Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Jahanara Begum and others Vs. Hazera Khatun, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
.... not sustainable in law and the same is accordingly set aside. In the result the appeals are allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......oth the Appeals) Judgment May 12, 2003. Result: Appeals are allowed. Cases Referred to- Golam Kader Vs. Abdul Khaleque Choukder, 43 DLR (AD) 107, AIR 1931 PC 162. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mr. A. Quayum, Advocate with him), instructed b..Category: Contract Law | Date: 12 May, 2003 | Hits: 251
State Vs. Md. Motiur Rahman & anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ns 120(b)/302/380/201/212/114/411/34 of the Penal Code, rejecting the prayer for bail now pending in the Court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka, is hereby set aside. Ed. ......section 164 of the Code, when there is strong circumstantial evidence, cannot be taken into consideration for granting bail to an accused of a murder case………..(14) Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 12 May, 2003 | Hits: 74
Chan Miah (Md) Vs. Md. Dabirul Islam Khan & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....it any consideration and we also do not find any illegality or infirmity to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......onsideration money together with compensation prior to determination of important issues, would not be an illegality. Case Referred to- Wahab Ali vs Kadem Ali 14 DLR 204. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate instructed by M Khaled Ahmed, Advocate̴..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 May, 2003 | Hits: 141
Bangladesh Biman Corporation, represented by MD Vs. Rabia Bashri Irene and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....sion. In the afore state of the matter we find no substance in these petitions. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 132. ......een held by the High Court Division as discriminatory and further the discrimination so made being violative of the Article 28 of the Constitution is not legal……………………………(10) Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate‑onâ€..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 30 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 164
Nurul Huq (Md.) Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
...., 2000 against the appellant, being informant of the case, is hereby set aside. Communicate this order to the Court concerned Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 588..................Appellant Vs. State....................................................................Respondent Judgment April 28, 2003. Result: The Appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Raziur Rahman Chowdhury, Advocate—For the Appellant. Sk Rezaul Kar..Category: Women and Children | Date: 28 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 126
United Commercial Bank Ltd. Vs. Jahangir Alam Khan & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....comment on it. 11. However, in any view of the matter, the impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity for our interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......application under section 85(3) of the Companies Act invoking the provision of section 85(2) of the Companies Act in the facts and circumstances of the case……….(9) Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Ataur Ra..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 22 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 201
Amir Hossain Vs. MA Malek & others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... is no bar for the complaint case to proceed side by side with winding up proceeding. In view of the above, the appeal is allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (AD) 146. ...... The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898) Section 561A There is no bar for the complaint case to proceed side by side with winding up proceeding about the same subject matter. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Rec..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 15 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 88
Suo Moto Order No. 248 of 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....ey General for Bangladesh for necessary action. With the aforesaid observations and directions the matters is disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLT (HCD) (2003) 281. ......ul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nizamul Huq J Suo Moto Order No. 248 of 2003 Judgment April 9, 2003. Result: The suo moto order is disposed of with certain observations. Lawyers Involved: A. F. Hassan Ariff, Attorney General with Adilur Rahman, Deputy Attorney Gene..Category: Women and Children | Date: 9 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 148
Sazzadul Haque Liku (Md.) and others Vs. Sarder Anwar Hossain, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....his Rule is made absolute. The impugned judgment and order is set aside and the plaint is rejected. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 273. ......990 BLD (AD) 151=42 DLR (AD) 137; Chowmahani College and another Vs. Md. Ismail Hossain and others, 26 DLR 10; Md. Rqfiqul Alam Vs. Mustafa Kamal and others, 1990 BLD (AD) 151 = 42 DLR (AD) 137. Lawyers Involved: Mrinal Kanti Biswas, Advocate‑For the Petitioner. SS Haider with Bivas..Category: Civil Law, Election Law | Date: 24 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 2
