Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1021-1040 of 4918 results.
....order as to costs. The order of stay is vacated.
Let the suit be disposed of in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 79.
......is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 79.
...... (1991) 79.
......igh Court Division
(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction)
Present:
Muhammad Ansar Ali J
Inspector, Railway Nirapatta Bahini, Bangladesh Railway, Khulna and others........Petitioners
Vs.
Sohrab Ali ...............................................................Opposite Party
..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 18 Apr, 1989 | Hits: 87
....t be sent at once to the Sessions Judge and the Deputy Commissioner, Narayanganj and also to the Upazila Magistrate Araihazar Upazila.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HD) (1990) 79. ......ent:
Fazal Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J
Mahmudul Amin Chowdhury J
Sukhendra Chandra Das..........................Petitioner
Vs.
The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of Bangladesh and Others……....Opposite Parties
Judgment
December 13, 1988.
Result:
T......990) 79. ......
(Dhaka)
(Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction)
Present:
Fazal Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J
Mahmudul Amin Chowdhury J
Sukhendra Chandra Das..........................Petitioner
Vs.
The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of Bangladesh and Others……....Opposite Par..
Category: Women and Children | Date: 13 Dec, 1988 | Hits: 193
Mohammad Meah Vs. Pubali Bank & others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....st consider the decision reported in 28 DLR (AD) 43 which appears at the first glance to support the appellant's case. In that case the judgment debtor obtained an order of attachment directing the Government to deposit the judgment-debtor's security-money lying with the Government. The Govern......lbemarle Supply Company, Limited Vs. Hind and Company (1928) 1 K.B. 307, Green Vs. All Motors Ltd. (1917, 1 K.B. 625), Koone vs. Thomas (1905) 1 K.B. 136, Cree v. All Motors Ltd., (1917, 1 K.B. 625). Bangladesh vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another 28 DLR (AD), Hatton V. Car Maintenance Company, Limite......ult: The appeal is dismissed. The Contract Act, 1872 (IX of 1872), section 170 The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order 38, rule 5 From the facts and circumstances of the case I have got no hesitation to hold that the plaintiff knew about the def......Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mohammad Meah........................................Appellant Vs. Pubali Bank & ors.......................................Respondents Judgment ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 1 Sep, 1988 | Hits: 252
Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
.... (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu...........................Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment March 20, 1988. ......ppellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment March 20, 1988. Result: The detention is held to be illegal. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 102 Materials were available to the detaining authority since March 1...... Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu...........................Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment March 20, 1988. Result: The detention i......Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu...........................Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment March 20, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Mar, 1988 | Hits: 95
Firoza Begum Vs. Hormuz Ali & another, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
....lty to Women (Deterrent Punishment) Ordinance, 1983 read with the Special Powers Act (See Section 10 of the Cruelty to Women (Deterrent Punishment) Ordinance, 1983). 5. It further appears that the Government has not preferred any appeal against the said impugned order dated 27.4.87 passed by Spec......appeal is, therefore, not maintainable on this ground also. The appeal accordingly is summarily dismissed on the grounds suited above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (1988) 161.......nal No. III, Tangail discharging accused Md. Hormuz Ali in Special Powers Act case No. 31 of 1986. The impugned order dated 27.4.87 is as follows- "Accused Hormuz Ali who is on bail files hazira and is present in the court. The record is taken up for framing of charge. Perused the F.I.R., C/S a......ourt High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Abdul Bari Sarkar J Firoza Begum …………………….Appellant Vs. Hormuz Ali & another..............Respondents Judgment July 29, 1987. Lawyers I..Category: Women and Children | Date: 29 Jul, 1987 | Hits: 112
Sreemati Parul Kusum Roy Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
....declared to have been passed without any lawful authority and to be no legal effect. Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 389. ......on (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J Sreemati Parul Kusum Roy…………………………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh & others…………………………………………..Respondents Judgment ...... namely the Upazila Nirbahi Officer, Anowara dated 14.09.85 declaring the disputed properties as vested property on the recommendation of the respondent No.4, namely Upazila, Revenue Officer, Anowara and approving grant of lease thereof in favour of the stranger respondent Nos.6-9. 2. 8.23 acre...... Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J Sreemati Parul Kusum Roy…………………………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh & others…………………………………………..Respondents Judgm..Category: Property Law | Date: 22 Mar, 1987 | Hits: 13
Md. Nurul Haque Vs. Sonali Bank of Bangladesh & another, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....der section 115(1) C.P.C. The application is, therefore, summarily rejected. Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 223. ...... Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Haque…………………………………...........Petitioner Vs. Sonali Bank of Bangladesh & another………….Respondents Judgment November 19, 1986. Result:......ents Judgment November 19, 1986. Result: The application is summarily rejected. Case Referred to- Satish Vs. Apara, 34 Cal 403 (F.B), Bejoy Vs. Satish, 9 I.C. 842, Sikandar Vs. Kushal, 59 Cal 756, Sardar Vs. Jahar, 59 Cal 906, Baijnath Vs. Kedar, A.I.R 1938 Cal 74, G......visional Jurisdiction Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Haque…………………………………...........Petitioner Vs. Sonali Bank of Bangladesh & another………….Respondents Judgment Novembe..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 19 Nov, 1986 | Hits: 24
....t and decree.
