Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1081-1100 of 4843 results.
Jamsed & others Vs. Abdus Samad & others, 1892, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ner indicated herein-before. This application is thus disposed of accordingly. 9. Let a copy of this judgment be forwarded to the Secretary, Cabinet Division and Ministry of law of the Government of Bangladesh to draw the attention of all Additional District Magistrates about the...... disposing criminal appeals in the light of the observations made in this judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 68. ......Present: Latifur Rahman J Jamsed & others…………………………………………Petitioners Vs. Abdus Samad & others……………………&he...... disposing criminal appeals in the light of the observations made in this judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 68. ..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 1 Dec, 1982 | Hits: 1
Ramesh Chandra Barman & others Vs. Naresh Chandra Barman & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....e-emption case is dismissed. In the result, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 99. ........(7) Cases Referred to- Upendra Chandra Roy Vs. Jonab Ali, 29 DLR (Dacca) 1977 at page 229; Bandar Ali Halder Vs. Kalu Halder and others; Mohar Ali Mondal Vs. Shahabuddin Mia at page 27, 1 Bangladesh Case Report (1981). Lawyers Involved: Abdul Mannan Khan, Advocate— For th...... (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Rahman J Ramesh Chandra Barman & others……………………Petitioners Vs. Naresh Chandra Barman & others…………………&......e-emption case is dismissed. In the result, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 99. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 24 Nov, 1982 | Hits: 2
....does not go to show that the appellant created a tenancy in his favour by not interfering with it.
17. As regards the contention that the suit land being tenanted lands were acquired by the Government, it appears that no evidence has been given to show that the suit land falls within ......without any order as to costs. Judgments and decrees of the Courts below are set aside and Title Suit No. 76 of 1958 is decreed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 157.
......
FKMA Munim CJ
Ruhul Islam J
Badrul Haider Chowdhury J
Shahabuddin Ahmed J
Chowdhury ATM Masud J
New Dhamai Tea Estate Limited………… Appellant
Vs.
Arjun Kurmi, being dead his heirs: Chenia Kurmi and ors………… Res......without any order as to costs. Judgments and decrees of the Courts below are set aside and Title Suit No. 76 of 1958 is decreed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 157.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: 6 Aug, 1982 | Hits: 3
....dinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca are hereby affirmed for the reasons stated above.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 282.
......82.
......ate Jurisdiction)
Present:
Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J
M.H. Rahman J
Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation………………Appellant
Vs.
M/S Moinuddin Akhtaruddin Chowdhury…………………......adah Company Ltd. Vs. Raymon & Co. (India) Private Ltd., AIR 1962 (SC) 1810; Waverly Jute Mills Co. Ltd Vs. Raymon Co. (India) Private Ltd., AIR 1963 Supreme Court 90.
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Abdul Aziz, Advocate— For the Appellants.
Fakir Shahabuddin Ahmed with Shah Abu Nayee..
Category: Arbitration Law, Corporate Law, Property Law | Date: 15 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 2
M/s Saleh Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. TSS PACIFIC ABETO and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ertified copy of the plaint is to be kept in the record. The Bank guarantee in this suit is extended upto 15th July, 1982. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 188. ...... at Chittagong from the Tag Master is the Tag's agent in Singapore; (iv) Acknowledgement receipt duly signed by the plaintiffs upon receipt of the vessel in afloat condition at Chittagong in Bangladesh to be attached along with the documents required for negotiation of the letter of Credit.......l Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury ATM Masud J M/s Saleh Steel Industries Ltd………………… Appellant Vs. TSS PACIFIC ABETO and others…………… Respondents Judgm......ertified copy of the plaint is to be kept in the record. The Bank guarantee in this suit is extended upto 15th July, 1982. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 188. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 400
....s in the application. Their case is similar. According to them the company, Incorporated on 20th August. 1976, started functioning after purchasing Elahinoor Tea Estate and Halda Valley Tea Estate in Government auction on 14th June, 1977: that the Company had to take loan of Tk. 5, 70368/22 paisa fr......Advocates of the parties and by Mr. Rafiq-ul Huq who appeared as amicus Curiae.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 345; 3 BLD (HCD) (1983)149
......
