Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1221-1240 of 7814 results.
Abdul Kader Khan Vs. Rajshahi Co-operative Town Society Ltd, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....………..................Petitioner Vs. Rajshahi Co-operative Town Society Ltd……….Opposite Party Judgment April 29, 2002. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdus Samad with Md. Bazlul Dabir .......................Petitioner Vs. Rajshahi Co-operative Town Society Ltd……….Opposite Party Judgment April 29, 2002. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdus Samad with Md. Bazlul Dabir with Shachira Hossa..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 29 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 3
Delwar Hossain Vs. Rajiur Rahman Chowdhury and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....er seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 22‑52000 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3869 of 1995 discharging the Rule. 2. The facts leading to the application are that the responde......h were dishonoured, it is a prima-facie case of deception. Moreover there is no bar to initiate a criminal case if a civil suit is pending on the same fact. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Haque, Advocate, instructed by Md Aftab H..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 24 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 71
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Golam Rabbani and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
.... is condoned. The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 8‑3‑2000 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1631 of 1994 making the Rule absolute. 2. The facts leading to the leave petition are that the petitioners Golam Rabbani ......f settlement has no jurisdiction in deciding the question of abandonment of the case building when a suit challenging the abandoned character of the property is pending in a competent civil Court. Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by Sufla Khatun, Ad..Category: Property Law | Date: 22 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 107
Abul Kashem & anr. Vs. Govt. of BD and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....sp; Mainur Reza Chowdhury J.- This leave petition arises out of judgment and order of the High Court Division in Civil Revision 3617 of 1995 discharging the Rule. 2. The petitioners as the plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 333 of 1984 in th...... given satisfactory explanation for delay in filing the case where there is substantial public interest involved, there is no wrong in passing the order in condoning the delay. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury AM Zahangir, ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 13 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 133
Gouri Das and ors. Vs. ABM Hasan Kabir and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....n J.- These two appeals by special leave are directed against the judgement and order of the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 2407 and 7793 of 1991 dated 15‑1‑1995 making the making the Rules absolute in the former and discharging the Rules the latter. 2. These appea......roved title in the suit property defendant appellant’s claim of long possession cannot save them…………..(20) Cases Referred to- 29 CWN 138; 43 CWN 828. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Instructed by Sharif Uddi..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 9 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 148
Ali Ahmed and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....Hasan J.- The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 6‑32000 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1383 of 1996 discharging the Rule. 2. The facts leading to the application are that the suit land was requisitioned in LA Cas......had already been delivered to the requiring body on payment of compensation the requisitioned land is not liable to be released even if it remains unutilised by the requiring body………...(4) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Petitioners. Not represent..Category: Property Law | Date: 8 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 84
Aroti Rani Paul Vs. Sudarshan Kumar Paul and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....vil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1200 of 1997 against the judgment and order dated 3rd March, 1997 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 323 of 1994 making the Rule absolute against the judgment and decree passed oil 21st September, 1993) by the learned Additi......reafter on the basis of the law already dead………………(14) Case Referred to- Laxmi Kanta Roy vs Upazila Nirbahi Officer and another, 46 DLR 136. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul ..Category: Family Law | Date: 1 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 181
Chowdhury Mahmood Hasan and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....rs Vs. Bangladesh and others………………………….............Respondents Judgment March 27, 2002. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases referred to- Dr. Mohiuddin Faroque 49DLR (AD) 1; Hyundai Cor......undai Corporation Vs. Sumikin Bussan Corporation and others 2002 BLD (AD) 16 = 54 DLR (AD) 88; Mohammad Hossain vs Quamrul Islam Siddique and others 54 DLR 88; 43 DLR (AD) 126; AIR 1996 (SC) 11. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaq with Mohammod Hossain, Advocates— For the Petitioners. ..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: 27 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 7
Mahmood Alam (Md.) and another Vs. Moklesur Rahman Bhuiya, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.....Petitioners Vs. Moklesur Rahman Bhuiya…………………………Opposite Party Judgment March 27, 2002 Result: The Rule is discharged. Adverse Possession Possession commencing lawfully can transform into a......cil Vs. Debendra Lal Khan, (1933) 61 IA 78; 1934 All U 153 (PC); P Lakshmi Reddy Vs. Lakshmi Reddy, AIR 1957 (SC) 314; Annasaheb Bapusaheb Patil Vs. Balwant. (1995) 2 SCC 543; AIR 1995 (SC) 895. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum, Advocate- For the Petitioners Mahbubey Alam with ..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 4
Abul Hussain and others Vs. Afezuddin Mondal and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
.... leave granted by this Division in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 353 of 1995 against judgment passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 371 of 1991 making the Rule absolute on setting aside the judgment and decree passed in Title Appeal 170 of 1987 of the Cou......urts below…..(5) Case Referred to- Jashimuddin Kanchan vs. Md Ali Ashraf 42 DLR (AD) 289. Lawyers Involved: Rafique‑ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate, inst..Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 80
