Search Options
Judgment Search By Title
Molina Rani and others Vs. Gopal Goyala and another, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)
Mafruza Sultana Vs. State and another, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)
Nurul Huda (Md.) Vs. State, represented by the DC, Lalmonirhat, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)
Clause
(ka) of section 11 does not speak of any hurt grievous or simple, it
has prescribed two kinds of punishments (i) sentence of death if anyone
causes the death of a ‘নারী’ for dowry and (ii) imprisonment for life if
anyone attempts to cause death of a ‘নারী’ for dowry and in both the
cases, fine has to be also imposed. So, in order to convict a person and
to sentence him under clause-(ka) of section 11, there must be evidence
that a person so charged either caused death of a ‘নারী’ or attempted
to cause death of a ‘নারী’…..(17).
Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. Mofazzal Hossain Chowdhury Maya, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)
State Vs. Md. Lutfur Rahman and others, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)
MN Alam Associated Ltd Vs. Chairman, Rajdani Unnayan Kartripakkhaya, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)
The
word judgment is not defined in the Arbitration Act. Order XX, rule
4(2) of the Code requires that judgments of all Courts shall contain a
concise statement of the case, the points for determination, the
decision thereon, and the reasons for such decision. Section 17 of the
Arbitration Act empowers the Court to pronounce judgment after the time
for making an application to set aside the award has expired or such
application having been made after refusing it. So pursuant to section
17 Court is required to see whether there is any cause to remit the
award or any of the matters to arbitration for reconsideration or to set
aside the award.
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdul Maleque Miah and 7 anothers, 2013, 42 CLC (AD)
Babul Robin de' Rozario Vs. Elizabeth R Das another, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)
Sub-section (4) of section 439 of the Code debars the High Court Division to convert an order to acquittal to one of conviction. High Court Division has exceeded its revisional power by restoring the conviction on setting aside the order of acquittal to one of conviction........(5)
Engineer Abdul Md. Wadud Vs. State and another, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)
Durnity Daman Commission, represented by its Chairman, Dhaka Vs. M Sahabuddin Ahmed and others, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Mojibul Haque & others, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)
Nur Mohammad and others Vs. Mosammat Kamla Khatun and others, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)
Meer Ramij Uddin Vs. Meer Judge Meah and others, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)
Sarker and other Vs. Md. Nasibuddin and others, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)
State Vs. Barrister Nazmul Huda and other, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)
Sohan Kumar Agarwala Vs. Assistant Registrar, Department of Patents Designs and Trade Marks and another, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)
Mohammad Faizulla Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 1979, 8 CLC (HCD)
DR. Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
Nurul Islam & others Vs. Md. Abdur Rashid, 1980, 9 CLC (HCD)