Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 921-940 of 7814 results.

Nazim Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....zowan Ali J Md. Abu Tariq J Nazim………………….......Appellant Vs. State………………….......Respondent Judgment March 29, 2006. Result: The Rule is made absolute. The Limitation Act, 1908 (Act No. IX of 1908); section 5 The con......ation of delay always depends upon the discretion of the Court concerned. If the Court is satisfied as to the reason and explanation of the delay, it can be condoned.........................(5) Lawyers Involved:  Sultan Ahmed Miah, Advocate - For the Appellant.  Farah Mahmu..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: 29 Mar, 2006 | Hits: 32

Government of Bangladesh Vs. Kalimuddin Pramanic and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....lip;…Petitioner Vs. Kalimuddin Pramanic and others…………………..Opposite Parties Judgment March 28, 2006. Result: The Rule is made abso­lute. Cases Referred to- Jafar Ali Vs. Khagendra Chandra Dutta and o......abso­lute. Cases Referred to- Jafar Ali Vs. Khagendra Chandra Dutta and others, 1983 BLD 32; Abdul Majid and others Vs. The Province of East Pakistan and others, (1971) 23 DLR 203. Lawyers Involved: Rubaiyat Hossain, Assistant Attorney-General-For the Petitioner. No one ..

Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 28 Mar, 2006 | Hits: 4

Ms. Ok Kyung Oh Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....mplaint in Nari-O-Shishu Case no.18 of 2005 by Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal, is upheld. 24. Copy be sent down accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 26. ......e of sexual harassment under Penal Code in Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal under section 27(3) of the Ain …………………………………(21) Cases referred to- Pakistan Criminal Law Journal, Lahore (1983) Page 2241; AIR 1928 Patna page 359; Ansarulla Molla Vs. Hamid Ulla and ot..

Category: Women and Children | Date: 22 Mar, 2006 | Hits: 84

Md. Delwar Hossain Vs. State represented the DC, Narayanganj & another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.11.2002 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in write petition No. 5684 of 2002 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the petitioner was charged and convicted under sections 8 and 9 ......r Vs. The State, represented the Deputy Commissioner, Narayanganj & another …..Respondents Judgment March 9, 2006. Result: The petition is dis­missed. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kazi Akter Hamid, Advocate, instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-..

Category: Women and Children | Date: 9 Mar, 2006 | Hits: 127

Kishore Kumar Dutta Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....en on bail in the Criminal Appeal, bail bond furnished by him stands discharge. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 BLT (HCD) (2007) 174. ......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Appellant Vs. The State……………………………................Respondent Judgment February 20, 2006. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Kamruzzaman with Parvez Ahmed - For convict-appellant. A.S. Md. Ramz..

Category: Women and Children | Date: 20 Feb, 2006 | Hits: 127

Rafiqul Islam (Md.) Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....dhan. Advocate—For the Petitioner. Ireen Mahahub, Deputy Attorney-General—For the State-Opposite Party. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 13459 of 2005. Judgment Md. Abu Tariq J. - This Rule is directed against an order passed by the learned Judge, Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal......……………………………………………………..Opposite Party. Judgment February 13, 2006. Cases Referred to- AIR 1949 Mad 77; Lakhi Naragam Kundu Vs. Crown, 4 DLR 352. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Latif Prodhan. Advocate—For the Petitioner. Ireen Mahahub, Deputy At..

Category: Women and Children | Date: 13 Feb, 2006 | Hits: 98

Md. Abdul Hannan alias Khalil Vs. Sate and another, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

.... Send down the lower Court's records at once with a copy of the judgment for information and for taking necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 291. ......€¦â€¦â€¦(23) Cases Referred to- Nazrul Islam Chowdhury Vs. The State, 19 BLD (AD) 18; Abdul Hakim Vs. The State, 45 DLR 352; M. Alam Chowdhury and 9 others Vs. The State, 6 BLC 220. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Alim Miah, Advocate - For the appellant. Md. Alamgir Kabir, As..

