Search Options

Judgment Search By Title

Displaying 7821-7840 of 8375 results.
State Vs. Mostafizur Rahman and another, 2013, 42 CLC (AD)


Molina Rani and others Vs. Gopal Goyala and another, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)


Mafruza Sultana Vs. State and another, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)


Nurul Huda (Md.) Vs. State, represented by the DC, Lalmonirhat, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)

Clause (ka) of section 11 does not speak of any hurt grievous or simple, it has prescribed two kinds of punishments (i) sentence of death if anyone causes the death of a ‘নারী’ for dowry and (ii) imprisonment for life if anyone attempts to cause death of a ‘নারী’ for dowry and in both the cases, fine has to be also imposed. So, in order to convict a person and to sentence him under clause-(ka) of section 11, there must be evidence that a person so charged either caused death of a ‘নারী’ or attempted to cause death of a ‘নারী’…..(17). 


Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. Mofazzal Hossain Chowdhury Maya, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)


State Vs. Md. Lutfur Rahman and others, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)


MN Alam Associated Ltd Vs. Chairman, Rajdani Unnayan Kartripakkhaya, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)

The word judgment is not defined in the Arbitration Act. Order XX, rule 4(2) of the Code requires that judgments of all Courts shall contain a concise statement of the case, the points for determination, the decision thereon, and the reasons for such decision. Section 17 of the Arbitration Act empowers the Court to pronounce judgment after the time for making an application to set aside the award has expired or such application having been made after refusing it. So pursuant to section 17 Court is required to see whether there is any cause to remit the award or any of the matters to arbitration for reconsideration or to set aside the award.

Section 15 empowers the Court to modify the award and section 16 empowers the Court to remit the award to the arbitrator or umpire for reconsideration upon such terms as it thinks fit. Section 17 is the enabling section which empowers the appellant to prefer an appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court only on the ground that it is in excess of, or not otherwise in accor­dance with, the award. Court has to see whether there is any reason for setting aside the award before making the award Rule of the Court...... (27) 


Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdul Maleque Miah and 7 anothers, 2013, 42 CLC (AD)


Babul Robin de' Rozario Vs. Elizabeth R Das another, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)

Sub-section (4) of section 439 of the Code debars the High Court Division to convert an order to acquittal to one of conviction. High Court Division has exceeded its revisional power by restoring the conviction on setting aside the order of acquittal to one of convic­tion........(5) 


Engineer Abdul Md. Wadud Vs. State and another, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)


Durnity Daman Commission, represented by its Chairman, Dhaka Vs. M Sahabuddin Ahmed and others, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)


Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Mojibul Haque & others, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)


Nur Mohammad and others Vs. Mosammat Kamla Khatun and others, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)


Meer Ramij Uddin Vs. Meer Judge Meah and others, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)


Sarker and other Vs. Md. Nasibuddin and others, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)


State Vs. Barrister Nazmul Huda and other, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)


Sohan Kumar Agarwala Vs. Assistant Registrar, Department of Patents Designs and Trade Marks and another, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)


Mohammad Faizulla Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 1979, 8 CLC (HCD)


DR. Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)


Nurul Islam & others Vs. Md. Abdur Rashid, 1980, 9 CLC (HCD)