Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1201-1220 of 8156 results.
Govt. of BD rep. by the Sec., Min. of Housing & Pub. Work & ors Vs. Md. Javed Alam, 2004, 33 CLC (AD
....ecember 10, 1998 allowed the case and made direction to exclude the property 5 Bagmara Road (also known as 5 Medical Gate Road) PS Kotwali, District Mymensingh from the list of abandoned buildings as published in the Bangladesh Gazette (Extraordinary) dated September 23, 1986 at page 9762 (70) again......tioners. Saleem Ullah Advocate, instructed by MG Bhuyan, Advocate-on-Record‑For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 21186 of 2001. (From the Judgment and order dated March 4, 2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5021 of 1999). ......d. Accordingly, the leave petition is disposed of in the aforesaid manner. Ed. ......n J KM Hasan J Md. Fazlul Haque J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Work and others .............................Petitioners Vs. Md. Javed Alam......................Respondent Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: 24 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 463
Syeda Mazeda Khatun Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
.... In that view of the matter, this petition is dismissed. Ed. Same Case Cited in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 82. ......ted by AKM Khalequzzaman Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1370 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 8th June 2002 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka in Appeal No. 46 of......Same Case Cited in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 82. ......inur Reza Chowdhury CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J AS Ahammed J Syeda Mazeda Khatun.......Petitioner Vs. Bangla..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 17 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 84
Moinul Haque (Md) & anr. Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... substance in the petitions. The two petitions are accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: 56 DLR (AD) 81; 9 MLR (2004) (AD) 321. ......lah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record‑For the Respondents (In both the cases). Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 162 & 171 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 27‑5‑2001 and 28‑5‑2001 passed by the High Court Division in De......re accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: 56 DLR (AD) 81; 9 MLR (2004) (AD) 321. ......bsp; Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Moinul Haque (Md) and another........Petitioner Vs. State ................................. Respondent &..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 13 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 316
Nahar Shipping Lines Ltd. & anr. Vs. Homera Ahmed & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ourt Division in the company matter, we do not find any reason to grant leave against the said judgment. The petition is therefore, dismissed and the delay is condoned. Ed. ......d‑ For Respondent Nos. 1‑ 7. Not represented‑Respondent Nos. 8‑13. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1382 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 4 December 2001 passed by the High Court Division in Matter No. 151 of 1997). Ju...... The petition is therefore, dismissed and the delay is condoned. Ed. ...... Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J AS Ahammed J Nahar Shipping Lines Ltd. and another .............Petitioners ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 12 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 273
Aloke Nath Dey Vs. Govt. of BD. rep. by the DC, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....the challenges, we do not find any illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment for our interference. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......Attorney‑General, instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary Advocate‑ on‑Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1049 of 2002 (From the judgment and order dated 15th April 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Matter No. 2 of 2000). Jud......sp; The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ury CJ Syed JR Mudasir Hussain J AS Ahammed J Aloke Nath Dey.........................Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner. ...Respondent Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: 11 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 436
Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Dhaka & ors Vs. Cieng Tong Chong, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....mitted no illegality in making the said direction. Thus we find no ground to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ....... Mahbudul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 523 of 2002 (From the judgment and order dated 6th January 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5364 of 2001).&n......e with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ....... Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: 5 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 114
Salema Khatun Vs. Matiur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....e of the rule is vacated. In the facts of the case, I do not make any order as to costs. Send down the lower Court record. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 339. ...... the petitioner. Md. Haroon Ar Rashid, Advocate-For the Opposite party. Civil Revision No.1447 of 2001. Judgment Bijan Kumar Das J.-This rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.1.2001 passed by the 3rd Court of the senior Assistant judge and S.C.C. Judge, Dhaka ...... None appears - For the petitioner. Md. Haroon Ar Rashid, Advocate-For the Opposite party. Civil Revision No.1447 of 2001. Judgment Bijan Kumar Das J.-This rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.1.2001 passed by the 3rd Court of the senior Assistant judge an......upreme Court High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Bijan Kumar Das J Salema Khatun……………………Petitioner Vs. Matiur Rahman……………………Oppo..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 8 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 61
....se of action, if any, had matured.
In view of the above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 94; 1 ADC (2004) 497.
......‑For the Appellants.
Abdur Razzaq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑ Record‑For the Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 51 of 2002.
(From the judgment and order dated 9‑11‑2000 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5233 of 2000).
......owed without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 94; 1 ADC (2004) 497.
......uch no cause of action has yet arisen……………………(21 & 22)
Cases Referred to-
Kohinoor Mercantile Corporation vs Hazera Khatun 14 DLR 47; Modi Food Products Ltd vs Commissioner of Sales Tax AIR 1956 (All) 35; ML Bagga vs C Murhar Rao AIR 1956 Hyderabad 35; Sarder and othe..
