Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1281-1300 of 4843 results.
Seru Mia Vs. Fajilatennessa and others, 1973, 2 CLC (HCD)
.... 706; P LD. 1965 (S.C.) page 37. Wherein their Lordships while considering plaintiff's claim for compensation money under an agreement for sale of land which had been compulsorily acquired by the Government, followed the English principle of law creating vendee's "equitable estate"...... is dismissed with cost. The judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979)159 ......reme Court High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Ruhul Islam J Seru Mia…………………Defendant-Appellant Vs. Fajilatennessa and others.…………Defendant-Appellant Judgment...... is dismissed with cost. The judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979)159 ..Category: Property Law | Date: 8 Jan, 1973 | Hits: 2
....determined before trial. The learned Subordinate Judge decided by his impugned order that the suit was maintainable.
4. The plaintiff-opposite party, in its counter-affidavit has stated that the Government of Bangladesh by Notification No.Ind-14 vested 16/74/336 dated 30-6-75 placed the plainti......ore trial. The learned Subordinate Judge decided by his impugned order that the suit was maintainable.
4. The plaintiff-opposite party, in its counter-affidavit has stated that the Government of Bangladesh by Notification No.Ind-14 vested 16/74/336 dated 30-6-75 placed the plaintiff firm under ......upreme Court
High Court Division
(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction)
Present:
S. Ahmed J
M.H.Rahman J
Dinajpur Industries Ltd................................Petitioner
Vs.
M/s. Hardeo Glass, Aluminium, Enamel & Silicate Works……Opposite......Hardeo Glass, Aluminium, Enamel & Silicate Works……Opposite Party
Judgment
August 10, 1972.
Result:
The rule is discharged.
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Joynul Abedin—For the petitioner.
Shah Md. Sharif, H.K.Abdul Hye—For the oppos..
Category: Corporate Law | Date: 10 Aug, 1972 | Hits: 2
Mrs. June Ferguson & others Vs. Ameenur Rasheed Chaudhury and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....bour wages, salaries of the staff, the Provident Fund Contributions, etc. are all in arrears should be run efficiently by the Second party for the preservation of the property and also for payment of Government revenues. The First party authorises the second party to:— i. Immediately take......ircumstances of the case, we direct that the suit may expeditiously be disposed of. Sayem, CJ. — I agree This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1973) 1 ...... High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: A. M. Sayem CJ D. C. Bhattacharya J Mrs. June Ferguson & others.............................Petitioners Vs. Ameenur Rasheed Chaudhury and others..........Opposite Parties Judgment July 5, 1......adesh 857; Inayat Ullah Vs. Shah Muhammad, PLD 1961 Lahore 373; Pak. Employees Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Anwar Sultana, PLD 1969 Karacai 476. Lawyers Involved: Bhahudat Honsain, Md. Abdul Aziz—For the Petitioners. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury, B. K. Das—For the ..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 Jul, 1972 | Hits: 0
Laxmi Kanta Roy Vs. Upazila Nirbahi Officer and another, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....ation Case No.193G/75‑76 in the Office of the Circle Officer (Rev) Gournadi and accordingly, a separate khatian was opened with regard to Ka schedule land. Since then he has been paying rent to the Government. The land is not enlisted as Vested and Non‑resident property. It is alleged that on th......uzzaman and others, 26 DLR 233. In the aforesaid decision a Division Bench of this Court held as follows: "20. The preamble of President's Order No.142 of 1972 which has been called the Bangladesh Transfer of Immovable Property (Temporary Provisions) Order, 1972 runs as follows : ......: Md. Mozammel Hoque J Laxmi Kanta Roy……………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Upazila Nirbahi Officer and another………………...Oppos......record immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (HCD) (1994) 136. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 3 May, 1972 | Hits: 4
Mojibor Rahman Mullick and another Vs. Tobarak Majhi, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
.... such case shall be conducted by, or in the presence of, a Magistrate, or by, or in the presence of, some officers specially empowered in this behalf by name or in virtue of his office by the Central Government." 15. It will appear from the section of the Arms Act quoted above that if any Magi...... the impugned order. The Rule is accordingly discharged with this modification of the impugned order that the last paragraph thereof is deleted. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......so Reported in: .....................Opposite Party Judgment September 15, 1970. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Chand Shah Vs. The Crown (1956) 8 DLR (FC) 24; Md. Ishaque Vs. Nur Mahal Begum (1961) 13 DLR (SC) 138. Lawyers Involved- Ataur Rahman K..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 15 Sep, 1970 | Hits: 76
....quot; as appear from Annexures D(2) to the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner, which shows that the same is under Khatian No.1 recorded not in the name of Imambara but in the name of the Government of Bangladesh. It further appears that a case is pending before the authority under Rule ......urisdiction)
Present:
Mirza Hussain Haider J
AKM Zahirul Hoque J
Shah Tazul Islam Rumel (Md.)………………….Petitioner
Vs.
