Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1041-1060 of 4843 results.
M/s. Haque Brothers (Carbide) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... on the aforesaid amount of principal and interest calculating from this day till realization. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (AD) (1985) 47. ......wdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury ATM Masud J Syed Md. Mohsen Ali J M/s. Haque Brothers (Carbide) Ltd. ...............Petitioner (In both the cases) Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others. .........Respondents (In both the cases) Judgment......Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury ATM Masud J Syed Md. Mohsen Ali J M/s. Haque Brothers (Carbide) Ltd. ...............Petitioner (In both the cases) Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others. .........Respondents (In both the cases) ......985) 47. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 2 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 105
Chatteswari Debi Bigraha Vs. Shirih Chandra Das & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....he suit is dismissed without any order as to costs. Syed Mohammad Ali J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 221 ......16.7.77 appear anywhere. The only date that is written at the bottom of the first page of the two page agreement Ext. 2 is 25th July, 1977). The plaintiff who is the Deputy Chief Mechanical Engineer, Bangladesh Railway Chittagong took House Building loan from the Railway Deptt. for payment of the ba...... ......—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 221 ..Category: Property Law | Date: 1 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 2
Trustees of the Port of Chittagong Vs. K. Mahbub Hossain & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....compensation at the rate of 10/- per annum from the date of institution of the suit till recovery. 2. The plaintiff alleged in the plaint that he was deputed to England by the then East Pakistan Government inter alia for training under the Colombo Plan for one year from 28.9.69 to 23.9.70. Out ......l realisation from the date of institution of the suit. Mohammed Habibur Rahman J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 292 ......High Court Division (Civil Appeal Jurisdiction) Present: Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Syed Mohammad Ali J Trustees of the Port of Chittagong.......................Appellant Vs. K. Mahbub Hossain & others..............................Respondent Judgment M......b Hossain & others..............................Respondent Judgment March 14, 1984. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred To- Chittagong Port Authority Vs. Md. Ishaque and others, 35 DLR (AD) 364; Central Bank of India Ltd. Vs. M/S-Jan Md. Hazi Ismail 17 D..Category: Contract Law | Date: 14 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 3
Nurul Islam & others Vs. The State, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ny substance in any of the contentions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 111. ...... Procedure Code. According to him no interference is required to be made in the order of learned Sessions Judge. 6. It appears that an application was made before the then Prime Minister of Bangladesh on 3-5-73 alleging that four persons were kidnapped by the petitioners on 13-1-73 fr......Division (Jessore Bench) (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J Nurul Islam & others....................................Petitioner Vs. The State...................................................Respondent Judgment M..........................Respondent Judgment March 11, 1984. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Abul Hossain Sana Vs. Suwalal Agarwala and another, 14 DLR 96; Md. Mostafa Chowdhury Vs. Lila Rani Naundi, 22 DLR 199; Habibullah Chowdhury Vs. Abdul Kader Howlade..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 11 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 3
Jahir Ahmed Vs. Badsha Mia Sowdagor, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ny land covered by a usufructuary mortgage after the expiry of the period of such mortgage, the mortgagor may apply to the Sub divisional Magistrate or to any officer authorised in this behalf by the Government, for such redemption or restoration and, on such application and, in the case of red......ite Party Judgment March 6, 1984. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Abdul Mannan and others Vs. Kulad Ranjan Mawali and others, 31 DLR (AD) 195; Bangladesh Vs. Haji Abdul Gani Biswas and ors, 32 DLR (AD) 233; Abu Bakkar Vs. Nasir Ahmed, 34 DLR (......) 90. ......ll bear their own costs in this Rule. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) 90. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 6 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 119
