Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1561-1580 of 7814 results.
Tota @ Tofayzel Hossain Tota @ Tofayzel Hossains Vs. State, 1984, CLC (HCD)
....ore dismissed, and the order of conviction and sentence is upheld. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 74. ......The State, PLD 1975, Karachi 275; Md. Anwar and others Vs. The State, PLD 1966 Lahore 643; Habibullah and others Vs. The State, PLD 1969 Supreme Court 127; the State Vs. Mokshed Ali, 20 DLR 714. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rahim— For the Appellant. Mohammad Abdul Haque—For..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 12 Jul, 1984 | Hits: 6
Abdul Hashem Vs. Saleh Ahmed & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ntract of sale and the petitioner is not a necessary party in a case like this. Being dissatisfied with and aggrieved from the said order of the learned Subordinate Judge the petitioner obtained this Rule. 6. During the hearing of the rule Mr. S.C. Das, the learned Advocate appearing for the pe......arties Judgment July 10, 1984. Result: The rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Mir Hasmat Ali Vs. Birendra Kumar Ghosh and others reported in 16 DLR page 239A. Lawyers Involved: S C. Das—For the petitioner. No one—For Opposite parties. ..Category: Contract Law, Property Law | Date: 10 Jul, 1984 | Hits: 5
Azizur Rahman & others Vs. Jugal Kishori Sarkar & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ul Majid-For the petitioners. B.N. Chowdhury with P.K. Base and Mansur Habib-For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision Case No. 1750 of 1981. Judgment Amin Ur Rahmnn Khan J. - This Rule at the instance of the defendant-petitioners is directed against the judgment and decree passed......rred to- Khirode Ch. Goshal Vs. Saroda 21 CLJ 525; Bota Krishna Vs. Akhoy Kumar, 15 CWN 450; Md. Magdu Bhuya Vs. Jabbar Huq (1959), 11 DLR 355; Habibulla Vs. Movi. Salek (1968), 20 DLR 489. Lawyers Involved: Md. Anser Ali with Abdul Majid-For the petitioners. B.N. Chowdhury with ..Category: Family Law | Date: 20 Jun, 1984 | Hits: 2
Eastern Maritime & Trading Corpora¬tion Vs. Sea Trade & Cons¬truction Limited, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....tachariya—For the defendant-appellant. Moudud Ahmed with A.K.M. Shamsul Huda and Sharifuddin Chaklader—For the opposite-party. Fast Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2 of 1984 with Civil Rule No. 33 (F.M.) of 1984. Judgment Fazle Hussain Muhammad Habibur Rahman J.- This appea......peals No.28 and 29 of 1983 of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh; Thai Seree Fishery Co. Ltd & Thai Seri Cold Storage Co. Ltd. Vs. Amin Fish Farm & Industries Ltd. Lawyers Involved: M. HafizuUah with Mokbul Ahmed and P. Bhattachariya—For the defendant-a..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 12 Jun, 1984 | Hits: 5
Abdul Quddus Vs. Anjuman Khatoon & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....earned Advocate also submits that the contract is bad for uncertainty. Section 14 of the Transfer of Property Act which embodies the rule against perpetuity reads as follows: “14 Rule against perpetuity.--No transfer of property can operate to create an interest which is to take......d. Affan and others Vs. Tazal Hoque and 42 others, 27 DLR 58; Rambaran Vs. Rani Mohit (1967) AIR (SC) 144; Gladstone Vs. A. B. M. Shayesta (1976) 28 DLR 344; Umar Vs. Fazal Din PLD 1952 Uh. 166. Lawyers Involved: Ahsanul Kabir-For the Appellant. No one—For the Respondent. A..Category: Contract Law, Property Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1984 | Hits: 4
Abdul Jaher Vs. Abdul Kader & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... Abdul Jaher.......................................Petitioner Vs. Abdul Kader & others...........................Opposite parties Jugdment May 30, 1984. Result: The Rule is discharged. Civil Procedure Code, 1908; Section 24 Transfer of suit when should be......less the defendant establishes a balance and preponderance of convenience in his favour. Cases Referred to- AIR 1925 Lab. 189; AIR 1944 Lah. 400; PLD 1968 Dae. 849; AIR 1961 pages 560. Lawyers Involved: Formanullah Khan—For the Petitioner. M. Fazlul narim—For th..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 30 May, 1984 | Hits: 2
Mokbul Ahmed and others Vs. Bazal Ahmed & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... fide and as such their judgments suffer from illegality. The mala fide canvassed by the learned Advocate is that the settlement was made without making the necessary inquiry as required by Rule 54 of the Government Estate Manual read with section 77 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Ac......lip;………..Petitioner Vs. Bazal Ahmed & others...........................Respondent Judgment April 26, 1984. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M. Shqfiqur Rahman with M. Fazlul Karim—For the appellants. Az..Category: Property Law | Date: 26 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 3