Bangladesh, Represented By the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs,
Dhaka and Others…&hel......pellate Jurisdiction)
Present:
Mirza Hussain Haider J
AKM Zahirul Hoque J
Shah Tazul Islam Rumel (Md.)………………….Petitioner
Vs.
Bangladesh, Represented By the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs,
Dhaka and Others&he......LR (HCD) (2016) 130
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 0
....e DCT and examine the same under section 120 of the Ordinance and if he considers that any order passed thereon by the DCT is erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the Government revenue, he may invoke his jurisdiction under section 120 of the Ordinance subj...... No costs.
Communicate the judgment to respondents No.3 and 4 at once.
J.N. Deb Choudhury J.—I agree.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 68 DLR (HCD) (2016) 91
......ginal Jurisdiction)
Present:
Zinat Ara J
J.N. Deb Choudhury J
Kamal Uddin Ahmed, Director, Holy Crescent Hospital Limited, Chittagong………..Petitioner
Vs.
Chairman, National Board of Revenue, Segunbagicha , Dhaka and Others……….Re...... No costs.
Communicate the judgment to respondents No.3 and 4 at once.
J.N. Deb Choudhury J.—I agree.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 68 DLR (HCD) (2016) 91
..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 0
AKM Fazlul Haq and anothers Vs. People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....application under Article 102(a) (i) of the Constitution of People's Republic of Bangladesh, the petitioners, being thirty in number, have sought for a direction upon the respondents to grant the Government portion of the petitioners' salary, who are presently serving in different colle......on (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Zubayer Rahman Chowdhury J Farah Mahbub J AKM Fazlul Haq and another.........Petitioners Vs. People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others............Respondents Judgment February 11, 2010. Result: ......upreme Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Zubayer Rahman Chowdhury J Farah Mahbub J AKM Fazlul Haq and another.........Petitioners Vs. People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others............Respondents Judgment ......bsp; Zhikorkacha Women's College, Jessor Islamic History 26-12-2001 29 Md. Alamgir Kabir Zhikorkacha Women's College, J..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 5
Moklesur Rahman & others Vs. State & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....ision clearly indicated that the case is to be disposed of within a specified time. This amendment was done by the law-making authority for speedy disposal of cases, keeping in view the policy of the Government for early disposal of criminal cases. Thus section 339C will operate in respect of c......the court concerned immediately for early disposal of the present case. Amin-ur-Rahman Khan J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 174 ...... Court High Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Rahman J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Moklesur Rahman & others................Petitioner Vs. State & others..............................Opposite Parties Judgment Novembe......e passed the predecessor-in-office under section 339C (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure— Lawyers Involved: Taleb Ali—For the petitioners. Sultan Ahmed, D.A.G. with Md. Mokhter Hossain—For the State (Opposite party). Criminal Revision No. 82 of 1983. ..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 1
....s follows:
CHITTAGONG PORT TRUST.
OFFICE ORDER NO. 5/69.
Office of the the Chairman,
Chittagong Port Trust.
