Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 941-960 of 7814 results.
....sented by the Secretary, Ministry of Communications, Bangladesh
Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others…………..............ReÂspondents
Judgment
August 15, 2005.
Result:
The Rule is discharged.
Cases Referred to-
51 DLR (AD) 24; 54
DLR (AD) 88; 55 DLR 171, 57 DLR......
51 DLR (AD) 24; 54
DLR (AD) 88; 55 DLR 171, 57 DLR (AD) 1; Tata Cellular Vs. Union of InÂdia A.I.R.
1996 S.C. 11; AssociÂated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. Vs. Wednesbury
Corporation.
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Ozair Faruque-For the Petitioner.
M. Amirul Islam-For Respondent No..
Category: Others | Date: 15 Aug, 2005 | Hits: 6
....ed by the Secretary, Ministry of Land and Land Administration & ors............................................................Respondents
Judgment
August 9, 2005.
Result:
The Rule is discharged.
The provisions as contemplated under section 5(7) of the Emergency Requisit....... Abdul Wahhab Mia and others, 4 BLC (AD) 1; Abdul Motaleb and others Vs. Fazle Karim and others, 1997 MLR (AD) 192; Ali Ahmed and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 55 DLR (AD) 92.
Lawyers Involved:
Mahbubey Alam with Zulfiquar Ahmed, Advocates- For the Petitioners.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: 9 Aug, 2005 | Hits: 4
Bangladesh Legal Aid and Service Trust (BLAST) Vs. Bangladesh & another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ervice Trust (Blast)………………………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh & one another……………………………Respondents Judgment August 2, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Qudrati Elahi Panir etc. Vs. Government of Banglade......R 2001 SC 724; R. Vs. H.M. Treasury ex-parte Smedley, (1985) 1 All ER 589; R Vs. Electricity Comrs, ex P London Electricity Joint Committee Co., (1920) Ltd. (1924) I KB 171; (1923) All ER Rep 150. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain with Tanjibul Alam, Ms. Amatul Karim and Ms. Sadeka Jahan, Ad..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 2 Aug, 2005 | Hits: 343
Raqib Sheikh (Md.) Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....wn the lower Court's records at once with a copy of this judgment for information and taking necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 568. ......lip;………………………………Respondent-State Judgment July 27, 2005. Result: The Appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate‑ For the Appellant. Md. Faisal Hossai..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 27 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 1
Sadeque @ Sadequr Rahman Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....er case. Send down the lower Court records at once with a copy of this judgment for information and taking necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (HCD) (2009) 498. ...... State, 42 DLR (AD) 186; Senu Mia Vs. State, 3 BLC 441; Angur Vs. State, 41 DLR 66; Abu Taker Vs. State, 1991 BLD (AD) 80; State Vs. Monu Mia, 54 DLR (AD) 60; Abul Hossain Vs. State, 46 DLR 77. Lawyers Involved: Md. Munsurul Hoque Chowdhury, Advocate — For the Appellant. Parvin H..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 27 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 9
Md. Azizur Rahman Vs. Mosammat Nazmun Nahar, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....;..........Petitioner Vs. Mosammat Nazmun Nahar………………………Opposite party Judgment July 26, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. The Evidence Act, 1872 (Act No. I of 1872), section 35 The voter list......oter list……………………(11) Cases Referred to- Arun Kumar Vs. the State, 10 BLT (AD) 40; Aysha Sultana Vs. Shahajahan Ali, 38 DLR 140. Lawyers Involved: Md. Giashuddin Ahmed - For the petitioner. Md. Harun-or-Rashid, Advocat..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 26 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 169
....ion No.4585 of 1997 have been disposed of by the same judgment as both the writ petitions have arisen out of the same fact and being governed by the same law.
2. In Writ Petition No.4470 of 1996 Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why they should not be directed to ......of Bangladesh, 44 DLR (AD) 111; Serajul Islam (Md.) Vs. Director General of Food, 42 DLR (AD) 199; SP Sampad Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 385; JB Chopor Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 page 357.
