Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
State Vs. Abdus Samad @ Samad Ali, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ase of alleged unsoundness of mind. It is by this test, as distinguished from medical test, that the criminality of the act is to be determined. This section in substance is the same as the McNaghtan Rules followed in the English jurisdiction. These Rules are still regarded as authoritative statemen...... Reference is rejected and the connected jail appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred To- PLD 1960 (WP) Lahore 111; Dahyabhai Chhanganbhai Thakkar vs. State of Gujarat, AIR 1964 (SC) 1563. Lawyers Involved: Syed Shahidur Rahman, Deputy Attorney-General with S M Aminur Rahim, Assistan..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 2 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 115
M. Saleemullah Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... intention to show any disrespect far less to do any thing that may even remotely show disrespect to any Court in any manner or in any form. He has also realised that he should not have contested the Rule at the first instance before the High Court Division and subsequently at the appeal stage befor......itioner was found guilty by the High Court Division and pronounced judgement of sentence against which appeal was preferred and the Honourable Appellate Division passed the order of exoneration. Lawyer Involved: Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate (MI Farooqui, Advocate with him) instructed by M..Category: Contempt of Court Law, Criminal Law | Date: 29 Jan, 2002 | Hits: 77
Abdul Rashid Vs. Santi Bhusan Deb and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....p; Md. Fazlul Karim J.- This petition for leave to appeal at the instance of the plaintiff is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 31‑5‑2001 making the Rule absolute, dismissing the suit, setting aside the judgment and decree of the Courts below decree...... Cases Referred to- Sangsad vs. Land Control, AIR 1966 Allahabad 221; Surendra Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1954 SC 194. Lawyers Involved: Khan Saifur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Shari..Category: Property Law | Date: 26 Jan, 2002 | Hits: 100
Abdul Mannan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....ile disposing of the petitions for leave to appeal. These petitioners are accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 143. ......is on the distribution of population as far as practicable taking into consideration the territorial unity and administrative convenience. But the same is directory and not mandatory. Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Petitioners (I..Category: Election Law | Date: 22 Jan, 2002 | Hits: 109
Mia Lutfi Hossain Khasru and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....posing of the petitions for leave to appeal. These petitions are accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 58. ...... an appeal in disguise whereby an erroneous decision is reheard or corrected but lies on patent error…………………………(5) Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Petitione..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 22 Jan, 2002 | Hits: 122
Monsur Ali (Md) and others Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; This petition for leave to appeal is against the judgment and order dated 14th June, 1998 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 650 of 1993 discharging the Rule obtained against the judgment and order dated 22nd April 1993 passed by the Additional Sessions......rom law A fugitive has no right to seek any kind of redress as against his grievance, if any, against the judgment and order of a Court convicting him to imprisonment…………………...(5) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Petitioners. Not Represented..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 12 Dec, 2001 | Hits: 123
Moni Begum @ Moni Vs. The State, Represented by the Deputy Commissioner, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... Farmgate, Tejgaon, Dhaka............Petitioner Vs. The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka........Opposite Parties Judgement December 11, 2001 Result: Rules are made absolute. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898; Section 439 & 202(Chapter-XVI) ......ropolitan Magistrate Dhaka in Complaint case No. 1807 of 1999 and complaint case No. 2261 of 2000 in the absence of the High Police Officer and Police representative……......(35-36) Lawyers Involved: Sigma Huda—For Petitioners (In both the Criminal Revision No.683 of 199..Category: Constitutional Law, Procedural Law | Date: 11 Dec, 2001 | Hits: 7
KM Obaidur Rahman Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....ithout any excuse and in case of his failure the trial Court will be at liberty to cancel the bail and take the appellant into custody and proceed with the case in accordance with law. Ed. ...... (ii) A member of the parliament do not have the privilege of not appearing before the court of which he is an accused on bail on the ground that the parliament is in session. Lawyers Involved: Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mainul Hosein, Advocate..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 1 Dec, 2001 | Hits: 83
Mahbubur Rahman and others Vs. Agrani Bank and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....ity in the impugned order. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. Same Case Cited in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 61. ......r agree to it. No adjournment should be granted unless sufficient cause for the same is made out………………………(5) Lawyers Involved: Shaheed Alam. Advocate instructed by Chowdhury Md. Jahangir, ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 19 Nov, 2001 | Hits: 101
Shankar Lal Das Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....ez Siddique J Shankar Lal Das ………….Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others... Opposite Parties Judgment November 18, 2001. Result: The Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. Cases Referred to- Bank of Dacca Ltd.......e absolute without any order as to costs. Cases Referred to- Bank of Dacca Ltd. vs. Gour Gopal Saha, AIR 1936 Calcutta 409; B Sheshaiah vs. Veerabhadrayya, AIR 1972 Andhra Pradesh 134. Lawyers Involved: Sk. Afzalur Rahman, Advocate — For the Petitioner. Shamim Khaled A..Category: Banking Law | Date: 18 Nov, 2001 | Hits: 146
Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust and another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
