Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Azima Begum Vs. Yusuf Khan (Md) and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....and the parties will be at liberty to take such steps as advised for hearing of the Rule. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (AD) (1991) 53. ......lso Reported in: 43 DLR (AD) (1991) 53. ...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: M H Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Azima Begum......................................Appellant Vs. Yusuf Khan (Md) and others ...................Respondents Judgment February 14, 1......te instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 1. B. Hossain, Deputy Attorney‑General instructed by Mr. Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent No.2 (State). Criminal Appeal No.43 of 1986. (From the Judgment and order dated 25.9.86 passed b..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 14 Feb, 1990 | Hits: 58
Anisuzzaman Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....roject authority. In the result, I allow the appeal with the aforesaid observation. The appellant is released from his bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 35. ......roject authority. In the result, I allow the appeal with the aforesaid observation. The appellant is released from his bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 35. ...... High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: A M Mahmudur Rahman J Anisuzzaman alias Anis @ Alinur Rahman @ Peara .............................Appellant Vs. The State .......................................................................................t Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: A M Mahmudur Rahman J Anisuzzaman alias Anis @ Alinur Rahman @ Peara .............................Appellant Vs. The State .....................................................................................Responden..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 4 Feb, 1990 | Hits: 86
Monindra Kumar Malaker Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....ce by us. In the result, this appeal is dismissed and the judgment of acquittal passed by the Special Tribunal is hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 349. ......llant Vs. The State…………………………………………………..Respondents Judgment August 16, 1989. Result: This appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Firoza Begum Vs. Hormuz Ali & another, 40 DLR 161; Abdul Halim Mollah alias Monohar Mollah and another ...... 349. ......eme Court High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Rahman J Md. Mozammel Hoque J Monindra Kumar Malaker......................Appellant Vs. The State…………………………………………………..Respondents Judgment August 16..Category: Women and Children | Date: 16 Aug, 1989 | Hits: 153
Manindra Kumar Malakar Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....e copy of this order be communicated to the Deputy Commissioner, Gazipur and the Jailor, Gazipur District Jail at once for compliance. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 71. ......an 16 years, then father/ guardian will not be entitled to claim her guardianship and the girl will be treated as major and she will be allowed to go anywhere she likes. The decision in Jahanara Begum alias Joisna Rani Saha and another Vs. The State, 15 DLR (Dhaka) 148 has got full application ......ision (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Rahman J Md. Mozammel Hoque J Manindra Kumar Malakar................................................Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & others ................Opposite Parties Judg......titled to claim her guardianship and the girl will be treated as major and she will be allowed to go anywhere she likes. The decision in Jahanara Begum alias Joisna Rani Saha and another Vs. The State, 15 DLR (Dhaka) 148 has got full application in the facts and circumstances of this case. ......Category: Women and Children | Date: 14 Aug, 1989 | Hits: 104
Circle Officer, Sutrapur Vs. Mohammad, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
.... the Rule is made absolute without any order as to cost. Let a copy of this judgment be sent to the District Judge, Dhaka immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 84. ...... the Rule is made absolute without any order as to cost. Let a copy of this judgment be sent to the District Judge, Dhaka immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 84. ......n (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hossain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J Circle Officer, Sutrapur.....................Petitioner Vs. Mohammad ...................................Opposite Party Judgment August 9, 19......stance of the case as he looks after the cases in which Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka is a party. He had stated in his affidavit that before the decree was drawn up against the Government on 27.3.88 the State representing the petitioners applied for the certified copy of the judgment and decree on 24.3..Category: Limitation Law | Date: 9 Aug, 1989 | Hits: 178
