Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
A.F.M. Shah Alam Vs. Mujibul Huq & Others, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....ced in a strait-jacket for purposes of the instant case. It has also to be remembered that the impugned order of the Election Commission could not be said to be a final pronouncement on the rights of the parties as it was in the nature of an order covering an unforeseen eventuality w..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 165
Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 212
M/s. M. M. Ispahani Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
..... Sonali Bank which is the successor of the National Bank of Pakistan was created by the President's Order No. 26 of 1972, [The Bangladesh Banks (Nationalisation) Order, 1972] vesting all the assets, rights and interest subsisting in the National Bank of Pakistan within the territory of Bangladesh. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Abdul Kader & ors. Vs. A. K. Noor Mohammad & ors., 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....the transferee has taken or continued in possession, other than a right expressly provided by the terms of the contract: Provided that nothing in this section shall affect the rights of a transferee for consideration who has no notice of the contract or of the part perfor&s..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Radha Krishna Jogani (Agarwalla) Vs. Dwarka Das Agarawalla & others, 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
....Company or its properties. (d) Taking advantage of temporary absence of the appellant, respondent 1 managed to create some false, forged and fabricated documents to deprive the appellant of his rights in suit properties and to usurp the same. Respondent 1 has only four annas share in the busin..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Mehar Khatun and ors. Vs. Sarat Kumar Kanungoe, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....y of which the transferee has taken or continued in possession, other than a right expressly provided by the terms of the contract: Provided that nothing is this section shall affect the rights of transferee for consideration who has no notice of the contract or of the part performanc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Moulvi Abdulla Welfare Trust Vs. K.A. Gani, Advocate & ors., 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....ct remains that the claim put forward in the application arises out of the administration as receiver on the basis of his accounts as receiver duly passed by the Court. Even when third party rights are involved in the course of Court's management the Court allows such third party to initi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Kad Banu & others Vs. Hajera Khatun and others, 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
....ng they brought the allegation that defendant had violated the order of injunction. Order 21, rule 32 is in the following terms: ''Decree for specific performance for restitution of conjugal rights, or for an injunction.—(1) Where the party against whom a decree for the specific perform..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Asaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
....of the Regulation: "4. Vesting of abandoned property.— Where before the commencement of this Regulation, any property, or the possession, control, management, administration or other rights of, or in respect of, any property, has been or is purported to have been, taken over under..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Faiz Ahmed Chowdhury & another Vs. Baktear Ahmed Chowdhury & other, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
..................Respondents Judgment June 14, 1983. The provision for the appointment of a receiver is to be considered as one of the harshest remedies for the enforcement of rights to property. It should, therefore, be exercised only in extreme cases. Where there is n..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Ass. Custodian, Enemy Property (L & B), Tangail Vs. Bholanath Guha & ors., 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....s are heard together and disposed of by this single judgment. 2. Respondent No. 1 filed Miscellaneous Case Nos. 1002 to 1005 of 1969, in the 2nd Court of Munsif, Tangail, for correction of rights under section 143A of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. The case of respondent No...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Md. Tabibur Rahman Mollah Vs. Md. Sayedur Rahman & ors., 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... Both the documents have been considered by the trial Court, but the lower Appellate Court considered only, Ext-B, totally ignoring Ext-2, and other evidence, such as rent receipts, record-on-rights. Non-consideration of the materials evidence by the lower Appellate Court has exposed its fi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Abdul Karim Meah Vs. Arch Bishop, Christian Missionaries and another, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....ot entertained Lord Esher, MR in this connection observed: "We must act on the settled rule of practice, which is that amendments are, not admissible when they prejudice the rights of the opposite party as existing at the date of such amendment. If an amendment were allow..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Nasiruddin Mahmud & others Vs. Momtazuddin Ahmed & another, 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
....was advanced that by special agreement between the parties, one partner could be regarded as entrusted with property. The clue was taken from the Book on Partnership Edn. 10 by Lord Lindley where the rights of a partner is dealt with in these words: “In the absence of a special agreement ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 146
Abdul Hakim Vs. Goleda Begum and others, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... but before the final decree was passed, non-substitution of their heirs did not cause any damage to the decree or its execution. The reason for this principle of law is very simple; it is that the rights of parties to the suit have been conclusively determined in the preliminary decree and what ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 97
Safia Khatun and others Vs. Amena Khatun, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....int. The subsequent application of the other three brothers for being added as defendants in the mortgage suit was rejected by the Court by order dated 13.2.22 Ext. 8 with the observation that the rights of the three brothers, if any, would not be affected by any decision of the suit. 10...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Bangladesh Vs. Tobarak Ali Mia and others, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
.... pattani holders the howla could not be sold under section 9 read with section 11 of Patni Regulation of 1819. As the auction sale was made illegally it was void and illegal and did not affect the rights and interests of the plaintiffs in the suit lands. The High Court Division confirmed the fin..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Sekander Ali Mia, Mujibur Rahman & Shahidul Islam Vs. Chairman, B.I.W.T.A. & ors, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....licence read as follows: "11. This licence is not to be and shall never be construed to have created any right or tenancy in favour of the Licensee and Licensor reserves and retains all his rights of: (i) conducting/performing all his activities including collection of Tolls, L.S.Cs, ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 103
Tahmina Khatun Vs. Begum Nurun Nahar and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....ers' share, provisions of section 151 C.P.C. are applicable. We do not think that this contention is tenable. For, remedy sought in the application goes into the merit of the decree itself in which rights and liabilities of the parties have been conclusively determined. Under this decree, decree..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
M. A. Hai Md. Wazed Ali Miah & Md. Moslem Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....was given. In the case of M/s. M. Laxmi & Co. v. Dr. Anant R. Deshpande, AIR 1973 SC 171, it has been held that the Court can take notice of subsequent events to shorten litigation, to preserve rights of both the parties and to serve the ends of justice. In the case of Amarjit Kaur v. Pritam S..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 112