6. The principal question in this Rule is whether an Assistant Custodian Enemy Property (Lands and Buildings) can maintain a suit in 1974 in respect of the properties vested in the Government of Bangladesh under President's Order No.29 of 1972 as amended by P.O. No.134 of......others……………………Opposite-parties
Judgment
September 16, 1986.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
Cases Referred to-
Bangladesh Enemy Property Management Board and others Vs. Md. Abdul Majid, 27 DLR (AD) 52; M/S. Dull......ip;………Opposite-parties
Judgment
September 16, 1986.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
Cases Referred to-
Bangladesh Enemy Property Management Board and others Vs. Md. Abdul Majid, 27 DLR (AD) 52; M/S. Dullchand Omraolal Vs. Bangladesh, through the ......nal Jurisdiction)
Present:
Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J
Subitri Bari………………………………Petitioner
Vs.
Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property & Additional Deputy Commissioner (Rev) Patuakhali..
Category: Evidence Law | Date: 16 Sep, 1986 | Hits: 259
Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....t of the said Memo the petitioner deposited rent for the year 1389 B.S. on 22.08.1981 and tie petitioner executed a lease deed signed by the District Fishery Development Officer on behalf of the Government of Bangladesh. It is also the cases of the petitioner that the petitioner thereafter subm......(Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: S Hossain Khan J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd…………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Reforms, and ......n Khan J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd…………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Reforms, and others………………&hell......ion (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: S Hossain Khan J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd…………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Refo..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 23 Apr, 1986 | Hits: 247
Reajuddin and another Vs. Azimuddin@ Abdul Aziz and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....ent of the learned Lower Appellate Court it affirmed. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD)(1987) 228. ...... or records of the acts— (1) of the sovereign authority, (ii) of official bodies and tribunals, and (iii) of public officers, legislative, judicial and executive of any part of Bangladesh or of the Commonwealth, or of a foreign country. 2) Public records kept in Banglades......lso Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD)(1987) 228. ...... Bench (Civil Rivisional Jurisdiction) Present: AM Mahmudur Rahman J Reajuddin and another…………..............Plaintiff-Respondents-Petitioners Vs. Azimuddin @ Abdul Aziz and others…………………&h..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 3 Apr, 1986 | Hits: 8
Ruhul Amin Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....cord be sent down with a copy of this order at once. Md. Abdul Jalil J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 166. ...... James Gardner Vs. Edward A. Lucas, (1878) 3 A 532; Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Vs. Irving 1905 AC 369; Delhi Cloth and General Mills. Co. Ltd. Vs. Income-Tax Commissioner, Delhi, AIR 1927 PC 242; Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Mannan and others, 29 DLR (SC) 17. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mohammad Al......ch 19, 1986. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- James Gardner Vs. Edward A. Lucas, (1878) 3 A 532; Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Vs. Irving 1905 AC 369; Delhi Cloth and General Mills. Co. Ltd. Vs. Income-Tax Commissioner, Delhi, AIR 1927 PC 242; Bangladesh Vs. Abdu...... (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Ruhul Amin........................................Petitioner Vs. The State..........................................Opposite party Judgment March ..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 19 Mar, 1986 | Hits: 3
Mst. Ayesha Sultana @ Minu Vs. Md. Shahjahan Ali, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....t raised was that the learned Additional Sessions Judge overlooked the provision of law inasmuch as after the promulgation of P.O. 7 of 1972 dissolving local Council and Municipal Committees the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh by an Extra Ordinary Gazette Notification......s Judge overlooked the provision of law inasmuch as after the promulgation of P.O. 7 of 1972 dissolving local Council and Municipal Committees the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh by an Extra Ordinary Gazette Notification dated 20th November, 1972 appointed the Adminis......i—For the Appellant. Syiedur Rahman Mean—For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 314 of 1983. Judgment Amia-ur-Rahman Khan J.- This appeal is directed against the Judgment and order dated 19.9.83 passed by Mr. Md. Abdul Kadir Khan, Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Dh......sent: Latifur Rahman J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Mst. Ayesha Sultana @ Minu………………………………...Appellant Vs. Md. Shahjahan Ali………………………&h..Category: Family Law | Date: 17 Mar, 1986 | Hits: 1