Category: Women and Children | Date: 7 Feb, 2006 | Hits: 78

Moju Bibi and others Vs. Abdul Aziz and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....ip;……………………………………….Opposite Parties Judgment January 25, 2006. Result: The Rule is discharged. Case Referred to- Sachindra Lal Das and others Vs. Hriday Ranjan Das b......ary 25, 2006. Result: The Rule is discharged. Case Referred to- Sachindra Lal Das and others Vs. Hriday Ranjan Das being his heirs Bimal Kanti Das and others, 40 DLR (AD) 56. Lawyers Involved: Md. Tafazzal Hossain- For the Petitioners. Md. Abdul Quddus Mia- For th..

Category: Property Law, Procedural Law | Date: 25 Jan, 2006 | Hits: 5

M. Manzur Ahmed Vs. Mrs. Inge Flatz and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

.... liberty to get the sale deed executed and registered through court in accordance with law. Send down the L.C.R. at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 41. ...... to prove contract between the plaintiff and the defen­dant and whether the plaintiff is ready and willing at all material dates to perform his part of the contract…………………(31) Law under section 101 of the Evi­dence Act is that the burden of proof lies with the party who su..

Category: Property Law | Date: 15 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 8

M/S. Uttara Properties Ltd. Vs. Joint District Judge and Artharin Adalat No.1, Dhaka and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....…………………Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge and Artharin Adalat No.1, Dhaka and others…………Re­spondents Judgment December 15, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Act No. VIII of 2003); se......n giving such opportu­nity has not been curtailed by the legislature in order to close the door of justice. …………………..(7) Cases Referred to- 57 DLR 164=25 BLD 171 Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahmud with Md. Waliur Reza Chaudhury-For the Petitioner. Raf..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 15 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 19

Abdul Aziz & Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hindu Deity Luxmi Gobinda Jew & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....dgment MM Ruhul Amin J.- These appeals by leave are from the judgment and order dated 16.08.1998 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 455 of 1981 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff insti­tuted Title Suit No. 34 of 1970 in t......operty as secular property, which, in fact was not the legal position…………………….(15) Case Referred to- Sukumar Bose and others Vs. Abani Kumar Haider and others 60 C.W.N.778. Lawyers Involved: A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate- on-Record for the Appellant (In Civil Appeal ..

Category: Property Law | Date: 8 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 90

International Finance Investment and Commerce Bank Limited Vs. M/S. Marinar Fashions Wear Pvt. Ltd. and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....Haque J.-This appeal arises in respect of an order dated 5.4.2004 passed by the Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka, in Artha Rin Execution Case No.1 of 2003, rejecting an application under Order XXI Rule 98 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 57 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, prayi......se its such Jurisdiction as provided in rules 97 and 98 under Order XXI of the Code read with section 26 of the Act, and give necessary directions to execute its order……………………(20) Lawyers Involved: Md. Zafor Ali Khan, Advocate-For the Appellant. None-For the Respondent. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 22

Most. Musarraf Sultana Vs. Principal and Member-Secretary, Kanchipara Mahabidhyalaya and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Petitioner Vs. Principal and Member-Secretary, Kanchipara Mahabidhyalaya and others……Opposite Parties Judgment December 6, 2005. Result: The Rule is made abso­lute. Failure and/or frustration of the ancillary/auxiliary relief ca......igRam and others, 48 DLR (AD) 154; Abdul Mazid Howlader and another Vs. Lahajuddin Howlader & ors., 48 DLR (AD)(1996) 160; Safaruddin and others Vs. Fazlul Huq and others, 5 BLT (AD) 201. Lawyers Involved: Md. Mazibar Rahman, with Gouranga Chandra Kar, Advocates-For the Petitioners..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 6 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 6