Alfazuddin Mollah and ors. Vs. Md. Almas Chokder and anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....is appeal, by way of granting leave, is decided against the judgment and order dated 11‑4‑1994 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision 481 of 1992 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the order dated 2‑2‑1992 passed by the learned Assistan......uired to be ascertained by adducing evidence in the trial court to find out the nature of transaction and to decide the case properly …………. (10) Lawyers Involved: Abdul Qauyum, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Husain, Advocate‑o..Category: Property Law | Date: 16 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 95
Raj Unnayan Kartripakshya (RAJUK), Dhk. & ors. Vs. Water Front Apt. Ltd. and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....an J.- The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 22‑91998 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2280 of 1998 making the Rule absolute. 2. The facts, in short, are that the respondents purchased the case land......bsp; Case Referred to- Secretary, Ministry of Industries, Nationalised Industries Division vs. Saleli Ahmed and another 46 DLR (AD) 148. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate..Category: Property Law | Date: 9 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 1202
Abu Taher Bhuiyan Vs. Lal Mohon Mondal and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....her Bhuiyan.…………..Petitioner Vs. Lal Mohon Mondal and others ………. Opposite Parties Judgment March 6, 2002. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocate—For the Petitioner.......ip;……..Petitioner Vs. Lal Mohon Mondal and others ………. Opposite Parties Judgment March 6, 2002. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Ibrahim Khalil Miah..Category: Property Law | Date: 6 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 56
Shah Newaz Ebne Mostaque & ors. Vs. Shah Alam and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....il petitioner for leave to appeal by judgment‑debtor‑petitioners arises from the judgment passed by a Single Judge of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2849 of 1992 making the Rule absolute and setting aside the Order No. 24 dated 26‑10‑1992 passed by the Senior A......uto and the decree holder is not required to file an application to proceed with the pending execution case………………(4) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑RecordR..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 4 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 99
Rabeya Khatun Vs. Md. Saidur Rahman, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....sit the rent with the House Rent Controller as per above provisions. As such the High Court Division held that the decision of the courts below could not be sustainable in law and therefore, made the Rule absolute. We find that the courts below overlooked the fact that the rent deposited under the m...... rent within 15 days of refusal of acceptance of the rent by the landlord under section 18 but the Court is not to see whether the tenant has paid the rent within time under section 19 (Ka). Lawyers Involved: Md Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the PetitionerNot represented‑The..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 19 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 268
Monzur Alam (Md) Vs. State and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....p; KM Hasan J.- The accused petitioner seeks leave to appeal against three judgements and orders dated 8-8-2001 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rules in Criminal Miscellaneous Case Nos. 7753, 7754 and 7755 of 2000. The leave applications are di......l proceeding can be proceeded independently of the civil suit. Since there is a prima facie case the criminal case cannot be quashed……(5) Lawyers Involved: KZ Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md...Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 13 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 124
Bangladesh and others Vs. Eastern Beverage Industries Ltd. & another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... in Writ Petition No. 728 of 1990 heard analogously with Writ Petition Nos. 802, 803, 838 of 1990 and Writ Petition Nos. 1092, 115 and 456 of 1989 at the instance of the respondents herein making the Rules absolute declaring the impugned notification to have been issued without any lawful authority....... 1965 (SC) 1107; Kalawati Devi Harialka vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal and others, AIR 1968 (SC) 162; Ghularn Zamin vs. AB Khandker 16 DLR 486; Croft vs. Dunphy (1933 AC 156). Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney‑General, (Md. Feroz Shah, Assistant At..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 13 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 161
....rs
Vs.
Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works and others….…………….Respondents
Judgment
February 12, 2002.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
Case Referred To-
Jabed Ali vs. Abu Sheikh, being dead his heirs Md......uary 12, 2002.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
Case Referred To-
Jabed Ali vs. Abu Sheikh, being dead his heirs Md. Naimuddin and others 1983 BLD (AD) 1 = 35 DLR (AD) 31.
Lawyers Involved:
Rafiqul Huq with Afreen Mahiuddin, Advocate — For the Petitioners.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: 12 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 28
Jaban Ali (Md) Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... any other case. The trial Court is at liberty to cancel the bail in case of any misuse of the privilege of bail by the accused appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 89.......nt: Md. Muzammel Hossain J Md. Shamsul Huda J Jaban Ali (Md) .........Accused Appellant Vs. State......................Respondent Judgment February 10, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Golam Arshad, Advocate-For the Appellant. ABM Waliur Rahman Khan, Assist..Category: Women and Children | Date: 10 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 79
Hazrat Khan @ Hazrat Ali Khan Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....t accused-appellant Hazrat Ali Khan @ Hazrat Khan be released from custody forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 636. ......…..Appellant Vs. State……………......................... Respondent Judgment February 6, 2002. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Not represented—the Appellant. Sk Rezaul Karim, Assistant Attorney..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 6 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 29
8920187200165185202121891589142031481074397193109190144427342384408