Lawyers Involved:
Abu Bakkar Siddique, Advocate‑ For the Petitioner
SAM Mahbub Elahi, De..
Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 24 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 8
Masud Rana Vs. National Board of Revenue & others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....o the genuinity of objection or point of law in the impugned order in the same way when leave is granted in a writ petition or Civil Appeal preferred against the order under the provision of order 41 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The provision of section 196F and 196G clearly mandate that ......rd of Revenue & others………………Respondents (Customs Appeal No.17 of 2005) Judgment July 24, 2005. Result: Appeals are allowed. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ahmed, Advocate- For the Appellant. A.B.M. Nurul Islam, senior..Category: Family Law, Women and Children | Date: 24 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 109
Shafiuddin Vs. Samir Bhuiyan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....Khan with Ozair Farooq, Moinuddin Advocates- For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.784 of 2005. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- One Shafiuddin who was elected chairman obtained the Rule upon making an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against judgment an......Bank, 37 DLR (AD) 1; ASF Rahman Vs. Bangladesh Bank, 52 DLR (AD) 61; Director, National Bank Vs. Bangladesh Bank, 2 BLC 20; IFIC Bank and others Vs. Beximco Holdings Ltd. and others, 57 DLR 154. Lawyers Involved: Amir-ul-Islam with Tania Amir, Dr. Shirin Sharmin Chowdhury & Moniruzzam..Category: Civil Law, Election Law | Date: 13 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 7
Ashraful Alam (Md.) Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....llip;…................................Petitioner Vs. State.......................................................Opposite Party Judgment July 4, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Shyam Sunder Vs. State of Chhatisgors, 202 CrLJ ......d. Sadeq Sarker, 50 DLR 181; Amina Bibi alias Amena Bibi and another Vs. State, 1984 BLD 144; Raman Lal Rathi Vs. State AIR 1951 Cal. 305; Ukha Kolhe Vs. State of Maharashtra AIR 1963 (SC) 1531. Lawyers Involved: Nitai Roy Chowdhury with Nuro Nabi, Advocates- For the Petitioner. ..Category: Family Law | Date: 4 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 2
Pushpa Rani Saha Podder Vs. Rash Mohan Saha, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....Ruhul Amin, J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.11.1994 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1244 of 1987 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the subject matter of the dispute is a parcel of land with a two s......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Appellant Vs. Rash Mohan Saha being dead his heirs: Kartick Chowdhury Saha & others………..Respondent Judgment July 4, 2005. Result: The Appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. Md. Aftab Hossain..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 127
Saeeda Yasmin and others Vs. Capital Service Center Ltd and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....udgment  Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment of February 5, 2003 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 235 of 2002 discharging the Rule which was obtained impugning the order dated 8‑11‑2001 (Order No. 43 dated 8‑11‑2001) o......gning the reason of arriving at the decision taken. In spite of that even if the order itself be not elaborate or speaking but if the decision is taken is proper, the order passed is sustainable. Lawyers Involved: AM Mahbubuddin, Advocate (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed b..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 98
Md. Abu Aslam Advocate Vs. Rajshahi University and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... being repÂresented by its Vice Chancellor and others……………………………………………………………Opposite Parties Judgment June 25, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absoÂlute. The question of maintainability of the suit should be decreed i......man Chowdhury and others, 9 DLR 467; 26 DLR 100; 37 DLR 83; Abu Taher Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 11 DLR (AD) 2; AbÂdul Hamid Kazi Vs. Abdul Jabbar Jamadar and others, 26 DLR (SC) 6. Lawyers Involved: M.I. Farooqui with Md. Ruhul Quddus and Nazneen Nahar, Advocates- For the Pe..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 25 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 7
