Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1281-1300 of 2251 results.
Abi Abdullah (Md.) and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... Quamrunnesa, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 3838 of 1998. Judgment Fazlur Rahman J. - This Rule under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned ...... petitioners are concerned. In the result, the Rule is made absolute so far as it relates to the petitioners without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 250. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Abdur Razzaque Zoarder and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....n light of the above, this Court finds substance in this Rule. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 245. ......sidered for appointment as effected under Annexure-C to the Writ Petition. In this regard attention is drawn to an Officer Order in Memo No. 1130-UP(c)IV/6A- 36/66 dated 11-8-1966 issued by then East Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (Annexure 1 to the Supplementary Affidavit to Affidav..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Afil Jute Mills (Pvt) Ltd. and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....t Attorney-General—For Respondent No. 1. Writ Petition No. 2977 of 1998. Judgment Md. Joynul Abedin J.- Initially Rule Nisi was issued under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned notices bei...... Rule and it must fail. In the result, the Rule is discharged for the above reasons without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 207, 26 BLD (HCD) (2006) 361. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 125
HRC Shipping Ltd. Vs. MV X-Press Manaslu, MV X-Press Resolve & others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
.... The defendant No. 1 is directed to bear all expenses of the Marshal and his team in connection with the release of the vessel. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 185; 12 MLR 265. ......uton 1 and others, 1993 MLD 1957 Karachi; Central Insurance Company Ltd Vs. MT Tasman Spirit and others, 2004 CLD 695; the Evpo Agnic, 1988 1 IVLR 1091;Muhammadi Steamship Co Ltd Vs. Province of East Pakistan and others; 22 DLR 596; Merriels case (1969) 1 Lloyds List Law Reports 63; Messrs Sun Line ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 314
Mainul Hosein and others Vs. Anwar Hossain and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....rman Vs. M Abdul Hye Chairman of the Election Committee and others, 48 DLR 569; Sultana Nahar Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1998 BLD 363 = 2 BLC 430; Md. Abdur Rashid Khan Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 6 MLR (AD) 8; Shahabuddin (Md.) Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Youth and Sports ......hid Nabi Malik Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, PLD 1992 (SC) 32; Khorshed Alam Vs. Azizur Rahman, 1995 BLD 639; Abul Hasnat & others Vs. Ershad Ali Beg 42 DLR 244; Akbar Hassan Vs. Government of Pakistan, PLD 1976 (SC) 315; Shahid Nabi Malik (PLD 1997 (SC) 32); Bharat Kumar K Palicha and anothe..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 324
Moulana Md. Abdul Kader Azadi Vs. Government of Bangladesh and other, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... Assistant Attorney-General—For Respondent No. 1 Writ Petition No. 6685 of 2004. Judgment Syed Mahmud Hossain J. - In this application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, a Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why ......ce with law. Therefore, we do not find any substance in this Rule. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 114. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Jahangir Hossain Howlader (Md.) Vs. CMM, Dhaka and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....Khan, Additional Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 1034 of 2002. Judgment Syed Mahmud Hossain J.- This Rule Nisi under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned ......no order as to costs. The order of stay granted at the time of issuance of the Rule is hereby recalled and vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 106, 26 BLD (HCD) (2006) 83. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 158
Abdul Mannan alias Mona Miah Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....nt. Judgment August 21, 2002. Cases Referred to- State Vs. Abul Kalam, 5 BLC 230; State Vs. Eunnus Kha, 5 BLC 253; the State represented by the Solicitor to the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shafikul Islam alias Rafique and another, 43 DLR (AD) 92; State Vs. M...... of Additional Sessions Judge, and Nari-o Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat No. 2, Noakhali for necessary action in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 91. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Md. Bazlur Rashid Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ovisions of second proviso to section 4 of Act, 1974 as also Rules 3,4 and 10 of Rules 1975 are not in any way violatives of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh. 6. As it appears in 51 DLR (AD) 152 the Appellate Division held as follow......ecision and there is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 8 LG (AD) (2011) 53. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Kamruzzaman (Md.) alias Zaman Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....har, District-Rajshahi be enlarged on bail in Motihar PS Case No.2 dated 6-3-2000 to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Rajshahi. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 556. ......iscated where confiscation is authorised under that Act. Section 23 provides as follows: 23. Prohibition of movement of antiquity.—(1) No person shall transport an antiquity from one place in Pakistan to another with the object of exporting it in contravention of section 22. (2) Whoever c..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Bally Schutrabriken Ag, Switzerland Vs. Hosnara Begum, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....ined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The Court fees paid are correct. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 546. ......wears under the trade mark “BALLY” constituting part of their company name. This Trade Mark has been registered in more than 100 countries of the world including United Kingdom, Canada, India and Pakistan and is used since the year 1851 first in Switzerland and subsequently in other countries of..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 210
....ually sought for a declaration for making the force of the Appellate Division`s judgment inoperative. He further submitted that the suit is barred under Article 111 of the Constitution of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh. He further submitted that the earlier suit was for Specific Performance of C......the suit land in favour of appellants through court.