Dated, Chittagong the 10th Jan, 1969.
In pursuance of Central Government's decision communicated vide Ministry of Defence (Directorate General of Ports and Sh...... Munim J.— In this petition under Article 98 of the Constitution of Pakistan,1962 which has been continued by Sub-paragraph-3 of Paragraph-6 of the 4th Schedule to the Constitution of Bangladesh, the petitioners who are 134 in number challenged the validity of an order dated 10th Jan......Court Division
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
Fazle Munim J
Shahabuddin Ahmed J
Md. Siddiqur Rahman, Acctt/Funds & Claims & others..........Petitioners
Vs.
The Board of Trustees, Port of Chittagong, and others..........Respondents
Judgment
...... DLR (HCD) (1975) 481
..
Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 1
M/S Helal Jute Press Ltd Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....mdash;For Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Petition No. 352 of 19724. Judgment S.M. Hussain J.—A Notification No. 290 Sec. V dated 28.12.71 issued by the Ministry of Commerce of the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh under Acting President's Order No. IM-35/7......h Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Munim J S.M. Hussain J M/S Helal Jute Press Ltd..................Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh......................Respondents Judgment March 12, 1975. Result: Th......bsp; ......fice at Dacca. From the last return of the said company filed with the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies at Dacca on 31. 10. 70, it appears that out of total 85 thousand shares, the petitioner No. 2 Md. Hanif himself held 54 thousand shares and his brother Md. Said held another 27 thousand shares (..Category: Abandoned Properties Law | Date: | Hits: 7
....ent Governing Body and whereas, I have now reasons to believe that the Society can no longer function smoothly under its present governing body.
Now, therefore, I, as Director of Social Welfare, Government of Bangladesh in pursuance of Section 9(1) of the Voluntary Social Welfare Agen......
......airman of the Board of Governors,
Bangladesh National Society for the Blind…………Petitioner
Vs.
Bangladesh and others……………………&helli......mature stage.
Accordingly, the Rule in this petition should be discharged for the reasons stated herein before.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 602
..
Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 2
Abdul Mukid (Md.) Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Khulna and another, 2013, 42 CLC (HCD)
....order passed or certificates issued by the said Artha Rin Adalat also resulted in nullity. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 66 DLR (HCD) (2014)2 11, 33 BLD (HCD) (2013) 296. ......efore the Adalat without jurisdiction and, as such, the same are nullity in the eye of law……………… (4) Cases Referred to- Registrar, Supreme Court of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Sufi Uddin, 6 BLC (AD) 241; Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation Vs. Jah......urisdaction) Present: Nazmun Ara Sultana J Sheikh Hasan Arif J Abdul Mukid (Md.)……………….............................. Appellants Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Khulna and another………………&hellip......D (HCD) (2013) 296. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 3
S. M. Qamruzzaman Vs. State, 1980, 9 CLC (HCD)
....1947 and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and also to pay a fine of Tk. 2000/-. 2. The prosecution case is that following the devastating cyclone in November, 1970 the Government decided to purchase and distributes some plough-cattle amongst the cyclone-affected peopl...... and serve out the remainder of the sentence. The order granting stay of realisation of fine is vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 107. ......Court High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: A.T.M. Afzal J S. M. Qamruzzaman………………..........Appellant Vs. State…………………………&helli......1C 785; Sheonandan Singh & others Vs. Jeonandan Das, 13 CWN 71;Chennupatti Vs. Nellurai Narayanaswami, AIR 1954 Mad 215. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubddin Ahmed with S.M.N. Alam and Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocates-For the Appellant. Fakrul Islam, Advocate-For the State. C..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: | Hits: 2
Mohammad Ali Vs. Sukur Ali (The State) & others, 1985, 14 CLC (HCD)
....oper case and direct trial notwithstanding the provisions as to conclusion of trial within a specified time. While we find our inability to do anything in the present case. We hope that the Government would come forward with some legislative measure authorising the superior Court to interf......sions of section 339C Cr.P.C. With the observations as above, this Rule is discharged. Latifur Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 1. ...... Bench) (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: A.T.M. Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Mohammad Ali........................................Informant Petitioner Vs. Sukur Ali (The State) & others......................Opposite-Parties Judgment ......sions of section 339C Cr.P.C. With the observations as above, this Rule is discharged. Latifur Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 1. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 1