Swapon Kumar Gain Vs. Amita Golder, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....”For the Petitioner. Gobinda Chandra Tagore, Advocate—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 4785 of 2000 with Civil Revision No. 1058 of 2001. Judgment Bijan Kumar Das J.- By these Rules the opposite party was called upon to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree da......ibur Rahman (Md) vs. Shakila Begum and others reported in 53 DLR 152, Utpal Kanti Das vs Monju Rani Das, 50 DLR (AD) 47, 53 DLR 152, 42 DLR 483, 38 DLR (AD) 172, 35 DLR 160, 2 BLC 509, 34 DLR 221. Lawyers Involved: Minal Kanti Biswas, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Gobinda Chandra Tagore, A..Category: Family Law | Date: 25 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 237
Md. Joinul Abedin Vs. Government of Peoples' Republic of Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....retary, Ministry of Education, Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka and others…………………Respondents Judgment June 22, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. There was no allegation of misconduct or incompetency against the petiti......lawful authority.....................(8) Cases Referred to- M/S Jubiles Syndicate Vs. Collector of Customs, (1968) 20 DLR 300; The University of Dhaka Vs. Zakir Ahmed, 16 DLR (SC) 722. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Islam, Advocate-For the Petitioner. Md. Khashruzzaman, Advocat..Category: Civil Law | Date: 22 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 3
Golam Hossain Sikder (Md.) and others Vs. Deputy Commissioner & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....in Sikder (Md.) and others................Petitioners Vs. Deputy Commissioner & ors.............................Opposite Parties Judgment June 19, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. State Acquisition and Tenancy Act (XXVIII of 1951); Section 85 Code......ince the instant suit is a Civil Suit but appeal pending in the Bhumi Appeal Board is not a Civil Suit, the principle of res judicata will not be claimed here…………(12) Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, with Abul Quashem, Md. Abul Bashar, Moinuddin and Ariful Islam-For t..Category: Property Law | Date: 19 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 3
Jamuna Television Limited and another Vs. angladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....n Limited and another....................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others...........................................Respondents Judgment June 16, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Bangladesh Telecommunication Act (Act No.XVIII of 2001) In the......munication Act, 2001 could only be cancelled or suspended by it by following the procedure of section 46 of the Act after giving the licensee proper notice and hearing……..(71) Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate with Ahsanul Karim with Faheemul Huq and Rabe..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: 16 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 4
Kazi Mahbubuddin Ahmed alias Mahbub Vs. State, represented by the DC, Dhaka, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....f required. Courts dealing with criminal eases at least constantly remember that there is a long mental distance between "may be true" and "must be true" and this Basic and Golden Rule only helps to maintain the vital distinction between "conjecture" and "sure conc...... State of Kerala and others Vs. Revada Chandrasekhar and others, 2001 SCC (Crl) 1048; Woolmington Vs. Director of Public Prosecutions, (1935) AC 462; Zilu Mia and others Vs. State, 1988 BLD 418. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubur Rahman with Zainal Abedin and Md. Abu Taher, Advocates- For Convict..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 15 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 7
Hamida Begum Vs. Mosharef Hossein Sikder and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Petitioner Vs. Mosharef Hossein Sikder son of Late AbÂdul Mannan Sikder and others………………State Judgment June 15, 2005. Result: Rule is absolute. Lawyers Involved: Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate-For the Petitioner. ......€¦â€¦Petitioner Vs. Mosharef Hossein Sikder son of Late AbÂdul Mannan Sikder and others………………State Judgment June 15, 2005. Result: Rule is absolute. Lawyers Involved: Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate-For the Petitioner. A.B.M. Waliur Rahman K..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 15 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 2
Emarat Ali Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
..............................Opposite Party Judgment June 14, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the petitioner is entitled to con......p;…..(28-30) Cases Referred to- Masum Ali and others Vs. State, 37 DLR 261; Montu Miah Vs. Akhlakur Rahman, 28 DLR 74; Jamir Hossain and others Vs. Crown, PLD 1949 (Lahore) 179. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Matin Khasru with Habibur Rahman and Farhad Ahmed‑ For the Petitioner..Category: Criminal Law, Limitation Law | Date: 14 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 1
866889737861893686438028897284198933903326910086674635870589568911892286868988