Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1081-1100 of 5157 results.
Circle Officer, Sutrapur Vs. Mohammad, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
.... Judgment August 9, 1989. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Same privilege of government and citizens for filing appeal for delay condonation The law is the same for the Government as well as for the citizens and that the Government can not enjoy a special privilege in ......tion of budget and sanction of fund by the relevant Ministry under a particular head are involved and as such Government requires longer time in making the decision and then in processing the matter. Bangladesh Vs. Zahiruddin 1986 BLD (AD) 180 referred......... (9) Right of appeal – Unive......Petitioner Vs. Mohammad ...................................Opposite Party Judgment August 9, 1989. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Same privilege of government and citizens for filing appeal for delay condonation The law is the same for the Government as ......n (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hossain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J Circle Officer, Sutrapur.....................Petitioner Vs. Mohammad ...................................Opposite Party Judgment August 9, 19..Category: Limitation Law | Date: 9 Aug, 1989 | Hits: 178
Ziaul Hoque Vs. Election Commission, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
...., 1990. Result: The Rule is discharged. Delimitation of the area of the upazillas in question can not affect the petitioner who is not resident of any of the villages taken away by the Government by an impugned notification. The residents of the villages in question are the only perso...... is discharged with compensatory cost of Tk. 5,000/‑ (Taka five thou sand) only to be paid to the respondent No. 5 by the petitioner. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 9. ......ue J Ziaul Hoque........................................................................................Petitioner Vs. The Election Commission, Sher‑e‑Bangla Nagar, Dhaka and others ............Respondents Judgment May 30, 1990. Result: The Rule is di......ent: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Ziaul Hoque........................................................................................Petitioner Vs. The Election Commission, Sher‑e‑Bangla Nagar, Dhaka and others ............Re..Category: Election Law | Date: 14 Jun, 1989 | Hits: 98
AK Banik & Khokan Kumar Saha Vs. M. Karim & another, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....n both the two cases was received by the Deputy Jailor (Detention Branch) on 6.4.89 during lock-up hours. 4. The two contemners have brought our attention to 3 annexures containing the Government orders and representations by authority thereto. By Memo No.1017(Security-1) dated 7......cretary, Ministry of Home Affairs advised the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons of all the Divisions of the Superintendent of Jails in Bangladesh through the Inspector General of Prisons, Bangladesh, that the Jail authority is to release the detenu in pursuance of the order of the Suprem......te—For the Contemner-Respondents (In both the petitions). Contempt Petition Nos. 9 & 10 of 1989. Judgment Mustafa Kamal J. - These two contempt Rules have been heard together and will be disposed of by the same judgment as they arise out of a same transaction. 2. In Con......aka) (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Mustafa Kamal J Md. Mozammel Hoque J AK Banik & Khokan Kumar Saha.................Petitioners (In both the petitions) Vs. M. Karim, Jailor, Dhaka Central Jail, Dhaka & another...................Respondent..Category: Contempt of Court Law, Criminal Law | Date: 11 Jun, 1989 | Hits: 102
Meher Ali Vs. A.K. Murshid and others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....iff, that SCC Suit No.5/70 is dismissed and that the plaintiff and others be evicted from the suit land and that the suit land is distributed to defendant No.1 A.K. Murshed, one Mir Sayed Ali and the Government of Bangladesh (who are to be added as defendants 7 and 8 respectively in the plaint), tha...... Murshid and others...................................Respondents Judgment May 25, 1989. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Nasiruddin Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh & ors. 32 DLR (AD) 216; Khondoker Ehteshamuddin Ahmed @ Iqbal Vs. Bangladesh and othe......l Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: FHMH Rahman J Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J Meher Ali....................................................Appellant Vs. A.K. Murshid and others...................................Respondents Judgment May 25, 1989. Res......t Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: FHMH Rahman J Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J Meher Ali....................................................Appellant Vs. A.K. Murshid and others...................................Respondents Judgment M..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 25 May, 1989 | Hits: 152
Ananda and others Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....t a dagger point, the threat to life haunting the girl althrough. But as to persons joining subsequently the judgment delivered by Nawalkishore, CJ in the relevant portion held thus:- "The learned Government advocate urged lastly that since the offence of abduction was a continuing one, and perso......not wanted in connection with any other case. The suo motu Rule for enhancement is discharged. Send down the L.C. records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 533.......Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 533.......33...Category: Women and Children | Date: 24 May, 1989 | Hits: 143
....order as to costs. The order of stay is vacated.
