Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 8201-8220 of 8244 results.
Agrabad Hotel Ltd. & another Vs. Revenue Deputy Collector, Cox's Bazar & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t the appellant No. 1, a Public Limited Company and the appellant No. 2, Managing Director of the said Company filed the above mentioned writ petition stating, inter alia, that the Government of Bangladesh allotted 5 acres of land of Plot No. 14/4 of Mouza-Jhilwanja District-Cox's Bazar to ......e discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in discharging the Rule. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. No order of cost. Ed. ......e discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in discharging the Rule. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. No order of cost. Ed. ......p; Agrabad Hotel Ltd. & another..............Appellants Vs. Revenue Deputy Collector, Cox's Bazar & others...........Respondents Judgment 28th November 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by S.R. Khoshnabish Huq, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 127
The Vice-Chancellor Chittagong University Vs. Mohammad Nurul Amin Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....10. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......10. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......10. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The Vice-Chancellor Chittagong University .................Appellant Vs. Mohammad Nurul Amin Chowdhury. .............Respondents Judgment 3rd March 2004. Lawyers Involved: A.F.M. Hasan Ariff, Attorney General, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Hriday Ranjan Dey & another Vs. Niranjan Dey and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....of the trial Court it appears that the trial Court found that C.S. Khatinas Ext.2 and 2(a) stand in the name of Baishnab Charan Dey original raiyat in respect of the suit land on the basis of an oral Bangladeshi and that the defendant could not prove that the suit land belonged to Jituram. The defen......he High Court Division are set aside and those of the learned District Judge duly affirming those of the learned Munsif are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 16. ......he High Court Division are set aside and those of the learned District Judge duly affirming those of the learned Munsif are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 16. ......s Vs. Maran Bepari, 21 DLR (SC) 448; 30 DLR (SC); Mir Laik Ali Vs. Standard Vacuum Oil Company (ESSO) and Abdur Razzak, 16 DLR (SC) 287; Akrab Ali and others Vs. Zahiruddin Kari, 30 DLR (SC) 81. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....its. 4. No other submission of any significance has been made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed ......its. 4. No other submission of any significance has been made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed ......its. 4. No other submission of any significance has been made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed ......an Vested and Non-resident Property, Collectorate Building, P.S. Kotwali , Dhaka.........Petitioner Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others..........Respondents Judgment 23rd May 1999 Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior, (Md. Shahidul Alam Chowdhury, Advocate ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Moulana Serajul Haque Vs. Md. Saifullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t Division are hereby set aside and those of the learned District Judge, Chandpur passed in Title Appeal No. 139 1994 and 140 of 1994 are restored. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......t Division are hereby set aside and those of the learned District Judge, Chandpur passed in Title Appeal No. 139 1994 and 140 of 1994 are restored. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......t Division are hereby set aside and those of the learned District Judge, Chandpur passed in Title Appeal No. 139 1994 and 140 of 1994 are restored. There is no order of costs. Ed. .......M. Ruhul Amin J Moulana Serajul Haque ......Appellant.(In both the appeals). Vs. Md. Saifullah ......Respondent In both the appeals). Judgement 29 July 2003 Lawyers Involved: S.S. Haider, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-R..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & ors Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nterest of respondent Nos. 1,2 and 3 as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 1005 of 1984 for declaration of title in the first schedule land measuring 0.70 acres. The appellant and the Government of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Naogaon were impleaded as defendant and proforma ......n proper perspective and after assigning cogent reasons arrived at a correct conclusion and hence does not require interference by us. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......n proper perspective and after assigning cogent reasons arrived at a correct conclusion and hence does not require interference by us. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... M.A. Aziz J Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & others......Appellants. Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & others...... .Respondents. Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- Fo..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Abdul Matlib and others Vs. Abdul Malik, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below. No order as to cost. Ed. ......ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below. No order as to cost. Ed. ......ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below. No order as to cost. Ed. ......ainur Reza Chowdhury J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abdul Matlib and others.......Appellants. Vs. Abdul Malik...............Respondent Judgment 8th May 2002. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mr. Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate and J. N. D..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Abdus Quddus Vs. Administration of Waqf & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ......bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ......bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ......in J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdus Quddus.............Appellant. Vs. Administration of Waqf & others.............Respondents. Judgment 16th August 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Ahsanullah Patwar..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Md. Abdul Jalil Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......r Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 94
State Vs. Abul Kalam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ed respondent of the charge under Sections 328 and 420 of the Penal Code. 2. The facts disclosed in the leave petition, in short, are that P.W.1 A. K. M. Amirul Alam and employee of Bangladesh Bank was known to the accused Abdur Rashid @ Jahangir and Bachchu and that they requested......y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction. Ed. ......y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction. Ed. ...... Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The State...........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent Judgment August 3, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Ramzan Ali, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mr. B. Hossain, Ad..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Panna Biswas Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ......yed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Enamul Haque Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......dassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Sharif Uddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Janata Bank Vs. Khalilur Rahman, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ta Bank, 110, Motijheel Commercial Area, Police Station Motijheel, Dhaka and others..........Petitioners Vs. Mr. Khalilur Rahman...................Respondent Judgment 19th June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83
Srwardi Shaikh and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... Sayeed Ahammed J Srwardi Shaikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent Judgment 22nd July 2002 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Represented-Res..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Ali Akbor Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. ......ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. ......ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. .............Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Respondent Judgment 27th April 2002 Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ...... J Judgment 20th July 2002 Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others………………Petitioners. Vs. The State................................Respondent Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-Petitioners. Not Represent..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......this case a piece of stone can be termed as a weapon of offence under section 324 of the Penal Code…………………. (16) Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate (Subrata Chowdhury, Advocate with him), ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Abdul Hakim and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... costs. Ed ...... or part thereof from 15th of April, 1971 till alleged termination of his service on 18th January, 1993. The appeal is accordingly allowed in part without any order as to costs. Ed ...... or part thereof from 15th of April, 1971 till alleged termination of his service on 18th January, 1993. The appeal is accordingly allowed in part without any order as to costs. Ed ......d Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd..........Appellant Vs. Abdul Hakim and another..........Respondent Judgment 28th July 2004 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate (M. R. Hasan, Advocate with him) instructed..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 130
National Board of Revenue and others Vs. Mustafizur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
...., and section 5A of the Sales Tax Ordinance, 1982 (XVIII of 1982), the National Board of Revenue is pleased to direct that such of the goods specified in the Schedule as are temporarily imported into Bangladesh with a view to subsequent re-exportation be exempt from payment of whole of customs duty ...... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......p; National Board of Revenue and others...............Appellants Vs. Mustafizur Rahman ..................Respondent Judgment January 21, 2003. Result: The Appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: A. F. Hassan Ariff, Attorney General (Borhanuddin, Deputy Attorney Genera..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Mohiuddin and others Vs. Shwkat Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....to interfere with the same. 12. On the reasonings stated above, we do not find any substance in this appeal, which is, therefore, dismissed of contest without any order as to costs. Ed. ......to interfere with the same. 12. On the reasonings stated above, we do not find any substance in this appeal, which is, therefore, dismissed of contest without any order as to costs. Ed. ......to interfere with the same. 12. On the reasonings stated above, we do not find any substance in this appeal, which is, therefore, dismissed of contest without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohiuddin and others...........Appellants Vs. Shwkat Ali and others .......Respondents Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
375372371370369368365364363362361360359357356355354352351350