Chancery Law Chronicles - Bytitle Judgment

Displaying 6881-6900 of 8375 results.

Sree Sree Moha Prabhu and Sree Sree Gopal Jew Deities Vs. Biresh Ranjan Dhar and others, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)

Abdul Wadud Miah Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Jute & others, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)

Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Altaf Hossain and others, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)

Bangladesh Biman Corporation and others Vs. Riaz Uddin Ahmed and others, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)

The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 102

Mere an omission to write the word appeal in the application cannot be a ground for not treating that application as an appeal.

Though the caption of the application filed by the writ petitionerdid not state the word "appeal" but for all practical purposes this application was filed by way of appeal after the order of dismissal and that merely an omission to write the words "appeal" under regulation 59 could not make the said application a barren one. ………………………………………………………(12)

Nuruzzaman (Md.) and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)

Mustaq Ahmed Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)

Bangladesh Vs. Shudhir Chandra Nath, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)

Abdul Latif Howlader Vs. Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) & others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)

Ayesha Khatun Akhtar Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)

Bachu Miah Vs. Samad Miah and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)

Moniruddin (Md.) Abedullah and others Vs. Controller of Examinations, Dhaka University and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)

Fakir (Md.) Tariqul Islam Vs. State and others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)

Md. Abdul Wahab Sarker and others Vs. Md. Shahid Sarker and others, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)

Md. Liton Miah alias Ripon Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

Akramuzzaman (Md.) alias Babu Vs. Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Rajbari and others, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)

Elite Lamps Ltd. Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

Touhid & Others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

Pochon Rikssi Das Vs. Khuku Rani Dasi and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)

Mosammat Momina Begum Vs. Additional District Judge and Bankruptcy Court, Dhaka and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

Application of writ jurisdiction in cases under the Bankruptcy Act, 1997

The writ jurisdiction is not maintainable in cases under the Bankruptcy Act, 1997 for two reasons- Firstly, the Bankruptcy Act, 1997 is a special law and special provision is provided in section 96 of the Act for preferring appeal against the Judgment and decree passed by the Bankruptcy Court. Secondly, whether notices/summons were properly served or not or whether the petitioner was a guarantor/a mere shareholder of the borrower company or borrowed money from the bank or not which are disputed question of facts and for which remedy lies in the Civil Court and not under summary Writ Jurisdiction…………………………….(8)

Sadiul Alam Vs. State, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)

Search Options

Judgment Search By Title