Priyatosh Talukder Vs. Asstt. Custodian of Enemy Property, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ustodian shall be exempted from attachment, seizure or sale in execution of a Civil Court decree or 'orders of any other authority." That enemy property which has now vested in the Government of Bangladesh by operation of law is exempted from attachment, seizure or sale in ex......ult: The appeal is allowed in part. The Rules are discharged. Cases Referred to- National Bank of Pakistan Vs. Kushtia Sugar Cane Mills, 29 DLR 32;Goutam Ranjan Sen and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981 BLD (A.D.) 126 Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shafiqur Rahman with......h Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Mohammed Habibur Rahman J Syed Mohammed Ali J Priyatosh Talukder.................................Appellant Vs. Asstt. Custodian of Enemy Property.............Respondent Judgment March 4, 1984....... are discharged. There will be no order as to costs. Syed Mohammad Ali J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 153 ..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 4
Eshaque Ali Vs. Aitunessa & others, 1982, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ntiffs got -/10/- annas share in the 'Ka' schedule property and have been possessing the same. 4. During the S.A operation the land was wrongly recorded in the name of the defendant No.1 Government of Bangladesh as khas land. On the basis of erroneous record of rights, the defendant No.......0/- annas share in the 'Ka' schedule property and have been possessing the same. 4. During the S.A operation the land was wrongly recorded in the name of the defendant No.1 Government of Bangladesh as khas land. On the basis of erroneous record of rights, the defendant No.13 and Hashem ......27 ......ed. Specific Relief Act, 1877; Section 42; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), Section 115(1) Lawyers Involved: Hemayetuddin Ahmed with P.C. Guha—For the Petitioner. Md. Nizamul Huq with Moslem Alt Howlader—For Opposite-party Nos.1-3. Civil Revision No. 5..Category: Property Law | Date: 6 Feb, 1984 | Hits: 4
Sarendra Nath Halder & others Vs. Satyandra Nath Halder, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.....66, Ext. 2, is hit by section 75-A of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (herein after called the Act) and the said lease was null and void and as such the land stood forfeited to Government. Mr. Abdul Quay urn, the learned Advocate for the plaintiff-petitioners, has frankly admi......nt and decree passed by the appellate court is set aside and those passed by the learned Munsif are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 163 ......nbsp; ......s. Satyandra Nath Halder..............................Opposite Party Judgment January 30, 1984. Result: The rule is made absolute Cases Referred to- Makbul Vs. Md. Idris (1969)21 DLR-511; Mir Laik Ali Vs. Standard Vacuum Oil (1964) 16 DLR 287; Abdus Sattar Vs...Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 30 Jan, 1984 | Hits: 5
Golam Ataher Chowdhury Vs. Administrator of Wakfs & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....nistrator of Waqfs is not a subordinate Court of the High Court Division or of the Civil Court. 4. The Administrator of Waqfs is appointed under Section 7 of the Waqfs ordinance by the Government. Under Section 10thereof the Administrator shall be deemed to be a "Public Offi......so Subordinate to the High Court Division or to the Civil Court. 6. The Waqfs Ordinance is a special statute governing the law relating to the administration and management of waqf properties in Bangladesh. When the Administrator passes an order under Section 32 of the Waqfs Ordinance......evisional Jurisdiction) Present: Mustafa Kamal J Golam Ataher Chowdhury………………………………..Petitioner Vs. Administrator of Wakfs & others...................Opposite parties Judgment J......titioner Vs. Administrator of Wakfs & others...................Opposite parties Judgment January 24, 1984. Result: The Rule is discharged Case Referred to- Md. Khorshed Alam Vs. Amir Sultan Ali Haider, 21 D.L.R. 799 Lawyers Involved: Md. Jamirudd..Category: Administrative Law, Trust/Waqf Law | Date: 24 Jan, 1984 | Hits: 1
Md. Suruj Mia Vs. Katu alias Abdul Latif & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....dditional Sessions Judge is directed to proceed with the case in accordance with law. Mohammad Abdul Rouf J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (HCD) (1984)102. ......rder of stopping the proceeding and releasing the accused-opposite-parties has been challenged in these two rules. 3. Mr. A. F. M. Shahid, the learned Assistant Attorney General has appeared for Bangladesh, the petitioner in Criminal Revision No.140 of 1983 and Mr. Azizur Rahman Chowdhury, the ......rt High Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Sultan Hossain Khan J Md. Abdul Rouf J Md. Suruj Mia..................................Petitioner Vs. Katu alias Abdul Latif & others.................Opposite parties Judgment Jan......e. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (HCD) (1984)102. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 18 Jan, 1984 | Hits: 132
