Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Ragib Ali Vs. Bangladesh and ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....e with costs to be paid as directed above. AT.M. Afzal J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 185. ......sh and ors……………….........Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. Result: The Rule is made absolute Fundamental Right to Protection of Law – Illegal dispossession by Government Officers— Government sold a propert..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 1
Salehuddin Khan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ......ower by necessary implication when rights of others are involved--There being no delegation of power to the Vice-President the impugned order passed with his approval cannot be sustained in law. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab Chowdhury—For the Petitioner. M. Shohrab Ali, D. A. G, ..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate & another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ......ction of the law and to be treated in accordance with law, and in accordance with law as guaranteed under Article 31 of the Constitution has been clearly infringed…….(27) Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, petitioner No.2 in person with MHA Sikdar, MI Faruque..Category: Constitutional Law, Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ............Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others ………...............Respondent Judgment January 13, 1982 Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, petitioner No.2 in person, with M.H.A. Sikdar,&nb..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Gopal Chandra Mondol Vs. Lashmat Dasi, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ......Respondent Judgment January 7, 1982. Result: The Appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred To- Seshammat Vs. Kuppanatyyangar, reported in A.I.R. 1926 Madras, at page 475. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim—For the Appellant. Kh. Mahbubuddin Ahmed with Fi..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 7 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 3
Zainal Abedin & Another Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... transmitted to the appellate Division of this Court alongwith the certificate for leave to appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 77, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 493 ......, AIR 1967 SC 1427; State of Mysore Vs. Krisna Murth, AIR 1973 SC 1146; B.S. Vadera & another Vs. Union of India & others, AIR 1969 SC 118; Shahabuddin Vs. Pakistan PLD 1957 Karachi 854. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab Chowdhury, Advocate- For the Petitioners Sohrab Ali, Deputy At..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 14 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1
Shahidur Rahman Molla & others Vs. Abdul Halim Molla & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....for preemption are affirmed. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 89. ......d others, 29 DLR (High Court Division) 153; Satya Ranjan Haider and others Vs. Surendra Nath Das and other, 13 DLR (Dacca) 338; Tamizuddin Ahmed Vs. Guljan Bibi and others, 26 DLR (HCD) 93. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Rahim, Advocate— For the Petitioners. Md. Nurul Haque with A..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 10 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1
Shahidur Rahman Molla & other Vs. Abdul Halim Molla & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....ion are affirmed. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:35 DLR (HCD) (1983) 79. ......ivision) 93; Nayeb Ali and others Vs. Aktar Rahman and others, 29 DLR (High Court Division) 153; Abdur Rahman Vs. Baser Ali and others, 21 D.L.R. (Dacca) page 599; 1 BLD (High Court Division) 121. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Rahim - For the Petitioners. Md. Nurul Hoque with, A.K.M Khasirul..Category: Property Law | Date: 10 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 19
Hasina Begum & others Vs. Haji Md. Ekramullah & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... view of the above the appeal is dismissed with costs. The judgment and decree of Courts below are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)116 ......Pradhan AIR 1930 Gal. 738; Harihar Prasad Singh Vs. Deonarayan 1956 SC A. 316 ; Binad Lai Pakrashi Vs. Kalu Pramanik. (1890) 20 Cal. 708; All India Film Cor. Vs. Shri Raja Cyan (1970) 2 SCR 581. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Mahbubey Alam, Quashem Faziul Hug Khan, Mirza Hos..Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 7 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 10
Aftabuddin Miah Vs. Kudrat Ali Miah & ors, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... the facts and circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 51 ......13; Jalil Ahmed Vs. Raish Mia, 20 D.L.R at page 80; Ratish Chandra Vs. Hara Krishna Goldar, 15 D.L.R. at page 654; Majada Khatun Vs. Rabindra Chandra Roy, P.L.D. (Dacca) at page 112. Lawyers Involved: Md. Yasin—For the Appellant. M. A. Jalil—For the Respondent..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 2
