Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1641-1660 of 7814 results.
....dinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca are hereby affirmed for the reasons stated above.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 282.
......1953 Calcutta 349; Kharadah Company Ltd. Vs. Raymon & Co. (India) Private Ltd., AIR 1962 (SC) 1810; Waverly Jute Mills Co. Ltd Vs. Raymon Co. (India) Private Ltd., AIR 1963 Supreme Court 90.
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Abdul Aziz, Advocate— For the Appellants.
Fakir Shahabuddin Ah..
Category: Arbitration Law, Corporate Law, Property Law | Date: 15 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 2
M/s Saleh Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. TSS PACIFIC ABETO and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....Court with proper jurisdiction as mentioned in rule 10 seems to be pointless, in view of the non applicability of the provisions of rule 10, Order 7, C.P.C. to proceedings in an Admiralty Court. Rule 10, Order 7, C.P C. is as follows: "10.—(1) The plaint shall at any stage of th......khsh Vs. Settlement Commissioner, (1969) 21 DLR (SC) 456=PLD 1970 SC 1; R.P.0' Connor Vs. P.G. Sampath Kumar, A.I.R. 1953 Md 897; Jagannath Prasad Vs. Smt. Chandrawati, AIR 1970 All, 309 FB. Lawyers Involved: K.A. Bakr, Senior Advocate, M.H. Khondker, Senior Advocate, A. Wadud Bhuiyan ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 400
....and others Vs. Shri Laxmidas Lalubhai Patel of Baroda and others, 48 Company cases. 438 a different view was taken. D.A. Desai J. noted that when the Supreme Court of India framed the Company (Courb) Rules in 1959 it had before in the rules of the English Court which provided that an application for......da, Daddy, S. & others Vs. Irani K.R. 78 CWN 872; Sri Gulabrai Kalidas Naik and others Vs. Shri Laxmidas Lalubhai Patel of Baroda and others, 48 Company cases, 438; 7 PLR (Dacca series) 159.
Lawyers Involved:
Amirul Islam with Moinur Reza Chowdhury, Advocate- For the Petition..
Category: Company Law | Date: 28 May, 1982 | Hits: 3
Abdul Quddus & Another Vs. The State, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ......ville, (1916) 2 KB 658; Shah Alam and others Vs. The Crown 10 DLR 237; Rameshwar Vs. The State of Rajasthan, (1952) SCR (India) 377; Momtaz Ahmed Khan Vs. The State 19 DLR (SC) 259 (265). Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocate— For the Appellants. Kazi Safiudd..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 6 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Narendralal Chowdhury & others Vs. Bimal Kanti Chowdhury & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... possession upon declaration that the suit properties were trust properties along with a prayer for accounting. 2. The plaintiff filed the suit as a pauper with leave of the Court under Order 33 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. He claimed to be an administrator of the disputed proper......thers, AIR 1944 Privy Council 78; Venkatachallapathilyer Vs. China Muna Chakaran Panilyer, AIR 1922 (Madras) 83; Afser Molla and another Vs. Abdul Aziz and others, 29 DLR 416. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rob (11), Advocate— For the Appellants. S.S. Halder, Ad..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 4 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
....from the carrier £ 100 per package not received. It has been contended that the plaintiff is not entitled to more than £ 100 per drum of the cargo. My attention has also been drawn to the Rule 5 of Article IV of the Hague Rules which reads as follows:-
“Neither the carrier nor......raf Hossain Choudhury Vs. General Manager, Titas Gas Transmission & Distribution Co. Ltd. and another) and Civil Appeal No 65 of 1980. (A.K.M. Ayub Ali Vs. Eastern Refinery Limited & ors
Lawyers Involved:
Dr. M. Zahir, M. Hasan, Advocate –For the Appellant
M. Hafizu..
Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 5
Md. Reazul Karim Vs. Mst. Shirin Begum, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....oner Vs. Mst. Shirin Begum………………………………Respondent Judgment March 7, 1982. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mian Aftabuddin Ahmed—For the Petitioner ......in Begum………………………………Respondent Judgment March 7, 1982. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mian Aftabuddin Ahmed—For the Petitioner Md. Anser Ali with Basir..Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 7 Mar, 1982 | Hits: 2
Md. Asghar Vs. Nowab Miah and others, 1892, 11 CLC (HCD)
....t Vs. Nowab Miah and others……………………………..Respondents Judgment March 2, 1982. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: BN Chowdhury, Advocate with M Nurullah and Kazi Ebad......h and others……………………………..Respondents Judgment March 2, 1982. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: BN Chowdhury, Advocate with M Nurullah and Kazi Ebadul Huq Advocates— F..Category: Property Law | Date: 2 Mar, 1982 | Hits: 2
Bashir Ahmed Vs. Abdul Shaheed, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....R. Pal with K. M. Saifuddin Ahmed—For the Appellant. Md. Ansar Ali with Azizur Rahman Chowdhury—For the Respondent No. 1. Appeal from Original Order No. 510 of 1981. Civil Rule No. 1721 (FM) of 1981. Judgment Chowdhury A. T. M. Masud J.— This appeal at the......does not arrive at any final decision on the merits of the case, but its object is only to preserve the status quo ante during the litigation………..................(7 & 8) Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal with K. M. Saifuddin Ahmed—For the Appellant. Md. Ansar A..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
....wyers Involved:
Abdur Rab-1—For the Petitioner.
Rafiqur Rahman—For the Contemner.
Contempt Petition No. 8 of 1980.
