Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Haji Ashraf and others Vs. The Special Tribunal No. 1, 1975, 3 CLC (HCD)
.... impugned order dated 5.4.75 passed by the Special Tribunal directing the police to submit charge sheet against the petitioners has been made without lawful authority and is no legal effect. The Rule is accordingly made absolute. We, however make no order as to costs. 6. An application for.............Appellants Vs. The Special Tribunal No.1………...................Respondent Judgment August 14, 1975 Result: The application is rejected. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hye Choudhury with Shah Mohammad Sharif and Mohamma..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 14 Aug, 1975 | Hits: 1
M/s. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. M/s. A. R. A. G. Ltd., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....or interference in the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1978) 76. ...... Vs. Wilsons & Co. 41 Madras, 907 Ramdhandas R. Kisson Prim Vs. Kishori Girm, AIR 1954 Orissa 254; Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation Vs. Aziz Quroshi, PLD 1965 Karachi 202. Lawyers Involved: H, Rahman Sharif, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advo..Category: Contract Law | Date: 31 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 240
Category: Property Law | Date: 30 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 3
Jinnat Ali Muktear Vs. Abdul Majid, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....e opposite party has submitted that application for leave must be filed before the expiry of the period of limitation otherwise the rule prescribing the time limit would be rendered nugatory. 4. Rule 2 of Chapter VIII of the High Court Rules lays down that every appeal under clause 15 of the Le......ion is rejected. An application for leave should not be entertained when the appeal is time barred. Case Referred To- Md. Sharif Khan Vs. Akhtar Hossain Khan, 5 D.L.R. at page 549 Lawyers Involved: Moinul Huq, with A. Baset Majumder—For the Appellant-Petitioner ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: 24 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 2
Amizuddin Ahmed Vs. Election Tribunal, Narayanganj and others, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....ip;………......................Petitioner Vs. Election Tribunal, Narayanganj and others…..........Respondents Judgment July 7, 1975. Result: The Rule is made absolute Cases Referred to- Stowe Vs. Jollife (1874), L.R.I.C. P-446 and &quo......e Vs. Jollife (1874), L.R.I.C. P-446 and "G.T. Mudaliar Vs. Sakuntala" AIR 1949 Mad. 835; Sirajuddin Ahmed Vs. Upendra Lala", 22 DLR (Dacca) 827; Ram Kr. Vs. Ratan, 35 C.W.N. 841. Lawyers Involved: Mouinul Haque with A. Gafur – For the Petitioner. Khandaker Mahbub..Category: Election Law | Date: 7 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 3
M/s. Friends Corporation Dacca Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
.... submitted to us in the negative. We make no order as to costs. A.S. Faizul Islam Chowdhury J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 566 ......957 Karachi 61; Income-tax, Bombay Vs. Sarangpur Cotton Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1938 (P.C.) 6 I.T.S. 36; Mohd. Anwer Mohd. Iqbal Vs. Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Karachi (1967) 15 Taxation 182. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hamid Chowdhury and Khondker Fazlul Quadir—For applicant. A..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 7 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 2
Mst. Masuda Khatoon & ors Vs. Maniruzzaman, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....s Vs. Maniruzzaman…………………………………...Opposite party Judgment July 1, 1975 Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Abdur Rahman Miji and ors. Vs. Abdul Wadud Mea and ......ibash Mukhupaddya and ors. Vs. Elahi Haider and ors.; 1969 D.LC 590 Nur Md. Babar Ali & ors. Vs. Shah Md. Ali and ors; Civil Order No. 14 of 1966, Lutfar Rahman Vs. Montashemuddin & ors. Lawyers Involved: Md. Yahya- For the Petitioners. Abdul Hamid- For the Opposite party..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 1 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 1
Category: Administrative Law | Date: 26 Jun, 1975 | Hits: 2
Afazullah Manjhee Vs. Election Tribunal, Patiya, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
.... Shahabuddin Ahmed J Afazullah Manjhee....................... Petitioner Vs. Election Tribunal, Patiya ........Respondents Judgment June 13, 1975. Result: The Rule disposed of. Lawyers Involved: Ahamad Sobhan with Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocates—F......J Afazullah Manjhee....................... Petitioner Vs. Election Tribunal, Patiya ........Respondents Judgment June 13, 1975. Result: The Rule disposed of. Lawyers Involved: Ahamad Sobhan with Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocates—For the petitioner. ..Category: Contract Law, Election Law | Date: 13 Jun, 1975 | Hits: 3
Lutfur Rahman Vs. Election Commission Dacca, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
.... the petitioner elected Vice-Chairman of the Union Panshad. The result of the election was accordingly published in the Bangladesh Gazette as per rule 43 of the Union Parishad and Pourashava Election Rules, 1973. The respondent No. 3, however, filed the election petition under rules 56(2) of the afo...... 1. Election Commission Dacca. 2. M.R. Talukdar, Munsif and Election Tribunal, Kurigram....the Respondents Judgment June 3, 1975. Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Shah Azizur Rahman—For the Petitioner. No One—For Responden..Category: Civil Law, Election Law | Date: 3 Jun, 1975 | Hits: 1
