Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1421-1440 of 1885 results.
Md. Nazim Uddin Vs. Managing Director and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 690. ......any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 690. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Fazlur Rahman Sikder Vs. Abdul Hashem Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nfirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 687. ......8.1997 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Rajapur, Jhalakati in Title Suit No.59 of 1996 decreeing the suit. 2. The plaintiff filed the above suit seeking for declaration that sale deed No.3277 executed on 5.7.1962 and registered on 5.11.1962 in respect of the 'Kha' schedule land..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Shahin Reza and others Vs. Abdul Hamid & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 682. ......leem Miah decided to migrate to Pakistan forever and handed over all the title papers in respect of the suit land in favour of the plaintiff’s father. On 30.10.1973 Musleem Miah executed a transfer deed in favour of the plaintiff’s father and that transfer deed was signed by Sirajul Islam, the f..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 139
Sayed Ahmed Majumder Vs. Samsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 673. ...... and one daughter, the plaintiff No.2; the plaintiff Nos.3 and 4 are the sons of plaintiff No.1; the defendant No.3 got .30 decimals of land out of Plot No.489 from the defendant No.1 by sale deed dated 23.1.81 and the defendant No.4 also got 30 decimals of land out of the above plot No. 48..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Rahmat Goni Vs. Mrs. Meherun Nessa & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e exchange deed. The case of the plaintiffs is that the suit land belonged to Osman Gani, father of the plaintiff, who transferred the same to his wife Saleha Khatun (the defendant No.1) by way of heba-bil-ewaj dated 18.03.1969. Saleha Khatun transferred the suit land along with a two storied bu...... filed Title Suit No.33 of 1998 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka for declaration of title in respect of 8 annas share of 'Ka' schedule property on the basis of Heba-bil-ewaj deed dated 07.12.1982 and for further declaration that the cancellation of deed No.2809 dated 29.09..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Md. Iftekher Uddin Bhuiyan Vs. Ranjit Kumar Saha & another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....n correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 665. ......il Revision No. 5101 of 2000 discharging the Rule. 2. The plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.86 of 1989 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Narsingdi for declaration that the registered deed No. 4999 dated 08.07.1989 in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Narsingdhi is not an exchange de..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 19
Mosammat Namiran Nessa Vs. Aftaruddin & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....eside at the dwelling house of Namiruddin who being satisfied, expressed his intention to transfer some land by a deed of Heba-bil-ewaj in their favour. The deed writer instead of writing a deed of heba-bil-ewaj wrote a Wasiatnama in favour of the defendant. The deed was duly registered at the H......he defendant came to the suit land of S.A. Khatian No.305 on 15.03.1989 and tried to cut and take away some trees. They were obstructed by the plaintiffs and at that time they disclosed about the deed of Wasiyatnama in question and claimed title to 3.44 acres of land. Thereafter, the plaintiff ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Mosammat Ashrafee Begum and others Vs. Md. Siddiqur Rahman Patwari and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ind, the judgment ought have but the result arrived at call for no interference. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 659. ......a died leaving sons, Haradhan Chakravarty and Arun Kumar Chakravarty. They inherited the property of their parents. Haradhan Chakravarty gifted his entire property to Arun Kumar Chakravarty by the deed of gift dated December 28, 1973, that Arun sold 1.30 acres of land to t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Monwara Begum Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rrect decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 649. ......te party No.14 Abdullah sold .19 decimals of land to opposite party No.1 on 26.02.1995 without notice as required under section 89 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act but fraudulently created deed of exchange by suppressing the real transaction of sale. The opposite party No.14 on the ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Mosa. Rabeya Khatun Vs. Md. Afzal Hossain Prang. and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ocate for the petitioner deserve no consideration. The petition is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 646. ......f the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act in the Court of the learned Assistant Judge, Bogra for getting pre-empted the land transferred by the preemptee Nos. 2-4 in favour of pre-emptee by a kabala deed dated 22.05.1997 as contiguous land holder. The pre-emption case, was filed stating, inte..