Shaikh Obaidul Haq Vs. The State & another, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....litan Magistrate, Dhaka be quashed. Latifur Rahman, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 105. ......mmending quashment of the said Criminal Case. 3. The petitioner's case is that he was the Managing director of Dhaka Paints Limited which was the principal agent dealer of Berger Paints Bangladesh Limited of which the Opposite party is the Regional Sales Manager. As the appointed agent...... The State & another............................Opposite Parties Judgment February 20, 1986. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Md. Anwar Ali and Md. Liaquat Ali Vs. State & Md. Nezamuddin, 30 DLR at page 327; Saeeduddin Qureshi Vs. The S......ivision (Dhaka Bench) (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Rahman J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Shaikh Obaidul Haq..............................Petitioner Vs. The State & another............................Opposite Parties Judgment Febr..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Feb, 1986 | Hits: 1
Mrs. Shahar Banoo Ziwar Sultana Beyad Vs. Mrs. Wahida Khan & 5 others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
.... absolute and the impugned order is set aside. The Criminal proceeding will continue as usual. Latifur Rahman, J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 132. ......fic Performance of Contract against the present petitioner on the basis of the forged Bainapatra and also obtained an ex-parte decree by suppressing summons from the petitioner. On her return to Bangladesh she became aware of the forgery and thereupon she made an application in the Civil Court ......Banoo Ziwar Sultan Beyed made a complaint to Kotwali Police Station on 5.2.79 stating that the Opposite party was her monthly tenant in the house No.252, Road No.22, Dhanmondi Residential Area, Dhaka and while the petitioner was absent at Iran for about 7 (seven) years the opposite party taking adva......minal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Ragman J Amin Ur Rahman Khan J Mrs. Shahar Banoo Ziwar Sultana Beyad………………Petitioner Vs. Mrs. Wahida Khan & 5 others………………Opposite-Par..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 14 Feb, 1986 | Hits: 31
Abul Hashem (Bulbul) Vs. Mobarak Uddin Mahmud, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
.... will vary from case to case. With regard to the School Register it has long been held that it is very common to understate the age when entering a school in order that the boy may not be too old for Government service, vide Mohammad Hashem Vs. Safdar, I.L.R. 14 (Lahore) 473. In the case of Bij Moha......below are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 145. ...... Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Imam Hossain Bepari Vs. Election Tribunal, 31 DLR 381; Mohammad Hashem Vs. Safdar, ILR 14 (Lahore) 473; Bij Mohan Singh Vs. Priya Brata Narayan Singh and others, AIR 1965 (SC) 282. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Karim—For the Petitioner. ......me Court High Court Division (Comilla Bench) (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Mustafa Kamal J Abul Hashem (Bulbul)..............................Petitioner Vs. Mobarak Uddin Mahmud .........................Opposite parties Judgment February ..Category: Election Law, Evidence Law | Date: 12 Feb, 1986 | Hits: 4
Alhaj Mamtaj Meah Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....n 167 of the Cr.P.C. On the other hand, the I.O. never submitted prayer for extension of time. Hence the case is dismissed under section 203 Cr.P.C. It may be mentioned that for the lapse of I.O. the Government is going to lose more than taka one lac. Send the copy of the order sheet to the S.P. Chi......of the case in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Md. Abdul Jalil, J.—I agree Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 152. ...... Vs. The Crown, AIR 1950 (East Punjab) (FB) 25; State Vs. Mohammed Jamil, 20 DLR (SC) 315; Adnan Afzal Vs. Sher Afzal, 21 DLR (SC) 123; James Gardner Vs. Edward A. Lucas, (1878) 3 AC 582; Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Commissioner, Delhi, AIR 1927 PC, 242; Colonial Sugar Refi......ction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Alhaj Mamtaj Meah…………….……...........Petitioner Vs. The State.........................................Opposite party Judgment January..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 30 Jan, 1986 | Hits: 1