Motiur Rahman Vs. May Industries Ltd, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... against the respondent-company. Certified for one counsel with one junior. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 41. ......d Jhunjhunwalla, A.I.R. 1976 (S.C.) 565; Bengal Waterways Vs. Rahimuddin Ahmed and others, 34 DLR (AD) 47; Ripon Press and Sugar Mill Co. Ltd., Bellary Vs. V. Gopal Chetti, A.I.R. 1932 (P.O.) 1. Lawyers Involved: Badruddin Ahmed with Sk. Abul Hossain and Syed Moynul Huq— For the Peti..Category: Company Law | Date: 26 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 6
Sarder Ahmed Ali Vs. G. M. Ali Boksh and others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....J Sarder Ahmed Ali................................Petitioner Vs. G. M. Ali Boksh and ors.........................Opposite-party Judgment April 12, 1984. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Short Vs. Henderson Ltd.; Gould Vs. Minister of Nat......poration. Vs. Mahabub Hossain, 29 DLR (SC) 39; 35 DLR 244; 13 DLR at page 341;Vithoba Bhanji Vs. Vithal Sakroo, AIR 1958 (Bom.) at page 27; Abdur Rashid Vs. Hari Pada Sarker, 22 DLR at page 668. Lawyers Involved: Shaikh Razzaque Ali—For the Petitioner. Md. Abdur Rahim—For ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 4
Rafiqul Islam & others Vs. Md. Abdul Hoque & another, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ners Vs. Md. Abdul Hoque & another…………………………Opposite-Party Judgment April 11, 1984. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Aziz—For the Petitioner. M. S. M. N......dul Hoque & another…………………………Opposite-Party Judgment April 11, 1984. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Aziz—For the Petitioner. M. S. M. Nasirul Islam—For th..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 11 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 1
Shababuddin & others Vs. Saijuddin & others,1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... there will be no order as to costs only before this Court. Send down the records as expeditiously as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 337 ...... & others ......................Appellant Vs. Saijuddin & others..........................Respondent Judgment April 7, 1984. Result: The appeal is dimissed. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Aziz—For the Appellant. Syed the Shamsur Rahman- For Respond..Category: Contract Law, Property Law | Date: 7 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 4
M/s. Haque Brothers (Carbide) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... on the aforesaid amount of principal and interest calculating from this day till realization. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (AD) (1985) 47. ...... a portion of letter is written “without prejudice”, that portion should not also been given consideration in decision the case against the party or the other………………………(19) Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him, inst..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 2 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 105
Rezia Khatun & others Vs. Delwar Hussain & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....on the plaintiffs. 3. The learned Munsif after considering the evidence found that according to the peon's returns Ext. A(1) and A(2) the summons were shown to have been served under Order 5 Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure was not put in by the serving peon nor the serving ......;……………….. (9, 11 & 13) Cases Referred to- Munshl Tamijuddin Vs. Altafuddin (1968) 20 DLR 901; Most Johra Vs. Rafiqul Kader, 25 DLR page 91 Lawyers Involved: A. Mannan Khan—For the appellants. Fazlul Karim with P.K. Base&mda..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 21 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 2
Fazal Ahmed Vs. Achima Khatun & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.....................Petitioner Vs. Achima Khatun & others..…………………Opposite parties Judgment March 18, 1984. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred To- Ayna Dasi Vs. Arena Bala Dashi and others, 12 DLR 6...... Vs. Hassan Ali Begunia, A.I.R. 1928 P.C. 303; Hemchandra Roy Chowdhury Vs. Suradhari Debya Chowdhurani, A.I.R. 1940 PC 134; Khurbuja Khir Vs. Jang Bahadur A.I.R. 1963 SC 1203. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim—For the Petitioner. R M. Saleh Ahmed—For the Op..Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 3