Let the suit be disposed of in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 79.
......is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 79.
...... (1991) 79.
......igh Court Division
(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction)
Present:
Muhammad Ansar Ali J
Inspector, Railway Nirapatta Bahini, Bangladesh Railway, Khulna and others........Petitioners
Vs.
Sohrab Ali ...............................................................Opposite Party
..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 18 Apr, 1989 | Hits: 87
....t be sent at once to the Sessions Judge and the Deputy Commissioner, Narayanganj and also to the Upazila Magistrate Araihazar Upazila.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HD) (1990) 79. ......ent:
Fazal Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J
Mahmudul Amin Chowdhury J
Sukhendra Chandra Das..........................Petitioner
Vs.
The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of Bangladesh and Others……....Opposite Parties
Judgment
December 13, 1988.
Result:
T......990) 79. ......
(Dhaka)
(Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction)
Present:
Fazal Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J
Mahmudul Amin Chowdhury J
Sukhendra Chandra Das..........................Petitioner
Vs.
The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of Bangladesh and Others……....Opposite Par..
Category: Women and Children | Date: 13 Dec, 1988 | Hits: 193
Mohammad Meah Vs. Pubali Bank & others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....st consider the decision reported in 28 DLR (AD) 43 which appears at the first glance to support the appellant's case. In that case the judgment debtor obtained an order of attachment directing the Government to deposit the judgment-debtor's security-money lying with the Government. The Govern......lbemarle Supply Company, Limited Vs. Hind and Company (1928) 1 K.B. 307, Green Vs. All Motors Ltd. (1917, 1 K.B. 625), Koone vs. Thomas (1905) 1 K.B. 136, Cree v. All Motors Ltd., (1917, 1 K.B. 625). Bangladesh vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another 28 DLR (AD), Hatton V. Car Maintenance Company, Limite......ult: The appeal is dismissed. The Contract Act, 1872 (IX of 1872), section 170 The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order 38, rule 5 From the facts and circumstances of the case I have got no hesitation to hold that the plaintiff knew about the def......Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mohammad Meah........................................Appellant Vs. Pubali Bank & ors.......................................Respondents Judgment ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 1 Sep, 1988 | Hits: 252
Jalaluddin Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....der of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Divisional Special Judge is right. In the result, I dismiss the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 87. ......der of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Divisional Special Judge is right. In the result, I dismiss the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 87. ...... Bird Vs. Jones, (1845) 7 Q.C. 742; P. Narasayya Pantula Vs. Capt. R.A.G. Stuart, (1865) 2 M.H.C.R. 396; Muthu Nadar, 1945 (Mad.) 313; Kunhi Bava vs. Emperor, 1929 (Mad.) 226; 1942 (Mad.) 723; Mallukhand Sheikh and another Vs. The King, AIR 1949 (Cal.) 104. Lawyers Involved: M. Fazlul Ka......(1989) 87. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 23 Mar, 1988 | Hits: 32
Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
.... (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu...........................Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment March 20, 1988. ......ppellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment March 20, 1988. Result: The detention is held to be illegal. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 102 Materials were available to the detaining authority since March 1...... Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu...........................Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment March 20, 1988. Result: The detention i......Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu...........................Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment March 20, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Mar, 1988 | Hits: 95
