Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1861-1880 of 7814 results.
....a High Court in Writ Petition No.586 of 1967.)
Judgment
Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J. - This appeal by special leave is against a judgment of a Bench of the Dacca High Court, discharging a Rule obtained by the appellant on an application under Article 98 of the late Constitution of Pakist......d, Vs. Income-tax Officer, For Bandar, (1959) Supp. 2 C.R. 547; A.I.R. 1959, 881; Maharana Mills (P) Ltd., Vs. Income-tax Officer Por Bandar (1959) Supple 2 S.C. 547; A.I.R. 1959 (S.C) 881.
Lawyers Involved:
Latifur Rahman, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 4 Mar, 1977 | Hits: 173
Abdur Rashid Vs. The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....he Act, with this observation the rule is discharged without any order as to costs. A.M. Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 233 ...... The rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Shyamlal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another A.J.R. 1954 S.C. 369.; Parshotam Lal Dhingra Vs. Union of India P.L.D. 1958 (S.C.) 217. Lawyers Involved: Syed Manzurul Ahsan-For the Petitioner. Sultan Hossain Khan, Deputy Att..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 9 Feb, 1977 | Hits: 1
Abdur Rashid Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....ct. With this observation the rule is discharged without any order as to costs. A.M.Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 40. ...... not be entitled to leave preparatory to retirement is bad in law and as such it cannot be sustained. The improved order minus the portion quoted above is found valid in law…….(13) Lawyers Involved: Syed Manzurul Ahsan—For the petitioner. Sultan Hossain Khan, Deput..Category: Constitutional Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 9 Feb, 1977 | Hits: 5
M/s. Free School Street Property Ltd. Dacca Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....nd another………………………………………Respondents Judgment February 3,1977. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: M. H. Khandker with M. B. Rahman–For the Pe......ellip;………………………………Respondents Judgment February 3,1977. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: M. H. Khandker with M. B. Rahman–For the Petitioner. Mostafa Kamal..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 3 Feb, 1977 | Hits: 3
Bangladesh and others Vs. M/s. Speedbird Navigation Co. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....erties of the firm as abandoned properties was declared to be of no legal validity and the impugned order dated 23-10-73 was found to have been passed without any jurisdiction. In the result the Rule was made absolute with costs. 6. Being dissatisfied with the decision of the High Court Di...... Cases Referred to- M/s. Khan Bros. (1975) 27 DLR 423; M/s. Helal Jute Press Ltd. (1975) 27 DLR 551; Govt. of Bangladesh vs. Messres A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others,(1976) 28 DLR 120. Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General with Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney Gen..Category: Others | Date: 27 Jan, 1977 | Hits: 217
M/s. Farmers & Co. Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....Title Suit No.104 of 1969 and also the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set side and the suit restored to file. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 123. ....................................Appellant Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and another..................Respondents Judgment January 20, 1977. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim with S.S. Haldar and A.Y. Musiuzzaman, Advocates instructed ..Category: Property Law | Date: 20 Jan, 1977 | Hits: 62
Nur Hossain & Nur Hossain Howlader Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....e may be set at liberty fort with if not wanted in any other connection. Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 405 ......;114(g) of the Evidence Act is accessible here thus there raises a question of doubt in the prosecution and benefit of this defect would go to the appellant………(5) Lawyers Involved: A. B. M. Knairul Hoque Advocate—For the Appellant. A.T.M Afzal, Dy..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 15 Dec, 1976 | Hits: 1