Trustees of the Port of Chittagong Vs. K. Mahbub Hossain & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....fendant No. 1 alone is liable for the loss of the car as a bails the defendant No. 3 & 4 against whom decree was also passed have not filed any appeal or cross objection. But in view of Order 41, Rule 33 C.P.C. this Court as an appellate Court can grant that relief to the respondent al......uthority Vs. Md. Ishaque and others, 35 DLR (AD) 364; Central Bank of India Ltd. Vs. M/S-Jan Md. Hazi Ismail 17 D.L.R. 582; Chittagong Port Authority Vs. Md. Ishaque and others 35 DLR. (AD) 364. Lawyers Involved: Makbul Ahmed for Muzammel Hug—For the appellant. M.A. Zalil for Rc..Category: Contract Law | Date: 14 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 3
Md. Gafar & others Vs. Azimuddin, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... allowed without any order as to casts. The judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge is set aside and the judgment and decree passed by the Munsif are restored. The connected Civil Rule 669(S) 1978 is disposed of accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (19...... possession…............(8) Cases Referred To- Sadek Ali Vs. Suruj Ali & others, 5 DLR 95;7 DLR page 96;Chand Muhammad Mondal Vs. Fayezuddin Ahamed & others, 10 DLR 193. Lawyers Involved: P. K. Base with Mansur Habib—For the appellants. Md. Marfat All&md..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 3
Nurul Islam & others Vs. The State, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....amp; others....................................Petitioner Vs. The State...................................................Respondent Judgment March 11, 1984. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Abul Hossain Sana Vs. Suwalal Agarwala and another,......DLR 96; Md. Mostafa Chowdhury Vs. Lila Rani Naundi, 22 DLR 199; Habibullah Chowdhury Vs. Abdul Kader Howlader, 29 DLR 338; Kanchan Ali Howlader Vs. Abdul Malek and others, 25 DLR 152;30 DLR 344. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Hoque—For the Petitioners. Syed Ghulam Mostafa—For t..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 11 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 3
Jahir Ahmed Vs. Badsha Mia Sowdagor, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ahir Ahmed............................................Petitioner Vs. Badsha Mia Sowdagor...............................Opposite Party Judgment March 6, 1984. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Abdul Mannan and others Vs. Kulad Ranjan Ma......to- Abdul Mannan and others Vs. Kulad Ranjan Mawali and others, 31 DLR (AD) 195; Bangladesh Vs. Haji Abdul Gani Biswas and ors, 32 DLR (AD) 233; Abu Bakkar Vs. Nasir Ahmed, 34 DLR (AD) 237, Lawyers Involved: A.K.M. Shafiqur Rahman with Mostafa Niaz Mohammad, Mokbul Ahmed—For the..Category: Property Law | Date: 6 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 119
Priyatosh Talukder Vs. Asstt. Custodian of Enemy Property, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
..............................Appellant Vs. Asstt. Custodian of Enemy Property.............Respondent Judgment March 4, 1984. Result: The appeal is allowed in part. The Rules are discharged. Cases Referred to- National Bank of Pakistan Vs. Kushtia Sugar Cane ......e Rules are discharged. Cases Referred to- National Bank of Pakistan Vs. Kushtia Sugar Cane Mills, 29 DLR 32;Goutam Ranjan Sen and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981 BLD (A.D.) 126 Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shafiqur Rahman with Mustafa Neaz Muhammad—For the appellant. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 4
S Joga Maya Debi & others Vs. S.D D. Singh Hazari & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ebi & others.............................Petitioners Vs. S.D D. Singh Hazari & others........................Opposite parties Judgment March 4, 1984. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred To- Ashwini Kumar Karmaker and others Vs. Hari Mohan...... Judgment March 4, 1984. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred To- Ashwini Kumar Karmaker and others Vs. Hari Mohan and others, 36 DLR (AD); 51 C.W.N. 644. Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahmud with H. Fazlul Karim —For the petitioners. S.C. ..Category: Procedural Law, Property Law | Date: 4 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 2
90749295929892929296941694139066906290679297308292899415938792909087788995389386