Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Dilip Kumar Chakravorty Vs. Abdul Muyeed Chowdhury and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ssed by the learned Subordinate Judge is restored. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 49. ......ssed by the learned Subordinate Judge is restored. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 49. ......ssed by the learned Subordinate Judge is restored. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 49. ......es Referred to- AIR 1914; (Cal. 815; 61 CLJ 543; AIR 1962 Cal. 519; AIR 1962 Pat. 443; AIR 1923 Mad. 92; 61 CLJ 543; AIR 1962 Cal 519; AIR 1914 Cal. 815; AIR 1968 Punjab (Hariana) page 374. Lawyers Involved: BN Chowdhury, Advocate with Parimal Chandra Guha Advocate— For the Peti..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 27 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 1
Ebadul Hoque & others Vs. Hajee Rajab Ali Molla & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....sts. The judgment and decree of the trial Court are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 287. ......sts. The judgment and decree of the trial Court are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 287. ......sts. The judgment and decree of the trial Court are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 287. ...... Cases Referred to- Hussain Baksh Vs. Settlement Commissioner Rawalpindi, PLD 1970 (SC) 1; Manager Lever Brothers (Pak) Ltd. Vs. Lever Brothers (Pakistan) Ltd. Sramik Union, 25 DLR 242. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hamid, Advocate—For the Appellants. Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate&..Category: Civil Law, Limitation Law | Date: 16 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 3
Category: Arbitration Law, Corporate Law, Property Law | Date: 15 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 2
M/s Saleh Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. TSS PACIFIC ABETO and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... at Chittagong from the Tag Master is the Tag's agent in Singapore; (iv) Acknowledgement receipt duly signed by the plaintiffs upon receipt of the vessel in afloat condition at Chittagong in Bangladesh to be attached along with the documents required for negotiation of the letter of Credit.......ertified copy of the plaint is to be kept in the record. The Bank guarantee in this suit is extended upto 15th July, 1982. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 188. ......ertified copy of the plaint is to be kept in the record. The Bank guarantee in this suit is extended upto 15th July, 1982. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 188. ......khsh Vs. Settlement Commissioner, (1969) 21 DLR (SC) 456=PLD 1970 SC 1; R.P.0' Connor Vs. P.G. Sampath Kumar, A.I.R. 1953 Md 897; Jagannath Prasad Vs. Smt. Chandrawati, AIR 1970 All, 309 FB. Lawyers Involved: K.A. Bakr, Senior Advocate, M.H. Khondker, Senior Advocate, A. Wadud Bhuiyan ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 400
Category: Company Law | Date: 28 May, 1982 | Hits: 3
Abdul Quddus & Another Vs. The State, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ......accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ......accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ......ville, (1916) 2 KB 658; Shah Alam and others Vs. The Crown 10 DLR 237; Rameshwar Vs. The State of Rajasthan, (1952) SCR (India) 377; Momtaz Ahmed Khan Vs. The State 19 DLR (SC) 259 (265). Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocate— For the Appellants. Kazi Safiudd..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 6 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Narendralal Chowdhury & others Vs. Bimal Kanti Chowdhury & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... that no trust was created by the will or that it was void. Mr. Halder pointed out that the amended section of section I of the Trust Act which runs as follows:- "It extends to the whole of Bangladesh. But nothing herein contained affects the rules of Muhammadan Law as to waqf, or the mutu...... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ...... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ......thers, AIR 1944 Privy Council 78; Venkatachallapathilyer Vs. China Muna Chakaran Panilyer, AIR 1922 (Madras) 83; Afser Molla and another Vs. Abdul Aziz and others, 29 DLR 416. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rob (11), Advocate— For the Appellants. S.S. Halder, Ad..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 4 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd Vs. M/S Brestern Shipping Company Ltd. & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......The suit against defendant Nos.1 and 2 is dismissed, but it is decreed with costs against defendant No.3. Case Referred to- Seafarers Inc. Vs. Province of East Pakistan; 20 DLR SC 225. Lawyers Involved: Dr. M Zahir & M Hasan, Advocates— For the Plaintiff. M Hafizul..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. M/S Brostern Shipping Company Ltd. & Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....(1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......defendant Nos.1 and 2 is dismissed, but it is decreed with costs against defendant No. 3. Cases Referred To- Seafarers Inc. Vs. Province of East Pakistan 20 D.L.R. S.C. 225 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir & M. Hasan, Advocates-For the Plaintiff M. Ha..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 5
Md. Reazul Karim Vs. Mst. Shirin Begum, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....adjudication in the light of the observation made above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 250 ......adjudication in the light of the observation made above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 250 ......adjudication in the light of the observation made above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 250 ......in Begum………………………………Respondent Judgment March 7, 1982. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mian Aftabuddin Ahmed—For the Petitioner Md. Anser Ali with Basir..Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 7 Mar, 1982 | Hits: 2
