendation made by the committee was assistance by the respondents to...... ......is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ......1. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 215
Sec. Min. of Law, Justice & Par. Affairs & ors. Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....s Judgment April 5, 2004. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), section 492 The relationship between the Special Public Prosecutor and the Government being that of a client and a lawyer and that being the accepted position and whose skill...... Division in Writ Petition No. 3005 of 1998 declaring the Memo No. 2862/Solicitor/96‑312/4 dated 13‑9‑1998 of the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Bangladesh cancelling the appointment of the petitioner as Special Public Prosecutor illegal and wi......upreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others .......Appellants Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and othe......p; Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others .......Appellants Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and others……..................Respondents Ju..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 201
SM Jillur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....aring of the Sessions Case No. 120 of 1993 of the 3rd Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Dhaka. The appointment was made by the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs (Solicitor Wing) Government of Bangladesh by the letter dated June 8, 1997. By the letter dated September 13, 1998 t...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J SM Jillur Rahman ..............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others .......................Respondents Judgment April 5, 2004......Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J SM Jillur Rahman ..............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others .......................Respondents Judgment April 5, 2004. T......nbsp; Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J SM Jillur Rahman ..............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others .......................Respondents Judgment A..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 259
Shakawat Hassan Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 244. ...... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 244. ...... case No.2633 of 2004. Judgment Khademul Islam Chowdhury J.-This is an application for anticipatory bail under section 498 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Perused the application and heard the learned Advocate. 3. It is stated in the application that the accused petitioner ......gh Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Khademul Islam Chowdhury J Afzal Hossain Ahmed J Shakawat Hassan.................................Petitioner Vs. State.................................................Opposite Party Judgment &nb..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 4 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 1
Alauddin Sikder (Md) & anr. Vs. BD and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ort of the petition, Mr. Prabir Haider, the learned Advocate, submits, inter alia, that High Court Division committed error in not considering that the administration and management of a Non‑Government Intermediate College having School Section is vested with Governing Body of the Institut...... Alauddin Sikder (Md) and another……………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others ....…….............Respondents Judgment Mar......rt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Alauddin Sikder (Md) and another……………Petitioners &...... J Alauddin Sikder (Md) and another……………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others ....…….............Respondents Judgment..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 31 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 213
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Mridha & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....on Act, 1957 read with paragraph 59 of the Anti‑Corruption Manual. 25. Provision of section 3(2) of Anti-Corruption Act, 1957 reads as: Section 3(2): "Subject to any orders which the Government may make in this behalf, officers of the Bureau shall have throughout Bangladesh in rela......appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......n of Corruption Act, 1947, section 3 (2) of the Anti-corruption Act, 1957 read with paragraph 59 of the Anti-corruption Manual it is seen that investigation of an offence enumerated in Act II of 1947 and in the Schedule of Anti-corruption Act, 1957 by an Assistant Inspector of the Bureau of Anti-cor......lowed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 30 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 74
Ershad Ali Sikder (Md) Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....e are in respectful agreement with the aforesaid observation which manifests the correct exposition of law on the subject. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......der (Md).....................Petitioner Vs. State ...........................................Respondent Judgment March 22, 2004. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 105 Unless the impugned order shows error apparent on the f......nion could be arrived at on fresh evaluation of the evidence………(14) Cases Referred to- Zenith Packages Ltd vs Member, Labour Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and others 52 DLR (AD) 160; Zulfikar Ali Bhutto vs State PLD 1979 SC 741 and Ekushey Television Ltd...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Ershad Ali Sikder (Md).....................Petitioner Vs. State ...........................................Respondent Judgment..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 22 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 332
BRTC Vs. Md. Esken Mollick and anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....as come to a correct decision and there being no error in the said judgment, the appeal has no substance. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... ......SJR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh Road Transport Corporation .......................Appellant Vs. Md Esken Mollick and another.... Respondents Judgment March 16, 2004. The Employme......il) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh Road Transport Corporation .......................Appellant Vs. Md Esken Mollick and another.... Respondents Judgment March 16..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 16 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 99
Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ed in Writ Petition No. 5958 of 2003 summarily rejecting the same. The writ petition was filed impugning Memo, dated September 3, 2003 issued under the signature of Deputy Secretary (Pouro), Local Government Division of the Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co‑operatives ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) …………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh………………………… Responden...... March 16, 2004. The Pourashava Ordinance, 1977 (XXVI of 1977), Section 13(1) (d) The resolution of no-confidence taken against the petitioner upon due compliance of relevant law and such resolution having been approved by the competent authority, the order of removal of the pe...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) …………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh………………………&hellip..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 16 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 269
.... arises does not thereby become an industry as commonly understood. We hardly think in terms of an industry, when we have regard, for instance, to the rights and duties of master and servant, or of a Government and its secretariat, or the members of the medical profession working in a hospital. It w...... therefore, necessary to limit its scope on permissible grounds, having regard to the aim, scope and the object of the whole Act."
