Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1001-1020 of 7814 results.
Mizanur Rahman (Md.) Vs. Commissioner of Customs and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... Mizanur Rahman (Md.)...................................Petitioner Vs. Commissioner of Customs and others...............Respondents Judgment March 6, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Golam Mohiuddin, Advocate‑ For the Petitioner. ....................................Petitioner Vs. Commissioner of Customs and others...............Respondents Judgment March 6, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Golam Mohiuddin, Advocate‑ For the Petitioner. Nahid Mahtab, Assistant..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 6 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 1
Hazi Md Hossain @ Md Aowlad Hossain and others VS. Obaidul Haque & others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... the decision of the previous case may be taken as additional factor in arriving at the decision in the case in hand. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order XXXIX, Rules 1 & 2 In a suit for partition of immovable property whether a party can be allowed......Ahmed vs. Rezia Begum and others 1986 BLD 326, Fahim Ali Haque (Minor) vs. Md Abdul Aziz 43 DLR 226 and 3 BLC (AD) 78; South Asia Shipping Ltd vs. 'MV Tony Best' and others 46 DLR 226. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali Advocate-o..Category: Civil Law | Date: 6 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 308
....nds and buildÂings which are “enemy property''
within the meaning of sub-rule (4) of rule 169 of the said rules and which are
not connected with any enemy firm as defined in sub-rule (2) of that Rule shall
vest in the Deputy Custodian of Enemy Property, Lands and Buildings with effect
from th......Dulichand
Omaraolal Vs. Bangladesh, through the secreÂtary, Ministry of Industries and
others, 33 DLR (AD) 30; Enemy propÂerty Management Board and others Vs. Abdul
Rashid, 27
DLR (AD) 52.
Lawyers Involved:
Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Advocate-For the Petitioner (In Civil Revision
No.2974 o..
Category: Property Law | Date: 23 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 5
M/s. Shanker Kumar Das Vs. Government of Bangladesh and 6 others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and 6 others………………………………..Respondents Judgment February 23, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam with Zahirul Alam Babor, Advocates-For ......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and 6 others………………………………..Respondents Judgment February 23, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam with Zahirul Alam Babor, Advocates-For the Petitioner. A.H.M. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 23 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 31
.... and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
No order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 271.
......3 at 227; Ebrahimi vs. Westbourne Galleries Ltd. [1972] 2 All ER 492, [1973] AC 360; [1972] 2 All ER 492 at 500; [1973] AC 360 at 379); Re Saul D Harrison and Sons Pic [1995] 1 BCLC 14 at 191.
Lawyers Involved:
Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate, instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advoca..
Category: Company Law | Date: 22 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 364
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abu Bakar, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....erred from Muladi. 3. On 28.05.1992, almost after three years, a proceeding was drawn up against the respondent under the provisions of the Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1985 on allegations that he failed to discharge his duties in connivance with the miscreant...... to take disciplinary actions against any Magistrate, exercising judicial function, consultation with the Supreme Court is a must……………….(12) Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advo..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 16 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 126
Govt. of BD rep. by the Sec., Min. of Establishment Vs. Md. Abu Bakar, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....d to him and that the last intimation that was given to him is on 1-2-2002 and after that the petitioner was not informed anything as to the fate of his prayer. Then the High Court Division issued Rule calling upon the respondent Nos. 1-3 to show cause as to why they shall not be directed to act......t in accordance with the law without any order of allotment of any plot to the Writ Petitioner. There is no ground to interfere with the order. The Petition is dismissed…….(4) Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by B Hossain, ..Category: Property Law | Date: 16 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 69
Siraj Miah Vs. Mohammad Miah and others, 2005, CLC (HCD)
.... Siraj Miah....................................Plaintiff-Petitioner Vs. Mohammad Miah and others.............Opposite Parties Judgment February 7, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Pordil Khan Vs. Sufaid Gul and others, 1965 PLD (Pe......ahan Begum and others Vs. Lutfe Ali Chowdhury, 49 DLR (AD) 73; Magu Barma Vs. Bholi Dass, AIR 1914 Cal 331; Sudhir Chandra Shuklabadhya Vs. Amulya Shuklabadhya and others (unreported). Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Mostafa, Advocate- For the Petitioner. Mohammad Ali Azzam, Adv..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 2
Chairman, Sherpur Paurashava Vs. Md. Jahangir Hossain Chowdhury, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....-retainable khas land of the original landlord, we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......o. 1379 of 1980 could not claim the land on the basis of alleged settlement from the ex-landlord under the provision of section 20 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate (in both the cases) instructed b..Category: Property Law | Date: 1 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 118
Mustaque Hossain (Md). Vs. Md. Shajahan Miah and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ith Civil Revision No.947 of 2003). Judgment Md. Fazlul Karim J.- The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 26‑4-Â2004 of the High Court Division making the Rules the Rule in Civil Revision No.305 of 2003 heard analogously with Civil Revision No.974 of 2003...... prevent the tenant not liable to be ejected on specific legal ground for the purpose………………….(14) Case referred to: Munshi Amiruddin Ahmed vs. Begum Shamsun Nahar, 48 DLR 21. Lawyers involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by SM Rahman, Advocate‑on‑Reco..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 1 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 120