Bacha Meah Vs. Province of East Pakistan & anothers, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....he order passed by the Authority (Munsif) was set aside. So, the petitioner filed the present application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure before this Court and obtained the Rule. 2. In Civil Revision No. 811 of 1968 the facts, in brief, are that the opposite-party was......k, N.W.R. Gujarat, 15 DLR (SC) 261; Anant Ram and others Vs. District Magistrate, Jodhpur and another, AIR 1956 Rajasthan 145; Ganeshi Ram Vs. District Magistrate and another , 1962 P.L.C. 1021. Lawyars Involved: Mozammal Huq—For Petitioner (In C.R. No. 1423 of 1970 and for opposite ..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 30 May, 1975 | Hits: 1
Abdur Rashid and another Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....hellip;………..Appellants Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh………Respondent Judgment May 22, 1975 Result: The Rule is made absolute In the presence of any family member no property can be treated as abando......es in question could not be treated as abandoned property within the meaning of Article 2 of the President's Order No. 16 of 1972 due to the circumstances mentioned above…....(3) Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan with A. H. Md. Nurul Huda Khandaker, Advocates—For the Petit..Category: Abandoned Properties Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 22 May, 1975 | Hits: 7
Monipur Tea Co. Ltd. And Ahmedur Rahman, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
.... the Companies, Act. Let the Cost of the petitioner corns out of the assets of the company. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 490. ....... 640. Bal Krishna Maheswari Vs. Uma Shanker Mehrotra AIR. 1947 All. 367; Ahmed Hossain Vs. Sayedur Rahman 18 DLR Dacca 506 and PLD 1968 Dacca 610, Satish Chandra Banik Vs. Dacca Jute Mills Ltd. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Huq, with E.H. Khan A.T. Islam— For the Petitioner. Mostaf..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 20 May, 1975 | Hits: 2
Md. Imanuddin Sarkar Vs. The Election Commission of Bangladesh, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
.....Petitioner Vs. The Election Commission of Bangladesh and others……….Respondents Judgment May 20, 1975. Bangladesh Union Parishad and Paurasbsva Election Rules, 1973 Rule 40— The Sanctity and Impartiality of the Election— The p......ellip;(4) Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred To- Md. Amjad Hossain Howlader Vs. The Chief Election Commission, Dacca and others in Writ Petition No. 185 of 1974 Lawyers Involved: A. T. M. Kamrul Islam, Advocate—For the Petitioner Dr. Aleem-Al-Ra..Category: Administrative Law, Election Law | Date: 20 May, 1975 | Hits: 1
Nazrul Islam alias Md. Nazrul Islam Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....ication of sentence the appeal is dismissed. Amirul Islam Chowdhury J.—I agree This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 671 ....... Result: The appeal is dismissed. Evidence to Be Excluded Only that part of a witness's evidence to be excluded which is found false and not his whole evidence Law does not require that the entire evidence of such an witness should be rejected. Evidence of suc..Category: Arms Law | Date: 2 May, 1975 | Hits: 2
Category: Civil Law | Date: 30 Apr, 1975 | Hits: 5
Category: Constitutional Law, Public Interest Litigation | Date: 28 Apr, 1975 | Hits: 3
Badruddin Vs. The Chairman, In the Court of Tribunal Judge, Ctg. & another, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....llip;………Petitioner Vs. The Chairman, In the Court of Tribunal Judge, Ctg. & another….....Respondents Judgment April 24, 1975 Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred To- Farquharson Vs. Morgan, Queen’s Beach Divi......Referred To- Farquharson Vs. Morgan, Queen’s Beach Division (1), 1894, 552 at page 558; Lord Denman in Bodenham Vs. Rickets; Lal and others Vs. The Crown, reported in 6 DLR (P.C.), 38 Lawyers involved: M. H. Khandker-For the Petitioner. S. R. Pal with S. C. Das—For th..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 24 Apr, 1975 | Hits: 2
Messrs. Haji Azam Vs. Singleton Binda & Co. Ltd. Binder, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
..... Haji Azam………….....Petitioner Vs. Singleton Binda & Co. Ltd. Binder............Opposite Party Judgment April 23, 1975. Result: Both the Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- M/s. Yangteza Ltd. Vs. Barlars Brothers, 14 DL...... April 23, 1975. Result: Both the Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- M/s. Yangteza Ltd. Vs. Barlars Brothers, 14 DLR (SC) 151; Ram Babu Vs. State, DLR (1950) SC 155. Lawyers Involved: Moinul Hossain, Mozammel Hoque Khan —For Petitioner (In both the Rules)..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 23 Apr, 1975 | Hits: 3
Bangladesh Vs. Babu Indu Bhusan Gupta & others, 1975, 4 CLC
....with by us. 27. We, therefore, do not find any substance in this appeal and the appeal is dismissed. Under the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Civil Rule No. 924(f) of 1968 has been obtained by as many as 85 petitioners for their addition as respond......54 I.A. 156, 31 C.W.N. 717; Rahimuddin Matabbar Vs. Naimuddin Howladar 31 C.W.N. 751; A.I.R. 1927 Cal. 565; Surendra Lal Depal Vs. Satya Tamas Ghosal, 12 D.L.R. 214; P.L.D. 1960 S.C. (Pak.) 179. Lawyers Involved: Fakir Shahabuddin, Attorney-General Ismailuddin Sarkar, Asstt. Attorney Gener..Category: Property Law | Date: 17 Apr, 1975 | Hits: 2