Search Options
Judgment Search By Title
Rokeya Begum Vs. Shafiqur Rahman & State, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
Md. Hazrat Ali Vs. Chairman, Bagladesh Chemical Industries Corporation & another, 1980, 9 CLC (HCD)
An employee of a statutory corporation is a State employee
An
employee of a corporation set up by a Presidential Order having the
force of law is an employee under the State, particularly when the
definitions of State and statutory public authority given in Art. 152(1)
of the Constitution are read and considered together. The petitioner
being an employee of a corporation set up under the authority of P.O.
27 of 1972 is an employee under the State to be called a State employee
as such…....(6)
Liaquat Hossain Chowdhury Vs. Mir Ali Hossain & others, 1980, 9 CLC (HCD)
Tripura Modern Bank ltd. Vs. Shuva Karan Rajgharia, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
S. M. Qamruzzaman Vs. State, 1980, 9 CLC (HCD)
P.K. Chakraborty Vs. A.P. Chowdhury & Others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
Payment of rent in lump does not help the tenant from the mischief of default-
A
tenant by making payment of rent in lump shall ordinarily be treated as
a defaulter in the payment of rent in terms of section 18(1) and 18(5)
of the Premises Rent Control Ordinance, 1963, unless there is a contract
to the contrary or such payment is covered by waiver and acquiescence
on the part of the landlord………………(5)
James Finlay & Co. Ltd Vs. Chaiman Second Labour Court, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
Sontosh Kumar Shaha Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
Abdus Sahid @ Shahid & others Vs. Anowara Begum & others, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
Ehtesamur Rahman Vs. The State & Others, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
It is the general rules of procedure that every case whether Civil or Criminal shall be instituted in the Court of the lowest grade competent to try it. The rule of procedure has got imperative force to comply with it which cannot be overlooked or avoided. The object of this rule is that the Court of the higher grade cannot be over-crowded with cases on the plea that the higher court has also concurrent jurisdiction to try the same case………(12)
Motahera Begum and others Vs. Abdul Monaf and others, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)
Chowdhury Mia and oth¬ers Vs. Superintendent, Primary Teacher Institution and others, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD)
When law is there, until and unless the law is invoked no one can evict from the suit property by administrative order
The suit is filed by plaintiffs not by the defendants. The suit may be dismissed or may be decreed which cannot in any way prompt the defendant to evict the plaintiffs or dismantle the property taking recourse to force. When law is there, until and unless the law is invoked no one can evict from the suit property by administrative order, but since it is submitted on reference to the records that when dismantle was done violator was not in knowledge about pendency of the proceeding before the High Court Division…….(17)
Rahima Begum Vs. Government of Banglades Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government and others, 2014, 43 CLC(HCD)
Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972; Article 102(2)
The
nature of order stopping salary, allowances and keeping off the
indicted employee from duty is unheard of and not known to law. Law
provides entitlement of allowance to the public servants or employees of
other public bodies under suspension. Here the poor lady was deprived
of everything. No norm of disciplinary action in passing the order has
been followed…....................(16)
If the service rendered by the MLSS is otherwise satisfactory and not detrimental to the interest of the institution concerned mere defect/flaw of his/her academic records, not detected at the entry stage or soon thereafter, should not be the ground for her removal. ........... (15)
Proshanta Kumar Sarkar Vs. Managing Director, Agrani Bank Ltd Head Office and others, 2013, 42 CLC (HCD)
Borun Khatun and others Vs. Md. Hebaj Uddin Pramanik and another, 2014, 43 DLR (HCD)
Presumptive value of 30 years old documents
It is true but contents of the exhibits 3 and 2 series being 30 years old are required to be proved. Learned Judge being final Court of fact has jurisdiction under section 107 of the Code of Civil Procedure to decide this law point by reference to the exhibits.
Although documents produced by the plaintiffs are written by pen or ball point which at the relevant time were not used in writing goes on to show some sort of forgery has been committed. The land ought to be ascertained by appointing an Advocate Commissioner to find whether on the suit land defendants reside, whether they have any homestead and any fruit bearing trees, on reference to the documents as such, we have no other option but to send back to the learned Additional District Judge, for passing the judgment on the light of the observations made in the body of the judgment....... (9)
Nur Jahan Akhtar, Director of Medona Garments Limited Vs. The Commissioner of Taxes, 2013, 42 CLC (HCD)
Khandker Abul Hashem Vs. The Commissioner of Taxes, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD)
Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC), BRAC Centre Vs. The Commissioner of Taxes, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD)
Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC) VS. The Commissioner of Taxes, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD)
The Income Tax Ordinance, 1948 (Ordinance No. XXXVI of 1984)
Paragraph 1(1), Part-A of the Schedule
In the relevant assessment year, any income derived from house property held under trust or other legal obligation or from operation of micro credit program by such trust or obligation is excluded from total income and tax exempted income.........................(20)
The incomes from interest of bank accounts, debentures and fixed deposits are not excluded income under the then prevailing provision of this Ordinance. Moreover, incomes from interest from FDR, debentures and bank accounts are classified as income from other sources under section 20 of the Ordinance. So, it cannot be treated as an income derived from micro credit operation..................(21)
Income derived from operation of micro credit program or from voluntary contribution and applicable wholly to the religious and charitable purposes is excluded from total income of the assessee in view of the provision of Paragraphs 1A and 2, Part-A of the Sixth Schedule of the Ordinance.....................(27)
Disallowance of exclusion of income in respect of income derived from house property of the assessee, a charitable organization, is justified in view of the provision of explanation of Paragraph 1(1), Part-A of the Schedule of the Ordinance.................(31)