Hazi Md. Lliyas Vs. Government of the People's Khan Republic of Bangladesh, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....sp; Abdul Matin Chowdhury J Hazi Md. lliyas……………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Government of the People's Khan Republic of Bangladesh………..Respondents ......lliyas……………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Government of the People's Khan Republic of Bangladesh………..Respondents Judgment July 26, 1978. Result: ...... Abdul Matin Chowdhury J Hazi Md. lliyas……………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Government of the People's Khan Republic of Bangladesh………..Respond......urt High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Shahabaddin Ahmed J Abdul Matin Chowdhury J Hazi Md. lliyas……………………………&h..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 3
Shamsun Nahar Begum on behalf of the detenu Khalequzzaman Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....it is stated in the petition, took active part in the iteration war. He was the President of JSD, Chandpur, Comilla. In 1973 he contested in the general election and he was a vocal critic of the then Government because of its corruption and nepotism, etc, as a result the local Awami League workers b......l Original Jurisdiction) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J A. Matin Khan Chowdhury J Shamsun Nahar Begum on behalf of the detenu Khalequzzaman...........Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh & others................................Respondents Judgment July 29, 1977...... (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J A. Matin Khan Chowdhury J Shamsun Nahar Begum on behalf of the detenu Khalequzzaman...........Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh & others................................Respondents Judgment July......at was rendered by Mr. S. S. Halder and Mr. AnwarulHuq Chowdhury in this case. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 33. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 1
Gouranga Chandra Dey Vs. Deputy Commissioner and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... by the Joint District Judge, even in appeal, is not subject to challenge before the High Court Division under its present revisional powers. Cases Referred to- Stratus Construction Co. Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2002 BLD 236; Narayana Swami Vs. Emperor, AIR 1939 PC 47; Gurdial Singh Vs......District Judge, even in appeal, is not subject to challenge before the High Court Division under its present revisional powers. Cases Referred to- Stratus Construction Co. Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2002 BLD 236; Narayana Swami Vs. Emperor, AIR 1939 PC 47; Gurdial Singh Vs. Central Boar......05) 319. ......ed under 115(1) of the Code, before the High Court Division, is incompetent and is not maintainable and, as such, summarily rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 319. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 2
Adhir Das Vs. Arati Rani Das and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....inistrative approval of the Supreme Court, the above notification does not assume the character of law. It is the common knowledge that law cannot be amended by the administrative notification of the Government, though such notification was issued with the administrative approval of the Supreme Cour......hort, is that plaintiff No.1 was given in marriage to defendant No.1, 20 years back in accordance with Hindu Law. Plaintiff Nos.2 and 3 were born out of their wedlock. Defendant No.1 used to serve in Bangladesh Army and he used to torture plaintiff No.1 now and then for dowry. The father of plaintif......ision (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Quamrul Islam Siddiqui J Adhir Das………………………………………………………………………………..Petitioner Vs. Arati Rani Das and others……………………………………………………..Oppos......hs from the date of receipt of the lower Court record. There is no order as to costs. Send down the lower Court record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007) 53. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Md. Khalil Ullah and others Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....decree. 5. With the aforesaid findings and observations, the writ petition is summarily disposed of, without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (HCD) (2010) 69. ......din Ahmed J.- Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioners do form part of the main application. This is an application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh challenging Judgment and Decree dated 05.07.2007 (degree signed on 11.07.2007) passed by ......me Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J Naima Haider J Md. Khalil Ullah and others………………………….Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Dhaka and others………………………..Respondents Judg......ly disposed of, without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (HCD) (2010) 69. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 37
9254913397109099714970897009588953695219520950993569201913891239015890584448443