Syed Abdul Aziz Vs.Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... observation this rule is discharged. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 54. ......s premature and not maintainable. We however, are inclined to observe that any of our observations as regards the merits of the………………….. (7) Lawyers Involved: Moinul Hossain, Advocate with Joynal Abedin, Advocate— For the Petition..Category: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 18 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 2
Kazi Habibul Awal Vs. Bangladesh Bar Council, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....sons referred to hereinbefore, accede to his prayer. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 58. ......lip;…Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Bar Council……………Respondent Judgment November 17, 1981. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Kazi Habibul Awal, Advocate— For the Petitioner in person. MA Mann..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 17 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 1
Bazlur Rahman Bhuiyan Vs. Bangladesh Shipping Corporation, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....time stipulated in the contract the suit shall be dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 443;34 DLR (AD) (1982) 42. ......amp; 12) Case Referred to- Thengafhandra Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1964 SC 1872; Manakehand Vs. Monoarlal, AIR 1944 PC 46; B.R. Bhuiyan. Vs. B.S. Corporation, 1981 BLD 320. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul-Huq, Sr. Advocate with, Aminul Huq, Advocate, instructed by&n..Category: Company Law, Contract Law, Procedural Law | Date: 12 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 0
Nabir Md. @ Nabiruddin Vs. The State, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....ence passed against him. Let the lower court records be sent down. Mustafa Kamal J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (1982) (HCD) 16 ...... evidence against the accused appellant both as regards fact and law and to substitute its own finding…….(8) Cases Referred To- Imran Ullah Vs. The Crown, 6 DLR (F.C.) 65 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek —For the Appellant. Marfat Ali —For the State. ..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 10 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 3
Kiron Chandra Das Vs. Sirajul Hoque Patwari, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....affirmed but in the facts and circumstances of the case. I direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 255 ......ntiff without proving his case prima facie would not as of right, get a decree in his favor merely because the contesting defendants were absent on the date of hearing …….......(5) Lawyers Involved: K. S. Nabt—For the appellant. Ruhul Amin—For the respondent...Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 6 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 2
Saad Ahmed Vs. The State, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....ain vacant seats of the National Assembly. The then President of Pakistan declared that after the bye-elections are held the National Assembly will be convened on the 28th December, 1971 and the Martial Law will be withdrawn on that very date. A representative government will be sworn in on tha......hellip;…………State Judgment November 3, 1981. Result: The Appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- AFM Nazmul Huda Vs. The State, 26 DLR 183. Lawyers Involved: Saad Ahmed, Advocate, appellant in person with AT Chowdhury and Sk. Ansar Ali..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 3 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 1
Archana Proshad Nandi Vs. Miss Chilia RanÂdolph and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....t of the full purchase money, and the judgment of the Courts below are set aside without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 106. ...........Respondents Judgment October 28, 1981. Result: The appeal is allowed. Case Referred To- Harendra Chandra Das Vs. Nanda Lal Roy, 36 C.W.N. 1002. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, B. B, Roy Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 28 Oct, 1981 | Hits: 234
Jamil Huq (Ex-Captain) Vs. Bangladesh & Others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....he Petitions are dismissed. Constitution of Bangladesh (1972); Art. 102 (2) (b); Art. 45 & 102 Scope of Enquiry and Interference in Habeas Corpus— Writ - Habeas Corpus--Court Martial- High Court Division has no jurisdiction to interfere with the decision and order of Co......981 BLD (AD) 378; Khandker Ehteskamuddin Ahmed Iqbal Vs. State, 1981 BLD (AD) 107; Attorney General for the Province of Ontari Vs. Attorney General for the Dominion of Conada, (1912) A.C. 571. Lawyers Involved: For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: M.H. Khandker, Sr. Advocate, with&nb..Category: Constitutional Law, Criminal Law | Date: 22 Sep, 1981 | Hits: 2
Md. Ismail & others Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....he operation of the impugned order of requisition is stayed till 21st October, 1981 from date. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 4, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 407 ......oosa Haji Vs. Province of East Pakistan 12 D. L. R. (Dacca) 236; Mohammad Shamsur Rahman vs. Province of East Pakistan 14 DLR 604; Tej Ram Jag Ram Vs. Union of India AIR 1059 Punj 478. Lawyers Involved: Fakir Shahabuddin Ahmed, with Mohammad Ali, Abu Backker, Syed Abu Nayeem, Adv..Category: Property Law | Date: 19 Aug, 1981 | Hits: 2
Category: Constitutional Law, Procedural Law | Date: 23 Jul, 1981 | Hits: 1