Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdur Rashid Vs. The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....he Act, with this observation the rule is discharged without any order as to costs. A.M. Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 233 ......he Act, with this observation the rule is discharged without any order as to costs. A.M. Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 233 ...... The rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Shyamlal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another A.J.R. 1954 S.C. 369.; Parshotam Lal Dhingra Vs. Union of India P.L.D. 1958 (S.C.) 217. Lawyers Involved: Syed Manzurul Ahsan-For the Petitioner. Sultan Hossain Khan, Deputy Att..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 9 Feb, 1977 | Hits: 1
Abdur Rashid Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....ct. With this observation the rule is discharged without any order as to costs. A.M.Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 40. ......ct. With this observation the rule is discharged without any order as to costs. A.M.Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 40. ...... not be entitled to leave preparatory to retirement is bad in law and as such it cannot be sustained. The improved order minus the portion quoted above is found valid in law…….(13) Lawyers Involved: Syed Manzurul Ahsan—For the petitioner. Sultan Hossain Khan, Deput..Category: Constitutional Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 9 Feb, 1977 | Hits: 5
M/s. Free School Street Property Ltd. Dacca Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....e absolute. The petitioner is entitled to costs of this application which is assessed at 35 G. Ms. M. H. Rahman J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 1. ......e absolute. The petitioner is entitled to costs of this application which is assessed at 35 G. Ms. M. H. Rahman J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 1. ......ellip;………………………………Respondents Judgment February 3,1977. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: M. H. Khandker with M. B. Rahman–For the Petitioner. Mostafa Kamal..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 3 Feb, 1977 | Hits: 3
Bangladesh and others Vs. M/s. Speedbird Navigation Co. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....awful authority and are as such of no legal effect. In the result this appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 101. ......awful authority and are as such of no legal effect. In the result this appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 101. ...... Cases Referred to- M/s. Khan Bros. (1975) 27 DLR 423; M/s. Helal Jute Press Ltd. (1975) 27 DLR 551; Govt. of Bangladesh vs. Messres A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others,(1976) 28 DLR 120. Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General with Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney Gen..Category: Others | Date: 27 Jan, 1977 | Hits: 217
M/s. Farmers & Co. Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....Title Suit No.104 of 1969 and also the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set side and the suit restored to file. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 123. ......Title Suit No.104 of 1969 and also the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set side and the suit restored to file. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 123. ....................................Appellant Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and another..................Respondents Judgment January 20, 1977. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim with S.S. Haldar and A.Y. Musiuzzaman, Advocates instructed ..Category: Property Law | Date: 20 Jan, 1977 | Hits: 62
Nur Hossain & Nur Hossain Howlader Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....e may be set at liberty fort with if not wanted in any other connection. Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 405 ......e may be set at liberty fort with if not wanted in any other connection. Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 405 ......;114(g) of the Evidence Act is accessible here thus there raises a question of doubt in the prosecution and benefit of this defect would go to the appellant………(5) Lawyers Involved: A. B. M. Knairul Hoque Advocate—For the Appellant. A.T.M Afzal, Dy..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 15 Dec, 1976 | Hits: 1
DR. Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....petitioner which we assess at 20 (twenty) gold mohurs. 31. The rule is accordingly made absolute with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 12 ......petitioner which we assess at 20 (twenty) gold mohurs. 31. The rule is accordingly made absolute with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 12 ...... is made absolute. Case Referred to- The State of Jammu and Kashmir Vs. Triloki Nath Khosa and others, AIR 1174 SC1; State of Assam and others Vs. Kanak Chandra Dutta, AIR 1967 SC 884. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed with Mahmudul Islam and Rokanuddin Mahmud, Advocates-For P..Category: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Dec, 1976 | Hits: 5
Abdul Majid Vs. Bata Shoe Company through its Provincial Controller, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....r reinstatement i.e. mandatory injunction directing the defendant to reemploy the plaintiff is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 262. ......r reinstatement i.e. mandatory injunction directing the defendant to reemploy the plaintiff is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 262. ........Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. Bata Shoe Company through its Provincial Controller, Defendant.......Respondent Judgment August 28, 1976. Result: This appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huda—For the Appellant A.K.M. Siddique for Hafizullah&md..Category: Corporate Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 28 Aug, 1976 | Hits: 3
Category: Civil Law, Others | Date: 24 Aug, 1976 | Hits: 3
Controller of Imports & Exports Vs. Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd. Dacca and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....mpositions which are made on goods imported into or exported from the country. In support, he referred to the following passage in Marriott Vs. Brune (1850) 50 US 6M at P. 631: "The general principle applicable to such a case would seem to be, that revenue should be collected only from the...... already been considered by us. In the result, all the twenty-eight appeals are allowed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 283. ...... All the appeals are allowed. Cases Referred to- Abdul Kader Vs. Sales Tax Officer, AIR 1964 (SC) 922; Nawit Lal Vs. K.K. Sen, AIR 1965 (SC) 1375; Marriott Vs. Brune, (1850) 50 US 617; Lawder Vs. Stone, (1902) 187 U.S. 281; Shri Prithi Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Broach Borrough Municipalit..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 18 Aug, 1976 | Hits: 226