..... Arayes Uddin J Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust and another...........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others...........Respondents Judgment November 6, 2001. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- State Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Satkhira and others, ...... The State, 49 DLR (HCD) 53; Bablu Vs. State, 1 BLD 1981 (HCD) 454; Bakhtair Hossain Vs. The State, 47 DLR (HCD) 542; Sheela Barse and another Vs. The Union of India and others, AIR 1986(SC) 1777. Lawyers Involved: Md. Idrisur Rahman with M.A. Mannan Khan and Md. Ekramul Islam- for the Petitio..Category: Women and Children | Date: 6 Nov, 2001 | Hits: 75
Hussain Mohammad Ershad Vs. Zahedul Islam Khan and others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....l Amin Chowdhury CJ.- This petition for leave to appeal is against judgment and order dated 6-2-2001 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2722 of 2000 making the Rule absolute. 2. The short fact leading to this petition is that respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed...... and shall vacate his seat automatically under Article 67 of the Constitution and there is no necessity or requirement of examination of the same by the Election Commission……. (13) Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate (ABM Nurul Islam, Senior Advocate with him) inst..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 22 Aug, 2001 | Hits: 111
Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Md. Habib & ors., 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....dings against them invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court Division under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1156 of 1999. A Division Bench made the Rule absolute and quashed the said proceedings against them by the judgment and order dated 17-8-99 ...... Penal Code an abettor is liable for a different act if that was probable consequence of the abetment………………………….(8) Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, (Md. Muhammad Nazrul Islam, Advocate..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 22 Aug, 2001 | Hits: 95
Chief Engineer, C & B and another Vs. Shah Hingul Mazar Sharif and others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated 24th February, 1998 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3165 of 1994 making the Rule absolute on setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, 4th ......right he can maintain a suit for permanent injunction. The trial court, it appears, exceeded its jurisdiction in deciding the title of the respective parties. …………………………….(6) Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by SB Barua, Advocate-on..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: 9 Aug, 2001 | Hits: 211
Dudu Mia and others Vs. Ekram Miah Chowdhury and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....on was seeking some other relief which was no doubt of consequential relief and thereupon directed plaintiff to pay ad valorem court fee. As against that plaintiff moved the High Court and obtained a Rule. The matter came up before a Division Bench which differed from the decision given by another D...... Sufia Khannam Chowdhury vs. Faizun Nesa Chowdhury 39 DLR (AD) 46; Abdul Hamid vs. Dr Sadeque Ali Ahmed & ors 21 DLR 507; AIR 1924 (Cal) 411; 17 DLR 119. Lawyers Involved: Md. Faziul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 5 Aug, 2001 | Hits: 136
Suhel Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. Salahuddin Ayubi and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....s possession but without any effect. Finding no other alternative Writ petition No. 3964 of 1998 was filed seeking a mandate from the court for restoration of possession and in that Writ Petition the Rule was made absolute 09.6.1999 with a direction to the respondents to restore vacant possession of......ip;……(7 & 12) Case Referred to- SAM Iqbal vs. State and another, 3 BLC (AD) 125. Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahnzud, Senior Advocate (SS Halder Se..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 30 Jul, 2001 | Hits: 95
Reazuddin (Md.) and another Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others…………………………..Respondents Judgment July 19, 2001. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Opportunity for defence when mandatory Withholding or cancellation ......tions, Karachi University, 18 PLR (SC) 422; University of Dhaka Vs. Zakir Ahmed, 16 DLR (SC) 722;. Messrs Faridsons Ltd. Karachi and another Vs. Government of Pakistan and another, 1961 PLD 537. Lawyers Involved: ABM Bayezid with Md. Touftq Islam, Advocates‑ For the Petitioners in all Wr..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 19 Jul, 2001 | Hits: 2
Sahera Khatun and others Vs. Abdul Gaffar @ Abdul Gaffar and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....28 acres out of 0.60 acres on plot No. 65 by way of execution of the decree is going beyond the terms of the decree and, as suck the execution case is liable to be struck off as not maintainable. The Rule in Civil Revision No. 4156 of 1997 was made absolute on 4‑2‑1999 on the finding, in......se Referred to- Bigo Rangam Kamon and others vs. Khan Bahadur Khalilur Rahman, PLD 1968 SC 342; Vasuder vs Rajabdar AIR 1970 SC 1475. Lawyers Involved: Md. Roushan Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by A..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 8 Jul, 2001 | Hits: 91
BD Water Dev. Board & ors Vs. Chairman, Divisional Labour Court, Khulna & ors, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....zlul Karim J.- This petition for leave to appeal by the petitioner Board is directed against judgment and order dated 27‑11‑2000 passed in Writ Petition No. 5537 of 2000 discharging the Rule thereby affirming judgment and order dated 18‑2‑1999 of the Divisional Labour Cour......ges Act, 1936 for realisation of the benefits consequent upon retirement of the deceased worker, in favour of the heirs of the deceased worker……………(5) Lawyers Involved: Hefzul Bari, Advocate, instructed by Md Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 4 Jul, 2001 | Hits: 78
MA Mazid Vs. Md. Abdul Motaleb, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....l Haque J Nazmun Ara Sultana J MA Mazid .......... ........Accused-Petitioner Vs. Md. Abdul Motaleb ..........Complainant‑Opposite Party Judgment July 3, 2001. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Anisur Rahman Hatem, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner.......ltana J MA Mazid .......... ........Accused-Petitioner Vs. Md. Abdul Motaleb ..........Complainant‑Opposite Party Judgment July 3, 2001. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Anisur Rahman Hatem, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Md. Fazlul Haque Chowd..Category: Banking Law | Date: 3 Jul, 2001 | Hits: 267