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK) Vs. Iqbal Ahmed and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ackground of the discussions made hereinbefore we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 631. ......Assistant Judge, Dhaka in Title Suit No.129 of 1999 dismissing the same. 2. The suit was filed seeking declaration of lease hold right in the land in suit and for cancellation of the lease deed made in favour of the defendant No.1 by the defendant No.2. 3. Facts, in short, are that..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Uttara Bank Ltd. Vs. Subordinate Judge and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....urt to decide the claim by Uttara Bank Limited in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 229. ...... No.11 of 1998 filed by the respondent Habib Bank Limited. In that application it was stated that the property of Mrs Maria Yousuf was mortgaged to the Uttara Bank Limited, by depositing the title deed against the house building loan granted to Mrs Maria Yousuf and that property is not liable to..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Wahed Talukder, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 218. ...... in the list of abandoned buildings unlawful and without lawful authority. 2. Facts, in short, are that the property in question was owned by one Mr. SM Hasan who got the same by lease deed dated May 31,1966 from the Government of the then East Pakistan. It is the case of the re..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Megha Fisheries Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
...., as such, we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 97, 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 25. ......o. 456 of 2000 dismissing the appeal. 2. The facts leading to the appeal are that the appellant as the plaintiff instituted Other Class Suit No.12 of 1996 for declaration that the registered lease deed No. 4330 dated 15-6-1996 between the plaintiff-appellant and defendant Megha Fisheries Ltd. is ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Badal Chandra Das and others Vs. Amena Khatun, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... could be pointed out for our interference. In view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 94. ......suit land; during liberation period said Sudhir Chandra left this country for India; Dil Mohammad transferred the suit land to his wife plaintiff-Amena Khatun (respondent herein) through registered deed of sale in return of dower money on 15-12-1967 and accordingly, mutated her name in mutation ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Abul Kashem Howlader & ors. Vs. Md. Kashem Ali Khan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....on 6-12-1958 as fraudulent and not binding upon the plaintiffs. The petition is disposed of aforesaid modification. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 86. ......ies viz., Abdul Kader and his brother and Khalilur Rahman and his other co-sharers, namely, Hachan Howlader and Yasin Howlader (the predecessor of the defendant Nos.1-19) executed and registered a deed of partition dated 25-7-1928. In terms of the said deed of partition Abdul Kader Howlader and ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Ali Akber Ansari, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 76. ......pondent No. 1 in affidavit-in-opposition contended, inter alia, that Mokter Ahmed Ansari and Peshkar Ahmed Ansari were two brothers who on 22.02.1960 purchased the lands question by two registered deeds from one Babu Kader Nath and thereafter constructed two apartment buildings thereon. On 21.09..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Sushil Kumar Ghose & another Vs. Md. Nurul Howlader & others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....orrect decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. All the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. This case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2009) 69. ......ns Kazi Altaf Hossain and Kazi Munir Hossain on different dates in the year 1979. Mesbahuddin again transferred his portion of the case lands of his daughter, Mosammat Mahmuda Begum by executing a deed of gift dated 16.02.1982. In the meantime the pre-emptee, Md. Nurul Haque Howlader filed three..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Sultan Molla and others Vs. Helaluddin Howlader & others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....on did not commit any error of law requiring interference by this court. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 66. ...... husband Ludu Mollah and mother Arabjan Bibi. Two sons of Swarupjan Bibi died unmarried. Arabjan Bibi transferred her share to the predecessor of these defendants on 13th Boishakh, 1319 B.S. by Heba deed and afterwards she sold her land inherited from her daughter to Hamijuddin by another deed. T..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
M/s. Pak Eastern Industries Ltd. Now M/s. Bangla Industries Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....the trial involved in acquisition for assessment of compensation at TK.80,000.00 per acre without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD)(2009) 1. ......5, 46, 49, 77, 80, 76, 75, 81, 40, 48 and 70 of Ranabhola Mouza presently under the Police Station Uttara at a consideration of TK.46,5000.00 and took over possession. On that basis a regular sale deed (Ext.56 Cha) was executed and registered on 09.05.1969 on receipt of the full consideration mo..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
28142813281128072806280428032802279727962794278627842781278027782774277227712767