Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Afazuddin Mollah and others Vs. Sadhan Chandra Roy, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Bhenunessa died leaving behind only son plaintiff and daughter Hajiron Nessa. Minor sons of Abdul Gafur were under the custody of their mother, Baron Nessa Bibi who executed and registered a kabala on behalf of the minor sons on 19.02.1947 in favour of the plaintiffs and delivered possessi......lot No. 554 Afazuddin got 0.32 decimals of land from plot No.1712 by amicable exchange with plot No. 844 and 854 with these defendants and transferred those lands to one Liakat Ali. The title deeds of the plaintiffs are false, collusive and the suit is liable to be dismissed with cost. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Mahadeb Chandra Mondal and other Vs. Rebati Sarder and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.....1933 in favour of the Guru Charan and latter asserted that he purchased the said land in the name of Jogendra Sarder. Billa Dasi died leaving behind daughters Laxmi Dasi who sold by a kabala deed dated 22.11.1942 in favour of Guru Charan. Guru Charan purchased that land in the benam......n favour of the Guru Charan and latter asserted that he purchased the said land in the name of Jogendra Sarder. Billa Dasi died leaving behind daughters Laxmi Dasi who sold by a kabala deed dated 22.11.1942 in favour of Guru Charan. Guru Charan purchased that land in the benami of Up..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
K.K.K. Garments Limited Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Limited and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....erit in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 181. ......87.00 for machinery and the defendants accepted the sanction letter which is fixed for repayment of the loan money together with profits thereof by 28.04.1988. Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 deposited the deed of the schedule property as collateral security in favour of the plaintiff bank and also ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Taj Din Vs. Mrs. Razia Begum Alvi and others, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
....sfied that there is no substance in them. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. The parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 13. ......land to her on the 5th May, 1949, for Rs. 20,000/-, out of which he received an advance of Rs. 16,000 and agreed to receive the balance of sale price at the time of execution and registration of sale deed after the Custodian had given the sanction for the proposed sale. In this connection he moved a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Lala Ghand Sarder Vs. Abdul Huq and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....red into an agreement with the petitioner on 27.02.1965 to sell their 8 annas share of the said property of the said holding; that they having failed to amicably settle to execute and register the kabala in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner filed Title Suit No. 232 of 1970 in the Cou......f schedule No. 3 property as heirs of their father who is owner of plot Nos. 94, 95, 96, 104, 101 and 102, purchased the said 1.46 acres of land from the vendor respondent No. 3 by registered sale deed dated 04.08.1983 at a consideration of Tk. 2000.00. After coming to know about the sale the re..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Haji Safiuddin Ahmed Vs. The Administrator of Waqf and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... we do not find any substance in this application for leave to appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 6 LG (AD) (2009) 105. ......ng the affairs of the Waqf Estate as Mutwalli smoothly, honestly sincerely, actively and in accordance with the provisions of the Waqf Ordinance, 1962. The petitioner by way of two registered Waqf deeds dated 08.02.1999 and 08.03.1999 transferred two decimals of valuable land in favour of the af..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 173
Professor Dr. Niaz Zaman Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakhya and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....e-C annexed thereto do form part of this order. With the above observation and the aforesaid directions this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 6 LG (AD) (2009) 101. ......ve approved a plan to construct in the lake's open area which the respondents cannot do, open space cannot be filled up in violation of the petitioner's rights and expectations by virtue of the lease deed along with the design map of the area at the time of the granting of the petitioner's lease. Th..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Quazi Md. Obaidur Rashid and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....also found nothing to interfere with. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed after condoning delay of 23 days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 6 LG (AD) (2009) 39. ......ents are the Writ Petitioners, they claimed that the property in question belonged to Mrs. Golshan Ali Hijri and Arifabad Co-operative Housing Society purchased 11.85 acres of land by a registered deed of sale dated 15-12-80 from Roshanally M. H. Hijri and three others who were legal heirs of Mr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
State Vs. Kalam Talukder and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....the submissions of the learned Deputy Attorney General has got no substance and accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 169. ......ased Abdul Mannan and informant Abdus Sobhan Howlader were ploughing their land in Mouza-Khodabox Kathi on plot No. 2499 which was acquired in the name of deceased Abdul Mannan on the basis of sale deed. While ploughing the land, the accused Kalam Talukder and others are armed with ramda, L..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Shahjahan Mridha Vs. Jalal Sikder and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Bibi and mother Amena Khatoon as his heirs and successors. The said Hazu Khatoon and Jahirun Bibi sold .97 decimals and .13 decimals of land to their brother Mohiuddin on 12-02-1949 by registered kabala and handed over possession to him. The said Mohiuddin Mridha sold .30 decimals of land which......nly to buy back Shushil Kumar's lands through registered kabala on 18-02-1978. Subsequently, Abdul Khaleque Pramanik being the owner in possession of the lands sold the same on 18-02-1993 by kabala deed No. 8817 registered on 18-12-1993 to the plaintiff Nos. 1-2 and handed over possession to the..