Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Bangladesh Bank and ors. Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....d. This Case is also Reported in: ...... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......roller of Estate Duty PLD 1961 SC 119 = 13 DLR (SC) 105; Kumudini Welfare Trust vs. Province of East Pakistan PLD 1963 Dhaka 136 = 12 DLR (SC) 17, State of Orissa vs. Modan Gopal Rungta AIR 1952. Lawyers Involved: Fida M Kamal, Additional Attorney-General, (Md. Ataur Rahman Khan, ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 24 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 175
Abdul Jabbar Vs. Md. Lokman Hossian, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......lias Lalim........Petitioner. Vs. Md. Lokman Hossain being dead his legal heirs and Md. Abdul Latif and others. ...........................Respondents. Judgment 21 April 2004 Lawyers Involved: Herendra Nath Nandi, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-rec..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 21 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 69
Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ot empowered to supersede the arbitration clause and appoint an arbitrator who is not named in said arbitration clause………………(51) Cases Referred to- Bangladesh Water Development Board Vs. Nasim another, 1988 BLD 369; RAJUK Vs. MN Alam & others, ......d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......ent of Andhra Pradesh, 4 SCC 93; Hashmat Ali Jamader Vs. Asmat Ali Jamader, 6 DLR 478; R. Sim & Co. Vs. Pakistand Industries Ltd., 8 DLR 305; Bangladesh Vs. Masriki Textile, 35 DLR (AD) 123. Lawyers Involved: MA Gaffar, Advocate- For the Appellant. Shafique Ahmed with ARM Shahidu..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 3
Agrani Bank, rep. by the Chairman, BoD, & ors. Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ept of proportionality which has no application in the instant case and thus it is not sustainable. Moreover doctrine of proportionality is non-existent in the field of administration of justice in Bangladesh. …………………………(13)&nb...... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ellip;………(13) Cases Referred to- Sonali Bank vs Ruhul Amin Khan 46 DLR (AD) 85: Union of India and another vs G Ganayutham AIR 1997 (SC) 3387. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali advocate̴..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 130
Ananda Builders Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... ...... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ...... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ......tract….(19) Cases Referred to- Sharping Matshyajibi Samabaya Samity Vs. Bangladesh 39 DLR (AD) 85; Bangladesh Power Development Board Vs. Md. Asaduzzaman Sikder 8 MLR (AD) 241. Lawyers involved: Rafique ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate, Abdur Razzaque, Senior Advocate with him, ins..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 215
Nurul Huq (Md) @ MN Huq Vs. Nirmal Chandra Dutta & anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ave been executed by the respondent and to decide the appeal iii accordance with law. The plaintiff of the suit shall bear the costs of the examination by the Handwriting Expert. Ed. ......ave been executed by the respondent and to decide the appeal iii accordance with law. The plaintiff of the suit shall bear the costs of the examination by the Handwriting Expert. Ed. ......ave been executed by the respondent and to decide the appeal iii accordance with law. The plaintiff of the suit shall bear the costs of the examination by the Handwriting Expert. Ed. ......r the appeal a fresh after obtaining report from the hand-writing expert as to execution of the document in question……………………(8 & 9) Lawyers Involved: Rafique‑ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate, (MI Farooqui, Advocate with hi..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 103
Sec. Min. of Law, Justice & Par. Affairs & ors. Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Division in Writ Petition No. 3005 of 1998 declaring the Memo No. 2862/Solicitor/96‑312/4 dated 13‑9‑1998 of the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Bangladesh cancelling the appointment of the petitioner as Special Public Prosecutor illegal and wi......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... a lawyer and that being the accepted position and whose skill or special know the government was utilizing cannot take exception to the termination of such appointment…..(14) Lawyers Involved: Syed Abu Kowser and Md. Dabirush Shan, Deputy Attorneys‑Genera..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 201
SM Jillur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J SM Jillur Rahman ..............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others .......................Respondents Judgment April 5, 2004...... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......y be considered legally well conceived” and such person is not competent to question the legality of such action……………………(8) Lawyers Involved: Md. Mujibur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ataur Rahman Kha..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 259
Shakawat Hassan Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 244. ...... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 244. ...... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 244. ...... April 4, 2004. Result: The Application is disposed of. Case Referred to- Abdul Wadud Vs. State, 48 DLR 599. Lawyers Involved: SM Rezaul Karim, Advocate-For the Petitioner. &n..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 4 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 1
Alauddin Sikder (Md) & anr. Vs. BD and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Alauddin Sikder (Md) and another……………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others ....…….............Respondents Judgment Mar......p; The petitioners are directed to pay cost of Taka 5,000 (five thousand) each and pay the amount to the college fund within one month from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. ......p; The petitioners are directed to pay cost of Taka 5,000 (five thousand) each and pay the amount to the college fund within one month from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. ......ation Authority of Bangladesh vs. Kazi Abdur Rouf and others 46 DLR (AD) 145; Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education and others vs. Md. Faizur Rahman and others 51 DLR (AD) 59. Lawyers Involved: Prabir Halder, Advocate, (appeared with the leave of the Court) ins..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 31 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 213
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Mridha & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......on in quashing the proceedings of the special cases. 32. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find merit in all these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......on in quashing the proceedings of the special cases. 32. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find merit in all these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......r vs. State 30 DLR 237; Maklesur Rahman vs. State 35 DLR 72 and Md. Mosharaf Hossain and others vs. State 1990 BLD I 10 = 42 DLR 213. Md Abul Hossain vs. State, 1999 BLD (AD) 97 = 4 BLC (AD) 122. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney‑ General, instructed by Md. Amir Ho..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 30 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 74