But before we consider the relevant Labour Legislations in Bangladesh we would like to consider certain earlier judgments passed by the Supreme Court of India ......t
High Court Division
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
ABM Khairul Haque J
Md. Miftahuddin Choudhury J
Chittagong City Corporation, represented by its Mayor and 3 others............Petitioners
Vs.
Md. Afzal Hossain and others ...........................Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
ABM Khairul Haque J
Md. Miftahuddin Choudhury J
Chittagong City Corporation, represented by its Mayor and 3 others............Petitioners
Vs.
Md. Afzal Hossain and others ..............................................Respondents
..
Category: Corporate Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 14 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 4
Jahangir Alam (Md) alias Zakir Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... to 10 (ten) years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months more. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (AD) 217. ......prisonment and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months more. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), Section 561A The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Articles 103 & 104 Considering the facts and circumstances of the cases and......................Petitioner Vs. State ....... Respondent Judgment March 9, 2004. Result: Maintaining the conviction, the sentence is modified to 10 (ten) years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months more. ......t Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Hussain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Jahangir Alam (Md) alias Zakir .....................Petitioner Vs. State ....... Respondent Judgment March 9, 2004. Result: Maintaining the convict..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 93
Ataur Rahman (Md.) another Vs. Edruc Limited, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... applications are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Amin Scales Ltd. and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987 BLD (AD) 259 = 39 DLR (AD) 201; Haridas Vs. Baroda Kishore, 27 Cal 38; Fardous Chowdhury Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 3 BLC (AD) 213; Bancharam Majumdar Vs. Adyanath Bhattacharja, ILR 36 Cal, ......are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Amin Scales Ltd. and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987 BLD (AD) 259 = 39 DLR (AD) 201; Haridas Vs. Baroda Kishore, 27 Cal 38; Fardous Chowdhury Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 3 BLC (AD) 213; Bancharam Majumdar Vs. Adyanath Bhattacharja, ILR 36 Cal, 936; Capt BS D...... Edruc Limited ..........................................Respondent Judgment March 3, 2004. Result: The applications are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Amin Scales Ltd. and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987 BLD (AD) 259 = 39 DLR (AD) 201; Haridas Vs. Baroda Kishore, 27 Cal 3......Supreme Court High Court Division (Statutory Original Civil Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Amirul Islam J Ataur Rahman (Md.) another......................Petitioners Vs. Edruc Limited ..........................................Respondent Judgment March..Category: Company Law | Date: 3 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 8
Govt. of BD. rep. by Sec., Min. of Post, T&T & ors. Vs. Abul Khair, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Post, Telegraph and Tele......peal No. 57 of 2002). Judgment Md. Faziul Karim J.- The Government of Bangladesh and others seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order of the Administrative Appe...... Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Post, Telegraph and Tele communication and others....................Petitioners Vs. Abul Khair........ Md. Tafazzal Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Post, Telegraph and Tele communication and others....................Petitioners Vs. Abul Khair.... Respondent Judgment February 23, 2004. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 23 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 125
903289351612261147902413759136134887813513212413313090391648910150