Nazir Ahmed & others Vs. The State, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... Under Article 2 of P.O. 16/73, there is nothing to show that the offence in question was committed by the accused in connection with the struggle for national liberation. The mere fact that the Government have stated that the accused are freedom fighters does not ipso facto give any indemnity ......O. 16/73 has no manner of application in the facts and circumstances of the present case. Cases Referred To- Syed Matiur Rahman Vs. The state 35 DLR (A) (D) 329; Baksu Mia Vs. Government of Bangladesh 30 DLR (SC) 228. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M. Shafiqur Rahman-For the Petition......ourt High Court Division (Criminal Revisioal Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Habibur Rahman J Syed Mohammed Ali J Nazir Ahmed & others.....................Petitioner Vs. The State.....................................Opposite parties Judgment January 3...... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 169; 5 BLD (1985) 80. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 3 Jan, 1984 | Hits: 2
I.C.I. (Bangladesh) Ltd Vs. M/s. G. K. Brothers, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
.... came into being. By operation of President's Order No.16 of 1972 which came into effect on 28.2.72, share-holdings and business management with all the assets and liabilities stood vested in the Government of Bangladesh. By letter Ext. D. dated 20.1.73. Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Commerce of......CD) 114 ...... High Court Division (Civil Appellant Jurisdiction) Present: Mohammed Habibur Rahman J Syed Mohammad Ali J I.C.I. (Bangladesh) Ltd.......................Appellant Vs. M/s. G. K. Brothers...........................Respondent Judgment December 13, 19...... registered through the trial court in accordance with law. Syed Mohammad Ali J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 114 ..Category: Abandoned Properties Law | Date: 13 Dec, 1983 | Hits: 8
Shamsul Huda & others Vs. Alauddin & Taiwa Tex¬tile Mills Ltd, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....ent No.1 Company entered into three agreements with Taiwa, namely, (1) Capital Participation Agreement, (2) Technical Assistance Agreement and (3) Technical Service Agreement. The then Government of Pakistan accorded permission for equity participation by Taiwa. Late Alauddin Miah was......Japan (hereinafter called Taiwai) became a share holder of the respondent No.1 Company Taiwa was holding in its own name 6993 shares of Tk. 100/- each amounting to a total of Tk 699,300.00. Bangladesh share-holders were holding 19.00/ share amounting to a total of Tk. 19, 00,700.00. 5...... ......pany and with regard to the petitioner No.1 himself can be gathered. It is stated that there was a Promoters Agreement dated 26.6.1961 between the Japanese investors headed by Tafwa Co. Ltd. and Md. Alauddin, Proprietor of Messrs Alauddin and Brothers, Dhaka launching the respondent company in ..Category: Company Law | Date: 24 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 4
Sultan Ahmed and others Vs. Md. Islam & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
.... dated 27.04.1979. He also delivered possession of the case land to the pre-emptee purchasers on behalf of the vendors. Pre-emptee purchasers gave notices to all co-sharers and paid rents to the Government. Subsequent to the present purchase pre-emptee Respondent No.3 Gura Mia (O.P.W.1) became ......tly allowed. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Syed Mohammad Ali J. —I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) 81. ......ision (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Mohammed Habibur Rahman J Syed Mohammed Ali J Sultan Ahmed and others......................Appellant Petitioners Vs. Md. Islam & others……………………&hell...... (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Mohammed Habibur Rahman J Syed Mohammed Ali J Sultan Ahmed and others......................Appellant Petitioners Vs. Md. Islam & others………………………&helli..Category: Property Law | Date: 20 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 88
Md. Taheruddin Vs. Abul Kashem & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....et the L.C. records be sent down to Sessions Judge, Naogaon at once for necessary action. Muhammad Abdul Wahab J. I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 107. ......used simply on the ground of the absence of the complainant or his witnesses. (Mobarak Ali Gazi Vs. Mokbul Sardar, 23 DLR 96). 12. Recent substantive changes in the Code of Criminal Procedure in Bangladesh have not made any difference in the legal position in so far as the trial of a case be&sh......ision (Rangpur Bench) (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Mustafa Kamal J Md. Abdul Wahab J Md. Taheruddin......................................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kashem & others.............................Opposite-Parties Judgment No......is Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 107. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 19 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 4
Abdul Hamid Vs. Dbakeswari Cotton Mills Ltd. & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