DR. Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....978 Judgment Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J.- Dr. Nurul Islam, Director and Professor of Medicine of the Institute of Post Graduate Medicine and Research, briefly called the IPGMR, obtained this Rule Nisi against the respondents to show cause why the Notification dated 22nd Nov, 1978 issued by ...... is made absolute. Case Referred to- The State of Jammu and Kashmir Vs. Triloki Nath Khosa and others, AIR 1174 SC1; State of Assam and others Vs. Kanak Chandra Dutta, AIR 1967 SC 884. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed with Mahmudul Islam and Rokanuddin Mahmud, Advocates-For P..Category: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Dec, 1976 | Hits: 5
Shafiuddin Mia Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. K. A. Bakr, Attorney General, with A.W. Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney General instructed by B.C. Pandey, Advocate-on-Record, under Order XLV of the Supreme Court Rule-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.6 of 1976. (From Criminal Revision No.62......ellip;……………………………….Respondent Judgment December 6, 1976 Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: A. Rab II. Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. K. A. Bakr, Attorney Ge..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: 6 Dec, 1976 | Hits: 147
Abdul Majid Vs. Bata Shoe Company through its Provincial Controller, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....ssed by Sales Personnel Department, Bata Shoe Company dated 7.7.59 terminating the service of the plaintiff, a shop employee of the Bata Shoe Company was in violation of the provision of the Standing Rules and Orders of Shop Employees of the said Company and further for a mandatory injunction for re........Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. Bata Shoe Company through its Provincial Controller, Defendant.......Respondent Judgment August 28, 1976. Result: This appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huda—For the Appellant A.K.M. Siddique for Hafizullah&md..Category: Corporate Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 28 Aug, 1976 | Hits: 3
.....8.45, requesting them to remove the stock on payment of price and other incidental expenses. Then on 4.9.45 the defendant No. 3 who was the District Controller passed order under Sub-rule I and 2 of Rule 75A of the Defense of India Rules requisitioning the stock of Lungies lying with the plaintiff ......Amud Ali Munshi 7 D.L.R. 603; Kumar Pramath Nath Roy Vs. Nawabzada Syed Ali Mirza and others 2 D.L.R. 319; Province of Bengal Vs. Board of Trustees for Improvement of Calcutta AIR 1946 Cal. 416.
Lawyers Involved:
S. C. Das with Zahir Ahem—For the Appellant.
Sultan Ahmed with Met..
Category: Civil Law, Others | Date: 24 Aug, 1976 | Hits: 3
Controller of Imports & Exports Vs. Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd. Dacca and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....k guarantees on the order of the High Court. 8. The respondents in these appeals moved the Dacca High Court, as it then was, under Article 98(2)of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1962 and obtained Rule Nisi upon the appellants to show cause why the impugned Public Notices dated April 25, 196...... All the appeals are allowed. Cases Referred to- Abdul Kader Vs. Sales Tax Officer, AIR 1964 (SC) 922; Nawit Lal Vs. K.K. Sen, AIR 1965 (SC) 1375; Marriott Vs. Brune, (1850) 50 US 617; Lawder Vs. Stone, (1902) 187 U.S. 281; Shri Prithi Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Broach Borrough Municipalit..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 18 Aug, 1976 | Hits: 226
Md. Nazimuddin Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....of Taka 1000/-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months more with direction of forfeiture of the seized article. This reference being in connection with a criminal appeal under the Rules of this Court, the appeal itself is required to be disposed of along with the reference. ......50 CWN 502; Garikapati, PLD (1962)448; Muzaffar Ahmad, (1964) 16 DLR 336; Gazi, PLD (1962) Lah. 662; Khushiram Halidas, PLD (1969)Kar. 875; Dammal All AIR (1936) P.3: Indira, AIR (1956) (SC) 77. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rouf with Khademul Islam Chowdhury and Md. Luthfar Rahman Mazumdar&..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 29 Jul, 1976 | Hits: 2