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Abdur Rashid Bepari Vs. Soleman Ali, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... of 1994. 2. The facts, in short, are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed the aforesaid Other Suit No.44 of 1994 against the defendant-opposite party for declaration that the registered kabala deed No.3473 dated 01.08.1987 purportedly executed and registered by the plaintiff-pet......4. 2. The facts, in short, are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed the aforesaid Other Suit No.44 of 1994 against the defendant-opposite party for declaration that the registered kabala deed No.3473 dated 01.08.1987 purportedly executed and registered by the plaintiff-petitioner..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Elahi Mondal Vs. Juran Mondal and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....f the land described in schedule Kha of the plaint on the averments that .21 acres of land of Plot No. 243 described in Ka schedule belonged to Nayeb Ali who transferred the same to Rahim Sheikh by kabala dated 8.2.1939 and after the death of Rahim Sheikh his son Mahtab Sheikh became owner of the...... land and Rahela Khatoon, who installed the defendant/petitioner in the suit land as her bargadar, will possess Kha schedule land, the plaintiff, in good faith, withdrew the above suit but no deed of exchange was then executed to the above effect and on the other the defendant, on 25.3.1986..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Mohammad Akbar Chowdhury Vs. Khalilur Rahman and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....950 was served on him and he (pre-emptee) never possessed the case plot. Being informed by the opposite party No.1, the petitioner searched in the sub registry office and took certified copy of the kabala on 18.01.1997 and became aware for the first time that the case land was secretly purchased ......rred by law and bad for defect of parties. The pre-emptor petitioner was not entitled to pre-empt the case land as he was not co-sharer in any way. The case land was purchased by him by registered deed dated 29.02.1992 and hence forth the (pre-emptee) has been continuously in possession within t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Jitendra Nath Bachar Vs. Badhakanta Sardar, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....r and Bishnanpada Bachhar to the extent of 1/3 share who settled 2.31 acres of by patta dated 04.06.1963 in favour of the plaintiff. Thereafter, Bishnapada Bachhar sold 2.16 acres of land by a kabala deed dated 03.05.1945 in favour of the plaintiff. Out of those land 3.30 acres of land is th......ishnanpada Bachhar to the extent of 1/3 share who settled 2.31 acres of by patta dated 04.06.1963 in favour of the plaintiff. Thereafter, Bishnapada Bachhar sold 2.16 acres of land by a kabala deed dated 03.05.1945 in favour of the plaintiff. Out of those land 3.30 acres of land is the suit ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Ahmed Safa Vs. Amin Sharif and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ion and Tenancy Act and in the alternative under Section 24 of the Non-agricultural Tenancy Act against the petitioner and opposite party Nos. 21-22 praying for pre-emption of the land of kabala dated 30.03.1986 alleging that the suit property originally belonged to Chandra Kumar, Banom......be an issue and does not deserve to be decided here. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 125. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Md. Solaiman and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....re is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 121. ......agreements with petitioner Nos.1,2 and 3 on 29.5.2004 and also another lease agreement with petitioner No.4 and that the respondent No.6 did not have any lawful authority to execute the above lease deeds with the petitioners and accordingly those leases were cancelled. 4. The High Court Di..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Md. Tazimuddin and others Vs. Md. Mafizul Islam and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ew of the judgment passed by this Court. We find no merit in this review petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 117. ......nnas of the entire land i.e. 13½ acres and two daughters got to the extent of 0.56¾ acre each and they possessed their land. Bhola Sheikh transferred .90 acres form his share by deed dated 21.12.1953 to the plaintiff and Rahimun Nessa, he also transferred 0.23½ acres b..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Narryan Chandra Das Vs. Sree Joydeb Datta and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... annas share vide Misc. Case No.879 of 1982-83 and thereafter he paid rents to the Government and while in possession transferred .24 decimals of land of plot No.518 to plaintiff No.2 by registered kabala dated 30.04.1984 and delivered possession in his favour and since then the plaintiff No.2 h......ng the same on payment of rent through plaintiff No.1. The balance .90 acres of suit jama and other land was transferred by said Girish Chandra Datta to his son plaintiff No.1 through a registered deed of gift dated 03.05.1984 and possession was delivered and plaintiff No.1 constructed homestead..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
RAJUK Vs. Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority and other, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....o have been done without lawful authority. We find no merit in the petition and accordingly the same is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 80. ......1964 that the cheque had been encashed; the lease money was deposited and the possession of the allotted land was handed over to the respondent No.1 but RAJUK did not execute and register the lease deed inspite of the repeated requests; in the meantime the construction works of residential build..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Abdul Samad Khan Vs. Sree Dulal Chandra Ghose and Another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 613 of 1991 is set aside. There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 78. ...... 1983. Subsequently the above execution case, being transferred to the Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Gazipur, was renumbered as Execution Case No. 13 of 1985 and then sale deed was executed and registered on 13.5.1985 through Court. The respondent No.1 then filed miscell..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 71