Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
AFM Safiyyullah Vs. AKM Bashirullah alias Mortuza Bashir and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....sideration, we are of the opinion that the conclusion of the learned Subordinate Judge is correct and does not call for any interference. In the result, the appeal is dismissed and the connected Rule being Civil Rule No. 131(F) of 1990 becoming infructuous is hereby discharged and the order of ......ment July 7, 1992. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Thirurengada Mudaliar Vs. Thaugavelu Mudaliar and others AIR 1928 (Mad) 594; AIR 1934 (Patna) 582. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mohammad Dashtagir Hossain, Advocate‑For the Appellants. MB Taz M..Category: Civil Law | Date: 7 Jul, 1992 | Hits: 1
Category: Constitutional Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 30 Jun, 1992 | Hits: 8
Category: Administrative Law | Date: 23 Jun, 1992 | Hits: 1
Serajul Islam Thakur Vs. Government of Bangla¬desh and another, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
............Petitioner [In WP No. 1737/89] Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another...........Respondent [In both the writ petitions] Judgment May 27, 1992. Result: The Rules are discharged. The Factories Board Ordinance, 1961. The employees under the Factori......M. Zahangir Hossain, 34 D.L.R. (AD) 173; Rear Admiral A.A. Mustafa (W.P. No. 64/92); Brigadier Abul Hasanat Md. Abdullah (W.P. No.15/87); Jamil Huq and II others Vs. Bangladesh, 34 DLR (AD) 125. Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hosein with Md. Joynul Abedin, Advocates—For the Petitioners in ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 27 May, 1992 | Hits: 1
Ataur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....petitioner participated in the auction held on 24.4.91 and came out successful at the highest bid of Taka 1,16,000.00. The petitioner thereafter was called upon to deposit the 50% bid money under the Rules and he paid Taka 58,000.00 on the spot against DCR No. 0046287 dated 24.4.91 issued by the Naz......lso be the basis of a contract. There cannot exist an agreement to waive an illegality because it is against public polity (AIR 1965 (SC) 1465). Cases Referred to- (AIR 1965 (SC) 1465) Lawyers Involved: Md. Hannan, Advocate‑For the Petitioner. Writ Petition No. 1847 of 19..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 25 May, 1992 | Hits: 2
Muzibur Rahman Talukder Vs. AKM Musa and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
......Petitioner Vs. AKM Musa and others………………………….......Respondents Judgment May 25, 1992. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Ali, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. ......KM Musa and others………………………….......Respondents Judgment May 25, 1992. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Ali, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Fazlul Hoque, Assistant A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 25 May, 1992 | Hits: 107
State Vs. Constable Lal Mia and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....eferred any appeal and remained fugitive. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.91 of 1988 filed by the complainant is disposed of in the above terms. Ed. This Caseis also Reported in: ......Babulal Chaukhari Vs. King Empenror AIR 1938 PC 130; Ata Md. Khan Alvi PLD 1950 Lah (FB) 288; 5 DLR (FC) 161; 10 DLR (SC) 29; AIR 1954 (SC) 436; AIR 1963 (SC) 1850; 10 DLR 134; 16 DLR 349. Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan Additional Attorney‑General instructed by, B Hossain, Advoc..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 14 May, 1992 | Hits: 73
Bengal Metro Engineering Co. and others Vs. Agrani Bank, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....g Co. and others………….Petitioner Vs. Agrani Bank.......................opposite Party Judgment May 5, 1992 Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Md. Obaidul Akbar Vs. East Pakistan Provincial (...... Md. Obaidul Akbar Vs. East Pakistan Provincial (now Bangladesh) Co‑operative Bank Ltd. 27, DLR 523; Haridas Mondra Vs. National and Grindlays Bank Ltd. reported in AIR 1963 Cal. 132. Lawyers Involved: AKM Ashaduzzarnan, Advocate—For the Petitioners SA Rahim, Advocate..Category: Contract Law | Date: 5 May, 1992 | Hits: 2
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 23 Apr, 1992 | Hits: 8
Asim Ali Vs. Badaruddin @ Suruj Mia & others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....bar, Advocates‑For the Petitioner. Zakir Ahmed with Mrs. Masuma Akhter, Advocates‑For opposite Party No. 5. Civil Revision No. 978 of 1980. Judgment Muhammad Ansar Ali J.-This Rule arises out of an application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure on behalf of t......dan Towary and others, 1926 Indian Case Vol. 96 at page 287; H and Fabric Limited Vs. Mallik Textile and others, 1985 BLD 271; Ram Chandra Das and others Vs. Md. Khalilur Rahman, 37 DLR (AD) 21. Lawyers Involved: MA Matin with MA Jabbar, Advocates‑For the Petitioner. Zakir Ah..Category: Property Law | Date: 22 Apr, 1992 | Hits: 3
Category: Property Law | Date: 22 Apr, 1992 | Hits: 4
Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 12 Mar, 1992 | Hits: 2
Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 4 Mar, 1992 | Hits: 3
Younus Chokdar Vs. Election Commission and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
.... Habibur Rahman J.—The petitioner Younus Chokdar who is a voter (being voter No.379) in Ward No.1 of Bhandari Kanda Union Parishad, Shibchar Upazila, District Madaripur, prays for issuance of a Rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause why the declaration of result in respect of Cha...... Vs. Anijad Ali alias Nazu Mia and Ors, 42 DLR (AD) 13; Farid Mia, 42 DLR (AD) 13; Farzana Ali Vs. Province of West Pakistan PLD 1970 (SC) 98; Md. Mostafa Hossain Vs. Md. Faruque 40 DLR (AD) 10. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hamid Chowdhury, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Writ Petition ..Category: Administrative Law, Election Law | Date: 27 Feb, 1992 | Hits: 2
Category: Administrative Law | Date: 12 Feb, 1992 | Hits: 1
Sri Kirtish Chandra Dev Vs. Begum Sufia Akhtar and Others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
.... Sri Kirtish Chandra Dev...........................Petitioner Vs. Begum Sufia Akhtar and Others................Opposite Parties Judgment February 5, 1992. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Code of Civil Procedure (V of 1908); Order 6, rule 17 Before allow......nature and character of the suit or the same is not inconsistent with the earlier pleadings or it does not substitute any cause of action of the suit……………..(5) Lawyers Involved: Ruhul Amin, Advocate— For the Petitioner. Miah Abdul Gafur, Advoca..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 5 Feb, 1992 | Hits: 1
Category: Property Law | Date: 15 Jan, 1992 | Hits: 3
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 12 Jan, 1992 | Hits: 6
Sonwar (Md.) Vs. Kamal Kha, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....d Badruzzaman J Sonwar (Md.).... ........................Petitioner Vs. Kamal Kha...............................Opposite Party Judgment January 6, 1992. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Md. Golam Hossain Vs. Mst. Asia Khatun reported,...... 89; M/s. A Haque and Co. & another Vs. Al‑haj Zakir Hossain 40 DLR (AD) 109; Ramjan Ali Mistry, 31 DLR (AD) 183; Abdus Sattar and others Vs. Suresh Chandra Das and others 32 DLR (AD) 170. Lawyers Involved: SK Sinha, Advocate—For the Petitioner. MA Mannan, Advocate—F..Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 6 Jan, 1992 | Hits: 3
Category: Banking Law | Date: 27 Aug, 1991 | Hits: 180