Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1821-1840 of 7814 results.
Begum Sayada Murguba Khatoon Vs. Dewan Shahifur Reza Chowdhury & another, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....t the amount so determined from the rent or otherwise recover from the landlord…………….(17) Claims of set-off—Conditions-Not bared by limitations- Order 8, Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 The relevant provisions dealing with set-off are- (......id in the first instance. The discretion has given to the Court to allow Court fees to be paid at any stage by the person by whom such fee is payable…………… (24) Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury—For the Appellant. Tajibul Huq—For the Respo..Category: Procedural Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 29 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 1
Dacca Match Factory Ltd Vs. Bangladesh Match Company Ltd. Principal-Defendant, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
.... along with other issues that may be raised in the suit. F.M.A. No. 218 of 1977 is dismissed. We affirm the impugned order refusing to grant temporary injunction to the plaintiff. The connected civil Rule is discharged, and the ad interim order of injunction is vacated. There will be no order as to ......ppeals.) Judgment August 23, 1977. Result: The petition is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Chowmuhani College Vs. Ismail (1974) 26 DLRr 10; R. Johnstone Vs. Archibald Law Report (AC) Vol. 7 Pak. 219; Full Wood Vs. Chancery Div. Vol. IX, 176; M/s. Pharmapak Vs. Dy. Re..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 23 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 8
Dwijendra Lal Nath Vs. Abu Zafar, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....y special leave is against an order of a Bench of the High Court Division, allowing an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure made by the respondent, without issuing a Rule upon the appellant, who was the sole opposite party in the said application, and setting a......ul Samad and others (1975) 27 DLR 31; Darogaii Sheikh and ors. Vs. Milatannessa Bibi and others (1976) 28 DLR 9; S.M. Yousuf and another Vs. Khandker Hafizur Rahman and others (1974) 26 DLR 124. Lawyers Involved: SR Pal, Senior Advocate, with S.C. Das, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Pan..Category: Civil Law | Date: 23 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 111
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shamsul Haque and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....77, even before the admission of the appeal and service of the notice upon the respondent, the cross-objection (filed on 9-3-77) is no cross-objection in the eye of law as contemplated under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil procedure. The relevant portion of the Order 41, Rule 22(1)&n...... Cases Referred to- Labhu Ram Vs. Ram Protap, AIR 1944 Lah. 76; S M. Nripjit Ram Vs. Sardar Satinder Singh, AIR 1955 Pun. 190; Dasulal Bhagchand Lal Vs. Narayan Mahadeo AIR 1937 Nag. 105. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Ahmed, D.A.G.—For the Appellant. Abdur Rashid Gazi—F..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 18 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 2
Ayaz Bahdaur Khan & others Vs. Abdus Sobhan & others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
.... of 1977). Ahmed Subhan, with Ataur Rahman Khan, Fazlul Karim and Fazlul Huq—For Respondents (In both the Appeals.) Appeal from original decree Nos. 16 and 17 of 1977, with Civil Rules 1039(f) and 1040(f)of 1976. Judgment Shahabuddin Ahmed J.— These two appeals a......………………Respondent Judgment August 18, 1977. Result: Both the appeals are allowed. Case Referred To- A.I.R. (SC) 1968, 147. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Huq with T. Islam—For Appellant (In F.A.No.16 of 1977). Sy..Category: Contract Law, Property Law | Date: 18 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 10
Md. Ajmal Khan Vs. Chairman, Ctg. Pourashava and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....only the Chairman. Chittagong Pourashava contested the rule by filing affidavit. Neither the Commissioner, Chittagong Division as controlling authority, not the Government of Bangladesh contested the Rule. 5. In the affidavit in opposition respdt. No. 1 took a preliminary objection that the pet......August 17, 1977. Result: The rule is made absolute. Cases Referred To- State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Bhailal Bhai. AIR 1964 (SC) 1006 A.I.R. 1961 (SC) 41; A.I.R 1962 (SC) 1320. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan with A. Taher Choudhury—For the petitioner. M.M. Haque&..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 17 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 5
Aram Ali Mondal Vs. Lutfar Rahman Dewan, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
..... Lutfar Rahman Dewan ………………………………Opposite Party Judgment August 15, 1977. Result: The two Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- Osman Gani Mondal Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and othe...... distinguishable. The case of Barada Prasanna Lod and others Vs. Kobbad Mia 13 DLR 765 South India Corporation (B) Ltd. Vs. Secretary, Board of Revenue, Trivandrum and another AIR 1964 (SC) 207. Lawyers Involved: Golam Rabbani—For the Petitioner. Md. Ansar Ali—For the Opposite ..Category: Property Law | Date: 15 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 3
....d 2 others………………………………………Respondents
Judgment
August 11, 1977.