.... originally provided as follows: “23. No. provision of law relating to the winding up of companies shall apply to a Corporation and a Corporation shall not be wound up save by order of the Government and in such manner as it may direct.” 3. By P.O. No. 37 of 1972 the afore-quot......nt as they all raise a common question of law. 2. Dkakerwari Cotton Mills Ltd. Is the common respondent in all these applications. By P.O. No. 27 of 1972 it was nationalized and placed under the Bangladesh Cotton Mills Corporation. Article 23 of P.O. No. 27 of 1972 originally provided as follow...... ......etitioner Vs. Dbakeswari Cotton Mills Ltd. & others ............Respondents Judgment November 16, 1983. Result: The Rules are discharged. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shahjahan—For the Petitioner. A. M. Nooruddin Ahmed—For the Respondent. ..Category: Company Law, Corporate Law | Date: 16 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 5
Mortoza Elahi @ Tipu & others Vs. The State, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
.... proceed in accordance with law. Communicate the Order at once. Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 100. ......561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Rule arises out of a First Information Report lodged by the complainant on 24-12-80 whereupon a case under sections 147/143/-149/448/324/323/326/302/307/34 Bangladesh Penal Code was started and the same was numbered as G.R. Case No.1595 of 1980. 3. Po...... (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J Mortoza Elahi @ Tipu & others...........................Petitioner Vs. The State.......................................................Respondent Judgment ...... Vs. The State.......................................................Respondent Judgment November 13, 1983. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Md. Badir Mollah and others Vs. The State and others, Criminal Revision Case No.82 of 1983. Law..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 13 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 1
Abdul Mannan Sarder & others Vs. The State, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....with law. Communicate the Order at once. Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 38. ......inant's son and other accused persons injured Shahid, Arshed and Ansar. 3. Police after investigation submitted chargesheet on 19.12.81 against the petitioners under sections 147/148/325/323 Bangladesh Penal Code read with section 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act and 14 of the Special......in Khan Chowdhury J Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J Abdul Mannan Sarder & others………………………………Petitioner Vs. The State…………………………&h......with law. Communicate the Order at once. Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 38. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 13 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 2
Administrator, Zilla Board Vs. Mukhlesur Rahman, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....strict Board was not a lower post than the post of Accountant, Works Programme. He held that the post of Accountant, Works Programme is merely a temporary post without any cadre, It is neither a Government service nor a local council service. In the absence of statutory provision, an employee o.........Petitioner Vs. Mukhlesur Rahman.....................................Respondent Judgment October 30, 1983. Result: The appeal is allowed. Cases Referred To- Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation Vs. Mahboob Hossain Chowdhury 29 DLR (S.C.) 41; Banglad...... ......orporation Vs. Mahboob Hossain Chowdhury 29 DLR (S.C.) 41; Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation Vs. Mah-boobHossain Chowdhury, 29 DLR (SC) 41; Bangladesh Biman Corporation, Vs. Chowdhury Md. Yusuf, 31 DLR (AD) 305 29 DLR (SC) 39, 41 and 31 DLR (AD) 305; District Council Vs. Dr. M.K. Rah..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 30 Oct, 1983 | Hits: 1
Abul Hossain & others Vs. The State, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....ecord found that the evidence on record was hearsay evidence and there was no evidence connecting the accused persons with the murder of deceased Abdur Rashid. Against the said order of acquittal the Government preferred an appeal under section 30 of the Special Powers Act, 1974. The Appellate Tribu......ing retrial--This is an abuse of the process of the court and must be set aside--Code of criminal Procedure (V of 1898) S. 561A……………(11) Case Referred to- Bangladesh Vs. Shajahan Seraj, 32 DLR (AD) 1, Lawyers Involved: Nurul Islam Chowdhury&mdas...... (Chittagong Bench) (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Habibur Rahman J Syed Md. Ali J Abul Hossain & others............................Petitioners Vs. The State.............................................Petitioner Judgment October......ree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 59. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 25 Oct, 1983 | Hits: 1
30829414938790877889953893809537928879399291953395357888908693849084906595269070