Ananda and others Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....not wanted in connection with any other case. The suo motu Rule for enhancement is discharged. Send down the L.C. records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 533......., 1974 in Special Tribunal Case No.12 of 1986. 2. The complainant Mofizuddin Molla lodged an ejahar with the Kotwali Police Station, Faridpur on 11.2.86 alleging that on 9.3.86 his daughter Afroza Begum alias Belly aged about 14 years went to Nasima's house to return a book. On her way back she m......33....... Court High Court Division (Dhaka Bench) (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Anwarul Hoque Choudhury J Ananda and others..............................Appellant Vs. The State............................Respondent Judgment May 24, 1989. Result: The appeal is..Category: Women and Children | Date: 24 May, 1989 | Hits: 143
Hazrat Ali & Abdur Rahman Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....emned prisoner Hazrat Ali with the modification of sentence of both the condemned prisoners from death to imprisonment for life. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990)177. ...... Cases Referred to- Salahuddin Vs. The State, 32 DLR 227; Joygun Bibi Vs. State, 12 DLR (SC) 157 (Rel 159-para-9); 12 DLR (SC) 156;16 DLR (SC) 598; 19 DLR 819; 31 DLR 316; 32 DLR 227; Shafali Begum and another Vs. The State, 1 B.C.R. (1981) 105; S.C.R.1979 (Vol) page 417; Abdur Rouf and othe......l Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Habibur Rahman Khan J Hazrat Ali & Abdur Rahman...............Condemned Prisoner & Appellant Vs. The State.........................................Respondent Judgment April 26......risdiction) Present: Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Habibur Rahman Khan J Hazrat Ali & Abdur Rahman...............Condemned Prisoner & Appellant Vs. The State.........................................Respondent Judgment April 26, 1989. R..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 26 Apr, 1989 | Hits: 152
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 18 Apr, 1989 | Hits: 87
Category: Women and Children | Date: 13 Dec, 1988 | Hits: 193
Jalaluddin Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....der of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Divisional Special Judge is right. In the result, I dismiss the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 87. ......der of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Divisional Special Judge is right. In the result, I dismiss the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 87. ......(1989) 87. ...... Supreme Court High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: AM Mahmudur Rahman J Jalaluddin Ahmed Chowdhury……………... Appellant Vs. The State.............................. Respondents Judgment March 23, 1988. Cases Referr..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 23 Mar, 1988 | Hits: 32
Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....is satisfied that the accused will indulge in prejudicial activities if he is allowed to remain at large. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 178; BCR 1988 (AD) 89. ......egal and the detenu is being held in custody without any lawful authority…………………(19 & 20) Cases Referred to- Govt. of West Pakistan Vs. Begum Abdul Karim 21 DLR (SC) 1(11); Mir Abdul Baqui Bliuch Vs. Government of Pakistan 20 DLR SC 249......Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu...........................Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment March 20, ......llip;(19 & 20) Cases Referred to- Govt. of West Pakistan Vs. Begum Abdul Karim 21 DLR (SC) 1(11); Mir Abdul Baqui Bliuch Vs. Government of Pakistan 20 DLR SC 249 (257); Godavari S. Vs. State of Maharashtra AIR 1966 (SC) 1404; Ram Bali Rajbhar Vs. The State of West Bengal AIR 1975..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Mar, 1988 | Hits: 95
Firoza Begum Vs. Hormuz Ali & another, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
....appeal is, therefore, not maintainable on this ground also. The appeal accordingly is summarily dismissed on the grounds suited above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (1988) 161.......so Reported in: 40 DLR (1988) 161.......ourt High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Abdul Bari Sarkar J Firoza Begum …………………….Appellant Vs. Hormuz Ali & another..............Respondents Judgment July 29, 1987. Lawyers I......…….Appellant Vs. Hormuz Ali & another..............Respondents Judgment July 29, 1987. Lawyers Involved: Abul Kashem, Advocate - For the Appellant. Not Represented - the State. Criminal Appeal No. 412 of 1978 Judgment Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J. ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 29 Jul, 1987 | Hits: 112
Sreemati Parul Kusum Roy Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
.... -For the Respondents 6-9. Writ Petition No.73 of 1986. Judgment Amin-ur-Rahman Khan J. - This Rule is directed against the order of the respondent No.3, namely the Upazila Nirbahi Officer, Anowara dated 14.09.85 declaring the disputed properties as vested property on the recommendation of......declared to have been passed without any lawful authority and to be no legal effect. Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 389. ...... Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J Sreemati Parul Kusum Roy…………………………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh & others…………………………………………..Respondents Judgm......declared to have been passed without any lawful authority and to be no legal effect. Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 389. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 22 Mar, 1987 | Hits: 13
Category: Evidence Law | Date: 16 Sep, 1986 | Hits: 259