Monajjel Hossain Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....revisional application the High Court Division has not, in any way, committed any illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......revisional application the High Court Division has not, in any way, committed any illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......revisional application the High Court Division has not, in any way, committed any illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... J Monajjel Hossain Khan alias Mintoo.......................Petitioner vs State, Represented by the DC......................Respondent Judgment March 24th, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate, wi..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 24 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 92
Ershad Ali Sikder (Md) Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....der (Md).....................Petitioner Vs. State ...........................................Respondent Judgment March 22, 2004. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 105 Unless the impugned order shows error apparent on the f......e are in respectful agreement with the aforesaid observation which manifests the correct exposition of law on the subject. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......e are in respectful agreement with the aforesaid observation which manifests the correct exposition of law on the subject. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......ber, Labour Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and others 52 DLR (AD) 160; Zulfikar Ali Bhutto vs State PLD 1979 SC 741 and Ekushey Television Ltd vs Dr Chowdhury Mahmood Hasan 55 DLR (AD) 26. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, AKM Shafiqul Alam, Advocate with him),..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 22 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 332
Aftab A (Capt Retired) Vs. SM Kutubuddin being dead his heirs: Nuzhat Banu & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....n merit. 12. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. 13. The First Appeal No. 191 of 1992 is remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit. There is no order as to costs. Ed.......n merit. 12. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. 13. The First Appeal No. 191 of 1992 is remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit. There is no order as to costs. Ed.......n merit. 12. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. 13. The First Appeal No. 191 of 1992 is remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit. There is no order as to costs. Ed.......the bianapatra with available authenticated signature of the defendant. Therefore The High Court Division was in error in sending the case back on remand for the same purpose to the trial court. Lawyers Involved: ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Appellant. M I Farooq..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 20 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 106
BRTC Vs. Md. Esken Mollick and anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... ......as come to a correct decision and there being no error in the said judgment, the appeal has no substance. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......as come to a correct decision and there being no error in the said judgment, the appeal has no substance. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......or prejudicial to the interest of the worker unless such intention is clearly spell out or manifested in the statute………………….(8 & 11) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Appellant. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 16 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 99
Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) …………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh………………………… Responden......passed in the light of the resolution which was taken after due compliance of the law as in section 13(3) of the Ordinance. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......passed in the light of the resolution which was taken after due compliance of the law as in section 13(3) of the Ordinance. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... The matters in Article 9 of the constitution are the policy matters of the Republic for the attainment thereof endeavour shall have to be made by the state to fulfill the same. Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 16 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 269
Category: Corporate Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 14 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 4
Jahangir Alam (Md) alias Zakir Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....prisonment and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months more. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), Section 561A The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Articles 103 & 104 Considering the facts and circumstances of the cases and...... to 10 (ten) years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months more. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (AD) 217. ...... to 10 (ten) years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months more. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (AD) 217. ......the ends of justice conviction under section 4 of the Anti-Terrorism Act is upheld but the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for life is modified to 10 years rigorous imprisonment with fine. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate, (appeared with the leave of the Court), instr..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 93
Akram Hossain (Md.) Vs. Sahera Khatun and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....nt District Judge is directed to hear and dispose of the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 317. ......nt District Judge is directed to hear and dispose of the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 317. ......nt District Judge is directed to hear and dispose of the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 317. ......td. Vs. Nitai Chand Saha and others, 3 BCR (AD) 221; Nurul Islam and others Vs. Jamila Khatun and others, 53 DLR (AD) 45; Mohammad Abdul Mannan Vs. Swaraj Roy and others, 8 MLR 302 = 54 DLR 352. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam with Samarandra Nath Biswas, Advocates‑ For the Petitioner. ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 8 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 5
Ataur Rahman (Md.) another Vs. Edruc Limited, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Amin Scales Ltd. and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987 BLD (AD) 259 = 39 DLR (AD) 201; Haridas Vs. Baroda Kishore, 27 Cal 38; Fardous Chowdhury Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 3 BLC (AD) 213; Bancharam Majumdar Vs. Adyanath Bhattacharja, ILR 36 Cal, 936; Capt BS D......tainable and are therefore, liable to be dismissed. In the result, the applications are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 337. ......tainable and are therefore, liable to be dismissed. In the result, the applications are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 337. ......ompany Cases 156; 40 Mad 31 (FB); AIR 1926 (Mad) 1173; AIR 1933 All 642 at 646; AIR 1952 AP 73, 77; AIR 1955 SC 376; AIR 1966 Mad. 74 at 76; AIR 1996 MP 85; Webb Vs. Stanton, (1883), 11 QBD 518. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Ahmed, Advocate- For the Petitioner. Shamsuddin Babul with Md. Mo..Category: Company Law | Date: 3 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 8