SMAH Ltd SMAH Ltd Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... ......ercial Trust of Bangladesh Ltd. and others, 1994 BLD (AD) 72=46 DLR (AD) 83; Brahmanbaria Pourashava Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land Reforms, Government of Bangladesh and others, 51 DLR (AD) 84. Lawyers Involved: TH Khan with Ramzan Ali Sikder, Advocates‑ For the Petitioner. Khondke..Category: Property Law | Date: 16 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 7
Monohar Joarder and others Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....LC record be sent down to the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Kushtia immediately for information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 494. ......239; Rafiqul Islam Vs. State, 1993 BLD (AD) 117 = 44 DLR (AD) 264; Abdul Khaleque and others Vs. State, 48 DLR 446; State Vs. Khalilur Rahman, 48 DLR 184; Abdus Samad Vs. State, 44 DLR (AD) 233. Lawyers Involved: Hasan Foez Siddique with Serajul Islam with Farhad Ahmed with Md. Masud Hasan..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 15 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 3
Barkatullah Khan (Md.) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ah Khan (Md.)......................................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.................Respondents Judgment January 15, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubur Rahman with Md. Salahuddin Dolon and Moh.............................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.................Respondents Judgment January 15, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubur Rahman with Md. Salahuddin Dolon and Mohammad Abu Taher, Advocates- ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 15 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 2
Habibullah (Md) Vs. Sher Ali Khan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....d. Ruhul Amin J. - This is a defendant's appeal by leave against the judgment and order dated July 7, 1997 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 502 of 1998 making the Rule absolute. The Rule was obtained against the judgment and decree dated July 25, 1987 of the Cou......egal evidence was not left out in making the decision in the case by the courts of fact High Court Division was in serious error in reversing concurrent finding by the courts below…….(15) Lawyers involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate with him instr..Category: Civil Law | Date: 15 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 177
Arshed Ali Sikder (Md.) Vs. Gouranga Chandra Shil and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... Gouranga Chandra Shil and others……………………………Opposite Parties Judgment January 10, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. Rules or procedures are made to subserve the ends of justice and not to def......4 BLD (AD) 229; Sova Rani Guha Vs. Abdul Awal Mia and others, 47 DLR (AD) 45; Abul Kashem Howlader Vs. Sultan Ahmed, 9 BLC 333; Chand Biswas Vs. Abdul Khaleque Sheikh and others, 51 DLR (AD) 55. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum, Advocate- For the Petitioner. Dr. Rafiqur Rahman with Joyn..Category: Property Law | Date: 10 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 2
Afzal Molla (Md.) Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
...........................................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others.................Opposite Parties Judgment January 10, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Md. Swaleh and another Vs. United Grain & Fodde......d. Abdul Gafur Pramanik and others, 1994 BLD (AD) 234; Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) and Assistant Custodian, Vested Property, Serajganj Vs. Md. Abdul Majid and others, 2 BLC (AD) 11. Lawyers Involved: Abul Kalam Mainuddin, Advocate‑For the Petitioner. Not represented‑T..Category: Limitation Law | Date: 10 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 6
Abdur Rahman Sikder (Md.) Vs. Nur Mohammad Khan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
..........................................Petitioner Vs. Nur Mohammad Khan and others.................................Opposite Parties Judgment January 10, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Mozaffar Ahmed Vs. State and others, 49 DLR 485; Md......Begum and others, 45 DLR (AD) 31; Nader Ali Sk Vs. State, 35 DLR 180; Abul Basher and another Vs. Hasanuddin Ahmed and others, 51 DLR (AD) 14; Abdul Majid Mondal Vs. State, 4 MLR 191=51 DLR 287. Lawyers Involved: Md. Majibur Rahman, Advocate-For the Petitioner. SM Rezaul Karim with Md..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 10 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 4
Badar Biswas & others Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....; ors......................................Petitioners Vs. State ........................................................Respondent Judgment January 9, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Sikander Ali Vs. State, 31 DLR (AD) 135; Abdul Haki......206; Syed Matiur Rahman alias Motiur Rahman Vs. State, 35 DLR (AD) 329; KATM Amanullah Vs. Golam Sultan and others, 36 DLR 131; Altab Hossain Vs. Kabed Ali and others, 1996 BLD 418 = 49 DLR 589. Lawyers involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan- For the Petitioners. Md. Shamsul Huda with Md. K..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 37
Lal Miah (Hajee) Vs. Nurul Amin and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....est money of Taka 15,000 paid to the defendant No. 1. The other part of the ordering portion of the judgment of the High Court Division is maintained. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......gh and another AIR 1937 PC 230; Shankarlal Narayandas Mundade vs The New Mofussil Co. Ltd. and others AIR 1946 PC 97; Bhup Narain Singh vs Gokul Chand Mahton and others AIR 1934 PC 68. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocat..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 5 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 147
Nasim (Md.) and another Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....asim (Md.) and another........................Petitioners Vs. State..................................................Opposite Party Judgment January 4, 2005. Result: The Rules are discharged. Cases Referred to- AIR 1945 PC 156; Abdul Quader Chowdhury Vs. State......58; 48 DLR (AD) 87; 48 DLR 102; 50 DLR 301, 551; 1987 BLD 11; 1988 BLD 64; 1993 BLD (AD) 17; 1995 BLD 151; 1995 BLD 188, 226; 20 BLD (AD) 265; 6 MLR (AD) 297; PLD 1961 Dac 753; PLD 1964 Dac 330. Lawyers Involved: Anisul Huque, Advocate- For the Petitioners in both the cases. Md. Helal..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 4 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 1
891790868584532872899989128566888589138896648999895388774621688932