Md. Asghar Vs. Nowab Miah and others, 1892, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ds expeditiously. The connected Rule for stay of further proceeding is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 37. ......ds expeditiously. The connected Rule for stay of further proceeding is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 37. ......ds expeditiously. The connected Rule for stay of further proceeding is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 37. ......h and others……………………………..Respondents Judgment March 2, 1982. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: BN Chowdhury, Advocate with M Nurullah and Kazi Ebadul Huq Advocates— F..Category: Property Law | Date: 2 Mar, 1982 | Hits: 2
Bashir Ahmed Vs. Abdul Shaheed, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....e sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the suit. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan J.— I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 154 ......e sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the suit. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan J.— I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 154 ......e sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the suit. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan J.— I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 154 ......does not arrive at any final decision on the merits of the case, but its object is only to preserve the status quo ante during the litigation………..................(7 & 8) Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal with K. M. Saifuddin Ahmed—For the Appellant. Md. Ansar A..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
Category: Contempt of Court Law, Criminal Law | Date: 5 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 2
Surendra Mohan Shaha Vs. Government of Bangla¬desh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....sit the find to the Registrar of this court within 10 days from date. Md. Altaf Hossain J. — I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)110 ......sit the find to the Registrar of this court within 10 days from date. Md. Altaf Hossain J. — I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)110 ......sit the find to the Registrar of this court within 10 days from date. Md. Altaf Hossain J. — I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)110 ......pur, M.A. Rashid, Sub divisional Officer (Sadar) Jamalpur.................Respottdenis-Contemners Judgment February 5, 1982. Result: Appeal is allowed. Contempt of Court Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab-I—For the Petitioner. Matiur Rahman—For the Conte..Category: Contempt of Court Law | Date: 5 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 3
Abdul Quader Molla Vs. The Chairman, Bakerganj Zilla Parishad and another, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ndatory or not could be decided upon the consequence that would follow in the event of not doing the thing by the authority. The petitioners were not Government employees under Rule 5(53) of the Bangladesh Service Rules and their pay were not paid out of the State Treasury— Under the......t of Bangladesh. This being the principal point urged by the learned Advocate for the petitioners in these rules we are setting out the memo as follows: “(i) The Executive Committee of the National Economic Council has since been pleased to approve of the rural and urban works programme s......all and are therefore discharged without any order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)157 ......aid to have suffered from illegality………(5 & 7) Cases Referred To- A.I.R. 1955 S.C. 70; P.L.D. 1939 S.C. 13; A.I.R. 1959 Calcutta 356; A.I.R. 1967 Calcutta 326. Lawyers Involved: Maimil Hosein with Md. Joynul Abedin—For petitioner in both Petitions. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 1 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
Ragib Ali Vs. Bangladesh and ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....igh Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhery J A.T. M. Afzal J Ragib Ali.......................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors……………….........Respondents Judgment......e with costs to be paid as directed above. AT.M. Afzal J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 185. ......e with costs to be paid as directed above. AT.M. Afzal J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 185. ......ce with law is the inalienable right guaranteed to every citizen under the Constitution, otherwise the confidence and trust of the people in the Government machinery may be seriously undermined. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtlaq Ahmed with Mahmudul Islam —For the Petitioner. Sohrab..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 1
Salehuddin Khan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Salehuddin Khan..................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors............................Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. ......ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ......ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ......ower by necessary implication when rights of others are involved--There being no delegation of power to the Vice-President the impugned order passed with his approval cannot be sustained in law. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab Chowdhury—For the Petitioner. M. Shohrab Ali, D. A. G, ..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate & another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....hury J ATM Afzal J Neerala Tea Estate & another……………………………………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors……………………&helli......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ......ction of the law and to be treated in accordance with law, and in accordance with law as guaranteed under Article 31 of the Constitution has been clearly infringed…….(27) Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, petitioner No.2 in person with MHA Sikdar, MI Faruque..Category: Constitutional Law, Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....riginal Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another……………........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others ………...............Respondent Judgment ......nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ......nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ............Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others ………...............Respondent Judgment January 13, 1982 Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, petitioner No.2 in person, with M.H.A. Sikdar,&nb..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2