Result:
The Rules are discharged.
Cases Referred To-
Abdur Rahman Vs. Govt. of East Pakistan (1967) 19......; Arun Kumar Vs. State of West Bengal; Brozan Vs. State of West Benga; Bhimsen Vs. Union of India, A.I.R. 1951 (SC) 481; Kripa Shindu Hazra Vs. Bangladesh Govt. in Criminal Misc. Case No. 69/77.
Lawyers involved:
K.Z. Alam with Latifur Rahman—For the petitioner (In the three petition..
Category: Criminal Law | Date: 11 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 4
Bhowal Raj Court of Wards State Vs. Md. Chand Mia, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....nd in the letter of reference, the reference is accepted. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 4. ....... Cases Referred to- Shahzada Daljit Singh vs. Mian Taj Singh A.I.R. 1939, Cud, 284; Netesa Naicken Vs. Raghavachari and others in A.I.R. 1925 Madras, 327;Ngathan Vs. Emperor in 15 Criminal Law Journal 555) Lawyers Involved: M. B. Rahman—In support of the Referen..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 10 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 2
Aseruddin Sk Vs. Serajuddin Talukder and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
.... Aseruddin Sk........................................Petitioner Vs. Serajuddin Talukder and others..............Opposite Parties Judgment August 9, 1977. Result: The Rule is discharged. Right of preemption under section 96 of the State Acquisition and......bdul Malek Laskar Vs. Begum Tayabnnnessa and others, (1966) 18 D.L.R. 18; Babul Haque Vs. Laljan Bibi and others, (1958) 10 D.L.R. 34; Diam Hossain Vs. Haran Das Namasudra, P.L.D. 1962 Dac. 458. Lawyers Involved: Abu Taker Chowdhury—For the petitioner. Md. Ansar Ali–For o..Category: Property Law | Date: 9 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 2
Akrab Ali and others Vs. Zahiruddin Kari and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....Division are set aside and those of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored, but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 81. ..................Respondents Judgment August 3, 1977. Result: This appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- Dakas Khan Vs. Ghulam Khan Qasim I.L.R. 45 Cal 793 28 C L.J. 441 Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, Mozammel Huq Khan, Advocate, instructed..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 3 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 113
Mohd. Mazibar Rahman Mia Vs. Naresh Chandra Guha, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....d order of the learned District Judge are confirmed. There will be no order as to costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J. - I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 213 ...... July 29, 1977. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Sarala Sundari Vs. Dina Bandho Roy, AIR 1944 (PC) 11. Md. Abdul Jalil Vs. Surendra Nath in 21 DLR 331. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Rouf-For the Petitioner Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with M..Category: Property Law | Date: 29 Jul, 1977 | Hits: 2
....tablishment Division, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others........................................Respondents
Judgment
July 27, 1977.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
Cases Referred to-
Quazl Md. Mahbubur Rahaman Vs. Government of Ban...... Establishment Division, Dacca & others (1977) 29 DLR 118; Md. Abdul Malek Vs. Secretary, Department of Local Government, Government of Bangladesh & ors in writ petition No. 372 of 1975.
Lawyers Involved:
Asrarul Hossain, Rafiqul Huq—For the Petitioner.
Kazi Shafiuddin, ..
Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Jul, 1977 | Hits: 2
Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rashid & others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
.... this amount till it is paid. The appeal is allowed in part without any cost. M. H. Rahman J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 119. ...... 18, 1977. Result: The appeal is allowed in part. Case Referred To- Bangladesh Vs. Fazlur Rahman, (1974) 26 D.L.R. 255;Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Mannan, (1977) 29 D.L.R. (S.C.) 17 Lawyers Involved: Sultan Ahmed, Deputy Advocate General—For the Appellant. M. A. Jal..Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Jul, 1977 | Hits: 2
Abdur Rahman Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....gation of the case can be made by the police of their own or under the order of a Magistrate. The answer to the question posed needs consideration of several sections of the Code as well as of some Rules of Police Regulations, 1943. The power of a police officer to investigate cases and the proce......SC) 55; Abul Vs. Haji Abdul Gani, 14 DLR Dac. 511; PLD 1963 Dac, 618; Attah Md. Vs. Inspector General of Police, West Pakistan, PLD 1965 (W.P.) Lah. 734; Jaffar Ahmed Vs. State, 26 DLR 211. Lawyers Involved: Md. Moksudur Rahman, Advocate instructed by S. S. Huda, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 13 Jul, 1977 | Hits: 72
Sreemati Tripti LalaKar Vs. Govt. of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....render possession of the disputed property to Asst. Custodian as it is alleged, he is in unauthorised possession of the property. This notice appears to have been issued under the Defence of Pakistan Rules treating property as enemy property vested with the custodian of the enemy property. Section&n...... C.W.N. 205; Ananda Mohan Kunda and others Vs. Province of East Pakistan and others, (1968) 20 D.L.R. 976; M.M. Ispahani Ltd. Vs. Deputy Custodian of Enemy Property and others (1968) 20 DLR 493. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal with S.C. Das—For the Appellant. Ismailuddin Sarkar, A.A...Category: Property Law | Date: 8 Jul, 1977 | Hits: 2
M. A. Khalilullah and Abdul Hakim Vs. Government of Bangla¬desh and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....d Abdul Hakim..............................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.......................Respondents Judgment June 29, 1977. Result: The Rules are made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Amir Hossain Khandker, Advocate—For the P...................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.......................Respondents Judgment June 29, 1977. Result: The Rules are made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Amir Hossain Khandker, Advocate—For the Petitioner. M.M. Hague, A...Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 29 Jun, 1977 | Hits: 3
Md. Sharifullah Vs. Election Tribunal Munsif Court Rajshahi and another, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....In Petition No. 211 of 1977) Vs. Election Tribunal Munsif Court Rajshahi and another……………..Respondents Judgment June 28, 1977. Result: The Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- Shamsul Huq Sikder Vs. Election Tribunal ......;nal and others, 27 DLR 388; Masahiduddin Ahmed Vs. Munsif, Sunamgonj, Sylhet and others 28 DLR 189 ; A Gafur Vs. Election Tribunal and Munsif, 2nd Court, Feni, Noa-khali and another 29 DLR 111. Lawyers Involved: Khandaker Mahbub Hossain, with Md. Shah Alam—For the Petitioner (In pet..Category: Administrative Law, Election Law | Date: 28 Jun, 1977 | Hits: 5
Ibrahim Malitha & others Vs. Izahar Ali Mir and ano¬ther, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
.... the statutory requirement as indicated above Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 161. ....................Plaintiff-Appellate Vs. Izahar Ali Mir and another.......................Defendants-Respondent Judgment June 28, 1977. Result: The appeal fails. Lawyers Involved: Abu Taker Chowdhury—For the appellant. Md. Ansar Ali—For th..Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Jun, 1977 | Hits: 2
Tasir Ahmed and others Vs. People’s Republic of Bangladesh , 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....€¦Petitioners Vs. People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Barisal…………………Respondents Judgment June 28, 1977. Result: The Rule is discharged. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. V of 1908), section 151; Or......yer for the ends of justice...............(8) Cases Referred to- The Sind Tanneries Ltd. Vs. Hajee Mohammedin & Co., 8 DLR 719; Azizur Rahman Vs. Janata Bank, 28 DLR 252. Lawyers Involved: Shahid Alam, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Sultan Ahmed, Deputy Attorne..Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Jun, 1977 | Hits: 60
9423943269609257901392719303912990119019696193069316912792993029020924691346004