Mansur Ali Vs. State, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....trial in accordance with law. The appeal is, therefore, disposed of accordingly. Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 184. ......trial in accordance with law. The appeal is, therefore, disposed of accordingly. Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 184. ......t Division (Rangpur Bench) (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Daliluddin Ahmed J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J Mansur Ali.............................Accused-Appellant Vs. State……………………………………………..Respondent Judgment May 13, ......on (Rangpur Bench) (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Daliluddin Ahmed J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J Mansur Ali.............................Accused-Appellant Vs. State……………………………………………..Respondent Judgment May 13, 1986. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 13 May, 1986 | Hits: 30
Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....eration of this judgment and order be stayed for a period of two months from today. Sultan Hossain Khan J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 78. ......eration of this judgment and order be stayed for a period of two months from today. Sultan Hossain Khan J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 78. ......ion (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: S Hossain Khan J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd…………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Refo......i, A.I.R. 1973 (SC) 205; Chittagong Pourasava Vs. Md. Ajmal Khan, 4 BSCR page 5; E.P. Sugar Mills, AIR 1979 (SC) at page 621; Indo-Afgan Agencies Case, AIR 1969 (SC) 718; Radhakrishna Agarmal Vs. The State of Bihar, AIR. 1977 (SC) at page 1496; AIR1973 (SC), at page 205; AIR 1975 (Madras) at page 81..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 23 Apr, 1986 | Hits: 247
Ruhul Amin Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....cord be sent down with a copy of this order at once. Md. Abdul Jalil J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 166. ......cord be sent down with a copy of this order at once. Md. Abdul Jalil J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 166. ...... (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Ruhul Amin........................................Petitioner Vs. The State..........................................Opposite party Judgment March ......nal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Ruhul Amin........................................Petitioner Vs. The State..........................................Opposite party Judgment March 19, 1986. ..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 19 Mar, 1986 | Hits: 3
Mst. Ayesha Sultana @ Minu Vs. Md. Shahjahan Ali, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....ce to pay a fine of Tk. 1000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months. Latifur Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 140. ......ce to pay a fine of Tk. 1000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months. Latifur Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 140. ......sent: Latifur Rahman J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Mst. Ayesha Sultana @ Minu………………………………...Appellant Vs. Md. Shahjahan Ali………………………&h................Respondent Judgment March 17, 1986. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Awlad Ali—For the Appellant. Syiedur Rahman Mean—For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 314 of 1983. Judgment Amia-ur-Rahman Khan J.- This appeal ..Category: Family Law | Date: 17 Mar, 1986 | Hits: 1
Abdul Awal Vs. Abdul Mannan & another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ses in the same court according to the proceeding governing trials of cross-cases. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 254. ......ses in the same court according to the proceeding governing trials of cross-cases. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 254. ......he Accused and trial of two cases in the same Court according to the procedure of trial of Cross Cases is proper. The Petition is dismissed………..(5) Cases Referred To- Shahed Ali Vs. State, (1961) 13 DLR 414; Falak Sher v. State, (1967) 19 DLR 426 (SC). Lawyers Involved: ......ccused and trial of two cases in the same Court according to the procedure of trial of Cross Cases is proper. The Petition is dismissed………..(5) Cases Referred To- Shahed Ali Vs. State, (1961) 13 DLR 414; Falak Sher v. State, (1967) 19 DLR 426 (SC). Lawyers Involved: T..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 16 Mar, 1986 | Hits: 77
Shaikh Obaidul Haq Vs. The State & another, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....litan Magistrate, Dhaka be quashed. Latifur Rahman, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 105. ......litan Magistrate, Dhaka be quashed. Latifur Rahman, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 105. ......ivision (Dhaka Bench) (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Rahman J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Shaikh Obaidul Haq..............................Petitioner Vs. The State & another............................Opposite Parties Judgment Febr......(Dhaka Bench) (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Rahman J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Shaikh Obaidul Haq..............................Petitioner Vs. The State & another............................Opposite Parties Judgment February 20, 1986..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Feb, 1986 | Hits: 1