Firoza Begum Vs. Hormuz Ali & another, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
....lty to Women (Deterrent Punishment) Ordinance, 1983 read with the Special Powers Act (See Section 10 of the Cruelty to Women (Deterrent Punishment) Ordinance, 1983). 5. It further appears that the Government has not preferred any appeal against the said impugned order dated 27.4.87 passed by Spec......appeal is, therefore, not maintainable on this ground also. The appeal accordingly is summarily dismissed on the grounds suited above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (1988) 161.......nal No. III, Tangail discharging accused Md. Hormuz Ali in Special Powers Act case No. 31 of 1986. The impugned order dated 27.4.87 is as follows- "Accused Hormuz Ali who is on bail files hazira and is present in the court. The record is taken up for framing of charge. Perused the F.I.R., C/S a......ourt High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Abdul Bari Sarkar J Firoza Begum …………………….Appellant Vs. Hormuz Ali & another..............Respondents Judgment July 29, 1987. Lawyers I..Category: Women and Children | Date: 29 Jul, 1987 | Hits: 112
Sreemati Parul Kusum Roy Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
....declared to have been passed without any lawful authority and to be no legal effect. Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 389. ......on (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J Sreemati Parul Kusum Roy…………………………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh & others…………………………………………..Respondents Judgment ...... namely the Upazila Nirbahi Officer, Anowara dated 14.09.85 declaring the disputed properties as vested property on the recommendation of the respondent No.4, namely Upazila, Revenue Officer, Anowara and approving grant of lease thereof in favour of the stranger respondent Nos.6-9. 2. 8.23 acre...... Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J Sreemati Parul Kusum Roy…………………………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh & others…………………………………………..Respondents Judgm..Category: Property Law | Date: 22 Mar, 1987 | Hits: 13
Md. Nurul Haque Vs. Sonali Bank of Bangladesh & another, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....der section 115(1) C.P.C. The application is, therefore, summarily rejected. Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 223. ...... Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Haque…………………………………...........Petitioner Vs. Sonali Bank of Bangladesh & another………….Respondents Judgment November 19, 1986. Result:......ents Judgment November 19, 1986. Result: The application is summarily rejected. Case Referred to- Satish Vs. Apara, 34 Cal 403 (F.B), Bejoy Vs. Satish, 9 I.C. 842, Sikandar Vs. Kushal, 59 Cal 756, Sardar Vs. Jahar, 59 Cal 906, Baijnath Vs. Kedar, A.I.R 1938 Cal 74, G......visional Jurisdiction Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Haque…………………………………...........Petitioner Vs. Sonali Bank of Bangladesh & another………….Respondents Judgment Novembe..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 19 Nov, 1986 | Hits: 24
....t and decree.
6. The principal question in this Rule is whether an Assistant Custodian Enemy Property (Lands and Buildings) can maintain a suit in 1974 in respect of the properties vested in the Government of Bangladesh under President's Order No.29 of 1972 as amended by P.O. No.134 of......others……………………Opposite-parties
Judgment
September 16, 1986.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
Cases Referred to-
Bangladesh Enemy Property Management Board and others Vs. Md. Abdul Majid, 27 DLR (AD) 52; M/S. Dull......ip;………Opposite-parties
Judgment
September 16, 1986.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
Cases Referred to-
Bangladesh Enemy Property Management Board and others Vs. Md. Abdul Majid, 27 DLR (AD) 52; M/S. Dullchand Omraolal Vs. Bangladesh, through the ......nal Jurisdiction)
Present:
Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J
Subitri Bari………………………………Petitioner
Vs.
Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property & Additional Deputy Commissioner (Rev) Patuakhali..
