Search Options

Judgment Search By Title

Displaying 3801-3820 of 8375 results.
Moulana Fariduddin Ahmed and another Vs. Md. Kolimullah and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)


Mobasher Hossain (Md) and others Vs. Saidur Rahman (Pvt) Ltd. and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)


Mohammad Reazaul Karim and others Vs. A. B. M. Khalequzzaman and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)


Provas Chandra Banik Vs. Naresh Chandra Banik and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)


City Sugar Industries Ltd. and others Vs. Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)


Khondaker Modarresh Elahi Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)


Farzana Moazzem Vs. Securities and Exchange Commission and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)


Salim (Md) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Land and Chairman, Debt Settlement Board and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)


Jamir Ali (Md) and Md. others Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)


Abu Bakar Siddique Vs. Md. Khorshed Alam & ors., 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)


Bangladesh Water Development Board Vs. Golam Robbani Khan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)


Khandaker Abul Bashar Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)


Managing Director, Rupali Bank Limited & Ors. Vs. Chairman, First Labour Court & ors., 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)


Belal alias Bellal and 2 others Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)


Canada Shipping and Trading SA Vs. TT Katikaayu and another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)


State Vs. Shahin and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)


Begum Khaleda Zia Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)


Bangladesh Leaf Tobacco Company Ltd. Vs. Md. Abdul Mannan and others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)

H.M. Saya & Co. V. Wazir Ali Industries Ltd. 21 DLR (SC) 50 Case referred, Where a transfer is hit by section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act a transferee is not entitled to hold his title against a party to the suit sought to be affected by such transfer but the transfer is not void……………………(5)

A stranger to a suit or a proceeding is not prohibited by the Code of Civil Procedure from filing an appeal from an order passed therein. It is true that there is no express provision permitting such party to prefer an appeal against such an order……........(6)

The Court should proceed on the principle that every procedure which furthers administration of justice is permissible even if there is no express provision permitting the same........................ (6) 


Ziaul Hoque Vs. Election Commis­sion, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)

Delimitation of the area of the upazillas in question can not affect the petitioner who is not resident of any of the villages taken away by the Government by an impugned notification. The residents of the villages in question are the only persons who may be said to be affected by the impugned notification and as such the petitioner not being resident of any of the villages in question has no locus standi to challange the said notification…........................(7)

After the publication of the result in the official gazette the elected chairman acquires a vested right and remedy of the aggrieved person is to the Election Tribunal for redress of grievance........................ (9) 


Mohammod Hossain, Advocate Vs. Quamrul Islam Siddique, Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)