Category: Others | Date: 8 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 112
Abul Hossain (Md) Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....urt Division 'Further enquiry" is directed to be held. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 125. ...... by Mr. Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate‑on-Record‑For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 23 of 1999. (From the judgment and order dated 19‑2‑1998 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 199......nbsp; This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 125. ......ourt Division is Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 1992 allowing the appeal and sending it back to the trial Court for further investigation. 2. The facts, in short, are that one Jetindra Nath Paddar, Inspector, District Anti‑Corruption Bureau, Satkhira, lodged a first..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 80
Nasima Akhter Vs. Md. Siraj Miah and other, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....fers from no illegality and/or infirmity and we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 38. ......cate, instructed by Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For Respondent No.1 Not represented ‑ Respondent No. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 695 of 2002. (From Judgment and order dated 21‑1‑2002 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 122 of 1992). Jud......re with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 38. ...... is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 38. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 147
Md. Ashequr Rahman Vs. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....uded within 180 days as per Regulation 43(8) of the Regulations. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 1. ......l Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 315 of 2001. Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal by the writ petitioner by leave is against the judgment and order dated April 11, 2000 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.2417 o......ngly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 1. ......te-on- Record- For the Appellant. Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 315 of 2001. Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal by the writ petitioner by leave is against the judgment and order dated April 11, 2000 of a Division Bench of the High..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 2 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 92
Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Sub-Judge and Additional Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD
.... allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 121. ......n the debt or promise and retain the goods pledged as collateral security or he may sell the goods pledged on giving the pawnor reasonable notice of sale. But the court is not competent to make an order in a suit filed by the pawnee directing him to sell the pawned goods and ……upon......orted in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 121. ......nbsp; Md. Ruhul Amin J.- The appeal, by leave, is by the plaintiff of Money Suit No. 74 of 1999 (previously numbered 40 of 1997 of the 4th Court of Artha Rin Adalat) of th..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 28 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 112
Abdur Rashid (Md) Vs. LGRD and Cooperatives, Local Government Division and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
.... Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. Same Case Cited in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 72. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal by the writ‑petitioner is against the order dated August 26, 2002 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3668......AD) (2003) 72. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J KM Hasan J Md. Fazlul Haque J Abdur Rashid (Md) ...............Petitioner Vs. Local Government Rural Developm..Category: Others | Date: 27 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 89
....s and/or error apparent on the face of the record this petition do not merit any consideration.
This petition is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 58
......te with him) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Petitioner.
Not represented‑ The Respondents.
Civil Review Petition No. 47 of 2000.
(From the judgment and order dated 3Gth April 2000 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal N......it any consideration.
This petition is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 58
......rt
Appellate Division
(Civil)
Present:
Mainur Reza Chowdhury CJ
Md. Fazlul Karim J
SJR Mudassir Husain J
AS Ahammed J
Anowar Steel Mills Ltd...........Petitioner
Vs.
Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Internal Resources Division, Government of Ban..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 26 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 114
Alfazuddin Ahmed Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....emption case is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 108. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is an appeal, by leave, by the pre‑emptee (pre‑emption was sought under section 24 of the non-agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949) against the judgment and order dated July 2 1, 1991 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 523 of......AD) (2003) 108. ......ding, inter alia, that the High Court Division overlooked that the Court of appeal below without noticing and considering Exhibit 13(2) Khatian No. 3232/1 relied upon by the trial Court came to an erroneous finding that the pre‑emptors were the co-sharers of the land sought to be pre̴..Category: Property Law | Date: 21 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 81
Govt. of BD, rep. by the Sec., Min. of Defence & ors. Vs. Md. Afzal Hossain Ansari, 2003, 32 CLC (AD
....peal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 65. ......n, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 98 of 1999. (From the Judgment and order dated October 26, 1998 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No. 9 of 1998......ted in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 65. ......rule (2) (c) of Rule 4 of the Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1985) and further made the order to the opposite party in the Administrative Tribunal Case to reinstate the petitioner (respondent herein) in the AT Case. 2. Short facts of the case are that, r..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 8 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 122
Pannu Mollah & anr. Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ssed in Special Tribunal Case No. 100 of 1996 is quashed insofar as the same relates to the appellants. The appellants are set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......wab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Appellants. Ex parte‑The Respondent‑State. Criminal Appeal No. 26 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 29‑6‑2000 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case N......d insofar as the same relates to the appellants. The appellants are set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......peal, by way of leave, is from the judgment and order dated 29‑6‑2000 discharging the Rule in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1838 of 2000 in refusing to quash the conviction of the petitioners under section 19(f) of the Arms Act and the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 10(ten)..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 3 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 84
Securities and Exchange Commission Vs. Abu Tyeb and 10 ors. 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....aken by the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge in one session and not as directed by the High Court Division. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......eal No. 18 of 2000). Ex‑Parte‑Respondent. (In Criminal Appeal Nos.12, 17, 21 & 22 of 2000). Criminal Appeal Nos. 12, 21 and 22 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 23‑6‑1999 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case ......as directed by the High Court Division. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......are that the appellant, Securities and Exchange Commission and others, filed Complaint Petition Case Nos. 1079, 1078, 1074, 1074, 1086, 1088 of 1997 against the accused respondents in the aforementioned appeals under section 25 of the Securities and Exchange Ordinance, 1969 alleging that the acc..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 17 Dec, 2002 | Hits: 76
Captain (Rtd.) Nurul Huda Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....ed in connection with any other case. In the result this appeal is allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 691. ......shan, Deputy Attorney‑General, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate‑on‑ Record‑For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 2002. (From the judgement and order dated 4th June, 2001 passed by the the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 1965 of 1...... allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 691. ....... 1965 of 199.7 arising out of Ramna PS Case No. 93 dated 21‑10‑1996 under sections 149/448/326/307/302/34 of the Penal Code. 3. The short fact leading to this petition is that one Sahara Begum wife of Abul Hasanat Abdullah lodged an first information report alleging, inter a..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 1 Dec, 2002 | Hits: 123
Cinmoy Chowdhury and another Vs. Mridul Chowdhury and Others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....ils and is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 115. ......e Appellants. Not represented‑Respondent Nos. 2‑38. Civil Appeal No. 13 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 24‑5‑2000 passed by the High Court Division in FA No. 213 of 1996). ......3) 115. ......the elder brother and the ‘Karta’ of the joint family, and his wife defendant No. 11 successfully influenced Roy Mohan to go to Burma in the year 1946, Hari Mohan had been earning lot of money by doing business and service in Burma and contributed to increase the joint family fund to acq..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Nov, 2002 | Hits: 87
11019812311612031583732042116128821019465208192140184182209