Md. Nazimuddin Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....r repealed enactment. According' to this view there is no reason for giving any different effect to these two methods which achieve the same result. There is hardly any controversy that the above principle of law is not applicable to both the cases where a statute has been repealed; and where th......irul Islam Chowdhury J.—I agree Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.—I agree. Abdul Momith Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 49. ......50 CWN 502; Garikapati, PLD (1962)448; Muzaffar Ahmad, (1964) 16 DLR 336; Gazi, PLD (1962) Lah. 662; Khushiram Halidas, PLD (1969)Kar. 875; Dammal All AIR (1936) P.3: Indira, AIR (1956) (SC) 77. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rouf with Khademul Islam Chowdhury and Md. Luthfar Rahman Mazumdar&..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 29 Jul, 1976 | Hits: 2
Bangladesh Tea Estate Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Tea Estate Staff Association, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....e through the Union under East Pakistan Labour Dispute Act, 1965, hereinafter called the "Labour Dispute Act". The Union (East Pakistan) Tea Estate Staff Association, is the Respondent. The principle contention of the respondent was that Nurul Absar was an active member of the Union and wa......al is dismissed, but having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the question involved, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 190. ......ws Print Mills Vs. Khulna News Print Employees Union, 25 D.L.R. (S.C.) 85; Pakistan Tobacco Company Ltd. Vs. Pakistan Tobacco Company Employees Union Dacca 13 DLR (S.C.) 280 PLD 1961 (S.C.) 403. Lawyers Involved: T. Islam, Advocate, instructed by Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record—For ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 17 May, 1976 | Hits: 137
Gurudas Saha Vs. Deputy Custodian, Enemy Property (Lands & Buildings) & others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ationality, subject to the observation made above, these appeals are dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 133. ......ationality, subject to the observation made above, these appeals are dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 133. ......roperty, 1952 (2) B. 183; Amiya Kumar Tarafder Vs. Province of East Pakistan, 25 D.L.R. 304; Sevrracht Vs. Van Udens Scheepvart Agentuur Mastschappij (N. V. Gebr), 1943 Appeal Cases 203. Lawyers Involved: Khandkar Mahbubuddin Ahmad, Advocate instructed by A. Rab II, Advocate-..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 May, 1976 | Hits: 55
Salamat Khan Vs. Q.G. Ahad, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....graph 6, that the agreement need not be signed by the both parties. It being sufficient that a party has accepted and acted upon, although he may not have signed it. 8. This well-recognised principle that the acceptance of an offer to constitute an agreement need not be in writing and......es and we reject them. In the result the appeal is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 271. ...... Smoke Ball Company, 1893 1 Q. B. 256; Brogden Vs. Metropolitan Railway Company, 1877 (2) Appeal Cases 666; Muhd. Sagir Bhatti & Sons Vs. Federation of Pakistan, (1968) 10 DLR (SC) 169. Lawyers Involved: M. H. Khandker, Senior Advocate, with B.B. Roy Chowdhury and B.K. Das, Advoca..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: 20 Jan, 1976 | Hits: 352
Category: Property Law | Date: 2 Sep, 1975 | Hits: 3
Category: Administrative Law | Date: 28 Aug, 1975 | Hits: 1
Haji Ashraf and others Vs. The Special Tribunal No. 1, 1975, 3 CLC (HCD)
....tain the application for, addition of party. The application is accordingly rejected. Shahabuddin Ahmed J.-I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 550 ......tain the application for, addition of party. The application is accordingly rejected. Shahabuddin Ahmed J.-I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 550 .............Appellants Vs. The Special Tribunal No.1………...................Respondent Judgment August 14, 1975 Result: The application is rejected. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hye Choudhury with Shah Mohammad Sharif and Mohamma..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 14 Aug, 1975 | Hits: 1
M/s. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. M/s. A. R. A. G. Ltd., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....f loss suffered by them. The defendants only appealed to the Supreme Court. 4. The Supreme Court of Pakistan granted special leave to consider: Whether damages had been awarded on correct principle upon the contentions raised before it in awarding compensation to the plaintiffs in the......or interference in the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1978) 76. ...... Vs. Wilsons & Co. 41 Madras, 907 Ramdhandas R. Kisson Prim Vs. Kishori Girm, AIR 1954 Orissa 254; Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation Vs. Aziz Quroshi, PLD 1965 Karachi 202. Lawyers Involved: H, Rahman Sharif, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advo..Category: Contract Law | Date: 31 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 240
Category: Property Law | Date: 30 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 3
Amizuddin Ahmed Vs. Election Tribunal, Narayanganj and others, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....lot papers in presence of parties. Before doing so it must come to a finding by evidence on oath that this recounting is indispensably necessary. On this view we are supported by established judicial principles. The decisions in Stowe Vs. Jollife (1874), L.R.I.C. P-446 and "G.T. Mudaliar Vs. Sa......rcumstances of the case, we assess the costs at Taka one thousand only. S.M. Hussain, J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 594 ......e Vs. Jollife (1874), L.R.I.C. P-446 and "G.T. Mudaliar Vs. Sakuntala" AIR 1949 Mad. 835; Sirajuddin Ahmed Vs. Upendra Lala", 22 DLR (Dacca) 827; Ram Kr. Vs. Ratan, 35 C.W.N. 841. Lawyers Involved: Mouinul Haque with A. Gafur – For the Petitioner. Khandaker Mahbub..Category: Election Law | Date: 7 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 3