High Court Division
(Civil Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
M.H. Rahman J
United Planters and Traders Limited and Another…………Petitioners
Vs.
Md. Mosharraf Hossain Knan & Others………………&hel...... Court Division
(Civil Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
M.H. Rahman J
United Planters and Traders Limited and Another…………Petitioners
Vs.
Md. Mosharraf Hossain Knan & Others…………………&hell..
Category: Company Law | Date: 28 May, 1982 | Hits: 3
Abdul Quddus & Another Vs. The State, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ion that the girl was aged about 17 years. The genuineness of this certificate by the Deputy Civil Surgeon, Bogra is very much in doubt. Moreover a doctor of the rank of a Deputy Civil Surgeon of the Government would not normally examine an unmarried girl without her being forwarded by the police an......accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ......tion) Present: Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Mustafa Kamal J Abdul Quddus & Another…………………………Appellant Vs. The State…………………………&h...... Shah Alam and others Vs. The Crown 10 DLR 237; Rameshwar Vs. The State of Rajasthan, (1952) SCR (India) 377; Momtaz Ahmed Khan Vs. The State 19 DLR (SC) 259 (265). Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocate— For the Appellants. Kazi Safiuddin Ahmed, Assistant Att..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 6 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Narendralal Chowdhury & others Vs. Bimal Kanti Chowdhury & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... of the properties. She asserted that she purchased R.S. plot No.382 of schedule (B) in mortgage execution sale. She has been possessing the same since such purchase on payment of revenue to the Government by raising construction and making improvement thereon. 6. Defendant No.16 has ...... that no trust was created by the will or that it was void. Mr. Halder pointed out that the amended section of section I of the Trust Act which runs as follows:- "It extends to the whole of Bangladesh. But nothing herein contained affects the rules of Muhammadan Law as to waqf, or the mutu......adhir Sen J Sultan Hossain Khan J Narendralal Chowdhury & others…………………………………Appellants Vs. Bimal Kanti Chowdhury & others…………………&...... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 4 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd Vs. M/S Brestern Shipping Company Ltd. & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......: M.H. Rahman J Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd…………………………………………..Plaintiff Vs. M/S Brestern Shipping Company Ltd. & others……………&hel...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. M/S Brostern Shipping Company Ltd. & Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......(1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......t High Court Division (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Present: M.H. Rahman J Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd.…………..…..................Plaintiff Vs. M/S Brostern Shipping Company Ltd. & Others…….. Defendant Judgment ...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
....y jurisdiction of the High Court of Calcutta. The Admiralty rules framed by the High Court of Calcutta came into operation in June 1912. The jurisdiction was preserved by section 106 of the Government of India Act, 1915 and section 223 of the Government of India Act, 1935. In 194......Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 356
......dmiralty Jurisdiction)
Present:
M.H. Rahman J
Albert David (Bangladesh) Limited……………………………. Appellants
Vs.
Messrs. Nedlloyd Lunen B.V., Rotterdam owners of Nedlloyd Lines Bremen, represented by Agents M......ordered that the suit be decreed for a sum of Tk. 10, 27,502/- only against defendant Nos. 1 and 2 and 3 with costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 356
..
Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 5
Surendra Mohan Shaha Vs. Government of Bangla¬desh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....t High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Chowdhury A.T.M. Masud J Md. Altaf Hossain J Surendra Mohan Shaha.................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others………..Respondents and Surendra......sit the find to the Registrar of this court within 10 days from date. Md. Altaf Hossain J. — I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)110 ......reme Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Chowdhury A.T.M. Masud J Md. Altaf Hossain J Surendra Mohan Shaha.................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others………..Respondents and ......e is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)110 ..Category: Contempt of Court Law | Date: 5 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 3
Abdul Quader Molla Vs. The Chairman, Bakerganj Zilla Parishad and another, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ning an authority to do a certain thing is mandatory or not could be decided upon the consequence that would follow in the event of not doing the thing by the authority. The petitioners were not Government employees under Rule 5(53) of the Bangladesh Service Rules and their pay were not paid ou......ndatory or not could be decided upon the consequence that would follow in the event of not doing the thing by the authority. The petitioners were not Government employees under Rule 5(53) of the Bangladesh Service Rules and their pay were not paid out of the State Treasury— Under the......J Sultan Hossain Khan J Abdul Quader Molla...................Petitioner (In Writ Petition No.447/80) Roi Mohan Rai..........................Petitioner (In Writ Petition No.448/80) Vs. The Chairman, Bakerganj Zilla Parishad and another........Respondents is the Petitions ......p;……(5 & 7) Cases Referred To- A.I.R. 1955 S.C. 70; P.L.D. 1939 S.C. 13; A.I.R. 1959 Calcutta 356; A.I.R. 1967 Calcutta 326. Lawyers Involved: Maimil Hosein with Md. Joynul Abedin—For petitioner in both Petitions. Kazi Shafiuddin, A,A.O—For the ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 1 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
Ragib Ali Vs. Bangladesh and ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....hellip;….........Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. Result: The Rule is made absolute Fundamental Right to Protection of Law – Illegal dispossession by Government Officers— Government sold a property to the petitioner and thereafter disposse......igh Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhery J A.T. M. Afzal J Ragib Ali.......................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors……………….........Respondents Judgment......rt High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhery J A.T. M. Afzal J Ragib Ali.......................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors……………….........Respondents ......e with costs to be paid as directed above. AT.M. Afzal J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 185. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 1
Salehuddin Khan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors............................Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. Result: The rule is made absolute. Suspension of Government servant – Rule II of Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1976 ......High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Salehuddin Khan..................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors............................Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. ......urt High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Salehuddin Khan..................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors............................Respondents Judgment January 26, 19......ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate & another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....hellip;…………………………..Respondents Judgment January 13, 1982. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Whether the Government was within its rights to take over possession of the tea garden and other movables of the......hury J ATM Afzal J Neerala Tea Estate & another……………………………………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors……………………&helli......man Chowdhury J ATM Afzal J Neerala Tea Estate & another……………………………………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors…………………&hell......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ..Category: Constitutional Law, Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....oncurring with the same, I would like to add a few words of my own. We have felt obliged to take notice of aerie in facts that came to light in course of hearing of this matter and also from the Government file that was produced before us by the learned Assistant Attorney General. 2. The p......riginal Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another……………........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others ………...............Respondent Judgment ......Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another……………........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others ………...............Respondent Judg......nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Gopal Chandra Mondol Vs. Lashmat Dasi, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....re considered by the Court to have special means of knowledge as members of the family or otherwise, to testify to the relationship of the plaintiff with Gour Majhi. Those statements found on various Government records as to distribution and devolution of the family property and as to ownership, was......dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ......h Court Division (Second Appeal Jurisdiction) Present: Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J Gopal Chandra Mondol……………………Appellant Vs. Lashmat Dasi................................Respondent Judgment January 7, 1982. ......t January 7, 1982. Result: The Appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred To- Seshammat Vs. Kuppanatyyangar, reported in A.I.R. 1926 Madras, at page 475. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim—For the Appellant. Kh. Mahbubuddin Ahmed with Fida M. Kamal—For t..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 7 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 3
Zainal Abedin & Another Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....d Choudhury J M.H. Fahman J Zainal Abedin & Another………………………………........Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others…………........Respondents Judgme......sp;J M.H. Fahman J Zainal Abedin & Another………………………………........Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others…………........Respondents Judgment Decemb......bdul Wadud Choudhury J M.H. Fahman J Zainal Abedin & Another………………………………........Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others…………........Respondents ...... transmitted to the appellate Division of this Court alongwith the certificate for leave to appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 77, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 493 ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 14 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1
....alth and Population Control and others......................................Respondents
Judgment
December 2, 1981.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
Compulsory Retirement of Government Servant –
No materials were produced before the Court to show that the author......ginal Jurisdiction)
Present:
Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J
Sultan Hossain Khan J
Dr. Abu Ahmed Chowdhury…………………Petitioner
Vs.
Bangladesh represented by the Secretary of the Ministry of Health and Population Control and ot......ecial Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J
Sultan Hossain Khan J
Dr. Abu Ahmed Chowdhury…………………Petitioner
Vs.
Bangladesh represented by the Secretary of the Ministry of Health and Population Contr......hority. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs.
Ed.
Sultan Hossain Khan J.—I agree.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 21
..
Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 2 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1
93449351682193697099922793349338933292289226955095579558955393339229955592309543