Bangladesh Tea Estate Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Tea Estate Staff Association, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....rders Act. Mr. Huq in reply submits that an analysis of decisions, does not support the contention of Mr. Islam. We find in Khulna News Print Mills Case, the worker's service was terminated under Rule 12(1) of Model Standing Orders Rules 1946. Apart from the fact that there are verbal changes in......ws Print Mills Vs. Khulna News Print Employees Union, 25 D.L.R. (S.C.) 85; Pakistan Tobacco Company Ltd. Vs. Pakistan Tobacco Company Employees Union Dacca 13 DLR (S.C.) 280 PLD 1961 (S.C.) 403. Lawyers Involved: T. Islam, Advocate, instructed by Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record—For ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 17 May, 1976 | Hits: 137
Gurudas Saha Vs. Deputy Custodian, Enemy Property (Lands & Buildings) & others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... known source of living. The learned Judges also expressed doubt on the assertion of the appellants that their passports were renewed, by Pakistan Authorities. They took the view on a reference to Rule 161 (b) of Defence of Pakistan Rules 1965 and sec-section 83 of the Civil Procedure Code ......roperty, 1952 (2) B. 183; Amiya Kumar Tarafder Vs. Province of East Pakistan, 25 D.L.R. 304; Sevrracht Vs. Van Udens Scheepvart Agentuur Mastschappij (N. V. Gebr), 1943 Appeal Cases 203. Lawyers Involved: Khandkar Mahbubuddin Ahmad, Advocate instructed by A. Rab II, Advocate-..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 May, 1976 | Hits: 55
Salamat Khan Vs. Q.G. Ahad, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....es and we reject them. In the result the appeal is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 271. ...... Smoke Ball Company, 1893 1 Q. B. 256; Brogden Vs. Metropolitan Railway Company, 1877 (2) Appeal Cases 666; Muhd. Sagir Bhatti & Sons Vs. Federation of Pakistan, (1968) 10 DLR (SC) 169. Lawyers Involved: M. H. Khandker, Senior Advocate, with B.B. Roy Chowdhury and B.K. Das, Advoca..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: 20 Jan, 1976 | Hits: 352
...., thereafter, filed an application under Article 98(2) of the Constitution impugning the validity of the said notices and the directions contained therein as regards demand for Excise Duty.
3. Rule Nisi issued in the above mentioned application was discharged by the Dacca High Court. It was h......amp; Land Customs, East Zone, Chitttagong & another……..........................Respondents.
Judgment
November 20, 1975.
Result:
The appeal is dismissed.
Lawyers Involved:
Muhammad Habibur Rahman, with A. K. Khan, Advocates, instructed by A. Backkar..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 20 Nov, 1975 | Hits: 149
Hasan Ali Daftary & others Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
.... The State……………………………………Respondents Judgment September 3, 1975. Result: The Rule is discharged. Tofazzal Hossain Sardar and others Vs. The State; Abu Tayab Md. Mashood and......70/74 Sabje Ali and another Vs. the state and (3) Criminal Revision No. 584/74 (A.K. Rabbani alias Salim Vs. the State; Criminal Revision No. 1871/74 (Akhtar Hossain & others Vs. the State). Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hye Chowdhury—For the Petitioners Moazzem Hossain—For..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 3 Sep, 1975 | Hits: 2
.....
Ministry of Land Administration and Land Reforms,
Govt. of Bangladesh…………...............Respondents
Judgment
September 2, 1975.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute
Lawyers involved:
M. H. Khandaker with Abdul Aziz, Advocates—F......inistration and Land Reforms,
Govt. of Bangladesh…………...............Respondents
Judgment
September 2, 1975.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute
Lawyers involved:
M. H. Khandaker with Abdul Aziz, Advocates—For the Petitioner.
Ser..
Category: Property Law | Date: 2 Sep, 1975 | Hits: 3
....ement Trust represented by the Chairman, D.I.T., D.I.T. Buildings, Dacca and 2 others……………Respondents
Judgment
August 28, 1975
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
Lawyers Involved:
Ahmed Sobhan with Md. Fazlul Karim ......he Chairman, D.I.T., D.I.T. Buildings, Dacca and 2 others……………Respondents
Judgment
August 28, 1975
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
Lawyers Involved:
Ahmed Sobhan with Md. Fazlul Karim and Tamijul Huq, Advoc..
Category: Administrative Law | Date: 28 Aug, 1975 | Hits: 1
71639310901690106962711793189170711894359258719690189729607164951948695079515