Judgment
Chowdhnry A.T.M. Masud J.— This Rule was issued calling upon respondent No.1 to show cause as why he should not be committed for con..................Petitioner
Vs.
Abdur Rashid Khan, Sub-divisional Magistrate, Sherpur & ors....Respondents
Judgment
February 5, 1982.
Result:
The rule is made.
Lawyers Involved:
Abdur Rab-1—For the Petitioner.
Rafiqur Rahman—For the Cont..
Category: Contempt of Court Law, Criminal Law | Date: 5 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 2
Surendra Mohan Shaha Vs. Government of Bangla¬desh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....he Petitioner. Matiur Rahman—For the Contemners. Contempt petition No.1/79 arising out of Writ petition No. 916 of 1978. Judgment Chowdhury AT.M. Masud J.— This Rule was issued calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why they should not be committed fo......pur, M.A. Rashid, Sub divisional Officer (Sadar) Jamalpur.................Respottdenis-Contemners Judgment February 5, 1982. Result: Appeal is allowed. Contempt of Court Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab-I—For the Petitioner. Matiur Rahman—For the Conte..Category: Contempt of Court Law | Date: 5 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 3
Abdul Quader Molla Vs. The Chairman, Bakerganj Zilla Parishad and another, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ertain thing is mandatory or not could be decided upon the consequence that would follow in the event of not doing the thing by the authority. The petitioners were not Government employees under Rule 5(53) of the Bangladesh Service Rules and their pay were not paid out of the State Treasury&mda......aid to have suffered from illegality………(5 & 7) Cases Referred To- A.I.R. 1955 S.C. 70; P.L.D. 1939 S.C. 13; A.I.R. 1959 Calcutta 356; A.I.R. 1967 Calcutta 326. Lawyers Involved: Maimil Hosein with Md. Joynul Abedin—For petitioner in both Petitions. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 1 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
Ragib Ali Vs. Bangladesh and ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors……………….........Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. Result: The Rule is made absolute Fundamental Right to Protection of Law – Illegal dispossessio......sh and ors……………….........Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. Result: The Rule is made absolute Fundamental Right to Protection of Law – Illegal dispossession by Government Officers— Government sold a propert..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 1
Salehuddin Khan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....s. Bangladesh and ors............................Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. Result: The rule is made absolute. Suspension of Government servant – Rule II of Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1976 under which the petitioner has be......ower by necessary implication when rights of others are involved--There being no delegation of power to the Vice-President the impugned order passed with his approval cannot be sustained in law. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab Chowdhury—For the Petitioner. M. Shohrab Ali, D. A. G, ..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate & another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....Board & ors……………………………………..Respondents Judgment January 13, 1982. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Whether the Government was within its rights to take over possession of ......ction of the law and to be treated in accordance with law, and in accordance with law as guaranteed under Article 31 of the Constitution has been clearly infringed…….(27) Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, petitioner No.2 in person with MHA Sikdar, MI Faruque..Category: Constitutional Law, Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... in facts that came to light in course of hearing of this matter and also from the Government file that was produced before us by the learned Assistant Attorney General. 2. The petitioner in the Rule have although maintained that they had a valid lease for the Tea Garden in question and that it............Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others ………...............Respondent Judgment January 13, 1982 Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, petitioner No.2 in person, with M.H.A. Sikdar,&nb..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Gopal Chandra Mondol Vs. Lashmat Dasi, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ......Respondent Judgment January 7, 1982. Result: The Appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred To- Seshammat Vs. Kuppanatyyangar, reported in A.I.R. 1926 Madras, at page 475. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim—For the Appellant. Kh. Mahbubuddin Ahmed with Fi..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 7 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 3
Zainal Abedin & Another Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....p;……........Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others…………........Respondents Judgment December 14, 1981 Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred To- Haji Ghulam Zamin Vs. A.B. Khondker, PLD 1965 Dac 1......, AIR 1967 SC 1427; State of Mysore Vs. Krisna Murth, AIR 1973 SC 1146; B.S. Vadera & another Vs. Union of India & others, AIR 1969 SC 118; Shahabuddin Vs. Pakistan PLD 1957 Karachi 854. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab Chowdhury, Advocate- For the Petitioners Sohrab Ali, Deputy At..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 14 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1
Shahidur Rahman Molla & others Vs. Abdul Halim Molla & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... Molla & others…………………………………Opposite Parties Judgment December 10, 1981. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Akhtarun Nessa and another Vs. Habibullah &......d others, 29 DLR (High Court Division) 153; Satya Ranjan Haider and others Vs. Surendra Nath Das and other, 13 DLR (Dacca) 338; Tamizuddin Ahmed Vs. Guljan Bibi and others, 26 DLR (HCD) 93. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Rahim, Advocate— For the Petitioners. Md. Nurul Haque with A..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 10 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1
Shahidur Rahman Molla & other Vs. Abdul Halim Molla & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....man Molla & other……………………………Petitioner Vs. Abdul Halim Molla & others………………………Opposite party Judgment December 10, 1981. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Md. Matiur Rahman Vs. Md. Iman Ali @ Md. Iman Miah......ivision) 93; Nayeb Ali and others Vs. Aktar Rahman and others, 29 DLR (High Court Division) 153; Abdur Rahman Vs. Baser Ali and others, 21 D.L.R. (Dacca) page 599; 1 BLD (High Court Division) 121. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Rahim - For the Petitioners. Md. Nurul Hoque with, A.K.M Khasirul..Category: Property Law | Date: 10 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 19
93697099922793349338922693829337955695519550955795589553933392299555923093478502