Abdul Sobahan and others Vs. Noresh Chandra Mondal and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.Defendant-Petitioners Vs. Noresh Chandra Mondal and others……………………..Plaintiff Opposite parties Judgment December 4, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Zakir Hossain - For the petitioners. Momtazud......t-Petitioners Vs. Noresh Chandra Mondal and others……………………..Plaintiff Opposite parties Judgment December 4, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Zakir Hossain - For the petitioners. Momtazuddin Ahmed - For the Oppos..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: 4 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 3

Industries Chemie BV Vs. SMA Quddus and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....ellip;…………………..Applicant Vs. SMA Quddus and another..................Respondents Judgment November 30, 2005. Result: The Rule is disposed of. The Registrar of trademarks shall not exercise any power vested in him by ......concerned an opportunity of being heard. Cases Referred to-  Coca-Cola Company Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, 6 BLC 522; Nabisco Inc USA Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, 2002 BLD 640. Lawyers Involved:  Md. Ohiullah, Advocate — For the Appellant. No one — F..

Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: 30 Nov, 2005 | Hits: 142

State Vs. Maku Rabi Das, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....d. Connected jail appeal stands dismissed accordingly. Send down the LCRs along with copy of the judgment to the Court below immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 229.......d. Jail appeal stands dismissed.  Cases Referred to- Yusuf Sk Vs. Appellate Tribunal, 29 DLR (SC) 211; State Vs. Rokeya Begum and another, 13 BLT 377 = 10 BLC 687. Lawyers Involved: Fazilatun Nessa, Deputy Attorney-General with Nasreen Akhter, Assistant Attor..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: 21 Nov, 2005 | Hits: 82

Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....nbsp; 8.  In such view of the matter we do not find any illegality in the judgment passed by the courts below. The criminal petition is, therefore, dismissed.  Ed. ......lip;……………………………………..Respondent  Judgment October 23, 2005    Lawyers Involved:  Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, (S.M. Shajahan, Advocate, with him), in..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: 23 Oct, 2005 | Hits: 83

Cox's Bazar Pourashava Vs. Bangladesh and Others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

.... Bazar……Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and Others……………………………………………………………………….Respondents Judgment August 30, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Government of Bangladesh Vs. M/S. Eastern Industries .......Respondents Judgment August 30, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Government of Bangladesh Vs. M/S. Eastern Industries (BD) Limited, 14 B.L.D (AD) 254. Lawyers Involved: Idrisur Rahman with Md. Shahidullah and Pratikar Chakma-For the Petitioner. ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 30 Aug, 2005 | Hits: 39

Ali Imam Vs. Executive Engineer, Gaibandha and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....lip;……Petitioner Vs. Executive Engineer, Gaibandha and others……………Opposite Parties Judgment August 29, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. Section 114 of the Code empowers a Court to review its own judgment and mak......n Vs. Controller of Estate Duty, PLD 1962 (SC) 335 = 14 DLR (SC) 276; Chajju Ram Vs. Neki and others, (1922) Lloyd's Rep XLIX IA 144; Abdul Karim Vs. Arch Bishop and another, 36 DLR (AD) 38. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim with MA Harun, Advocate‑ For the Petitioner. Md. Joynul A..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 29 Aug, 2005 | Hits: 1

World Tel Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... Md. Fazlul Karim J.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 23-4-2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5135 of 2004 discharging the Rule challenging the Memo No. BTRC/LL-Sec/WorldTel/2002-1032 dated 20-4-2004 issued by respondent No......es Referred to- Dip Narain Singh vs Nayasher Prased and others, AIR 1930 (All) 1 (FB); Kalavagunta Venkata Kristnayya and others vs Kalavagunta Venkatachalam and others, 32 Mad 185 (DB); 4 Bombay Law Reports 948 (DB); Janu Sait vs Ramaswami Naidu, AIR 1923 Madras 626; Somu Pillai vs The Municipa..

Category: Information Technology Law | Date: 25 Aug, 2005 | Hits: 331