Sakya Pada Barua & others Vs. The State and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....id order of acquittal the Government as well as the informant preferred appeals before the Special Appellate Tribunal. The informant appeal was numbered as Tribunal Appeal No.22 of 1979 the Government's appeal was numbered as Tribunal Appeal No.23 of 1979. Mr. S.M. Serajul Mowla, ......udgment January 12, 1986. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Abul Hossain and others Vs. The State, 37 DLR 59; Adnan Afzal Vs. Sher Afzal, 21 DLR (SC) 123; Bangladesh Vs. Shahjahan Siraj, 32 DLR (AD) 1; Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Vs. Irving, 1905 AC 369 D......onal Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Sakya Pada Barua & others.........................Petitioner Vs. The State and others .................................Opposite Party Judgment January 12, 1986. ...... (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Sakya Pada Barua & others.........................Petitioner Vs. The State and others .................................Opposite Party Judgment Jan..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 12 Jan, 1986 | Hits: 1
Muktad Hossain Majumder Vs. Abul Bashar Majumder & others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....ally started on that application and it is a completely new matter which the appellate Court is called upon to decide. Mr. Amir Hossain submits that under the amended section 29 (4) of the Local Government Ordinance, 1984 the learned District Judge is required to adjudicate on the dec......he result, the Rule is discharged but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 41. .................Opposite-Parties Judgment January 7, 1986. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Khulna Tobacco Industries Ltd Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Khulna and another, 30 DLR 331; Mohammad Sharifullah Vs. Election Tribunal, 31 DLR 119; Amir Sultan Ali Hai......preme Court High Court Division (Comilla Bench) (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Mustafa Kamal J Muktad Hossain Majumder..........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Bashar Majumder & others...................Opposite-Parties Judgment Jan..Category: Administrative Law, Election Law | Date: 7 Jan, 1986 | Hits: 2
Sultana Ara Begum Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & others, 1985, 14 CLC (HCD)
....ry, Ministry of Home Affairs & others..........Respondent Judgment December 11, 1985. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Abdul Latif Mirza Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others, 31 DLR (AD) 1; Begum Aga Shorish Kashmiri, 21 DLR (SC) 1; Baqui......f Home Affairs & others..........Respondent Judgment December 11, 1985. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Abdul Latif Mirza Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others, 31 DLR (AD) 1; Begum Aga Shorish Kashmiri, 21 DLR (SC) 1; Baqui Baloch, 20 DL......irs & others..........Respondent Judgment December 11, 1985. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Abdul Latif Mirza Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others, 31 DLR (AD) 1; Begum Aga Shorish Kashmiri, 21 DLR (SC) 1; Baqui Baloch, 20 DLR (SC) 249;......riminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Sultana Ara Begum ......................................Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & others..........Respondent Judgment Dec..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 11 Dec, 1985 | Hits: 2
Abdur Razzak & others Vs. The State, 1985, 14 CLC (HCD)
.... The order staying further proceedings of Special Tribunal Case No.17 of 1985 is vacated. Md. Abdul Jalil J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 22. ......llip;………..………….Respondent Judgment September 9, 1985. Result: The rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Siraj Miah Vs. Bangladesh and another, 32 DLR (AD) 35. Lawyers Involved Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury with Mus......p;……..………….Respondent Judgment September 9, 1985. Result: The rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Siraj Miah Vs. Bangladesh and another, 32 DLR (AD) 35. Lawyers Involved Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury with Mustafa Niaz M......Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Abdur Razzak & others……………………………………Petitioners Vs. The State…………………………&h..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Sep, 1985 | Hits: 2
50387275186316964135850784987642760985759412940991508467941094119148914791499143