Category: Evidence Law | Date: 16 Sep, 1986 | Hits: 259
Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....t of the said Memo the petitioner deposited rent for the year 1389 B.S. on 22.08.1981 and tie petitioner executed a lease deed signed by the District Fishery Development Officer on behalf of the Government of Bangladesh. It is also the cases of the petitioner that the petitioner thereafter subm......(Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: S Hossain Khan J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd…………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Reforms, and ......n Khan J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd…………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Reforms, and others………………&hell......ion (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: S Hossain Khan J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd…………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Refo..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 23 Apr, 1986 | Hits: 247
Reajuddin and another Vs. Azimuddin@ Abdul Aziz and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....ent of the learned Lower Appellate Court it affirmed. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD)(1987) 228. ...... or records of the acts— (1) of the sovereign authority, (ii) of official bodies and tribunals, and (iii) of public officers, legislative, judicial and executive of any part of Bangladesh or of the Commonwealth, or of a foreign country. 2) Public records kept in Banglades......lso Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD)(1987) 228. ...... Bench (Civil Rivisional Jurisdiction) Present: AM Mahmudur Rahman J Reajuddin and another…………..............Plaintiff-Respondents-Petitioners Vs. Azimuddin @ Abdul Aziz and others…………………&h..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 3 Apr, 1986 | Hits: 8
Ruhul Amin Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....cord be sent down with a copy of this order at once. Md. Abdul Jalil J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 166. ...... James Gardner Vs. Edward A. Lucas, (1878) 3 A 532; Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Vs. Irving 1905 AC 369; Delhi Cloth and General Mills. Co. Ltd. Vs. Income-Tax Commissioner, Delhi, AIR 1927 PC 242; Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Mannan and others, 29 DLR (SC) 17. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mohammad Al......ch 19, 1986. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- James Gardner Vs. Edward A. Lucas, (1878) 3 A 532; Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Vs. Irving 1905 AC 369; Delhi Cloth and General Mills. Co. Ltd. Vs. Income-Tax Commissioner, Delhi, AIR 1927 PC 242; Bangladesh Vs. Abdu...... (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Ruhul Amin........................................Petitioner Vs. The State..........................................Opposite party Judgment March ..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 19 Mar, 1986 | Hits: 3
Mst. Ayesha Sultana @ Minu Vs. Md. Shahjahan Ali, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....t raised was that the learned Additional Sessions Judge overlooked the provision of law inasmuch as after the promulgation of P.O. 7 of 1972 dissolving local Council and Municipal Committees the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh by an Extra Ordinary Gazette Notification......s Judge overlooked the provision of law inasmuch as after the promulgation of P.O. 7 of 1972 dissolving local Council and Municipal Committees the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh by an Extra Ordinary Gazette Notification dated 20th November, 1972 appointed the Adminis......i—For the Appellant. Syiedur Rahman Mean—For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 314 of 1983. Judgment Amia-ur-Rahman Khan J.- This appeal is directed against the Judgment and order dated 19.9.83 passed by Mr. Md. Abdul Kadir Khan, Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Dh......sent: Latifur Rahman J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Mst. Ayesha Sultana @ Minu………………………………...Appellant Vs. Md. Shahjahan Ali………………………&h..Category: Family Law | Date: 17 Mar, 1986 | Hits: 1
Shaikh Obaidul Haq Vs. The State & another, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....litan Magistrate, Dhaka be quashed. Latifur Rahman, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 105. ......mmending quashment of the said Criminal Case. 3. The petitioner's case is that he was the Managing director of Dhaka Paints Limited which was the principal agent dealer of Berger Paints Bangladesh Limited of which the Opposite party is the Regional Sales Manager. As the appointed agent...... The State & another............................Opposite Parties Judgment February 20, 1986. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Md. Anwar Ali and Md. Liaquat Ali Vs. State & Md. Nezamuddin, 30 DLR at page 327; Saeeduddin Qureshi Vs. The S......ivision (Dhaka Bench) (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Rahman J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Shaikh Obaidul Haq..............................Petitioner Vs. The State & another............................Opposite Parties Judgment Febr..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Feb, 1986 | Hits: 1
Mrs. Shahar Banoo Ziwar Sultana Beyad Vs. Mrs. Wahida Khan & 5 others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
.... absolute and the impugned order is set aside. The Criminal proceeding will continue as usual. Latifur Rahman, J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 132. ......fic Performance of Contract against the present petitioner on the basis of the forged Bainapatra and also obtained an ex-parte decree by suppressing summons from the petitioner. On her return to Bangladesh she became aware of the forgery and thereupon she made an application in the Civil Court ......Banoo Ziwar Sultan Beyed made a complaint to Kotwali Police Station on 5.2.79 stating that the Opposite party was her monthly tenant in the house No.252, Road No.22, Dhanmondi Residential Area, Dhaka and while the petitioner was absent at Iran for about 7 (seven) years the opposite party taking adva......minal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Ragman J Amin Ur Rahman Khan J Mrs. Shahar Banoo Ziwar Sultana Beyad………………Petitioner Vs. Mrs. Wahida Khan & 5 others………………Opposite-Par..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 14 Feb, 1986 | Hits: 31
50405005731974197365503872751863429316964135850784987642760985759412940991508467