Search Options
Judgment Search By Title
State Vs. Sree Ranjit Kumar Pramanik, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
Nurul Huq Vs. Secretary, Rural Electrification Board and another, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
Anwarul Hoque (Md.) Vs. Golam Mahmud and Md. Mohsin, 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
State Vs. Tota Mia, 1997, 16 CLC (HCD)
Golam Mostafa Miah (Md.) Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
Abul Bashar Shaikh Vs. State, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
State Vs. MA Wahab, Advocate, 1998, 17 CLC (HCD)
Abdul Karim Vs. Gousddin and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
Manjurul Haque and 12 others Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, and others, 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
Ali Akbar (Md.) Vs. State and others, 1998, 17 CLC (HCD)
AKM Muhituddin Vs. State, 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
Motaleb Sardar (Md.) and others Vs. State and another, 1998, 17 CLC (HCD)
Bimal Chandra Adhikari Vs. State, 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
Zenith Packages Ltd. Vs. Member, Labour Appellate Tribunal and others, 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
Abdul Majid Mondal Vs. State and another, 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
Abu Sayeed Sheikh and others Vs. Md. Majibur Rahman and others, 1998, 17 CLC (HCD)
Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation (BCIC) and another Vs. Zia Fertilizer Company Limited Workers and Employees Union and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shafiqur Rahman, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
Kartic Das Gupta Vs. Election Commission of Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
Whether writ petition itself is maintainable in law or whether the writ petitioner has got any interest in the matter
Writ-petition in question could not be termed as public interest litigation. Before going into the merit of a writ petition the first and primary duty of the writ Bench is to see whether writ petition itself is maintainable in law or whether the writ petitioner has got any interest in the matter which if not protected he shall suffer injury.
Wrong description/inclusion of a voter in the voter list
According to section 14 of Act No.6 of 2009, because of wrong description of a voter or wrong inclusion of a person in the voter list, the existing voter list shall not be rendered invalid, so election of the Pourashavas could very much be held under the old voter list prepared in 2007
Challenge the election when it has been held
After
the election has been held the only way to challenge the same is by way
of filing an election petition before the concerned Election Tribunal..............................(12)