Motiur Rahman and others Vs. Chowdhury Md Mahfuzul Islam and ors., 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....ve, both the appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 104. ......e has a right to be considered for promotion which is a condition, of his service…………………….(23 & 24) Lawyers Involved: Amir‑ul Islam, Senior Advocate, (Tani..Category: Others | Date: 24 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 87
Giasuddin Ahmed Vs. Green Delta Insurance Co. Ltd. & anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....s both seen and taken together would not bar the respondents to register the appellant's share. In view of the above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......p; Cases Referred to- Bajaj Auto Ltd vs NK Firodia (1971) 41 Comp Cases 1, 6, 7 (SC); Re Smith & Fawcett Ltd. (1942) Ch. 304 & (1942) All England Report 542. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Salauddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 24 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 286
Mobarak Hossain alias Mobarak Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....titioner and other convicts unsustainable in law we find no reason to interfere with the judgment and order sought to be appealed. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ration of such evidence along with other evidence if case of the prosecution is proved or case of the prosecution does not stand, whatever order passed by the court is sustainable in law. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Petitioner. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 24 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 121
Syeda Mazeda Khatun Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
.... In that view of the matter, this petition is dismissed. Ed. Same Case Cited in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 82. ......ntinued in such post till 7‑6‑2000 when the 638; Bangladesh vs. Md Azizur Rahman 46 DLR(AD) 29 Abdul Mazid vs. Mushafi Ahmed 17 DLR SC 131 ref. (10, 11, 16 & 17) Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab Chaudhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md Zahiru..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 17 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 84
Moinul Haque (Md) & anr. Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... substance in the petitions. The two petitions are accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: 56 DLR (AD) 81; 9 MLR (2004) (AD) 321. ...... vs. State 45 DLR 66; Siraj Mal and others vs. State 45 DLR 688; Shahjahan Biswas & ors vs. State 1988 BLD (AD) 154 = 40 DLR (AD) 291 and State vs. Khadem Mondal 1990 BLD (AD) 228. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate (Kazi Shahadat Hossain, Advocate with h..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 13 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 316
Nahar Shipping Lines Ltd. & anr. Vs. Homera Ahmed & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ourt Division in the company matter, we do not find any reason to grant leave against the said judgment. The petition is therefore, dismissed and the delay is condoned. Ed. ......;……….(16 & 19) Cases Referred to- Nafisa Chowdhury vs United Food Complex 53 DLR 81 and Syed Al Nesar Ahmed vs Nafiza Chowdhury 53 DLR (AD) 83. Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑onR..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 12 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 273
Aloke Nath Dey Vs. Govt. of BD. rep. by the DC, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....the challenges, we do not find any illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment for our interference. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ng Co. Ltd. (1963) 4 Guj LR 741 at page 751‑52; Mt Shyarn SUndari Devi and others vs. Sarti Devi and others AIR 1962 Patna 220; State Bank of India vs. Netai Ch Porel AIR 1982 Cal 92. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, ..Category: Property Law | Date: 11 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 436
Salema Khatun Vs. Matiur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....e of the rule is vacated. In the facts of the case, I do not make any order as to costs. Send down the lower Court record. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 339. ......titioner Vs. Matiur Rahman……………………Opposite party Judgment February 8, 2003. Result: The rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: None appears - For the petitioner. Md. Haroon Ar Rashid, Advocate-For th..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 8 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 61
Category: Others | Date: 8 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 112
Abul Hossain (Md) Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....urt Division 'Further enquiry" is directed to be held. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 125. ...... 106 = 8 DLR (FC)47; Sheikh Abdul Mazid vs. State of Delhi, AIR 1955 SC 196; Siddique Ahmed and others vs. State, 37 DLR 223; Golam Moula Master vs. State 46 DLR 140. Lawyers Involved: ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on‑Record‑..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 80
Nasima Akhter Vs. Md. Siraj Miah and other, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....fers from no illegality and/or infirmity and we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 38. ......in case of sale of immovable property time is not essence of the contract. Case referred to- Ram Chandra Dash and others Vs. Md Khalilur Rahman and another, 1985 BLD (AD) 41= 37 DLR (AD) 21. Lawyers involved: Mohammad Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mohammad Nawab Ali, Advoc..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 147