The office is directed to send down the lower Court’s record at once.
Md. Rais Uddin J.- I agree.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST) and another Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ul Awal J Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST) and another ..........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others .......................Respondents ......rintendent, Central Jail, Tihar, New Delhi and another, AIR 1975 SC164; Kanai Lal Sethi Vs. Collector of Land Customs, Calcutta, 60 CWN 1042; Moslemuddin Sikdar Vs. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of East Pakistan and ors, 8 DLR 526; Bangladesh Italian Marble Works Limited Vs. Government of Bangladesh an..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 128
Mehnaz Sakib Vs. Bangladesh, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....se the detenu Mrs. Jobaida Rashid now detained in Dhaka Central Jail, Dhaka forthwith if she is not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 526.......ment May 30, 1999. Cases Referred To- Abdul Latif Mirza Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 31 DLR (AD) 1; Md. Anwar Hossain Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 30 DLR 423; Government of East Pakistan Vs. Mrs. Rowshan Bijaya Shaukat Ali Khan, 18 DLR (SC) 214; Faisal Mahbub Vs. Bangladesh, 44..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
....6/93 is hereby set aside and the appellant’s mark is restored to its original position.
Send down the lower Court records expeditiously.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 237.......rt of the world. He submits that non use of the trade mark from an earlier dated is no ground to entitle them to any protection and in such a situation he relied on a decision of the Supreme Court of Pakistan reported in 21 DLR 357 Bengal Friends & Co. Dacca Vs. Gour Benode Saha & Com Calcut..
Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 319
Abdur Rahim Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh Bank, Dhaka and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....Petition No. 5764 of 1996. Judgment Mainur Reza Chowdhury J. - A Rule Nisi was issued at the instance of the petitioner A Rahim Chowdhury under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why Memo No. BRPD (P) 651/9(......n the prayer of the petitioner let the operation of the order be stayed for 4 days to enable the petitioner to move the Appellate Division. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 231. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Sayed Nurul Hossain Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....of the unused project money the Writ Petition is not maintainable. 5. Mr. Amirul Islam, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner was not in the service of the Republic and the petitioner was all along in the service of Bangladesh Standards Institution (BDSI) ......sain…….. Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries.……………...Respondents Judgment June 8, 1998. Cases Referred to: Managing Director and Chairman National Bank of Pakistan vs. Ataul Huq, 17 DLR (SC) 74; 13 DLR (HC) 805, 29 DLR (SC) 232; 32 DLR (AD) 83; Mofizul Hu..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Amora Holding Inc. Vs. Bangladesh, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....llowed. The office is directed to return the above certified copies alter furnishing of the Photostat copies of the same by the petitioner. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 211. ...... the question as to whether mere import of goods in violation of a notification, amounts to smuggling under section 2(s) of the Customs Act, 1969 came for consideration. Section 2(s) as applicable in Pakistan at that relevant time was as follows: “2.(s) “smuggle” means to bring into or take..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 198
Shah Abdul Hannan and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....committee of a body, named “Centre for Human Rights,” at it’s meeting dated 15th September 1998, authorised the petitioners to proceed with appropriate action to protect public interest and the Republic’s natural resources and hence, this petition. 3. Being ignited by the zeal of the me......rder as to cost. All interlocutory orders, issued earlier, are hereby vacated. Mohammad Anwarul Haque J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLC (HCD) (2011) 386. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 231
Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) Vs. Aziz Pipes Limited, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
.... EFAS-83 shall be adjustable against the next installments refundable by the borrower. The relevant portion of the notification dated 20. 2.85 is quoted below:- Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Ministry of Finance Finance Division MF/Inv.III/FI-45/82-71 D......ll realization of the decreetal amount if it is not paid within a period of 90 days from date. The parties are to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 221. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 126
47664765475347494747474647454742474047224721472047194710470847064705470246944678